Alcohol pretreatment of stools effect on culturomics.
Actinobacteria
/ drug effects
Adult
Aged
Bacteria
/ drug effects
Bacteriological Techniques
Bacteroidetes
/ drug effects
Clostridioides difficile
/ drug effects
Clostridium Infections
/ therapy
Disinfection
Ethanol
/ pharmacology
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
Feces
/ microbiology
Female
Firmicutes
/ drug effects
Gastrointestinal Microbiome
Humans
Male
Proteobacteria
/ drug effects
Species Specificity
Specimen Handling
/ methods
Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization
Spores, Bacterial
/ drug effects
Succinates
/ metabolism
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 03 2020
23 03 2020
Historique:
received:
10
04
2019
accepted:
02
03
2020
entrez:
7
4
2020
pubmed:
7
4
2020
medline:
26
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recent studies have used ethanol stool disinfection as a mean of promoting valuable species' cultivation in bacteriotherapy trials for Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) treatment with a particular focus on sporulating bacteria. Moreover, the culturomic approach has considerably enriched the repertoire of cultivable organisms in the human gut in recent years. This study aimed to apply this culturomic approach on fecal donor samples treated with ethanol disinfection to evidence potential beneficial microbes that could be used in bacteriotherapy trials for the treatment of CDI. Thereby, a total of 254 bacterial species were identified, 9 of which were novel. Of these, 242 have never been included in clinical trials for the treatment of CDIs, representing potential new candidates for bacteriotherapy trials. While non-sporulating species were nevertheless more affected by the ethanol pretreatment than sporulating species, the ethanol disinfection technique did not specifically select bacteria able to sporulate, as suggested by previous studies. Furthermore, some bacteria previously considered as potential candidates for bacteriotherapy have been lost after ethanol treatment. This study, while enriching the bacterial repertoire of the human intestine, would nevertheless require determining the exact contribution of each of species composing the bacterial consortia intended to be administered for CDI treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32251347
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62068-x
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-62068-x
pmc: PMC7089995
doi:
Substances chimiques
Succinates
0
Ethanol
3K9958V90M
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5190Références
Pépin, J. et al. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in a region of Quebec from 1991 to 2003: a changing pattern of disease severity. CMAJ Can. Med. Assoc. J. J. Assoc. Medicale Can. 171, 466–472 (2004).
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1041104
McDonald, L. C. et al. An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 2433–2441 (2005).
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051590
pubmed: 16322603
pmcid: 16322603
Loo, V. G. et al. A predominantly clonal multi-institutional outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea with high morbidity and mortality. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 2442–2449 (2005).
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051639
pubmed: 16322602
pmcid: 16322602
Lessa, F. C. et al. Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 825–834 (2015).
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408913
pubmed: 25714160
pmcid: 25714160
Khoruts, A., Dicksved, J., Jansson, J. K. & Sadowsky, M. J. Changes in the composition of the human fecal microbiome after bacteriotherapy for recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 44, 354–360 (2010).
pubmed: 20048681
pmcid: 20048681
Lewis, B. B. et al. Loss of Microbiota-Mediated Colonization Resistance to Clostridium difficile Infection With Oral Vancomycin Compared With Metronidazole. J. Infect. Dis. 212, 1656–1665 (2015).
doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv256
pubmed: 25920320
pmcid: 25920320
Ferreyra, J. A. et al. Gut microbiota-produced succinate promotes C. difficile infection after antibiotic treatment or motility disturbance. Cell Host Microbe 16, 770–777 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.11.003
pubmed: 25498344
pmcid: 25498344
Gens, K. D., Elshaboury, R. H. & Holt, J. S. Fecal microbiota transplantation and emerging treatments for Clostridium difficile infection. J. Pharm. Pract. 26, 498–505 (2013).
doi: 10.1177/0897190013499527
pubmed: 23966282
pmcid: 23966282
Gerding, D. N. et al. Administration of spores of nontoxigenic Clostridium difficile strain M3 for prevention of recurrent C. difficile infection: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 313, 1719–1727 (2015).
doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3725
pubmed: 25942722
pmcid: 25942722
Dieterle, M. G., Rao, K. & Young, V. B. Novel therapies and preventative strategies for primary and recurrent Clostridium difficile infections. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1435, 110–138 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/nyas.13958
pubmed: 30238983
pmcid: 30238983
Hamilton, M. J., Weingarden, A. R., Sadowsky, M. J. & Khoruts, A. Standardized frozen preparation for transplantation of fecal microbiota for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 107, 761–767 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.482
pubmed: 22290405
pmcid: 22290405
van Nood, E. et al. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 407–415 (2013).
