Nuclear Magnetic Resonance to Detect Rumen Metabolites Associated with Enteric Methane Emissions from Beef Cattle.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 03 2020
27 03 2020
Historique:
received:
28
11
2019
accepted:
13
03
2020
entrez:
30
3
2020
pubmed:
30
3
2020
medline:
25
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study presents the application of metabolomics to evaluate changes in the rumen metabolites of beef cattle fed with three different diet types: forage-rich, mixed and concentrate-rich. Rumen fluid samples were analysed by
Identifiants
pubmed: 32221381
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62485-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-62485-y
pmc: PMC7101347
doi:
Substances chimiques
Methane
OP0UW79H66
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5578Références
Saunois, M. et al. The global methane budget 2000–2012. Earth System Science Data. 8, 697–751, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-697 (2016).
doi: 10.5194/essd-8-697
Wolf, J., Asrar, G. R. & West, T. O. Revised methane emissions factors and spatially distributed annual carbon fluxes for global livestock. Carbon Balance and Management. 12(1), 16, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-017-0084-y (2017).
doi: 10.1186/s13021-017-0084-y
pubmed: 5620025
pmcid: 5620025
Chang, J. et al. Revisiting enteric methane emissions from domestic ruminants and their δ13CCH4 source signature. Nature Communications. 10(1), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11066-3 (2019).
IPCC. Climate change: synthesis report. In: Pachauri, R. K., Meyer, L. A., editors. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva: IPCC 151 (2014).
Blake, D. R. & Rowland, F. S. Continuing worldwide increase in tropospheric methane, 1978 to 1987. Science. 239(4844), 1129–1131, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.239.4844.1129 (1998).
doi: 10.1126/science.239.4844.1129
Johnson, K. A. & Johnson, D. E. Methane emissions from cattle. Journal of Animal Science. 73(8), 2483–2492, https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.7382483x (1995).
doi: 10.2527/1995.7382483x
Murray, R. M., Bryant, A. M. & Leng, R. A. Rates of production of methane in the rumen and large intestine of sheep. British Journal of Nutrition. 36(1), 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19760053 (1976).
doi: 10.1079/bjn19760053
Morgavi, D. P. et al. Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants. Animal. 4(7), 1024–1036, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731110000546 (2010).
doi: 10.1017/S1751731110000546
Palarea-Albaladejo, J., Rooke, J. A., Nevison, I. M. & Dewhurst, R. J. Compositional mixed modeling of methane emissions and ruminal volatile fatty acids from individual cattle and multiple experiments. Journal of Animal Science. 95(6), 2467–2480, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016.1339 (2017).
doi: 10.2527/jas.2016.1339
Poulsen, M. et al. Methylotrophic methanogenic Thermoplasmata implicated in reduced methane emissions from bovine rumen. Nature Communications. 4, 1428, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2432 (2013).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms2432
Ametaj, B. N. et al. Metabolomics reveals unhealthy alterations in rumen metabolism with increased proportion of cereal grain in the diet of dairy cows. Metabolomics. 6(4), 583–594, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-010-0227-6 (2010).
doi: 10.1007/s11306-010-0227-6
Knapp, J. R. et al. Invited review: Enteric methane in dairy cattle production: Quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions. Journal of Dairy Science. 97(6), 3231–3261, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7234 (2014).
doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7234
Negussie, E. et al. Invited review: Large-scale indirect measurements for enteric methane emissions in dairy cattle: A review of proxies and their potential for use in management and breeding decisions. Journal of Dairy Science. 100(4), 2433–2453, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12030 (2017).
doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12030
Auffret, M. D. et al. Identification, comparison, and validation of robust rumen microbial biomarkers for methane emissions using diverse Bos Taurus breeds and basal diets. Frontiers in Microbiology. 8, 2642, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02642 (2018).
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02642
pubmed: 5767246
pmcid: 5767246
Emwas, A. H. et al. NMR Spectroscopy for Metabolomics Research. Metabolites. 9(7), 123, https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo9070123 (2019).
doi: 10.3390/metabo9070123
Wishart, D. S. Metabolomics: The principles and potential applications to transplantation. American Journal of Transplantation. 2814–2820, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01119.x (2005).
Duthie, C.A. et al. The effect of dietary addition of nitrate or increase in lipid concentrations, alone or in combination, on performance and methane emissions of beef cattle. Animal. 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111700146X (2017).
Duthie, C. A. et al. The impact of divergent breed types and diets on methane emissions, rumen characteristics and performance of finishing beef cattle. Animal.(11:10), 1762–1771, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117000301 (2017).
Duthie, C. A., Rooke, J. A., Hyslop, J. J. & Waterhouse, A. Methane emissions from two breeds of beef cows offered diets containing barley straw with either grass silage or brewers grains. Animal. 9(10), 1680–1687, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115001251 (2015).
doi: 10.1017/S1751731115001251
Troy, S. M. et al. Effectiveness of nitrate addition and increased oil content as methane mitigation strategies for beef cattle fed two contrasting basal diets. Journal of Animal Science. 93(4), 1815, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8688 (2015).
doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8688
Anderson, M. J. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology. 26(1), 32–46, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x (2001).
doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x
Ahdesmäki, M. & Strimmer, K. Feature selection in omics prediction problems using cat scores and false nondiscovery rate control. Annals of Applied Statistics. 6(1), 503–519, https://doi.org/10.1214/09-AOAS277 (2012).
doi: 10.1214/09-AOAS277
Lindgren, F., Geladi, P. & Wold, S. The kernel algorithm for PLS. Journal of Chemometrics. Wiley 7(1), 45–59, https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.1180070104 (1993).
doi: 10.1002/cem.1180070104
Kuhn, M. & Johnson, K. Applied Predictive Modeling, New York (Springer, 2013).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, https://www.R-project.org/ (2017).
Haque, M. N. Dietary manipulation: A sustainable way to mitigate methane emissions from ruminants. Journal of Animal Science and Technology. 60(1) (2018).
Martin, C., Morgavi, D. P. & Doreau, M. Methane mitigation in ruminants: From microbe to the farm scale. Animal. 4(3), 351–365 (2010).
doi: 10.1017/S1751731109990620
Murphy, M. R., Baldwin, R. L. & Koong, L. J. Estimation of stoichiometric parameters for rumen fermentation of roughage and concentrate diets. Journal of Animal Science. 55(2), 411–421 (1982).
doi: 10.2527/jas1982.552411x
Van Kessel, J. A. S. & Russell, J. B. The effect of pH on ruminal methanogenesis. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 20(4), 205–210 (1996).
doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1996.tb00319.x
Lovett, D. et al. Effect of forage/concentrate ratio and dietary coconut oil level on methane output and performance of finishing beef heifers. Livestock Production Science. 84(2), 135–146 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2003.09.010
Beauchemin, K. A. & Mcginn, S. M. Methane emissions from feedlot cattle fed barley or corn diets. Journal of Animal Science 83, 653–661 (2005).
doi: 10.2527/2005.833653x
Hall, M. B. et al. Total volatile fatty acid concentrations are unreliable estimators of treatment effects on ruminal fermentation in vivo. Journal of Dairy Science. 98(6), 3988–3999 (2015).
Janssen, P. H. Influence of hydrogen on rumen methane formation and fermentation balances through microbial growth kinetics and fermentation thermodynamics. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 160(1–2), 1–22 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.07.002
Bugaut, M. Occurrence, absorption and metabolism of short chain fatty acids in the digestive tract of mammals. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology–Part B: Comparative Biochemistry. 86(3), 439–472 (1987).
doi: 10.1016/0305-0491(87)90433-0
Zhao, S. et al. Metabolomics analysis reveals large effect of roughage types on rumen microbial metabolic profile in dairy cows. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 59(1), 79–85, https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.12247 (2014).
doi: 10.1111/lam.12247
Martinez-Fernandez, G. et al. Methane Inhibition Alters the Microbial Community, Hydrogen Flow, and Fermentation Response in the Rumen of Cattle. Frontiers in Microbiology. 7(July), 1–14 (2016).
Khafipour, E. et al. Rumen microbiome composition determined using two nutritional models of subacute ruminal acidosis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 75(22), 7115–7124 (2009).
doi: 10.1128/AEM.00739-09
Mcallan, A. B. & Smith, R. H. Degradation of nucleic acid derivatives by rumen bacteria in vitro. British Journal of Nutrition. 29(3), 467–474 (1973).
doi: 10.1079/BJN19730122
Saleem, F. et al. A metabolomics approach to uncover the effect of grain diets on rumen health in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 95(11), 6606–6623, https://doi.org/10.3168//jds.2012-5403 (2012).
doi: 10.3168//jds.2012-5403
pubmed: 22959937
pmcid: 22959937
Wishart, D. S. et al. HMDB: the Human Metabolome Database. Nucleic Acids Research. Jan;35(Database issue):D521-6. 17202168 (2007).
Turlin, E. et al. 3-Phenylpropionate catabolism and the Escherichia coli oxidative stress response. Research in Microbiology. 156(3), 312–321 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2004.10.012
Paul, K., Nonoh, J. O., Mikulski, L. & Brune, A. “Methanoplasmatales,” thermoplasmatales-related archaea in termite guts and other environments, are the seventh order of methanogens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 78(23), 8245–8253, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02193-12 (2012).
doi: 10.1128/AEM.02193-12
pubmed: 3497382
pmcid: 3497382
Deusch, S. et al. A structural and functional elucidation of the rumen microbiome influenced by various diets and microenvironments. Frontiers in Microbiology. 8(AUG), https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01605 (2017).
Van Gastelen, S. et al. Relationship between methane emissions of Holstein Freisian daily cows and fatty acids, volatile fatty acids and non-volatile metabolites in milk. Animal. 11(9), 1539–1548 (2017).
doi: 10.1017/S1751731117000295
Rooke, J. A. et al. Hydrogen and methane emissions from beef cattle and their rumen microbial community vary with diet, time after feeding and genotype. British Journal of Nutrition. 112(3), 398–407, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114514000932 (2014).
doi: 10.1017/S0007114514000932
Rymer, C. & Agnew, R. E. Summary of feed characterisation methods, In: Thomas, C. (ed.) Feed into milk: a new applied feeding system for dairy cows. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, 59–61 (2004).