Evaluation of the impact of an augmented model of The Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care on staff and patient outcomes: a naturalistic stepped-wedge trial.

caring behaviours patient experience productive ward quality improvement staff experience stepped-wedge trial teamwork

Journal

BMJ quality & safety
ISSN: 2044-5423
Titre abrégé: BMJ Qual Saf
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101546984

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2021
Historique:
received: 20 05 2019
revised: 20 11 2019
accepted: 27 02 2020
pubmed: 29 3 2020
medline: 22 9 2021
entrez: 29 3 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Improving the quality and efficiency of healthcare is an international priority. A range of complex ward based quality initiatives have been developed over recent years, perhaps the most influential programme has been Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care. The programme aims to improve work processes and team efficiency with the aim of 'releasing time', which would be used to increase time with patients ultimately improving patient care, although this does not form a specific part of the programme. This study aimed to address this and evaluate the impact using recent methodological advances in complex intervention evaluation design. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of an augmented version of The Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care on staff and patient outcomes. The design was a naturalistic stepped-wedge trial. The setting included fifteen wards in two acute hospitals in a Scottish health board region. The intervention was the Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care augmented with practice development transformational change methods that focused on staff caring behaviours, teamwork and patient feedback. The primary outcomes included nurses' shared philosophy of care, nurse emotional exhaustion, and patient experience of nurse communication. Secondary outcomes covered additional key dimensions of staff and patient experience and outcomes and frequency of emergency admissions for same diagnosis within 6 months of discharge. We recruited 691 patients, 177 nurses and 14 senior charge nurses. We found statistically significant improvements in two of the study's three primary outcomes: patients' experiences of nurse communication (Effect size=0.15, 95% CI; 0.05 to 0.24), and nurses' shared philosophy of care (Effect size =0.42, 95% CI; 0.14 to 0.70). There were also significant improvements in secondary outcomes: patients' overall rating of ward quality; nurses' positive affect; and items relating to nursing team climate. We found no change in frequency of emergency admissions within six months of discharge. We found evidence that the augmented version of The Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care Intervention was successful in improving a number of dimensions of nurse experience and ward culture, in addition to improved patient experience and evaluations of the quality of care received. Despite these positive summary findings across all wards, intervention implementation appeared to vary between wards. By addressing the contextual factors, which may influence these variations, and tailoring some elements of the intervention, it is likely that greater improvements could be achieved. UKCRN 14195.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Improving the quality and efficiency of healthcare is an international priority. A range of complex ward based quality initiatives have been developed over recent years, perhaps the most influential programme has been Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care. The programme aims to improve work processes and team efficiency with the aim of 'releasing time', which would be used to increase time with patients ultimately improving patient care, although this does not form a specific part of the programme. This study aimed to address this and evaluate the impact using recent methodological advances in complex intervention evaluation design.
METHOD
The objective of this study was to assess the impact of an augmented version of The Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care on staff and patient outcomes. The design was a naturalistic stepped-wedge trial. The setting included fifteen wards in two acute hospitals in a Scottish health board region. The intervention was the Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care augmented with practice development transformational change methods that focused on staff caring behaviours, teamwork and patient feedback. The primary outcomes included nurses' shared philosophy of care, nurse emotional exhaustion, and patient experience of nurse communication. Secondary outcomes covered additional key dimensions of staff and patient experience and outcomes and frequency of emergency admissions for same diagnosis within 6 months of discharge.
RESULTS
We recruited 691 patients, 177 nurses and 14 senior charge nurses. We found statistically significant improvements in two of the study's three primary outcomes: patients' experiences of nurse communication (Effect size=0.15, 95% CI; 0.05 to 0.24), and nurses' shared philosophy of care (Effect size =0.42, 95% CI; 0.14 to 0.70). There were also significant improvements in secondary outcomes: patients' overall rating of ward quality; nurses' positive affect; and items relating to nursing team climate. We found no change in frequency of emergency admissions within six months of discharge.
CONCLUSIONS
We found evidence that the augmented version of The Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care Intervention was successful in improving a number of dimensions of nurse experience and ward culture, in addition to improved patient experience and evaluations of the quality of care received. Despite these positive summary findings across all wards, intervention implementation appeared to vary between wards. By addressing the contextual factors, which may influence these variations, and tailoring some elements of the intervention, it is likely that greater improvements could be achieved.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
UKCRN 14195.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32217699
pii: bmjqs-2019-009821
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009821
pmc: PMC7788216
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Pagination

27-37

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

Trials. 2012 Jun 28;13:95
pubmed: 22742939
Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2009 Sep;16(5):14-8
pubmed: 19780482
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2012;25(4):237-53
pubmed: 22755479
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 1;17(1):510
pubmed: 28764696
J Nurs Manag. 2017 Oct;25(7):519-530
pubmed: 28799269
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
BMJ. 2016 Oct 18;355:i5417
pubmed: 27756729
Nurs Times. 2009 Aug 4-17;105(30):28-30
pubmed: 19736797
N C Med J. 2007 Sep-Oct;68(5):362-4
pubmed: 18183762
Fam Pract. 1998 Apr;15(2):165-71
pubmed: 9613486
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 19;14:642
pubmed: 25547227
Lancet. 1994 Jun 25;343(8913):1609-13
pubmed: 7911925
Br J Nurs. 2014 Apr 24-May 7;23(8):419-26
pubmed: 24763297
Trials. 2013 Oct 25;14:353
pubmed: 24160371
Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):691-729
pubmed: 16279964
Eur J Intern Med. 2014 Dec;25(10):874-87
pubmed: 25457434
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70
pubmed: 3397865
J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000 Mar;9(2):191-206
pubmed: 10746523
J Clin Nurs. 2013 May;22(9-10):1361-71
pubmed: 23472849
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Mar;67(3):267-77
pubmed: 24275499
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Dec;51(11):1611-25
pubmed: 11072882
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76
pubmed: 8433390
J Nurs Adm. 2014 Sep;44(9):452-61
pubmed: 25148399
J Qual Clin Pract. 2001 Dec;21(4):109-11
pubmed: 11856405
Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Feb;28(2):182-91
pubmed: 16829207
Trials. 2015 Aug 16;16:359
pubmed: 26275907
Nurs Times. 2009 Jun 23-29;105(24):22-5
pubmed: 19601437
Stat Med. 2015 Jan 30;34(2):181-96
pubmed: 25346484
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Jul;23(13-14):1866-76
pubmed: 24313355
J Nurs Manag. 2014 Oct;22(7):914-23
pubmed: 23773544
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Aug;158(8):1473-8
pubmed: 27255655
J Cancer Educ. 2012 Mar;27(1):27-36
pubmed: 22042712
Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug;47(4):1482-501
pubmed: 22375827
BMJ. 2015 Feb 06;350:h391
pubmed: 25662947
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2014 Feb;21(1):93-6
pubmed: 23157208
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Nov 08;6:54
pubmed: 17092344
J Nurs Manag. 2012 Apr;20(3):354-60
pubmed: 22519613
Nurs Stand. 2010 Apr 7-13;24(31):45-8
pubmed: 20441034
J Health Organ Manag. 2014;28(2):154-76
pubmed: 25065108

Auteurs

Brian Williams (B)

School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.

Carina Hibberd (C)

Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.

Deborah Baldie (D)

Division of Nursing, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, Musselburgh, East Lothian, UK.

Edward A S Duncan (EAS)

Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.

Andrew Elders (A)

Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.

Margaret Maxwell (M)

Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.

Janice E Rattray (JE)

School of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

Julie Cowie (J)

Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.

Heather Strachan (H)

Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK heather.strachan@stir.ac.uk.

Martyn C Jones (MC)

School of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH