What drives inhaler prescription for asthma patients? Results from a real-life retrospective analysis.


Journal

Respiratory medicine
ISSN: 1532-3064
Titre abrégé: Respir Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8908438

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2020
Historique:
received: 06 12 2019
revised: 27 02 2020
accepted: 17 03 2020
pubmed: 7 4 2020
medline: 10 10 2020
entrez: 7 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The choice of inhaler device for asthma patients depends upon multiple attributes. We investigated factors that may drive general practitioners (GPs) and respiratory specialists in the prescription of inhaler devices for asthma patients who initiated inhalation therapy. We retrospectively analysed prescriptions by GPs and respiratory specialists to asthma patients commencing inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist combination therapy available as both pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) and dry powder inhalers (DPIs). Patient characteristics were compared by device and multivariate analysis was used to model the likelihood of receiving a pMDI as opposed to a DPI in order to identify drivers for prescription. A sample of the respiratory specialists completed an ad-hoc survey of their perceived success in achieving asthma control in their patients and barriers to attaining full control. Prescription of a particular inhaler device was unrelated to the characteristics of the patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that the main driver for the choice of inhaler device was the medication (Odds Ratio and 95% Confidence Interval, respectively for GPs and specialists: 0.19 [0.16-0.23]; 0.17 [0.08-0.37]). Specialists perceived asthma as being inadequately controlled in 41% of their patients, and considered patients' difficulties in using DPIs and pMDIs as instrumental in this, citing a need for a novel, more effective inhaler technology. Physicians choose inhaler devices according to the prescribed drugs and not to the characteristics of the individual patient. This may reflect a lack of confidence in existing inhaler devices and underlines the need for technologies, which are more reliable and easier to use by patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The choice of inhaler device for asthma patients depends upon multiple attributes. We investigated factors that may drive general practitioners (GPs) and respiratory specialists in the prescription of inhaler devices for asthma patients who initiated inhalation therapy.
METHODS
We retrospectively analysed prescriptions by GPs and respiratory specialists to asthma patients commencing inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist combination therapy available as both pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) and dry powder inhalers (DPIs). Patient characteristics were compared by device and multivariate analysis was used to model the likelihood of receiving a pMDI as opposed to a DPI in order to identify drivers for prescription. A sample of the respiratory specialists completed an ad-hoc survey of their perceived success in achieving asthma control in their patients and barriers to attaining full control.
RESULTS
Prescription of a particular inhaler device was unrelated to the characteristics of the patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that the main driver for the choice of inhaler device was the medication (Odds Ratio and 95% Confidence Interval, respectively for GPs and specialists: 0.19 [0.16-0.23]; 0.17 [0.08-0.37]). Specialists perceived asthma as being inadequately controlled in 41% of their patients, and considered patients' difficulties in using DPIs and pMDIs as instrumental in this, citing a need for a novel, more effective inhaler technology.
CONCLUSION
Physicians choose inhaler devices according to the prescribed drugs and not to the characteristics of the individual patient. This may reflect a lack of confidence in existing inhaler devices and underlines the need for technologies, which are more reliable and easier to use by patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32250870
pii: S0954-6111(20)30077-9
doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.105937
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Adrenal Cortex Hormones 0
Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Antagonists 0
Delayed-Action Preparations 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105937

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest V.P. is an employee of IQVIA.

Auteurs

F Lavorini (F)

Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. Electronic address: federico.lavorini@unifi.it.

A Bianco (A)

Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.

F Blasi (F)

Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Internal Medicine Department, Respiratory Unit and Adult Cystic Fibrosis Center, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

F Braido (F)

Department of Internal Medicine, Respiratory Diseases and Allergy Clinic, University of Genova, Azienda Policlinico IRCCs San Martino, Genoa, Italy.

A G Corsico (AG)

Division of Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation - Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

F Di Marco (F)

Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Italy - Respiratory Unit, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.

A Gentile (A)

Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals, Milan, Italy.

P L Paggiaro (PL)

Department of Surgery, Medicine, Molecular Biology and Critical Care, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

V Pegoraro (V)

IQVIA Solutions Italy, Milan, Italy.

G Pelaia (G)

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.

P Rogliani (P)

Respiratory Medicine Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata" - Respiratory Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

P Santus (P)

Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC) - University of Milan. Division of Respiratory Diseases - "L. Sacco" University Hospital - ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco - Milan, Italy.

N Scichilone (N)

PROMISE Department, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.

A Soldi (A)

Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals, Milan, Italy.

G W Canonica (GW)

Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy Clinic, Humanitas Research Hospital - Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.

Articles similaires

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female

Vancomycin-associated DRESS demonstrates delay in AST abnormalities.

Ahmed Hussein, Kateri L Schoettinger, Jourdan Hydol-Smith et al.
1.00
Humans Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome Vancomycin Female Male
Humans Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Lung Neoplasms Prognosis Inflammation
Humans Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip Male Female Obesity, Morbid

Classifications MeSH