Automated planning through robust templates and multicriterial optimization for lung VMAT SBRT of lung lesions.
VMAT
automated planning
lung SBRT
robust templates
Journal
Journal of applied clinical medical physics
ISSN: 1526-9914
Titre abrégé: J Appl Clin Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101089176
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
04
11
2019
revised:
05
03
2020
accepted:
10
03
2020
pubmed:
11
4
2020
medline:
27
5
2021
entrez:
11
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To develop and validate a robust template for VMAT SBRT of lung lesions, using the multicriterial optimization (MCO) of a commercial treatment planning system. The template was established and refined on 10 lung SBRT patients planned for 55 Gy/5 fr. To improve gradient and conformity a ring structure around the planning target volume (PTV) was set in the list of objectives. Ideal fluence optimization was conducted giving priority to organs at risk (OARs) and using the MCO, which further pushes OARs doses. Segmentation was conducted giving priority to PTV coverage. Two different templates were produced with different degrees of modulation, by setting the Fluence Smoothing parameter to Medium (MFS) and High (HFS). Each template was applied on 20 further patients. Automatic and manual plans were compared in terms of dosimetric parameters, delivery time, and complexity. Statistical significance of differences was evaluated using paired two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test. No statistically significant differences in PTV coverage and maximum dose were observed, while an improvement was observed in gradient and conformity. A general improvement in dose to OARs was seen, which resulted to be significant for chest wall V The automation of the planning process for lung SBRT using robust templates and MCO was demonstrated to be feasible and more efficient.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32275353
doi: 10.1002/acm2.12872
pmc: PMC7324702
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
114-120Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2019 Jan-Feb;24(1):92-96
pubmed: 30505239
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):394-400
pubmed: 21036489
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Apr 1;88(5):1175-9
pubmed: 24529714
Med Dosim. 2014 Autumn;39(3):261-5
pubmed: 24933317
Med Phys. 2012 Feb;39(2):951-63
pubmed: 22320804
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2012 Oct-Dec;2(4):296-305
pubmed: 24674168
Br J Radiol. 2011 Nov;84(1007):967-96
pubmed: 22011829
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Jan 08;17(1):272-282
pubmed: 26894364
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2016 Nov-Dec;21(6):567-570
pubmed: 27721671
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Mar 15;103(4):843-850
pubmed: 30496884
Med Phys. 2014 Jan;41(1):011715
pubmed: 24387507
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Aug 1;77(5):1352-9
pubmed: 20056350
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Feb;110(2):298-302
pubmed: 24332021
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Nov 1;84(3):847-53
pubmed: 22445000
Phys Med. 2017 Apr;36:126-139
pubmed: 28238577
Med Phys. 2013 Jul;40(7):071718
pubmed: 23822422
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Aug;120(2):349-55
pubmed: 27394695
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Feb 9;13(1):24
pubmed: 29426358
J Neurosurg. 2006 Dec;105 Suppl:194-201
pubmed: 18503356
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018 May - Jun;8(3):e99-e107
pubmed: 29141779
Br J Radiol. 2016 Sep;89(1065):20160039
pubmed: 27355127
Med Dosim. 2013 Summer;38(2):165-70
pubmed: 23265938
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2017 Nov-Dec;22(6):441-449
pubmed: 28883765
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Mar;132:85-92
pubmed: 30825975
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2018 Jan;30(1):5-14
pubmed: 29033164
Radiat Oncol. 2016 Nov 24;11(1):155
pubmed: 27881187
Med Phys. 2013 Sep;40(9):091710
pubmed: 24007143