The sterlet sturgeon genome sequence and the mechanisms of segmental rediploidization.


Journal

Nature ecology & evolution
ISSN: 2397-334X
Titre abrégé: Nat Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101698577

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2020
Historique:
received: 19 08 2019
accepted: 27 02 2020
pubmed: 2 4 2020
medline: 25 8 2020
entrez: 2 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Sturgeons seem to be frozen in time. The archaic characteristics of this ancient fish lineage place it in a key phylogenetic position at the base of the ~30,000 modern teleost fish species. Moreover, sturgeons are notoriously polyploid, providing unique opportunities to investigate the evolution of polyploid genomes. We assembled a high-quality chromosome-level reference genome for the sterlet, Acipenser ruthenus. Our analysis revealed a very low protein evolution rate that is at least as slow as in other deep branches of the vertebrate tree, such as that of the coelacanth. We uncovered a whole-genome duplication that occurred in the Jurassic, early in the evolution of the entire sturgeon lineage. Following this polyploidization, the rediploidization of the genome included the loss of whole chromosomes in a segmental deduplication process. While known adaptive processes helped conserve a high degree of structural and functional tetraploidy over more than 180 million years, the reduction of redundancy of the polyploid genome seems to have been remarkably random.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32231327
doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1166-x
pii: 10.1038/s41559-020-1166-x
pmc: PMC7269910
mid: NIHMS1585560
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

841-852

Subventions

Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01 OD011116
Pays : United States

