Static and Fatigue Loading of Veneered Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Zirconia
fiber-reinforced composites
fracture
implants
lifetime
Journal
Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists
ISSN: 1532-849X
Titre abrégé: J Prosthodont
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9301275
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
04
06
2019
revised:
03
04
2020
accepted:
03
04
2020
pubmed:
10
4
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
entrez:
10
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to compare the load to failure and the probability of survival of porcelain fused to zirconia (PFZ) three-unit, implant-supported, fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) to those of indirect composites veneered to either zirconia (CVZ) or milled fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) frameworks under static and fatigue loading. One-hundred and twenty posterior three-unit FDP (second premolar pontic) frameworks were fabricated via milling from a single Standard Tessellation Language (STL) file. The FDPs were divided into three groups. Each group (n = 40) was subjected to static (n = 20) and fatigue (n = 20) loading tests, as follows: (1) PFZ: zirconia framework layered with porcelain veneer; (2) CVZ: zirconia framework veneered with indirect composite resin; and (3) FRC: FRC framework veneered with indirect composite resin. After porcelain veneering onto sintered zirconia frameworks, or resin composite veneering onto zirconia or FRC frameworks, FDPs were cemented on their abutments using self-adhesive resin cement. After thermal cycling, half of the FDPs were subjected to an accelerated fatigue test. The other half of the FDPs were subjected to single load-to-failure (SLF) testing at a crosshead speed (1 mm/min). Lifetime analysis was conducted to determine the probability of survival, and fractographic analysis was performed. Significant differences were observed among the studied groups for SLF with the highest characteristic strength values observed for PFZ (2154 N), followed by 1905.47 N for CVZ and 1679.56 N for FRC. The probability of survival for 100,000 cycles at 500 N was the highest for FRC (98%) and CVZ (100%) and was significantly lower for PFZ (88%). Different fracture patterns were observed in the fractography. In fatigue testing, which simulates masticatory function better than static tests, a higher probability of survival was observed for FRC and CVZ than for PFZ. Framework fractures were not observed only for the FRC group, indicating that chairside repair with the addition of indirect composite could be performed for continued function.
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
Dental Materials
0
Dental Porcelain
12001-21-7
Zirconium
C6V6S92N3C
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
679-685Subventions
Organisme : Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
ID : 2012/19078-7
Organisme : Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
ID : 001
Organisme : Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
ID : 304589/2017-9
Organisme : Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
ID : 434487/2018-0
Informations de copyright
© 2020 by the American College of Prosthodontists.
Références
Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, et al: Corrigendum to “All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth- supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs)” [Dental Materials 31 (6) (2015) 603-623]. Dent Mater 2016;32:e389-e390
Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Makarov NA, et al: Corrigendum to “All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs” [Dental Materials 31 (6) (2015) 624-639]. Dent Mater 2017;33:e48-e51
Bonfante EA, Coelho PG: A critical perspective on mechanical testing of implants and prostheses. Adv Dent Res 2016;28:18-27
Schepke U, Meijer HJ, Vermeulen KM, et al: Clinical bonding of resin nano ceramic restorations to zirconia abutments: a case series within a randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016;18:984-992
Pieralli S, Kohal RJ, Rabel K, et al: Clinical outcomes of partial and full-arch all-ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29(Suppl 18):224-236
Sailer I, Muhlemann S, Kohal RJ, et al: Reconstructive aspects: summary and consensus statements of group 3. The 5(th) EAO Consensus Conference 2018. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29(Suppl 18):237-242
Menini M, Conserva E, Tealdo T, et al: Shock absorption capacity of restorative materials for dental implant prostheses: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:549-556
Seemann R, Wagner F, Marincola M, et al: Fixed, fiber-reinforced resin bridges on 5.0-mm implants in severely atrophic mandibles: up to 5 years' follow-up of a prospective cohort study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;76:956-962
Dehurtevent M, Robberecht L, Behin P: Influence of dentist experience with scan spray systems used in direct CAD/CAM impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:17-21
Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, Navarro JM, Jr., et al: Reliability and failure modes of implant-supported Y-TZP and MCR three-unit bridges. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12:235-243
Cheung GJ, Botelho MG: Zirconia surface treatments for resin bonding. J Adhes Dent 2015;17:551-558
Michalakis K, Pissiotis AL, Kang K, et al: The effect of thermal cycling and air abrasion on cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:569-574
Benalcazar Jalkh EB, Machado CM, Gianinni M, et al: Effect of thermocycling on biaxial flexural strength of CAD/CAM, bulk fill, and conventional resin composite materials. Oper Dent 2019;44:E254-E262
Woda A, Foster K, Mishellany A, et al: Adaptation of healthy mastication to factors pertaining to the individual or to the food. Physiol Behav 2006;89:28-35
DeLong R, Douglas WH: Development of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restoratives: bi-axial force and movement control. J Dent Res 1983;62:32-36
Waltimo A, Kononen M: A novel bite force recorder and maximal isometric bite force values for healthy young adults. Scand J Dent Res 1993;101:171-175
Helkimo E, Carlsson GE, Helkimo M: Bite force and state of dentition. Acta Odontol Scand 1977;35:297-303
Magne P, Silva M, Oderich E, et al: Damping behavior of implant-supported restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:143-148
Nelson WB: A bibliography of accelerated test plans. Part II - references. IEEE Trans Reliabil 2005;54:194-197
Nelson W: Accelerated Testing: Statistical Models, Test Plans and Data Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2004.
