Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of the proposed biosimilar ABP 710 with infliximab reference product in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Adult
Aged
Antirheumatic Agents
/ pharmacokinetics
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
/ drug therapy
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals
/ pharmacokinetics
C-Reactive Protein
/ metabolism
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Infliximab
/ pharmacokinetics
Male
Middle Aged
Therapeutic Equivalency
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
ABP 710
Biosimilar
Infliximab
Rheumatoid arthritis
Journal
Arthritis research & therapy
ISSN: 1478-6362
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Res Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101154438
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 03 2020
26 03 2020
Historique:
received:
18
10
2019
accepted:
05
03
2020
entrez:
29
3
2020
pubmed:
29
3
2020
medline:
12
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
ABP 710 is being developed as a biosimilar to infliximab reference product (RP). Analytical similarity and pharmacokinetic equivalence between the two have been previously demonstrated. Here we report results from a comparative clinical study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of ABP 710 relative to the RP in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 50-week equivalence study, patients with moderate to severe active RA despite methotrexate received 3-mg/kg infusions of ABP 710 or RP at predetermined intervals based on initial randomization and then with re-randomization at week 22. The primary endpoint was response difference (RD) of ACR20 at week 22, with clinical equivalence evaluated based on 90% CI of - 15%, 15%. Secondary endpoints included Disease Activity Score 28-joint count C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 across time, as well as safety and immunogenicity assessments. A total of 558 patients were randomized for the initial treatment (ABP 710 n = 279; RP n = 279). The estimated RD of ACR20 at week 22 was 9.37% with 90% CI (2.67%, 15.96%). The lower bound was within the pre-specified criteria, thus confirming non-inferiority; the upper bound exceeded the pre-specified criteria by 0.96% such that superiority could not be ruled out statistically. In a post hoc analysis with adjustment for random imbalance in baseline factors, the CI of RD was narrowed (0.75%, 13.62%). Changes from baseline in DAS28-CRP as well as ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates across time and hybrid ACR evaluations were similar for the initial and initial/re-randomized treatment groups. Adverse events and incidence of anti-drug antibodies were similar between treatment groups. These efficacy and safety results support similarity with no clinically meaningful differences between ABP 710 and infliximab RP. Although we were unable to statistically confirm non-superiority, post hoc analysis was supportive of non-superiority. DAS28-CRP, ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, and hybrid ACR evaluations over the entire study were consistently comparable as were safety and immunogenicity. ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02937701. Registered August 30, 2016.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
ABP 710 is being developed as a biosimilar to infliximab reference product (RP). Analytical similarity and pharmacokinetic equivalence between the two have been previously demonstrated. Here we report results from a comparative clinical study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of ABP 710 relative to the RP in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS
In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 50-week equivalence study, patients with moderate to severe active RA despite methotrexate received 3-mg/kg infusions of ABP 710 or RP at predetermined intervals based on initial randomization and then with re-randomization at week 22. The primary endpoint was response difference (RD) of ACR20 at week 22, with clinical equivalence evaluated based on 90% CI of - 15%, 15%. Secondary endpoints included Disease Activity Score 28-joint count C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 across time, as well as safety and immunogenicity assessments.
RESULTS
A total of 558 patients were randomized for the initial treatment (ABP 710 n = 279; RP n = 279). The estimated RD of ACR20 at week 22 was 9.37% with 90% CI (2.67%, 15.96%). The lower bound was within the pre-specified criteria, thus confirming non-inferiority; the upper bound exceeded the pre-specified criteria by 0.96% such that superiority could not be ruled out statistically. In a post hoc analysis with adjustment for random imbalance in baseline factors, the CI of RD was narrowed (0.75%, 13.62%). Changes from baseline in DAS28-CRP as well as ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates across time and hybrid ACR evaluations were similar for the initial and initial/re-randomized treatment groups. Adverse events and incidence of anti-drug antibodies were similar between treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS
These efficacy and safety results support similarity with no clinically meaningful differences between ABP 710 and infliximab RP. Although we were unable to statistically confirm non-superiority, post hoc analysis was supportive of non-superiority. DAS28-CRP, ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, and hybrid ACR evaluations over the entire study were consistently comparable as were safety and immunogenicity.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02937701. Registered August 30, 2016.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32216829
doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-2142-1
pii: 10.1186/s13075-020-2142-1
pmc: PMC7098142
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antirheumatic Agents
0
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals
0
C-Reactive Protein
9007-41-4
Infliximab
B72HH48FLU
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02937701']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
60Références
Stat Med. 1998 Aug 15-30;17(15-16):1863-92
pubmed: 9749453
Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Mar;48(3):625-30
pubmed: 12632413
Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Oct;72(10):1613-20
pubmed: 23687260
Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Apr 02;18:82
pubmed: 27038608
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2020 Feb;9(2):246-255
pubmed: 31628783
Arthritis Rheum. 1993 Jun;36(6):729-40
pubmed: 8507213
Arthritis Rheum. 1998 Oct;41(10):1845-50
pubmed: 9778226