Références

Van de Peer, Y., Maere, S. & Meyer, A. The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 725–732 (2009).
pubmed: 19652647 doi: 10.1038/nrg2600
Lynch, M. & Conery, J. S. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290, 1151–1155 (2000).
pubmed: 11073452 doi: 10.1126/science.290.5494.1151
Dehal, P. & Boore, J. L. Two rounds of whole genome duplication in the ancestral vertebrate. PLoS Biol. 3, e314 (2005).
pubmed: 16128622 pmcid: 1197285 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030314
Meyer, A. & Van de Peer, Y. From 2R to 3R: evidence for a fish‐specific genome duplication (FSGD). Bioessays 27, 937–945 (2005).
pubmed: 16108068 doi: 10.1002/bies.20293
Braasch, I. & Postlethwait, J. H. in Polyploidy and Genome Evolution (eds Soltis P. & Soltis, D.) 341–383 (Springer, 2012).
Symonová, R. et al. Molecular cytogenetic differentiation of paralogs of Hox paralogs in duplicated and re-diploidized genome of the North American paddlefish (Polyodon spathula). BMC Genet. 18, 19 (2017).
pubmed: 28253860 pmcid: 5335500 doi: 10.1186/s12863-017-0484-8
Havelka, M., Hulák, M., Bailie, D., Prodöhl, P. & Flajšhans, M. Extensive genome duplications in sturgeons: new evidence from microsatellite data. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 29, 704–708 (2013).
doi: 10.1111/jai.12224
Otto, S. P. The evolutionary consequences of polyploidy. Cell 131, 452–462 (2007).
pubmed: 17981114 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.022
Force, A. et al. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151, 1531–1545 (1999).
pubmed: 10101175 pmcid: 1460548
Ludwig, A., Belfiore, N. M., Pitra, C., Svirsky, V. & Jenneckens, I. Genome duplication events and functional reduction of ploidy levels in sturgeon (Acipenser, Huso and Scaphirhynchus). Genetics 158, 1203–1215 (2001).
pubmed: 11454768 pmcid: 1461728
Wolfe, K. H. Yesterday’s polyploids and the mystery of diploidization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 333–341 (2001).
pubmed: 11331899 doi: 10.1038/35072009
Rajkov, J., Shao, Z. & Berrebi, P. Evolution of polyploidy and functional diploidization in sturgeons: microsatellite analysis in 10 sturgeon species. J. Heredity 105, 521–531 (2014).
doi: 10.1093/jhered/esu027
Crow, K. D., Smith, C. D., Cheng, J.-F., Wagner, G. P. & Amemiya, C. T. An independent genome duplication inferred from Hox paralogs in the American paddlefish—a representative basal ray-finned fish and important comparative reference. Genome Biol. Evol. 4, 937–953 (2012).
pubmed: 22851613 pmcid: 3509897 doi: 10.1093/gbe/evs067
Miller, M. J. in Sturgeons and Paddlefish of North America. Fish & Fisheries Series Vol. 27 (eds LeBreton, G. T. O., Beamish, F. W. H. & McKinley, R. S.) 87–101 (Springer, 2004).
Saito, T. et al. The origin and migration of primordial germ cells in sturgeons. PLoS ONE 9, e86861 (2014).
pubmed: 24505272 pmcid: 3914811 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086861
Hochleithner, M. & Gessner, J. The Sturgeon and Paddlefishes of the World—Biology and Aquaculture Aquatech Publication 106 (Aquatech, 2001).
Allen, P. J., Cech, J. J. & Kültz, D. Mechanisms of seawater acclimation in a primitive, anadromous fish, the green sturgeon. J. Comp. Physiol. B 179, 903–920 (2009).
pubmed: 19517116 pmcid: 2745624 doi: 10.1007/s00360-009-0372-2
Haidvogl, G. et al. Typology of historical sources and the reconstruction of long‐term historical changes of riverine fish: a case study of the Austrian Danube and northern Russian rivers. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 23, 498–515 (2014).
pubmed: 25284959 doi: 10.1111/eff.12103
Saffron, I. Caviar: The Strange History and Uncertain Future of the World’s Most Coveted Delicacy (Broadway Books, 2002).
Cheng, P. et al. Draft genome and complete Hox-cluster characterization of the sterlet sturgeon (Acipenser ruthenus). Front. Genet. 10, 776 (2019).
pubmed: 31543900 pmcid: 6739705 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00776
Bytyutskyy, D., Srp, J. & Flajšhans, M. Use of Feulgen image analysis densitometry to study the effect of genome size on nuclear size in polyploid sturgeons. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 28, 704–708 (2012).
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2012.02021.x
Fontana, F. et al. Fluorescent in situ hybridization with rDNA probes on chromosomes of Acipenser ruthenus and Acipenser naccarii (Osteichthyes Acipenseriformes). Genome 42, 1008–1012 (1999).
doi: 10.1139/g99-030
Valente, G. T. et al. B chromosomes: from cytogenetics to systems biology. Chromosoma 126, 73–81 (2017).
pubmed: 27558128 doi: 10.1007/s00412-016-0613-6
Du, K. et al. The genome of the arapaima (Arapaima gigas) provides insights into gigantism, fast growth and chromosomal sex determination system. Sci. Rep. 9, 5293 (2019).
pubmed: 30923320 pmcid: 6439221 doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41457-x
Betancur-R, R. et al. Phylogenetic classification of bony fishes. BMC Evol. Biol. 17, 162 (2017).
pubmed: 28683774 pmcid: 5501477 doi: 10.1186/s12862-017-0958-3
Betancur-R, R. et al. The tree of life and a new classification of bony fishes. PLoS Curr. 5 http://doi.org/dpxx (2013).
