Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of the proposed biosimilar ABP 710 with infliximab reference product in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.


Journal

Arthritis research & therapy
ISSN: 1478-6362
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Res Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101154438

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 03 2020
Historique:
received: 18 10 2019
accepted: 05 03 2020
entrez: 29 3 2020
pubmed: 29 3 2020
medline: 12 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

ABP 710 is being developed as a biosimilar to infliximab reference product (RP). Analytical similarity and pharmacokinetic equivalence between the two have been previously demonstrated. Here we report results from a comparative clinical study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of ABP 710 relative to the RP in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 50-week equivalence study, patients with moderate to severe active RA despite methotrexate received 3-mg/kg infusions of ABP 710 or RP at predetermined intervals based on initial randomization and then with re-randomization at week 22. The primary endpoint was response difference (RD) of ACR20 at week 22, with clinical equivalence evaluated based on 90% CI of - 15%, 15%. Secondary endpoints included Disease Activity Score 28-joint count C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 across time, as well as safety and immunogenicity assessments. A total of 558 patients were randomized for the initial treatment (ABP 710 n = 279; RP n = 279). The estimated RD of ACR20 at week 22 was 9.37% with 90% CI (2.67%, 15.96%). The lower bound was within the pre-specified criteria, thus confirming non-inferiority; the upper bound exceeded the pre-specified criteria by 0.96% such that superiority could not be ruled out statistically. In a post hoc analysis with adjustment for random imbalance in baseline factors, the CI of RD was narrowed (0.75%, 13.62%). Changes from baseline in DAS28-CRP as well as ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates across time and hybrid ACR evaluations were similar for the initial and initial/re-randomized treatment groups. Adverse events and incidence of anti-drug antibodies were similar between treatment groups. These efficacy and safety results support similarity with no clinically meaningful differences between ABP 710 and infliximab RP. Although we were unable to statistically confirm non-superiority, post hoc analysis was supportive of non-superiority. DAS28-CRP, ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, and hybrid ACR evaluations over the entire study were consistently comparable as were safety and immunogenicity. ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02937701. Registered August 30, 2016.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
ABP 710 is being developed as a biosimilar to infliximab reference product (RP). Analytical similarity and pharmacokinetic equivalence between the two have been previously demonstrated. Here we report results from a comparative clinical study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of ABP 710 relative to the RP in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS
In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 50-week equivalence study, patients with moderate to severe active RA despite methotrexate received 3-mg/kg infusions of ABP 710 or RP at predetermined intervals based on initial randomization and then with re-randomization at week 22. The primary endpoint was response difference (RD) of ACR20 at week 22, with clinical equivalence evaluated based on 90% CI of - 15%, 15%. Secondary endpoints included Disease Activity Score 28-joint count C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 across time, as well as safety and immunogenicity assessments.
RESULTS
A total of 558 patients were randomized for the initial treatment (ABP 710 n = 279; RP n = 279). The estimated RD of ACR20 at week 22 was 9.37% with 90% CI (2.67%, 15.96%). The lower bound was within the pre-specified criteria, thus confirming non-inferiority; the upper bound exceeded the pre-specified criteria by 0.96% such that superiority could not be ruled out statistically. In a post hoc analysis with adjustment for random imbalance in baseline factors, the CI of RD was narrowed (0.75%, 13.62%). Changes from baseline in DAS28-CRP as well as ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates across time and hybrid ACR evaluations were similar for the initial and initial/re-randomized treatment groups. Adverse events and incidence of anti-drug antibodies were similar between treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS
These efficacy and safety results support similarity with no clinically meaningful differences between ABP 710 and infliximab RP. Although we were unable to statistically confirm non-superiority, post hoc analysis was supportive of non-superiority. DAS28-CRP, ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, and hybrid ACR evaluations over the entire study were consistently comparable as were safety and immunogenicity.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02937701. Registered August 30, 2016.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32216829
doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-2142-1
pii: 10.1186/s13075-020-2142-1
pmc: PMC7098142
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antirheumatic Agents 0
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals 0
C-Reactive Protein 9007-41-4
Infliximab B72HH48FLU

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02937701']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

60

Références

Stat Med. 1998 Aug 15-30;17(15-16):1863-92
pubmed: 9749453
Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Mar;48(3):625-30
pubmed: 12632413
Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Oct;72(10):1613-20
pubmed: 23687260
Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Apr 02;18:82
pubmed: 27038608
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2020 Feb;9(2):246-255
pubmed: 31628783
Arthritis Rheum. 1993 Jun;36(6):729-40
pubmed: 8507213
Arthritis Rheum. 1998 Oct;41(10):1845-50
pubmed: 9778226

Auteurs

Mark C Genovese (MC)

Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University, 1000 Welch RD #203, Palo Alto, CA, USA. genovese@stanford.edu.

Juan Sanchez-Burson (J)

Hospital Infanta Luisa, Calle San Jacinto 87, Sevilla, Spain.

MyungShin Oh (M)

Biosimilars, Amgen, One Amgen Center Dr., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

Eva Balazs (E)

Csongrád Megyei dr. Bugyi István Kórház Mozgásszervi Rehabilitációs, Sima Ferenc u. 44-58, Csongrad, Hungary.

Jeffrey Neal (J)

Bluegrass Community Research, 330 Waller Avenue, Lexington, KY, USA.

Andrea Everding (A)

Hamburger Rheuma Forschungszentrum II, Hamburg, Germany.

Tomas Hala (T)

CCR Czech a.s., Trida miru 2800, 53002, Pardubice, Czech Republic.

Rafal Wojciechowski (R)

Department of Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Diseases, University Hospital No. 2, Bydgoszcz, Poland.

Gary Fanjiang (G)

Biosimilars, Amgen, One Amgen Center Dr., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

Stanley Cohen (S)

Metroplex Clinical Research, 8144 Walnut Hill Lane, Dallas, TX, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH