Metabolic phenotyping by treatment modality in obese women with gestational diabetes suggests diverse pathophysiology: An exploratory study.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 07 11 2019
accepted: 04 03 2020
entrez: 3 4 2020
pubmed: 3 4 2020
medline: 8 7 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Excess insulin resistance is considered the predominant pathophysiological mechanism in obese women who develop gestational diabetes (GDM). We hypothesised that obese women requiring differing treatment modalities for GDM may have diverse underlying metabolic pathways. In this secondary analysis of the UK pregnancies Better Eating and Activity Trial (UPBEAT) we studied women from the control arm with complete biochemical data at three gestational time points; at 15-18+6 and 27-28+6 weeks (before treatment), and 34-36+0 weeks (after treatment). A total of 89 analytes were measured (plasma/serum) using a targeted nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) platform and conventional assays. We used linear regression with appropriate adjustment to model metabolite concentration, stratified by treatment group. 300 women (median BMI 35kg/m2; inter quartile range 32.8-38.2) were studied. 71 developed GDM; 28 received dietary treatment only, 20 metformin, and 23 received insulin. Prior to the initiation of treatment, multiple metabolites differed (p<0.05) between the diet and insulin-treated groups, especially very large density lipoprotein (VLDL) and high density lipoprotein (HDL) subclasses and constituents, with some differences maintained at 34-36 weeks' gestation despite treatment. Gestational lipid profiles of the diet treatment group were indicative of a lower insulin resistance profile, when compared to both insulin-treated women and those without GDM. At 28 weeks' the diet treatment group had lower plasma fasting glucose and insulin than women treated with insulin, yet similar to those without GDM, consistent with a glycaemic mechanism independent of insulin resistance. This exploratory study suggests that GDM pathophysiological processes may differ amongst obese women who require different treatment modalities to achieve glucose control and can be revealed using metabolic profiling.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Excess insulin resistance is considered the predominant pathophysiological mechanism in obese women who develop gestational diabetes (GDM). We hypothesised that obese women requiring differing treatment modalities for GDM may have diverse underlying metabolic pathways.
METHODS
In this secondary analysis of the UK pregnancies Better Eating and Activity Trial (UPBEAT) we studied women from the control arm with complete biochemical data at three gestational time points; at 15-18+6 and 27-28+6 weeks (before treatment), and 34-36+0 weeks (after treatment). A total of 89 analytes were measured (plasma/serum) using a targeted nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) platform and conventional assays. We used linear regression with appropriate adjustment to model metabolite concentration, stratified by treatment group.
MAIN FINDINGS
300 women (median BMI 35kg/m2; inter quartile range 32.8-38.2) were studied. 71 developed GDM; 28 received dietary treatment only, 20 metformin, and 23 received insulin. Prior to the initiation of treatment, multiple metabolites differed (p<0.05) between the diet and insulin-treated groups, especially very large density lipoprotein (VLDL) and high density lipoprotein (HDL) subclasses and constituents, with some differences maintained at 34-36 weeks' gestation despite treatment. Gestational lipid profiles of the diet treatment group were indicative of a lower insulin resistance profile, when compared to both insulin-treated women and those without GDM. At 28 weeks' the diet treatment group had lower plasma fasting glucose and insulin than women treated with insulin, yet similar to those without GDM, consistent with a glycaemic mechanism independent of insulin resistance.
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION
This exploratory study suggests that GDM pathophysiological processes may differ amongst obese women who require different treatment modalities to achieve glucose control and can be revealed using metabolic profiling.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32240196
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230658
pii: PONE-D-19-31068
pmc: PMC7117764
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers 0
Blood Glucose 0
Hypoglycemic Agents 0
Insulin 0
Triglycerides 0
Metformin 9100L32L2N

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0230658

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/L002477/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : NI-SI-0512-10104
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-PG-0407-10452
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : CZB/A/680
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00011/6
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Diabetes UK
ID : 14/0004849
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/ L002477/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : NF-SI-0166-10196
Pays : United Kingdom

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

SMN and LP disclose receipt of lecture/other fees from Roche Diagnostics, outside the scope of this work. DAL discloses receipt of fees from Roche Diagnostics and Ferring Pharmaceuticals for research unrelated to this paper. All other authors declare that there is no declaration of interest associated with their contribution to this manuscript. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Références

BMC Med. 2017 Aug 28;15(1):163
pubmed: 28844206
Curr Diab Rep. 2010 Feb;10(1):78-86
pubmed: 20425071
Diabetes Care. 1999 Oct;22(10):1688-93
pubmed: 10526736
Diabetes. 2012 Jun;61(6):1372-80
pubmed: 22511205
PLoS Med. 2014 Dec 09;11(12):e1001765
pubmed: 25490400
Reproduction. 2010 Sep;140(3):365-71
pubmed: 20457594
Diabetes Care. 2013 Mar;36(3):648-55
pubmed: 23129134
BMC Med. 2016 Dec 13;14(1):205
pubmed: 27955712
Diabetes Care. 1997 Nov;20(11):1717-23
pubmed: 9353615
Diabetes Care. 2013 Nov;36(11):3732-8
pubmed: 24026559
Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Sep;22(9):353-63
pubmed: 21616678
BMC Med. 2019 Jan 21;17(1):15
pubmed: 30661507
N Engl J Med. 2008 May 8;358(19):1991-2002
pubmed: 18463375
PLoS Med. 2014 Feb 25;11(2):e1001606
pubmed: 24586121
Diabetes Care. 2016 Jun;39(6):1052-5
pubmed: 27208340
Diabetologia. 2017 Oct;60(10):1903-1912
pubmed: 28766127
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015 Oct;3(10):767-77
pubmed: 26165396
Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):676-82
pubmed: 20190296
Analyst. 2009 Sep;134(9):1781-5
pubmed: 19684899
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1985 Dec;61(6):1039-45
pubmed: 3902865

Auteurs

Sara L White (SL)

Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Shahina Begum (S)

Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Matias C Vieira (MC)

Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Paul Seed (P)

Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Deborah L Lawlor (DL)

MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Population Health Science, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Naveed Sattar (N)

Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Scott M Nelson (SM)

School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Paul Welsh (P)

Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Dharmintra Pasupathy (D)

Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Lucilla Poston (L)

Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH