Effect of treatment modality and cerebral vasospasm agent on patient outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in the elderly aged 75 years and older.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
11
01
2020
accepted:
11
03
2020
entrez:
10
4
2020
pubmed:
10
4
2020
medline:
7
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We sought to examine whether the effect of treatment modality and drugs for cerebral vasospasm on clinical outcomes differs between elderly and non-elderly subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients in Japan. We analyzed the J-ASPECT Study Diagnosis Procedure Combination database (n = 17,343) that underwent clipping or coiling between 2010 and 2014 in 579 hospitals. We stratified patients into two groups according to their age (elderly [≥75 years old], n = 3,885; non-elderly, n = 13,458). We analyzed the effect of treatment modality and anti-vasospasm agents (fasudil hydrochloride, ozagrel sodium, cilostazol, statin, eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA], and edaravone) on in-hospital poor outcomes (mRS 3-6 at discharge) and mortality using multivariable analysis. The elderly patients were more likely to be female, have impaired levels of consciousness and comorbidity, and less likely to be treated with clipping and anti-vasospasm agents, except for ozagrel sodium and statin. In-hospital mortality and poor outcomes were higher in the elderly (15.8% vs. 8.5%, 71.7% vs. 36.5%). Coiling was associated with higher mortality (odds ratio 1.43, 95% confidence interval 1.2-1.7) despite a lower proportion of poor outcomes (0.84, 0.75-0.94) in the non-elderly, in contrast to no effect on clinical outcomes in the elderly. A comparable effect of anti-vasospasm agents on mortality was observed between non-elderly and elderly for fasudil hydrochloride (non-elderly: 0.20, 0.17-0.24), statin (0.63, 0.50-0.79), ozagrel sodium (0.72, 0.60-0.86), and cilostazol (0.63, 0.51-0.77). Poor outcomes were inversely associated with fasudil hydrochloride (0.59, 0.51-0.68), statin (0.84, 0.75-0.94), and EPA (0.83, 0.72-0.94) use in the non-elderly. No effect of these agents on poor outcomes was observed in the elderly. In contrast to the non-elderly, no effect of treatment modality on clinical outcomes were observed in the elderly. A comparable effect of anti-vasospasm agents was observed on mortality, but not on functional outcomes, between the non-elderly and elderly.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32271814
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230953
pii: PONE-D-20-00983
pmc: PMC7145106
doi:
Substances chimiques
Vasodilator Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0230953Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Dr. Iihara reports grants from grants from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., grants from Kaneka Medix Corporation, grants from Eisai Co., Ltd., grants from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., personal fees from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo Ltd, outside the submitted work; Dr. Kitazono reports grants from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Astellas Pharma Inc., MSD KK., and Shionogi & CO., LTD. Dr. Kamouchi reports personal fe 1 es from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Ono pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., and Pfizer Co., Ltd.. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jul 21;6(7):
pubmed: 28733434
Stroke. 2007 May;38(5):1545-50
pubmed: 17413047
J Neurosurg. 2018 May;128(5):1318-1326
pubmed: 28548595
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD000277
pubmed: 17636626
Circ J. 2016 Oct 25;80(11):2289-2290
pubmed: 27725418
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 May-Jun;23(5):1001-18
pubmed: 24103675
J Intensive Care. 2014 Feb 18;2(1):9
pubmed: 25520825
Stroke. 2019 Jul;50(7):1805-1811
pubmed: 31164072
Lancet. 2002 Oct 26;360(9342):1267-74
pubmed: 12414200
Neurology. 2000 Sep 12;55(5):658-62
pubmed: 10980729
Eur Radiol. 2017 Aug;27(8):3333-3342
pubmed: 28004163
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;128(1):100-110
pubmed: 28298025
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 20;377(3):257-266
pubmed: 28723321
Brain. 2018 Apr 1;141(4):1111-1121
pubmed: 29401245
Int Heart J. 2005 Sep;46(5):855-66
pubmed: 16272776
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011 Jun;31(6):1443-51
pubmed: 21285966
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;32(1):89-93
pubmed: 21677432
Stroke. 2012 Jun;43(6):1711-37
pubmed: 22556195
J Neurosurg. 2010 Jun;112(6):1200-7
pubmed: 19961311
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
J Neurosurg. 2019 Sep 13;:1-10
pubmed: 31518984
BMJ Open. 2013 Apr 29;3(4):
pubmed: 23633419
Stroke. 2013 Jul;44(7):1897-902
pubmed: 23686977
Neurosurgery. 2009 Mar;64(3):423-8; discussion 428-9
pubmed: 19240603
Neurology. 2019 Jul 30;93(5):e458-e466
pubmed: 31278116
World Neurosurg. 2019 Nov;131:e508-e513
pubmed: 31398522
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1995;132(1-3):1-8
pubmed: 7754842
Neurosurgery. 2007 Apr;60(4):658-67; discussion 667
pubmed: 17415202
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Mar;68(3):337-41
pubmed: 10675216
Lancet. 2015 Feb 21;385(9969):691-7
pubmed: 25465111
J Neurosurg. 1996 Mar;84(3):405-14
pubmed: 8609551
Stroke. 2008 Oct;39(10):2720-6
pubmed: 18669898
Surg Neurol. 2007 Aug;68(2):126-31; discussion 131-2
pubmed: 17586012
J Neurosurg. 2013 Jan;118(1):121-30
pubmed: 23039152
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1963 May;87:684-93
pubmed: 14015517
J Neurosurg. 2010 Oct;113(4):795-801
pubmed: 19852537
J Neurosurg. 1992 Apr;76(4):571-7
pubmed: 1545249
World Neurosurg. 2014 Feb;81(2):309-15
pubmed: 23032083
J Neurosurg. 2007 Sep;107(3):530-5
pubmed: 17886551
Surg Neurol. 1991 Aug;36(2):112-8
pubmed: 1891755
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Jan;35(1):164-9
pubmed: 23868158
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2009 Aug;29(8):1444-53
pubmed: 19458605
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2017 Nov 15;57(11):575-583
pubmed: 28835583
Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:74
pubmed: 21748027