Near, T. J. et al. Resolution of ray-finned fish phylogeny and timing of diversification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 13698–13703 (2012).
pubmed: 22869754 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206625109
Hughes, L. C. et al. Comprehensive phylogeny of ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii) based on transcriptomic and genomic data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 6249–6254 (2018).
pubmed: 29760103 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1719358115
Rabosky, D. L. et al. Rates of speciation and morphological evolution are correlated across the largest vertebrate radiation. Nat. Commun. 4, 1958 (2013).
pubmed: 23739623 doi: 10.1038/ncomms2958
Darwin, C. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (Oxford Univ. Press, 1859).
Krieger, J. & Fuerst, P. A. Evidence for a slowed rate of molecular evolution in the order Acipenseriformes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 891–897 (2002).
pubmed: 12032245 doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004146
Chalopin, D., Naville, M., Plard, F., Galiana, D. & Volff, J.-N. Comparative analysis of transposable elements highlights mobilome diversity and evolution in vertebrates. Genome Biol. Evol. 7, 567–580 (2015).
pubmed: 25577199 pmcid: 4350176 doi: 10.1093/gbe/evv005
Amemiya, C. T. et al. The African coelacanth genome provides insights into tetrapod evolution. Nature 496, 311–316 (2013).
pubmed: 23598338 pmcid: 3633110 doi: 10.1038/nature12027
Berthelot, C. et al. The rainbow trout genome provides novel insights into evolution after whole-genome duplication in vertebrates. Nat. Commun. 5, 3657 (2014).
pubmed: 24755649 pmcid: 4071752 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4657
Lien, S. et al. The Atlantic salmon genome provides insights into rediploidization. Nature 533, 200–205 (2016).
pubmed: 27088604 doi: 10.1038/nature17164 pmcid: 27088604
Chen, Z. et al. De novo assembly of the goldfish (Carassius auratus) genome and the evolution of genes after whole-genome duplication. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav0547 (2019).
pubmed: 31249862 pmcid: 6594761 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav0547
Andreyushkova, D. et al. Next generation sequencing of chromosome-specific libraries sheds light on genome evolution in paleotetraploid sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus). Genes 8, 318 (2017).
pmcid: 5704231 doi: 10.3390/genes8110318
Romanenko, S. A. et al. Segmental paleotetraploidy revealed in sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus) genome by chromosome painting. Mol. Cytogenet. 8, 90 (2015).
pubmed: 26587056 pmcid: 4652396 doi: 10.1186/s13039-015-0194-8
Bennett, R. J., Uhl, M. A., Miller, M. G. & Johnson, A. D. Identification and characterization of a Candida albicans mating pheromone. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 8189–8201 (2003).
pubmed: 14585977 pmcid: 262406 doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.22.8189-8201.2003
Gerstein, A. C., Chun, H.-J. E., Grant, A. & Otto, S. P. Genomic convergence toward diploidy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 2, e145 (2006).
pubmed: 17002497 pmcid: 1570378 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020145
De Storme, N. & Mason, A. Plant speciation through chromosome instability and ploidy change: cellular mechanisms, molecular factors and evolutionary relevance. Curr. Plant Biol. 1, 10–33 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.cpb.2014.09.002
Rajaraman, R., Rajaraman, M. M., Rajaraman, S. R. & Guernsey, D. L. Neosis—a paradigm of self‐renewal in cancer. Cell Biol. Int. 29, 1084–1097 (2005).
pubmed: 16316756 doi: 10.1016/j.cellbi.2005.10.003
Session, A. M. et al. Genome evolution in the allotetraploid frog Xenopus laevis. Nature 538, 336–343 (2016).
pubmed: 27762356 pmcid: 5313049 doi: 10.1038/nature19840
Tang, H. et al. Synteny and collinearity in plant genomes. Science 320, 486–488 (2008).
pubmed: 18436778 doi: 10.1126/science.1153917
Dewey, C. N. Positional orthology: putting genomic evolutionary relationships into context. Brief. Bioinform. 12, 401–412 (2011).
pubmed: 21705766 pmcid: 3178058 doi: 10.1093/bib/bbr040
Freeling, M. Bias in plant gene content following different sorts of duplication: tandem, whole-genome, segmental, or by transposition. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 60, 433–453 (2009).
pubmed: 19575588 doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092122
Birchler, J. A. & Veitia, R. A. Gene balance hypothesis: connecting issues of dosage sensitivity across biological disciplines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14746–14753 (2012).
pubmed: 22908297 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207726109
Hrbek, T., Seckinger, J. & Meyer, A. A phylogenetic and biogeographic perspective on the evolution of poeciliid fishes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 43, 986–998 (2007).
pubmed: 17185005 doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.06.009
