Our experience regarding patients with headache, vomiting, and urinary retention following endothermal ablation of the greater saphenous vein under spinal anesthesia: Gender type, age interval, and procedural risk factors are important.
Ablation Techniques
/ adverse effects
Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Anesthesia, Spinal
/ adverse effects
Chronic Disease
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Post-Dural Puncture Headache
/ etiology
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
/ etiology
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Saphenous Vein
/ surgery
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Retention
/ etiology
Varicose Veins
/ diagnosis
Venous Insufficiency
/ diagnosis
Young Adult
Greater saphenous vein
endovenous thermal ablation
headache
spinal anesthesia
urinary retention
vomiting
Journal
Vascular
ISSN: 1708-539X
Titre abrégé: Vascular
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101196722
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
29
3
2020
medline:
22
9
2020
entrez:
29
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The endovenous thermal ablation of the greater saphenous vein under spinal anesthesia is still a popular technique. Although this procedure is considered to be fast and simple, side effects such as headaches, vomiting, and urinary retention could occur. These side effects make the recovery period difficult for the patient. The patient's age, gender, and procedural risk factors such as needle sizes and types are important parameters that affect the occurrence and rate of undesirable outcomes. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the endovenous thermal ablation method for the management of incompetent great saphenous veins under spinal anesthesia. A total of 128 patients with incompetent varicose veins who were treated with an endovenous thermal ablation method under spinal anesthesia were retrospectively investigated between January 2016 and January 2019. The pre-, intra-, post-procedural, and follow-up data of the patients were collected and retrospectively compared. A total of 128 patients (69 males, 59 females; mean age 45.8 ± 11.8 years; range 21-71 years) were included in the study. The average preprocedural great saphenous vein diameters were 7.41 ± 18.8 mm (range: 5.5-13.0). The average ablated vein length was 25.3 ± 3.4 (range: 15-35) cm. The average tumescent anesthesia use was 300.9 ± 52.6 (range: 150-500) mL. The average procedure time was 18.2 ± 1.8 (range: 11-25) min. The venous clinical severity scores and the chronic venous insufficiency quality of life questionnaire scores declined significantly ( The endovenous thermal ablation of the greater saphenous vein under spinal anesthesia is a fast and effective treatment option for the management of incompetent saphenous veins. However, side effects such as headaches, vomiting, and urinary retention that are affected by gender types, age-intervals, and procedural characteristics should be kept in mind.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32216537
doi: 10.1177/1708538120911302
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM