Effectiveness of autogenic training on psychological well-being and quality of life in adults living with chronic physical health problems: a protocol for a systematic review of RCT.
Anxiety
Autogenic training
Chronic conditions
Depression
Psychological distress
Quality of life
Relaxation
Journal
Systematic reviews
ISSN: 2046-4053
Titre abrégé: Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580575
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 04 2020
07 04 2020
Historique:
received:
14
09
2018
accepted:
17
03
2020
entrez:
9
4
2020
pubmed:
9
4
2020
medline:
25
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Autogenic training is a relaxation technique that uses systematic exercises to induce a general disconnection of the organism. It is used in conjunction with conventional medical care as part of disease management to relieve symptoms associated with chronic health problems and to improve well-being. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy of autogenic training on psychological well-being, quality of life, and adverse effects in people living with chronic physical health problems. The methodology used follows the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Studies, published up to December 31, 2019, will be identified through searches in the following databases: MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, SCOPUS, PsychINFO, CINAHL, EBM Reviews, Google Scholar, Dissertations & Theses Global, Open Access Theses and Dissertations, OpenGrey, E-Theses Online Service, Grey Literature Report, eScholarship@McGill, Papyrus, and CorpusUL. All studies of randomized controlled trials that assess autogenic training as an intervention to improve psychological well-being and quality of life in adults aged 18 and older living with one or more chronic physical health problem will be considered eligible. The study selection, the data collection, and the evaluation of the risk of bias will be conducted independently and in duplicate by two reviewers. RoB 2 tool will be used to assess the risk of bias. Discrepancies will be resolved through discussion. A tabular and narrative synthesis of data is planned, and a meta-analysis will be done according to the quality of data. The primary outcomes will be general psychological distress, depression, and anxiety, and the secondary outcomes will be quality of life and adverse effects. The present protocol of systematic review is reporting following MECIR standards for the reporting of protocols and the PRISMA-P recommendations. Autogenic training appears to be a promising therapy to improve psychological well-being and quality of life in people living with chronic physical health problems, but no recent reports have synthesized the available evidence in this population. The results of this review will examine and synthesize the evidence on the benefits and harms of autogenic training on psychological well-being and quality of life in people living with chronic physical health problems, thus supporting the development of best practices for complementary approaches. PROSPERO CRD42018105347.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Autogenic training is a relaxation technique that uses systematic exercises to induce a general disconnection of the organism. It is used in conjunction with conventional medical care as part of disease management to relieve symptoms associated with chronic health problems and to improve well-being. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy of autogenic training on psychological well-being, quality of life, and adverse effects in people living with chronic physical health problems.
METHODS
The methodology used follows the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Studies, published up to December 31, 2019, will be identified through searches in the following databases: MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, SCOPUS, PsychINFO, CINAHL, EBM Reviews, Google Scholar, Dissertations & Theses Global, Open Access Theses and Dissertations, OpenGrey, E-Theses Online Service, Grey Literature Report, eScholarship@McGill, Papyrus, and CorpusUL. All studies of randomized controlled trials that assess autogenic training as an intervention to improve psychological well-being and quality of life in adults aged 18 and older living with one or more chronic physical health problem will be considered eligible. The study selection, the data collection, and the evaluation of the risk of bias will be conducted independently and in duplicate by two reviewers. RoB 2 tool will be used to assess the risk of bias. Discrepancies will be resolved through discussion. A tabular and narrative synthesis of data is planned, and a meta-analysis will be done according to the quality of data. The primary outcomes will be general psychological distress, depression, and anxiety, and the secondary outcomes will be quality of life and adverse effects. The present protocol of systematic review is reporting following MECIR standards for the reporting of protocols and the PRISMA-P recommendations.
DISCUSSION
Autogenic training appears to be a promising therapy to improve psychological well-being and quality of life in people living with chronic physical health problems, but no recent reports have synthesized the available evidence in this population. The results of this review will examine and synthesize the evidence on the benefits and harms of autogenic training on psychological well-being and quality of life in people living with chronic physical health problems, thus supporting the development of best practices for complementary approaches.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42018105347.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32264955
doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01336-3
pii: 10.1186/s13643-020-01336-3
pmc: PMC7137438
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
74Références
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 May;28(3):e13086
pubmed: 31087398
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Aug 05;14(1):115
pubmed: 27495166
Menopause. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):60-5
pubmed: 18978640
BMJ. 2015 Jan 02;350:g7647
pubmed: 25555855
Complement Ther Med. 2015 Jun;23(3):405-12
pubmed: 26051576
BMJ Open. 2014 Mar 13;4(3):e003901
pubmed: 24625637
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2002 Mar;27(1):45-98
pubmed: 12001885
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10:ED000142
pubmed: 31643080
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 01;5(1):146
pubmed: 27585627
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;74(6):e520-6
pubmed: 23842021
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Sep;24(9):3783-91
pubmed: 27048456
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Dec;9(4):404-412
pubmed: 31537580
Complement Ther Med. 2014 Jun;22(3):419-25
pubmed: 24906579
J Psychosom Res. 2009 Jun;66(6):511-9
pubmed: 19446710
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Mar;53(6):729-35
pubmed: 16553681
J Clin Sleep Med. 2012 Dec 15;8(6):681-91
pubmed: 23243402
Front Public Health. 2016 Aug 02;4:159
pubmed: 27532034
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2010 May-Jun;33(3):210-6
pubmed: 20531108
Complement Ther Med. 2013 Oct;21(5):481-6
pubmed: 24050583
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD005108
pubmed: 17943839
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2012 Sep;11(3):265-75
pubmed: 22457381