De Smet, R. et al. Convergent gene loss following gene and genome duplications creates single-copy families in flowering plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2898–2903 (2013).
pubmed: 23382190 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300127110
Sémon, M. & Wolfe, K. H. Consequences of genome duplication. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 17, 505–512 (2007).
pubmed: 18006297 doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2007.09.007
Conant, G. C., Birchler, J. A. & Pires, J. C. Dosage, duplication, and diploidization: clarifying the interplay of multiple models for duplicate gene evolution over time. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 19, 91–98 (2014).
pubmed: 24907529 doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2014.05.008
Makino, T. & McLysaght, A. Positionally biased gene loss after whole genome duplication: evidence from human, yeast, and plant. Genome Res. 22, 2427–2435 (2012).
pubmed: 22835904 pmcid: 3514672 doi: 10.1101/gr.131953.111
Szklarczyk, D. et al. STRING v11: protein–protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D607–D613 (2019).
pubmed: 30476243 doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1131 pmcid: 30476243
Kikuta, H. et al. Genomic regulatory blocks encompass multiple neighboring genes and maintain conserved synteny in vertebrates. Genome Res. 17, 545–555 (2007).
pubmed: 17387144 pmcid: 1855176 doi: 10.1101/gr.6086307
Innan, H. & Kondrashov, F. The evolution of gene duplications: classifying and distinguishing between models. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 97–108 (2010).
pubmed: 20051986 doi: 10.1038/nrg2689
Ward, R. & Durrett, R. Subfunctionalization: how often does it occur? How long does it take? Theor. Popul. Biol. 66, 93–100 (2004).
pubmed: 15302219 doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2004.03.004
Ohno, S. Evolution by Gene Duplication (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013).
Kjærner-Semb, E. et al. Atlantic salmon populations reveal adaptive divergence of immune related genes—a duplicated genome under selection. BMC Genomics 17, 610 (2016).
pubmed: 27515098 pmcid: 4982270 doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2867-z
Wassarman, P. M. Zona pellucida glycoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 24285–24289 (2008).
pubmed: 18539589 pmcid: 2528931 doi: 10.1074/jbc.R800027200
Sano, K. et al. Comparison of egg envelope thickness in teleosts and its relationship to the sites of ZP protein synthesis. J. Exp. Zool. B 328, 240–258 (2017).
doi: 10.1002/jez.b.22729
Kim, B.-M. et al. Antarctic blackfin icefish genome reveals adaptations to extreme environments. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 469–478 (2019).
pubmed: 30804520 doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-0812-7 pmcid: 7307600
Cao, L. et al. Neofunctionalization of zona pellucida proteins enhances freeze-prevention in the eggs of Antarctic notothenioids. Nat. Commun. 7, 12987 (2016).
pubmed: 27698404 pmcid: 5059455 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12987
Montavon, T. et al. A regulatory archipelago controls Hox genes transcription in digits. Cell 147, 1132–1145 (2011).
pubmed: 22118467 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.023
Beccari, L. et al. A role for HOX13 proteins in the regulatory switch between TADs at the HoxD locus. Genes Dev. 30, 1172–1186 (2016).
pubmed: 27198226 pmcid: 4888838
Woltering, J. M., Noordermeer, D., Leleu, M. & Duboule, D. Conservation and divergence of regulatory strategies at Hox loci and the origin of tetrapod digits. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001773 (2014).
pubmed: 24465181 pmcid: 3897358 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001773
Braasch, I. et al. The spotted gar genome illuminates vertebrate evolution and facilitates human–teleost comparisons. Nat. Genet. 48, 427–437 (2016).
pubmed: 26950095 pmcid: 4817229 doi: 10.1038/ng.3526
Amores, A. et al. Zebrafish hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution. Science 282, 1711–1714 (1998).
pubmed: 9831563 doi: 10.1126/science.282.5394.1711
Mungpakdee, S. et al. Differential evolution of the 13 Atlantic salmon Hox clusters. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 1333–1343 (2008).
pubmed: 18424774 doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn097
Martin, K. J. & Holland, P. W. Enigmatic orthology relationships between Hox clusters of the African butterfly fish and other teleosts following ancient whole-genome duplication. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 2592–2611 (2014).
pubmed: 24974377 pmcid: 4166920 doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu202
Kuraku, S. & Meyer, A. The evolution and maintenance of Hox gene clusters in vertebrates and the teleost-specific genome duplication. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 53, 765–773 (2009).
pubmed: 19557682 doi: 10.1387/ijdb.072533km
Woltering, J. M. & Durston, A. J. The zebrafish hoxdb cluster has been reduced to a single microRNA. Nat. Genet. 38, 601–602 (2006).
pubmed: 16736008 doi: 10.1038/ng0606-601
