A retrospective analysis of budget impact models submitted to the National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics in Ireland.


Journal

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care
ISSN: 1618-7601
Titre abrégé: Eur J Health Econ
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101134867

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Historique:
received: 26 09 2019
accepted: 13 03 2020
pubmed: 2 4 2020
medline: 17 6 2021
entrez: 2 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics (NCPE) is a National HTA Agency in Ireland responsible for assessment of comparative clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and potential budget impact of drugs on behalf of the Health Service Executive. This research aims to assess if the budget impact models submitted to the NCPE have accurate predicted utilisation, assess if the models are consistent in the parameters included, and determine if probabilistic sensitivity analyses would aid the characterization of uncertainty. A retrospective analysis of budget impact models that had been submitted (January 2010-December 2017 inclusive) to the NCPE was performed. The input parameters in the budget impact model were recorded. For each drug, annual realised utilisation was compared with what had been predicted by the respective budget impact model. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was also performed on each model. A total of 12 models were included; each model pertained to one drug for one indication. Of the 12 models, six underpredicted and six overpredicted the annual realised utilisation. There were a range of different parameters included in each of the budget impact models. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis did not improve the characterization of uncertainty. This research has demonstrated that budget impact models submitted to a national HTA agency have limited accuracy in predicting realised utilisation, and there is inconsistency among the parameters included. An electronic budget impact template for applicants has been developed, as a more systematic approach, for their submissions to the NCPE.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics (NCPE) is a National HTA Agency in Ireland responsible for assessment of comparative clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and potential budget impact of drugs on behalf of the Health Service Executive. This research aims to assess if the budget impact models submitted to the NCPE have accurate predicted utilisation, assess if the models are consistent in the parameters included, and determine if probabilistic sensitivity analyses would aid the characterization of uncertainty.
METHODS METHODS
A retrospective analysis of budget impact models that had been submitted (January 2010-December 2017 inclusive) to the NCPE was performed. The input parameters in the budget impact model were recorded. For each drug, annual realised utilisation was compared with what had been predicted by the respective budget impact model. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was also performed on each model.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 12 models were included; each model pertained to one drug for one indication. Of the 12 models, six underpredicted and six overpredicted the annual realised utilisation. There were a range of different parameters included in each of the budget impact models. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis did not improve the characterization of uncertainty.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This research has demonstrated that budget impact models submitted to a national HTA agency have limited accuracy in predicting realised utilisation, and there is inconsistency among the parameters included. An electronic budget impact template for applicants has been developed, as a more systematic approach, for their submissions to the NCPE.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32232603
doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01181-0
pii: 10.1007/s10198-020-01181-0
pmc: PMC7366580
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

895-901

Références

Value Health. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):5-14
pubmed: 24438712
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Dec;34(12):1267-1276
pubmed: 27473640
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Nov;73(11):1449-1455
pubmed: 28819675
Value Health. 2019 Mar;22(3):332-339
pubmed: 30832971

Auteurs

Felicity Lamrock (F)

Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK. f.lamrock@qub.ac.uk.
National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. f.lamrock@qub.ac.uk.

Laura McCullagh (L)

National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Lesley Tilson (L)

National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Michael Barry (M)

National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH