Spatiality in Health: The Distribution of Health Conditions Associated with Electronic Waste Processing Activities at Agbogbloshie, Accra.
Adolescent
Adult
Burns
/ epidemiology
Cicatrix
/ epidemiology
Electronic Waste
First Aid
Geographic Information Systems
Ghana
/ epidemiology
Humans
Hypertension
/ epidemiology
Lacerations
/ epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Occupational Health
Occupational Injuries
/ epidemiology
Prevalence
Recycling
Skin
/ injuries
Spatial Analysis
Waste Disposal Facilities
Workplace
Young Adult
Journal
Annals of global health
ISSN: 2214-9996
Titre abrégé: Ann Glob Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620864
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 03 2020
18 03 2020
Historique:
entrez:
27
3
2020
pubmed:
27
3
2020
medline:
6
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A walk through the Agbogbloshie e-waste recycling site shows a marked heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of the different e-waste processing activities, which are likely to drive clustering of health conditions associated with the different activity type in each space. To conduct a spatial assessment and analysis of health conditions associated with different e-waste activities at different activity spaces at Agbogbloshie. A choropleth showing the various activity spaces at the Agbogbloshie e-waste site was produced by mapping boundaries of these spaces using Etrex GPS device and individuals working in each activity spaces were recruited and studied. Upon obtaining consent and agreeing to participate in the study, each subject was physically examined and assessed various health outcomes of interest via direct physical examination while characterizing and enumerating the scars, lacerations, abrasions, skin condition and cuts after which both systolic and diastolic blood pressure values were recorded alongside the administration of open and close ended questionnaires. All individuals working within each activity space and consented to participate were recruited; giving a total of one hundred and twelve (112) subjects in all. A study of the choropleth showed that health conditions associated e-waste processing activities were clustered in a fashion similar to the corresponding distribution of each activity. While a total of 96.2% of all the study subjects had cuts, the dismantlers had higher mix of scars, lacerations and abrasions. Abrasions were observed in 16.3% of the dismantlers. Scars were the most common skin condition and were observed on the skins of 93.6% of the subjects. Prevalence of burns among the study subjects was 23.1%. Developing hypertension was not associated with activity type and while a total of 90.2% of subjects had normal blood pressure and 9.8% of them were hypertensives. Finally, 98.2% of respondents felt the need to have a first aid clinic at the site with 96.4% and 97.3% willing to visit the clinic and pay for services respectively. We conclude that while the observed injuries were random and were due purely to accidents without any role of spatial determinants such as the configuration, slope, topography and other subterranean features of the activity spaces, a strong association between the injuries and activity type was observed.
Sections du résumé
Background
A walk through the Agbogbloshie e-waste recycling site shows a marked heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of the different e-waste processing activities, which are likely to drive clustering of health conditions associated with the different activity type in each space.
Objective of study
To conduct a spatial assessment and analysis of health conditions associated with different e-waste activities at different activity spaces at Agbogbloshie.
Methods
A choropleth showing the various activity spaces at the Agbogbloshie e-waste site was produced by mapping boundaries of these spaces using Etrex GPS device and individuals working in each activity spaces were recruited and studied. Upon obtaining consent and agreeing to participate in the study, each subject was physically examined and assessed various health outcomes of interest via direct physical examination while characterizing and enumerating the scars, lacerations, abrasions, skin condition and cuts after which both systolic and diastolic blood pressure values were recorded alongside the administration of open and close ended questionnaires. All individuals working within each activity space and consented to participate were recruited; giving a total of one hundred and twelve (112) subjects in all.
Results
A study of the choropleth showed that health conditions associated e-waste processing activities were clustered in a fashion similar to the corresponding distribution of each activity. While a total of 96.2% of all the study subjects had cuts, the dismantlers had higher mix of scars, lacerations and abrasions. Abrasions were observed in 16.3% of the dismantlers. Scars were the most common skin condition and were observed on the skins of 93.6% of the subjects. Prevalence of burns among the study subjects was 23.1%. Developing hypertension was not associated with activity type and while a total of 90.2% of subjects had normal blood pressure and 9.8% of them were hypertensives. Finally, 98.2% of respondents felt the need to have a first aid clinic at the site with 96.4% and 97.3% willing to visit the clinic and pay for services respectively.
Conclusion
We conclude that while the observed injuries were random and were due purely to accidents without any role of spatial determinants such as the configuration, slope, topography and other subterranean features of the activity spaces, a strong association between the injuries and activity type was observed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32211301
doi: 10.5334/aogh.2630
pmc: PMC7082828
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
31Subventions
Organisme : FIC NIH HHS
ID : R24 TW009497
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
Références
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2001 Mar;51(3):352-60
pubmed: 11266099
Environ Int. 2011 Jul;37(5):921-8
pubmed: 21470682
Lancet. 2018 Feb 3;391(10119):462-512
pubmed: 29056410
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2013 Oct-Dec;19(4):278-86
pubmed: 24588034
Annu Rev Public Health. 2012 Apr;33:107-22
pubmed: 22429160
Environ Int. 2015 Jun;79:65-73
pubmed: 25797584
Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2003 Jul;135C(3):269-75
pubmed: 12927901
J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:949048
pubmed: 22811600
BMC Public Health. 2015 Oct 16;15:1065
pubmed: 26474859
Environ Health. 2006 Oct 10;5:29
pubmed: 17032453
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2015 Jul-Oct;14-15:63-74
pubmed: 26530824
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;16:35-42
pubmed: 26919753
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2012;9(5):340-4
pubmed: 22512792
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1986 May;36(5):668-73
pubmed: 3708168
Ann Occup Hyg. 2016 Jun;60(5):581-96
pubmed: 26888889
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Jan 1;466-467:369-76
pubmed: 23921367
Ann Occup Hyg. 2016 May;60(4):405-20
pubmed: 26712895
Sci Total Environ. 2012 May 1;424:63-73
pubmed: 22446112
Environ Pollut. 2015 Jan;196:450-61
pubmed: 25468213
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2016 Jan;219(1):72-8
pubmed: 26454658
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2003 Feb;53(2):143-51
pubmed: 12617289
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jan 19;13(1):
pubmed: 26797626
Environ Res. 2011 Apr;111(3):463-7
pubmed: 21397224
J Occup Environ Med. 2009 Apr;51(4):435-40
pubmed: 19322109
Environ Int. 2014 Dec;73:243-51
pubmed: 25300751
Glob Health Promot. 2017 Dec;24(4):90-98
pubmed: 27271535
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;16:43-9
pubmed: 26919754
J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2014 Jan 20;12(1):36
pubmed: 24444377
J Urban Health. 2012 Dec;89(6):977-91
pubmed: 22684425
Sci Total Environ. 2013 Oct 1;463-464:1147-53
pubmed: 22858354
Altern Med Rev. 2002 Dec;7(6):456-71
pubmed: 12495372
Chemosphere. 2016 Dec;164:68-74
pubmed: 27580259
Chemosphere. 2011 Jan;82(5):648-55
pubmed: 21131020
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;18:13-23
pubmed: 27494956
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2012 Jan-Mar;18(1):43-52
pubmed: 22550696
Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Mar;117(3):367-72
pubmed: 19337510
Ann Glob Health. 2014 Jul-Aug;80(4):286-95
pubmed: 25459330
Indian J Community Med. 2010 Jul;35(3):382-5
pubmed: 21031101
Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Jun;112(9):998-1006
pubmed: 15198920
Appl Ergon. 2010 May;41(3):347-54
pubmed: 19643394
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2016 May;17:1-13
pubmed: 27246268
Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Jul;115(7):1113-7
pubmed: 17637931
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;16:1-10
pubmed: 26919750
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;16:21-33
pubmed: 26919752
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2015 Jan;12:39-52
pubmed: 25779908
Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Aug;116(8):1105-10
pubmed: 18709139