McClintock, J. M., Kheirbek, M. A. & Prince, V. E. Knockdown of duplicated zebrafish hoxb1 genes reveals distinct roles in hindbrain patterning and a novel mechanism of duplicate gene retention. Development 129, 2339–2354 (2002).
pubmed: 11973267
Takamatsu, N. et al. Duplicated Abd-B class genes in medaka hoxAa and hoxAb clusters exhibit differential expression patterns in pectoral fin buds. Dev. Genes Evol. 217, 263–273 (2007).
pubmed: 17333260 doi: 10.1007/s00427-007-0137-4
Schartl, M. et al. The genome of the platyfish, Xiphophorus maculatus, provides insights into evolutionary adaptation and several complex traits. Nat. Genet. 45, 567–572 (2013).
pubmed: 23542700 pmcid: 3677569 doi: 10.1038/ng.2604
Muller, H. Why polyploidy is rarer in animals than in plants. Am. Nat. 59, 346–353 (1925).
doi: 10.1086/280047
Mable, B. ‘Why polyploidy is rarer in animals than in plants’: myths and mechanisms. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 82, 453–466 (2004).
doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00332.x
Orr, H. A. ‘Why polyploidy is rarer in animals than in plants’ revisited. Am. Nat. 136, 759–770 (1990).
doi: 10.1086/285130
Wertheim, B., Beukeboom, L. & Van de Zande, L. Polyploidy in animals: effects of gene expression on sex determination, evolution and ecology. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 140, 256–269 (2013).
pubmed: 23817224 doi: 10.1159/000351998
Fopp-Bayat, D., Kolman, R. & Woznicki, P. Induction of meiotic gynogenesis in sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus) using UV-irradiated bester sperm. Aquaculture 264, 54–58 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.12.006
Havelka, M. & Arai, K. in Sex Control in Aquaculture (eds Wang H.-P. et al.) 669–687 (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2018).
Keyvanshokooh, S. & Gharaei, A. A review of sex determination and searches for sex‐specific markers in sturgeon. Aquac. Res. 41, e1–e7 (2010).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02463.x
Havelka, M., Kašpar, V., Hulák, M. & Flajšhans, M. Sturgeon genetics and cytogenetics: a review related to ploidy levels and interspecific hybridization. Folia Zool. 60, 93–104 (2011).
doi: 10.25225/fozo.v60.i2.a3.2011
Slotkin, R. K. & Martienssen, R. Transposable elements and the epigenetic regulation of the genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 272–285 (2007).
pubmed: 17363976 doi: 10.1038/nrg2072
Klein, S. J. & O’Neill, R. J. Transposable elements: genome innovation, chromosome diversity, and centromere conflict. Chromosome Res. 26, 5–23 (2018).
pubmed: 29332159 pmcid: 5857280 doi: 10.1007/s10577-017-9569-5
Foissac, S. et al. Transcriptome and chromatin structure annotation of liver, CD4+ and CD8+T cells from four livestock species. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/316091 (2019).
SMRT Link v.5.0.1 (Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. 2018).
Ruan, J. SMARTdenovo: Ultra-fast de novo assembler using long noisy reads (Github, accessed 10 January 2019); https://github.com/ruanjue/smartdenovo
Vaser, R., Sović, I., Nagarajan, N. & Šikić, M. Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Res. 27, 737–746 (2017).
pubmed: 28100585 pmcid: 5411768 doi: 10.1101/gr.214270.116
Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094–3100 (2018).
pubmed: 29750242 pmcid: 6137996 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191
Walker, B. J. et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS ONE 9, e112963 (2014).
pubmed: 25409509 pmcid: 4237348 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963
Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3997 (2013).
Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
pubmed: 19505943 pmcid: 19505943 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
Garrison, E. & Marth, G. Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3907 (2012).
Edge, P., Bafna, V. & Bansal, V. HapCUT2: robust and accurate haplotype assembly for diverse sequencing technologies. Genome Res. 27, 801–812 (2017).
pubmed: 27940952 pmcid: 5411775 doi: 10.1101/gr.213462.116
fgbio: Tools for working with genomic and high throughput sequencing data (Github, 2019); http://fulcrumgenomics.github.io/fgbio/
Li, H. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics 27, 2987–2993 (2011).
pubmed: 21903627 pmcid: 3198575 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr509
Durand, N. C. et al. Juicer provides a one-click system for analyzing loop-resolution Hi-C experiments. Cell Syst. 3, 95–98 (2016).
pubmed: 27467249 pmcid: 5846465 doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.07.002
Dudchenko, O. et al. De novo assembly of the Aedes aegypti genome using Hi-C yields chromosome-length scaffolds. Science 356, 92–95 (2017).
pubmed: 28336562 pmcid: 5635820 doi: 10.1126/science.aal3327
Durand, N. C. et al. Juicebox provides a visualization system for Hi-C contact maps with unlimited zoom. Cell Syst. 3, 99–101 (2016).
pubmed: 27467250 pmcid: 5596920 doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.07.012
Smit, A., Hubley, R. & Green, P. RepeatMasker Open-4.0 (ISB, 2013–2015); http://www.repeatmasker.org
Ou, S. & Jiang, N. LTR_retriever: a highly accurate and sensitive program for identification of long terminal repeat retrotransposons. Plant Physiol. 176, 1410–1422 (2018).
