Acetabular revision using a dual mobility cup as treatment for dislocation in Charnley total hip arthroplasty.
Acetabulum
/ surgery
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
/ adverse effects
Electronic Health Records
Female
Hip Dislocation
/ etiology
Hip Prosthesis
Humans
Length of Stay
/ statistics & numerical data
Male
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Failure
/ etiology
Reoperation
/ methods
Retrospective Studies
Arthroplasty
Charnley
Dislocation
Dual mobility
Hip
Plad
Revision
Journal
The bone & joint journal
ISSN: 2049-4408
Titre abrégé: Bone Joint J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101599229
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
entrez:
2
4
2020
pubmed:
2
4
2020
medline:
14
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Dislocation remains a significant complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA), being the third leading indication for revision. We present a series of acetabular revision using a dual mobility cup (DMC) and compare this with our previous series using the posterior lip augmentation device (PLAD). A retrospective review of patients treated with either a DMC or PLAD for dislocation in patients with a Charnley THA was performed. They were identified using electronic patient records (EPR). EPR data and radiographs were evaluated to determine operating time, length of stay, and the incidence of complications and recurrent dislocation postoperatively. A total of 28 patients underwent revision using a DMC for dislocation following Charnley THA between 2013 and 2017. The rate of recurrent dislocation and overall complications were compared with those of a previous series of 54 patients who underwent revision for dislocation using a PLAD, between 2007 and 2013. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean distribution of sex or age between the groups. The mean operating time was 71 mins (45 to 113) for DMCs and 43 mins (21 to 84) for PLADs (p = 0.001). There were no redislocations or revisions in the DMC group at a mean follow-up of 55 months (21 to 76), compared with our previous series of PLAD which had a redislocation rate of 16% (n = 9) and an overall revision rate of 25% (n = 14, p = 0.001) at a mean follow-up of 86 months (45 to 128). These results indicate that DMC outperforms PLAD as a treatment for dislocation in patients with a Charnley THA. This should therefore be the preferred form of treatment for these patients despite a slightly longer operating time. Work is currently ongoing to review outcomes of DMC over a longer follow-up period. PLAD should be used with caution in this patient group with preference given to acetabular revision to DMC. Cite this article:
Identifiants
pubmed: 32228082
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B4.BJJ-2019-1492.R1
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM