Technical requirements framework of hospital information systems: design and evaluation.
Communication service
Hospital information system
Security service
System architecture
System response time
Technical requirements
Journal
BMC medical informatics and decision making
ISSN: 1472-6947
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088682
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 04 2020
03 04 2020
Historique:
received:
04
09
2019
accepted:
19
03
2020
entrez:
5
4
2020
pubmed:
5
4
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Implementing the health information system (HIS) is more complex and costly than implementing other information systems. The present study was conducted to design and evaluate technical requirements for the HIS. The present study was conducted in 2016 by determining technical requirements for the HIS using the Delphi technique and then evaluating this system using a checklist based on the approved requirements. The first part of the study designed a 73-item final list of technical requirements for the HIS in four domains, i.e. communication service, system architecture, security service and system response time. The evaluation results obtained in the second part showed that communication service was met in 63.8% of the HIS programs, system architecture in 65.5%, security service in 72.4% and system response time in 76.3%. A technical evaluation tool was designed and used to select and evaluate the HIS. The evaluation results suggested the study HIS was poorer in terms of communication service and system architecture than in the other two dimensions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Implementing the health information system (HIS) is more complex and costly than implementing other information systems. The present study was conducted to design and evaluate technical requirements for the HIS.
METHODS
The present study was conducted in 2016 by determining technical requirements for the HIS using the Delphi technique and then evaluating this system using a checklist based on the approved requirements.
RESULTS
The first part of the study designed a 73-item final list of technical requirements for the HIS in four domains, i.e. communication service, system architecture, security service and system response time. The evaluation results obtained in the second part showed that communication service was met in 63.8% of the HIS programs, system architecture in 65.5%, security service in 72.4% and system response time in 76.3%.
CONCLUSIONS
A technical evaluation tool was designed and used to select and evaluate the HIS. The evaluation results suggested the study HIS was poorer in terms of communication service and system architecture than in the other two dimensions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32245499
doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1076-5
pii: 10.1186/s12911-020-1076-5
pmc: PMC7119017
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
61Références
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 03;17(12):e275
pubmed: 26681155
J Med Syst. 2011 Jun;35(3):333-43
pubmed: 20703556
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2003;27(2-3):137-46
pubmed: 12620304
Int J Med Inform. 2004 Mar 31;73(3):217-27
pubmed: 15066550
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jun;23(6):755-61
pubmed: 18369679
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2003;96:231-7
pubmed: 15061550
Acta Inform Med. 2016 Feb;24(1):47-50
pubmed: 27046944
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Nov;119:47-53
pubmed: 30342685
Acta Inform Med. 2015 Feb;23(1):39-43
pubmed: 25870490
Biomed Inform Insights. 2015 Apr 01;7:1-9
pubmed: 25983557
Perspect Clin Res. 2015 Apr-Jun;6(2):73-6
pubmed: 25878950
J Med Syst. 2011 Jun;35(3):391-407
pubmed: 20703551
Int J Med Inform. 2006 Mar-Apr;75(3-4):268-81
pubmed: 16169771
Virtual Mentor. 2012 Sep 01;14(9):712-9
pubmed: 23351350
Int J Med Inform. 2004 Mar 31;73(3):297-303
pubmed: 15066562
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Oct;25(5):788-799
pubmed: 30485608
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jan;97:68-75
pubmed: 27919397
MedGenMed. 2007 Jan 11;9(1):8
pubmed: 17435617
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Jun;Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-19-W5-21
pubmed: 15659454
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 Nov-Dec;22 Suppl 6, Public Health Informatics:S34-S43
pubmed: 27684616
Int J Med Inform. 2005 Aug;74(7-8):657-62
pubmed: 16043088
Acta Inform Med. 2015 Apr;23(2):102-4
pubmed: 26005276
Comput Inform Nurs. 2016 Dec;34(12):601-612
pubmed: 27359212
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Mar-Apr;14(2):191-7
pubmed: 17213495
Healthc Inform Res. 2011 Mar;17(1):67-75
pubmed: 21818459
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Jun;Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-10-W5-18
pubmed: 15659453
N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 22;365(25):2426-31
pubmed: 22187990
Acta Inform Med. 2016 Feb;24(1):51-5
pubmed: 27041811
Med Intensiva. 2011 Nov;35(8):484-96
pubmed: 21944163
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Feb;86:82-90
pubmed: 26564330
Inform Health Soc Care. 2018 Sep;43(3):280-299
pubmed: 28398097
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Jun;18(6):e45-51
pubmed: 21676049
Healthc (Amst). 2018 Mar;6(1):7-12
pubmed: 28716376
Int J Med Inform. 2008 Dec;77(12):848-54
pubmed: 18657471
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 2):1333-6
pubmed: 15361031
Int J Med Inform. 2001 Dec;64(2-3):143-56
pubmed: 11734382
Aust Health Rev. 2007 Nov;31(4):531-9
pubmed: 17973611
Open Med Inform J. 2008;2:160-5
pubmed: 19415143
J Biomed Inform. 2013 Jun;46(3):541-62
pubmed: 23305810