pubmed: 29233850 doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01310
Ellinghaus, D., Kurtz, S. & Willhoeft, U. LTRharvest, an efficient and flexible software for de novo detection of LTR retrotransposons. BMC Bioinform. 9, 18 (2008).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-18
Xu, Z. & Wang, H. LTR_FINDER: an efficient tool for the prediction of full-length LTR retrotransposons. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W265–W268 (2007).
pubmed: 17485477 pmcid: 1933203 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm286
Smit, A. F., Hubley, R. & Green, P. RepeatMasker (ISB, 2019); http://www.repeatmasker.org/webrepeatmaskerhelp.html
Bairoch, A. & Apweiler, R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 45–48 (2000).
pubmed: 10592178 pmcid: 102476 doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.45
Li, W. & Godzik, A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22, 1658–1659 (2006).
pubmed: 16731699 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 pmcid: 16731699
Bao, W., Kojima, K. K. & Kohany, O. Repbase Update, a database of repetitive elements in eukaryotic genomes. Mob. DNA 6, 11 (2015).
pubmed: 26045719 pmcid: 4455052 doi: 10.1186/s13100-015-0041-9
Shao, F., Wang, J., Xu, H. & Peng, Z. FishTEDB: a collective database of transposable elements identified in the complete genomes of fish. Database 2018, 1–9 (2018).
doi: 10.1093/database/bax106
Christiam, C. et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 10, 421 (2009).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421
Novák, P. et al. TAREAN: a computational tool for identification and characterization of satellite DNA from unassembled short reads. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, e111 (2017).
pubmed: 28402514 pmcid: 5499541 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx257
Novák, P., Neumann, P., Pech, J., Steinhaisl, J. & Macas, J. RepeatExplorer: a Galaxy-based web server for genome-wide characterization of eukaryotic repetitive elements from next-generation sequence reads. Bioinformatics 29, 792–793 (2013).
pubmed: 23376349 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt054
Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890 (2018).
pubmed: 30423086 pmcid: 6129281 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560
Neumann, P., Novák, P., Hoštáková, N. & Macas, J. Systematic survey of plant LTR-retrotransposons elucidates phylogenetic relationships of their polyprotein domains and provides a reference for element classification. Mob. DNA 10, 1 (2019).
pubmed: 30622655 pmcid: 6317226 doi: 10.1186/s13100-018-0144-1
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
pubmed: 22388286 pmcid: 22388286 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923
Wickham, H. ggplot2. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 3, 180–185 (2011).
doi: 10.1002/wics.147
Higham, D. J. & Higham, N. J. MATLAB Guide Vol. 150 (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2016).
Simão, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31, 3210–3212 (2015).
pubmed: 26059717 pmcid: 26059717 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351
Stanke, M. et al. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W435–W439 (2006).
pubmed: 16845043 pmcid: 1538822 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl200
Slater, G. S. C. & Birney, E. Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison. BMC Bioinform. 6, 31 (2005).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-31
Birney, E., Clamp, M. & Durbin, R. GeneWise and genomewise. Genome Res. 14, 988–995 (2004).
pubmed: 15123596 pmcid: 479130 doi: 10.1101/gr.1865504
She, R., Chu, J. S.-C., Wang, K., Pei, J. & Chen, N. GenBlastA: enabling BLAST to identify homologous gene sequences. Genome Res. 19, 143–149 (2009).
pubmed: 18838612 pmcid: 2612959 doi: 10.1101/gr.082081.108
Ter-Hovhannisyan, V., Lomsadze, A., Chernoff, Y. O. & Borodovsky, M. Gene prediction in novel fungal genomes using an ab initio algorithm with unsupervised training. Genome Res. 18, 1979–1990 (2008).
pubmed: 18757608 pmcid: 2593577 doi: 10.1101/gr.081612.108
Trapnell, C. et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat. Protoc. 7, 562–578 (2012).
pubmed: 22383036 pmcid: 22383036 doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.016
Haas, B. J. et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1494–1512 (2013).
pubmed: 23845962 doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.084 pmcid: 23845962
Haas, B. J. et al. Improving the Arabidopsis genome annotation using maximal transcript alignment assemblies. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 5654–5666 (2003).
pubmed: 14500829 pmcid: 206470 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg770
Haas, B. J. et al. Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using evidencemodeler and the program to assemble spliced alignments. Genome Biol. 9, R7 (2008).
pubmed: 18190707 pmcid: 2395244 doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-1-r7
Camacho, C. et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 10, 421 (2009).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421