Quinn JB, Quinn GD: A practical and systematic review of Weibull statistics for reporting strengths of dental materials. Dent Mater 2010;26:135-147
Zhao WE, Elsayed EA: A general accelerated life model for step-stress testing. IEEE Trans Reliabil 2005;37:1059-1069
Abernethy R: The New Weibull Handbook (5th ed.). Dr. Robert. Abernethy, North Palm Beach, 2006.
Kelly JR: Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:652-661
Kelly JR, Benetti P, Rungruanganunt P, et al: The slippery slope: critical perspectives on in vitro research methodologies. Dent Mater 2012;28:41-51
Nazari V, Ghodsi S, Alikhasi M, et al: Fracture strength of three-unit implant supported fixed partial dentures with excessive crown height fabricated from different materials. J Dent (Tehran) 2016;13:400-406
Kokubo Y, Tsumita M, Sakurai S, et al: The effect of core framework designs on the fracture loads of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures on posterior implants. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:503-507
Plengsombut K, Brewer JD, Monaco EA, Jr., et al: Effect of two connector designs on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic core materials for fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:166-173
Rismanchian M, Shafiei S, Nourbakhshian F, et al: Flexural strengths of implant-supported zirconia based bridges in posterior regions. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:346-350
Sundh A, Molin M, Sjogren G: Fracture resistance of yttrium oxide partially-stabilized zirconia all-ceramic bridges after veneering and mechanical fatigue testing. Dent Mater 2005;21:476-482
Sundh A, Sjogren G: Fracture resistance of all-ceramic zirconia bridges with differing phase stabilizers and quality of sintering. Dent Mater 2006;22:778-784
Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, Guess PC, et al: Fatigue and damage accumulation of veneer porcelain pressed on Y-TZP. J Dent 2010;38:318-324
Lawn B, Bhowmick S, Bush M, et al: Failure modes in ceramic-based layer structures: a basis for materials design of dental crowns. J Am Cer Soc 2007;90:1671-1683
Quinn JB, Quinn GD, Sundar V: Fracture toughness of veneering ceramics for fused to metal (PFM) and zirconia dental restorative materials. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 2010;115:343-352
Paula VG, Lorenzoni FC, Bonfante EA, et al: Slow cooling protocol improves fatigue life of zirconia crowns. Dent Mater 2015;31:77-87
Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, et al: A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:227-235
Bonfante EA, Suzuki M, Lubelski W, et al: Abutment design for implant-supported indirect composite molar crowns: reliability and fractography. J Prosthodont 2012;21:596-603
Suzuki M, Bonfante E, Silva NR, et al: Reliability testing of indirect composites as single implant restorations. J Prosthodont 2011;20:528-534
Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ: Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res 2014;93:1232-1234
Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, vanNoort R: Brittleness index of machinable dental materials and its relation to the marginal chipping factor. J Dent 2007;35:897-902
Bonfante EA, Suzuki M, Hirata R, et al: Resin composite repair for implant-supported crowns. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2017;105:1481-1489
Swain MV, Rose L: Strength limitations of transformation-toughened zirconia alloys. J Am Cer Soc 1986;69:511-518
Bonfante EA, Suzuki M, Carvalho RM, et al: Digitally produced fiber-reinforced composite substructures for three-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30:321-329
deOliveira Lino LF, Machado CM, dePaula VG, et al: Effect of aging and testing method on bond strength of CAD/CAM fiber-reinforced composite to dentin. Dent Mater 2018;34:1690-1701
Bonfante EA, Suzuki M, Carvalho RM, et al: Digitally produced fiber-reinforced composite substructures for three-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30:321-329