Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction and Modified Lemaire Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Similarly Improve Knee Stability After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anterior Cruciate Ligament
/ surgery
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
/ surgery
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
/ methods
Biomechanical Phenomena
Cadaver
Female
Humans
Joint Instability
/ surgery
Knee
/ surgery
Knee Joint
/ surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Range of Motion, Articular
Rotation
Tendons
/ surgery
Tenodesis
/ methods
Torque
Journal
Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association
ISSN: 1526-3231
Titre abrégé: Arthroscopy
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8506498
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2020
07 2020
Historique:
received:
18
10
2019
revised:
11
03
2020
accepted:
15
03
2020
pubmed:
7
4
2020
medline:
13
1
2021
entrez:
7
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To determine the stabilizing role of anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) and modified Lemaire lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) performed in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to determine whether either procedure was superior to the other. Six nonpaired, human, fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were tested with a 6-df robotic system. Internal rotation and anterior translation of the knee were recorded from 0° to 90° of flexion after application of a 5-Nm internal rotation torque and a 134-N anterior load, respectively. A full kinematic assessment was performed in each of the following conditions: (1) intact knee, (2) after sectioning of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), (3) after sectioning of the ACL and anterolateral ligament, (4) after isolated ACLR, and (5) after combined ACLR and Lemaire LET and combined ACLR and ALLR. ALLR was performed using the gracilis tendon, whereas the modified Lemaire procedure was performed using the central strip of the iliotibial band. The different states were compared using a Tukey paired comparison test. In knees with combined deficiency of the ACL and anterolateral structures, anterior translation and internal rotation remained significantly increased after isolated ACLR compared with the intact knee (+2.33 ± 1.44 mm and +1.98° ± 1.06°, respectively; P < .01). On the other hand, the addition of ALLR or modified Lemaire LET to ACLR restored anterior translation and internal rotation to values similar to those in the intact knee. The 2 anterolateral procedures did not show statistically significantly different values for both tests. This difference was 0.67 ± 1.46 mm for anterior translation (P = .79) and 0.11° ± 1.11° for internal rotation (P = .99). In knees with ACL and anterolateral deficiency, combined ACLR and anterolateral reconstruction restored the native knee stability in anterior translation and internal rotation contrary to isolated ACLR. In addition, both types of extra-articular reconstruction-ALLR and modified Lemaire LET-were similar in terms of restoring knee kinematics, and neither overconstrained the knee. In knees with deficiency of the ACL and anterolateral structures, combined ACLR and anterolateral reconstruction increased knee stability at time zero after surgery. This biomechanical improvement could be responsible for the protective effect on ACL graft and meniscal repair reported in the literature after the combined procedure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32251683
pii: S0749-8063(20)30272-3
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.03.027
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1942-1950Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.