Mudunuri, U., Che, A., Yi, M. & Stephens, R. M. bioDBnet: the biological database network. Bioinformatics 25, 555–556 (2009).
pubmed: 19129209 pmcid: 2642638 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn654
Kulmanov, M., Khan, M. A. & Hoehndorf, R. DeepGO: predicting protein functions from sequence and interactions using a deep ontology-aware classifier. Bioinformatics 34, 660–668 (2017).
pmcid: 5860606 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx624
Chan, P. P. & Lowe, T. M. in Gene Prediction. Methods in Molecular Biology Vol. 1962 (ed. Kollmar, M.) 1–14 (Humana, 2019).
Lagesen, K. et al. RNammer: consistent annotation of rRNA genes in genomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 3100–3108 (2007).
pubmed: 1888812 pmcid: 1888812 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160
Nawrocki, E. P. & Eddy, S. R. Infernal 1.1: 100-fold faster RNA homology searches. Bioinformatics 29, 2933–2935 (2013).
pubmed: 24008419 pmcid: 3810854 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt509
Kalvari, I. et al. Rfam 13.0: shifting to a genome-centric resource for non-coding RNA families. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D335–D342 (2017).
pmcid: 5753348 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1038
Cho, Y. S. et al. The tiger genome and comparative analysis with lion and snow leopard genomes. Nat. Commun. 4, 3433 (2013).
Ruan, J. et al. TreeFam: 2008 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, D735–D740 (2007).
pubmed: 18056084 pmcid: 2238856 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm1005
Ponting, C. TreeBeST v.0.5 (SourceForge, 2007); http://treesoft.sourceforge.net/treebest.shtml
Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004).
pubmed: 15034147 pmcid: 15034147 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340
Capella-Gutiérrez, S., Silla-Martínez, J. M. & Gabaldón, T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009).
pubmed: 19505945 pmcid: 2712344 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348
Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313 (2014).
pubmed: 24451623 pmcid: 24451623 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033
Ronquist, F. et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539–542 (2012).
pubmed: 22357727 pmcid: 3329765 doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029
Yang, Z. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1586–1591 (2007).
pubmed: 17483113 doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm088
Inoue, J., Dos Reis, M. & Yang, Z. A step-by-step tutorial: Divergence time estimation with approximate likelihood calculation using MCMCTREE in PAML (Citeseer, 2011).
Stamatakis, A., Hoover, P. & Rougemont, J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst. Biol. 57, 758–771 (2008).
pubmed: 18853362 doi: 10.1080/10635150802429642
Lin, Q. et al. The seahorse genome and the evolution of its specialized morphology. Nature 540, 395–399 (2016).
pubmed: 27974754 doi: 10.1038/nature20595
Lundberg, J. G. & Chernoff, B. A Miocene fossil of the amazonian fish Arapaima (Teleostei, Arapaimidae) from the Magdalena River region of Colombia-biogeographic and evolutionary implications. Biotropica 24, 2–14 (1992).
doi: 10.2307/2388468
Kumazawa, Y. & Nishida, M. Molecular phylogeny of osteoglossoids: a new model for Gondwanian origin and plate tectonic transportation of the Asian arowana. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 1869–1878 (2000).
pubmed: 11110903 doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026288
O’Brien, K. P., Remm, M. & Sonnhammer, E. L. Inparanoid: a comprehensive database of eukaryotic orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, D476–D480 (2005).
pubmed: 15608241 doi: 10.1093/nar/gki107
Suyama, M., Torrents, D. & Bork, P. PAL2NAL: robust conversion of protein sequence alignments into the corresponding codon alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W609–W612 (2006).
pubmed: 16845082 pmcid: 1538804 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl315
Talavera, G. & Castresana, J. Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst. Biol. 56, 564–577 (2007).
pubmed: 17654362 doi: 10.1080/10635150701472164
Retief, J. D. in Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols (eds Misener, S. & Krawetz, S. A.) 243–258 (Humana Press, 2000).
Huerta-Cepas, J., Serra, F. & Bork, P. ETE 3: reconstruction, analysis, and visualization of phylogenomic data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1635–1638 (2016).
pubmed: 26921390 pmcid: 4868116 doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw046
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635
Catchen, J. M., Amores, A., Hohenlohe, P., Cresko, W. & Postlethwait, J. H. Stacks: building and genotyping loci de novo from short-read sequences. G3 1, 171–182 (2011).
Catchen, J., Hohenlohe, P. A., Bassham, S., Amores, A. & Cresko, W. A. Stacks: an analysis tool set for population genomics. Mol. Ecol. 22, 3124–3140 (2013).
pubmed: 23701397 pmcid: 3936987 doi: 10.1111/mec.12354
Feron, R. et al. RADSex (Github, 2018); https://github.com/RomainFeron/RADSex

Auteurs

Kang Du (K)

Physiological Chemistry, Biocenter, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Developmental Biochemistry, Biocenter, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.

Matthias Stöck (M)

Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, IGB, Berlin, Germany. matthias.stoeck@igb-berlin.de.

Susanne Kneitz (S)

Physiological Chemistry, Biocenter, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.

Christophe Klopp (C)

Plate-forme Bio-informatique Genotoul, Mathématiques et Informatique Appliquées de Toulouse, INRA, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
SIGENAE, GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, Castanet-Tolosan, France.

Joost M Woltering (JM)

Lehrstuhl für Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

Mateus Contar Adolfi (MC)

Physiological Chemistry, Biocenter, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.

Romain Feron (R)

Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Dmitry Prokopov (D)

Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.

Alexey Makunin (A)

Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.

Ilya Kichigin (I)

Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.

Cornelia Schmidt (C)

Physiological Chemistry, Biocenter, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.

Petra Fischer (P)

Physiological Chemistry, Biocenter, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.

Heiner Kuhl (H)

Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, IGB, Berlin, Germany.

Sven Wuertz (S)

Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, IGB, Berlin, Germany.

Jörn Gessner (J)

Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, IGB, Berlin, Germany.

Werner Kloas (W)

Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, IGB, Berlin, Germany.

Cédric Cabau (C)

Plate-forme Bio-informatique Genotoul, Mathématiques et Informatique Appliquées de Toulouse, INRA, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
SIGENAE, GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, Castanet-Tolosan, France.

Carole Iampietro (C)

INRAE, US 1426, GeT-PlaGe, Genotoul, Castanet-Tolosan, France.

Hugues Parrinello (H)

Montpellier GenomiX (MGX), c/o Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Montpellier, France.

Chad Tomlinson (C)

McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Laurent Journot (L)

Montpellier GenomiX (MGX), c/o Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Montpellier, France.

John H Postlethwait (JH)

Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.

Ingo Braasch (I)

Department of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Vladimir Trifonov (V)

Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.

Wesley C Warren (WC)

Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.

Axel Meyer (A)

Lehrstuhl für Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

Yann Guiguen (Y)

INRA, UR1037 LPGP, Fish Physiology and Genomics, Rennes, France.

Manfred Schartl (M)

Developmental Biochemistry, Biocenter, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany. phch1@biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de.
The Xiphophorus Genetic Stock Center, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA. phch1@biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de.
Hagler Institute for Advanced Study and Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. phch1@biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice

Classifications MeSH