Devising a Pace-Based Definition for "The Wall": An Observational Analysis of Marathoners' Subjective Experiences of Fatigue.
endurance training
exercise
physical endurance
physical fitness
running
sports
Journal
Journal of athletic training
ISSN: 1938-162X
Titre abrégé: J Athl Train
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9301647
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
29
3
2020
medline:
22
10
2020
entrez:
29
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Many runners report "hitting The Wall" (HTW) during a marathon (42.2 km). However, the performance manifestation of this subjectively experienced phenomenon remains unclear. To identify a pace-based classification for HTW by integrating subjective reports of fatigue and runners' pacing profiles during a marathon. Cross-sectional study. Public race event (2018 Dublin Marathon). Eighty-three runners (28 [34%] women, 55 [66%] men, age = 41.5 ± 9.1 years, height = 1.73 ± 0.09 m, mass = 70.2 ± 10.1 kg). The pacing profiles for respondents to our postrace questionnaire that concerned the phenomenon of HTW were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed on discretized outcomes of the time series of marathoners' paces during the race. Using the receiver operating characteristic analyses, we observed that runners could be classified as having experienced HTW if they ran any 1-km segment 11% slower than the average of the remaining segments of the race (accuracy = 84.6%, sensitivity = 1, specificity = 0.6) or if the standard deviation of the normalized 1-km split times exceeded 0.0532 (accuracy = 83%, sensitivity = 0.818, specificity = 0.8). Similarly, runners could be classified as having experienced HTW if they ran any 5-km segment 7.3% slower than the average of the remaining 5-km segments of the race (accuracy = 84.6%, sensitivity = 1, specificity = 0.644) or if the standard deviation of the normalized 5-km split times exceeded 0.0346 (accuracy = 82%, sensitivity = 0.909, specificity = 0.622). These pace-based criteria could be valuable to researchers evaluating HTW prevalence in cohorts for whom they lack subjective questionnaire data.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32216656
doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-243-19
pmc: PMC7249282
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
494-500Références
Sports Med. 2007;37(4-5):404-7
pubmed: 17465620
Br J Sports Med. 1998 Sep;32(3):229-34; discussion 234-5
pubmed: 9773172
J Phys Act Health. 2012 Jan;9 Suppl 1:S76-84
pubmed: 22287451
Int J Sports Med. 2004 Apr;25(3):198-204
pubmed: 15088244
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2016 Aug 26;8(1):26
pubmed: 27570626
Open Access J Sports Med. 2017 Aug 21;8:171-180
pubmed: 28860876
Int J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;35(11):933-8
pubmed: 24886929
Int J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;39(13):1018-1027
pubmed: 30290371
Sports Med. 2013 May;43(5):301-11
pubmed: 23456493
Sports Med. 2007;37(4-5):374-7
pubmed: 17465612
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008 Nov 06;5:56
pubmed: 18990237
Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2014 Dec;24(6):645-55
pubmed: 24901444
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002 Sep;93(3):1039-46
pubmed: 12183501
Res Sports Med. 2018 Jan-Mar;26(1):86-99
pubmed: 29064284
Br Heart J. 1976 Apr;38(4):403-9
pubmed: 1267984
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 25;8(1):15756
pubmed: 30361513
Can J Sport Sci. 1987 Mar;12(1):6-10
pubmed: 3594322
J Clin Epidemiol. 1999 Mar;52(3):219-27
pubmed: 10210239