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205037
pubmed: 23323867
pmcid: 23323867
Brandt, L. J. American Journal of Gastroenterology Lecture: Intestinal microbiota and the role of fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) in treatment of C. difficile infection. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 108, 177–185 (2013).
doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.450
pubmed: 23318479
pmcid: 23318479
Goldenberg, S. D. et al. Comparison of Different Strategies for Providing Fecal Microbiota Transplantation to Treat Patients with Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection in Two English Hospitals: A Review. Infect. Dis. Ther. 7, 71–86 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/s40121-018-0189-y
pubmed: 29450831
pmcid: 29450831
Zipursky, J. S., Sidorsky, T. I., Freedman, C. A., Sidorsky, M. N. & Kirkland, K. B. Patient attitudes toward the use of fecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 55, 1652–1658 (2012).
doi: 10.1093/cid/cis809
Petrof, E. O. et al. Stool substitute transplant therapy for the eradication of Clostridium difficile infection: ‘RePOOPulating’ the gut. Microbiome 1, 3 (2013).
doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-1-3
pubmed: 24467987
pmcid: 24467987
Tvede, M., Tinggaard, M. & Helms, M. Rectal bacteriotherapy for recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea: results from a case series of 55 patients in Denmark 2000–2012. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 21, 48–53 (2015).
Khanna, S. et al. A Novel Microbiome Therapeutic Increases Gut Microbial Diversity and Prevents Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection. J. Infect. Dis. 214, 173–181 (2016).
doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv766
pubmed: 26908752
pmcid: 26908752
Tvede, M. & Rask-Madsen, J. Bacteriotherapy for chronic relapsing Clostridium difficile diarrhoea in six patients. Lancet Lond. Engl. 1, 1156–1160 (1989).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)92749-9
Emanuelsson, F., Claesson, B. E. B., Ljungström, L., Tvede, M. & Ung, K.-A. Faecal microbiota transplantation and bacteriotherapy for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a retrospective evaluation of 31 patients. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 46, 89–97 (2014).
doi: 10.3109/00365548.2013.858181
pubmed: 24354958
pmcid: 24354958
Koransky, J. R., Allen, S. D. & Dowell, V. R. Use of ethanol for selective isolation of sporeforming microorganisms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 35, 762–765 (1978).
doi: 10.1128/AEM.35.4.762-765.1978
pubmed: 348108
pmcid: 348108
Lagier, J.-C. et al. Microbial culturomics: paradigm shift in the human gut microbiome study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 18, 1185–1193 (2012).
Lagier, J.-C. et al. Culture of previously uncultured members of the human gut microbiota by culturomics. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16203 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.203
pubmed: 27819657
pmcid: 27819657
Barker, A. K. et al. A randomized controlled trial of probiotics for Clostridium difficile infection in adults (PICO). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 72, 3177–3180 (2017).
doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx254
pubmed: 28961980
pmcid: 28961980
Tojo, R. et al. Intestinal microbiota in health and disease: role of bifidobacteria in gut homeostasis. World J. Gastroenterol. 20, 15163–15176 (2014).
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i41.15163
pubmed: 25386066
pmcid: 25386066
Ruiz, L., Delgado, S., Ruas-Madiedo, P., Sánchez, B. & Margolles, A. Bifidobacteria and Their Molecular Communication with the Immune System. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2345 (2017).
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02345
pubmed: 29255450
pmcid: 29255450
Routy, B. et al. The gut microbiota influences anticancer immunosurveillance and general health. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 15, 382–396 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0006-2
pubmed: 29636538
pmcid: 29636538
Wu, F. et al. Phascolarctobacterium faecium abundant colonization in human gastrointestinal tract. Exp. Ther. Med. 14, 3122–3126 (2017).
doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4878
pubmed: 28912861
pmcid: 28912861
Ishaq, H. M. et al. Molecular Alteration Analysis of Human Gut Microbial Composition in Graves’ disease Patients. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 14, 1558–1570 (2018).
doi: 10.7150/ijbs.24151
pubmed: 30263008
pmcid: 30263008
Wilson, B. C., Vatanen, T., Cutfield, W. S. & O’Sullivan, J. M. The Super-Donor Phenomenon in Fecal Microbiota Transplantation. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 9 (2019).
Van der Meulen, R., Adriany, T., Verbrugghe, K. & De Vuyst, L. Kinetic analysis of bifidobacterial metabolism reveals a minor role for succinic acid in the regeneration of NAD+ through its growth-associated production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 5204–5210 (2006).
doi: 10.1128/AEM.00146-06
pubmed: 16885266
pmcid: 16885266
Fischbach, M. A. & Sonnenburg, J. L. Eating for two: how metabolism establishes interspecies interactions in the gut. Cell Host Microbe 10, 336–347 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.10.002
pubmed: 22018234
pmcid: 22018234
Rios-Covian, D. et al. Interactions between Bifidobacterium and Bacteroides Species in Cofermentations Are Affected by Carbon Sources, Including Exopolysaccharides Produced by Bifidobacteria. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 79, 7518–7524 (2013).
doi: 10.1128/AEM.02545-13
Morotomi, M., Nagai, F., Sakon, H. & Tanaka, R. Dialister succinatiphilus sp. nov. and Barnesiella intestinihominis sp. nov., isolated from human faeces. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 58, 2716–2720 (2008).
doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.2008/000810-0
pubmed: 19060046
pmcid: 19060046
Del Dot, T., Osawa, R. & Stackebrandt, E. Phascolarctobacterium faecium gen. nov, spec. nov., a Novel Taxon of the Sporomusa Group of Bacteria. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 16, 380–384 (1993).
doi: 10.1016/S0723-2020(11)80269-9
De Vadder, F. et al. Microbiota-Produced Succinate Improves Glucose Homeostasis via Intestinal Gluconeogenesis. Cell Metab. 24, 151–157 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.06.013
pubmed: 27411015
pmcid: 27411015
La transplantation de microbiote fécal et son encadrement dans les essais cliniques - Point d’Information - ANSM: Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé. https://ansm.sante.fr/S-informer/Points-d-information-Points-d-information/La-transplantation-de-microbiote-fecal-et-son-encadrement-dans-les-essais-cliniques-Point-d-Information2.
Lagier, J.-C. et al. Dramatic reduction in Clostridium difficile ribotype 027-associated mortality with early fecal transplantation by the nasogastric route: a preliminary report. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. 34, 1597–1601 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s10096-015-2394-x
Duncan, S. H., Hold, G. L., Harmsen, H. J. M., Stewart, C. S. & Flint, H. J. Growth requirements and fermentation products of Fusobacterium prausnitzii, and a proposal to reclassify it as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii gen. nov., comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52, 2141–2146 (2002).
pubmed: 12508881
pmcid: 12508881
Browne, H. P. et al. Culturing of ‘unculturable’ human microbiota reveals novel taxa and extensive sporulation. Nature 533, 543–546 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/nature17645
pubmed: 27144353
pmcid: 27144353
Seng, P. et al. Ongoing Revolution in Bacteriology: Routine Identification of Bacteria by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. Clin. Infect. Dis. 49, 543–551 (2009).
doi: 10.1086/600885
pubmed: 19583519
pmcid: 19583519
Dubourg, G. et al. The gut microbiota of a patient with resistant tuberculosis is more comprehensively studied by culturomics than by metagenomics. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. 32, 637–645 (2013).
doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1787-3
Stackebrandt, E. & Ebers, J. Taxonomic parameters revisited: Tarnished gold standards. Microbiol. Today 8, 6–9 (2006).
Kim, M., Oh, H.-S., Park, S.-C. & Chun, J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 64, 346–351 (2014).
doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.059774-0
pubmed: 24505072
pmcid: 24505072