Blood-based biomarkers for prediction of intracranial hemorrhage and outcome in patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury.


Journal

The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
ISSN: 2163-0763
Titre abrégé: J Trauma Acute Care Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101570622

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 7 4 2020
medline: 10 9 2020
entrez: 7 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Early identification of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) has implications for triage and intervention. Blood-based biomarkers were recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for prediction of ICH in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). We sought to determine if biomarkers measured early after injury improve prediction of mortality and clinical/radiologic outcomes compared with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) alone in patients with moderate or severe TBI (MS-TBI). We measured glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and microtubule-associated protein-2 (MAP-2) on arrival to the emergency department (ED) in patients with blunt TBI enrolled in the placebo arm of the Prehospital TXA for TBI Trial (prehospital GCS score, 3-12; SPB, > 90). Biomarkers were modeled individually and together with prehospital predictor variables [PH] (GCS score, age, sex). Data were divided into a training data set and test data set for model derivation and evaluation. Models were evaluated for prediction of ICH, mass lesion, 48-hour and 28-day mortality, and 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) and Disability Rating Scale (DRS). Area under the curve (AUC) was evaluated in test data for PH alone, PH + individual biomarkers, and PH + three biomarkers. Of 243 patients with baseline samples (obtained a median of 84 minutes after injury), prehospital GCS score was 8 (interquartile range, 5-10), 55% had ICH, and 48-hour and 28-day mortality were 7% and 13%, respectively. Poor neurologic outcome at 6 months was observed in 34% based on GOS-E of 4 or less, and 24% based on DRS greater than or equal to7. Addition of each biomarker to PH improved AUC in the majority of predictive models. GFAP+PH compared with PH alone significantly improved AUC in all models (ICH, 0.82 vs. 0.64; 48-hour mortality, 0.84 vs. 0.71; 28-day mortality, 0.84 vs. 0.66; GOS-E, 0.78 vs. 0.69; DRS, 0.84 vs. 0.81, all p < 0.001). Circulating blood-based biomarkers may improve prediction of neurological outcomes and mortality in patients with MS-TBI over prehospital characteristics alone. Glial fibrillary acidic protein appears to be the most promising. Future evaluation in the prehospital setting is warranted. Prospective, Prognostic and Epidemiological, level II.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Early identification of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) has implications for triage and intervention. Blood-based biomarkers were recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for prediction of ICH in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). We sought to determine if biomarkers measured early after injury improve prediction of mortality and clinical/radiologic outcomes compared with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) alone in patients with moderate or severe TBI (MS-TBI).
METHODS
We measured glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and microtubule-associated protein-2 (MAP-2) on arrival to the emergency department (ED) in patients with blunt TBI enrolled in the placebo arm of the Prehospital TXA for TBI Trial (prehospital GCS score, 3-12; SPB, > 90). Biomarkers were modeled individually and together with prehospital predictor variables [PH] (GCS score, age, sex). Data were divided into a training data set and test data set for model derivation and evaluation. Models were evaluated for prediction of ICH, mass lesion, 48-hour and 28-day mortality, and 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) and Disability Rating Scale (DRS). Area under the curve (AUC) was evaluated in test data for PH alone, PH + individual biomarkers, and PH + three biomarkers.
RESULTS
Of 243 patients with baseline samples (obtained a median of 84 minutes after injury), prehospital GCS score was 8 (interquartile range, 5-10), 55% had ICH, and 48-hour and 28-day mortality were 7% and 13%, respectively. Poor neurologic outcome at 6 months was observed in 34% based on GOS-E of 4 or less, and 24% based on DRS greater than or equal to7. Addition of each biomarker to PH improved AUC in the majority of predictive models. GFAP+PH compared with PH alone significantly improved AUC in all models (ICH, 0.82 vs. 0.64; 48-hour mortality, 0.84 vs. 0.71; 28-day mortality, 0.84 vs. 0.66; GOS-E, 0.78 vs. 0.69; DRS, 0.84 vs. 0.81, all p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Circulating blood-based biomarkers may improve prediction of neurological outcomes and mortality in patients with MS-TBI over prehospital characteristics alone. Glial fibrillary acidic protein appears to be the most promising. Future evaluation in the prehospital setting is warranted.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Prospective, Prognostic and Epidemiological, level II.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32251265
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002706
pmc: PMC7311234
mid: NIHMS1578400
pii: 01586154-202007000-00014
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antifibrinolytic Agents 0
Biomarkers 0
Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein 0
MAP2 protein, human 0
Microtubule-Associated Proteins 0
Tranexamic Acid 6T84R30KC1
Ubiquitin Thiolesterase EC 3.4.19.12

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase II Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

80-86

Subventions

Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL126585
Pays : United States

Références

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Nov 08;14:2989-3000
pubmed: 30510421
J Neurotrauma. 2007 Feb;24(2):287-93
pubmed: 17375993
J Neurotrauma. 2007 Feb;24(2):270-80
pubmed: 17375991
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jan;74(1):8-16
pubmed: 23271071
Brain Inj. 2012;26(13-14):1629-35
pubmed: 22794497
J Neurotrauma. 2007 Feb;24(2):315-28
pubmed: 17375996
J Neurosci Res. 2012 Feb;90(2):461-7
pubmed: 21948028
Crit Care. 2011 Jun 24;15(3):R156
pubmed: 21702960
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Sep;17(9):782-789
pubmed: 30054151
Front Neurol. 2017 Dec 04;8:652
pubmed: 29255443
Neuroscience. 1989;31(2):401-11
pubmed: 2797444
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Mar 17;66(9):1-16
pubmed: 28301451
Transl Stroke Res. 2010 Dec;1(4):246-51
pubmed: 24323552
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1976;34(1-4):5-10
pubmed: 961491
J Neurotrauma. 2002 May;19(5):503-57
pubmed: 12042091
Neurology. 2010 Nov 16;75(20):1786-93
pubmed: 21079180
JAMA Neurol. 2016 May 1;73(5):551-60
pubmed: 27018834
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018 Jan/Feb;33(1):46-52
pubmed: 28195955
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 May;72(5):1335-44
pubmed: 22673263
J Neurotrauma. 2007 Feb;24(2):303-14
pubmed: 17375995
Neurocrit Care. 2015 Feb;22(1):52-64
pubmed: 25052159
PLoS Med. 2008 Aug 5;5(8):e165; discussion e165
pubmed: 18684008
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;75(1):161-2
pubmed: 14707332
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Feb;30(1):46-53
pubmed: 25489727
Stat Med. 2013 Apr 30;32(9):1467-82
pubmed: 23296397
J Trauma. 2005 Jan;58(1):59-61
pubmed: 15674151
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Oct 15;36(20):2863-2871
pubmed: 30794101
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24566
pubmed: 21931758
Crit Care. 2015 Oct 12;19:362
pubmed: 26455520
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Jan 1;35(1):32-40
pubmed: 28895474
Crit Care Med. 2010 Jan;38(1):138-44
pubmed: 19726976
World Neurosurg. 2019 Aug;128:e434-e444
pubmed: 31051301

Auteurs

Taylor N Anderson (TN)

From the School of Medicine (T.N.A.), Department of Neurology (H.E.H.), Department of Surgery (S.E.R.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Biostatistics (J.H.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; College of Pharmacy (M.M.), Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon; Department of Emergency Medicine (L.P.), Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, Florida; Department of Surgery (A.V.), Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, Georgia; and Department of Surgery (S.E.R.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH