Chronic postoperative complications and donor site morbidity after sural nerve autograft harvest or biopsy.


Journal

Microsurgery
ISSN: 1098-2752
Titre abrégé: Microsurgery
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309230

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 12 08 2019
revised: 01 02 2020
accepted: 27 03 2020
pubmed: 12 4 2020
medline: 29 7 2021
entrez: 12 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The sural nerve is the most frequently harvested nerve autograft and is most often biopsied in the workup of peripheral neuropathy. While the complication types associated with these two procedures are well known, their clinical significance is poorly understood and there is a paucity of data regarding the complication rates. Pubmed search identified studies regarding complications after sural nerve harvest and biopsy. The data was grouped into sensory deficits, chronic pain, sensory symptoms, wound infections, wound complications, other postoperative complications, and complications impacting daily life. The incidence of each complication was calculated, and a chi-square analysis was performed to determine if there were any differences between nerve biopsies and graft harvest with respect to each complication. Twelve studies yielded 478 sural nerve procedures. Sensory deficits occurred at a rate of 92.9%, chronic pain at 19.7%, sensory symptoms at 41.1%, wound infections at 5.7%, noninfectious wound complications at 7.8%, and impact on daily life at 5.0%. The differences in wound infections, sensory symptoms, and impact on daily life between biopsies versus graft excisions were found to reach statistical significance (p < .05). Sural nerve excisions can cause chronic postoperative donor-site complications. Given these complications, alternative available mediums for nerve reconstruction should be explored and utilized wherever appropriate. If an alternative medium is unavailable and nerve autograft must be harvested for nerve reconstruction, then patients should be counseled about risks for developing donor site complications that may negatively affect quality of life.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The sural nerve is the most frequently harvested nerve autograft and is most often biopsied in the workup of peripheral neuropathy. While the complication types associated with these two procedures are well known, their clinical significance is poorly understood and there is a paucity of data regarding the complication rates.
METHODS METHODS
Pubmed search identified studies regarding complications after sural nerve harvest and biopsy. The data was grouped into sensory deficits, chronic pain, sensory symptoms, wound infections, wound complications, other postoperative complications, and complications impacting daily life. The incidence of each complication was calculated, and a chi-square analysis was performed to determine if there were any differences between nerve biopsies and graft harvest with respect to each complication.
RESULTS RESULTS
Twelve studies yielded 478 sural nerve procedures. Sensory deficits occurred at a rate of 92.9%, chronic pain at 19.7%, sensory symptoms at 41.1%, wound infections at 5.7%, noninfectious wound complications at 7.8%, and impact on daily life at 5.0%. The differences in wound infections, sensory symptoms, and impact on daily life between biopsies versus graft excisions were found to reach statistical significance (p < .05).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Sural nerve excisions can cause chronic postoperative donor-site complications. Given these complications, alternative available mediums for nerve reconstruction should be explored and utilized wherever appropriate. If an alternative medium is unavailable and nerve autograft must be harvested for nerve reconstruction, then patients should be counseled about risks for developing donor site complications that may negatively affect quality of life.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32277511
doi: 10.1002/micr.30588
pmc: PMC7540447
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

710-716

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors. Microsurgery published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Références

Ann Plast Surg. 1996 Nov;37(5):520-5
pubmed: 8937606
Orthopedics. 1985 Sep;8(9):1160-1
pubmed: 3832060
Ann Plast Surg. 2006 Oct;57(4):391-5
pubmed: 16998330
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018 Dec;71(12):1711-1716
pubmed: 30268744
Ann Plast Surg. 2009 Feb;62(2):220-2
pubmed: 19158538
Clin Plast Surg. 2003 Apr;30(2):247-68, vii
pubmed: 12737355
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Oct;66(10):1330-4
pubmed: 23845907
Clin Plast Surg. 1989 Jul;16(3):587-603
pubmed: 2673638
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Feb;119(2):670-4
pubmed: 17230105
Anat Rec. 1954 Nov;120(3):533-43
pubmed: 13218320
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994 Nov;94(6):850-5
pubmed: 7972432
Am J Surg. 1993 Sep;166(3):252-6
pubmed: 8396357
J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Jan;43(1):86.e1-86.e8
pubmed: 28951100
Neurology. 1998 Feb;50(2):480-4
pubmed: 9484376
Foot Ankle. 1992 May;13(4):199-202
pubmed: 1634152
Am J Med. 1981 Oct;71(4):525-32
pubmed: 6116431
BMC Surg. 2013 Sep 24;13:39
pubmed: 24063721
Hand Clin. 2016 May;32(2):127-40
pubmed: 27094886
J Reconstr Microsurg. 1984 Jul;1(1):31-9
pubmed: 6544340
Brain Behav. 2016 Oct 09;6(12):e00578
pubmed: 28032001
Ann Plast Surg. 1999 Dec;43(6):606-12
pubmed: 10597820
Neurol India. 2004 Dec;52(4):436-8
pubmed: 15626827
J Hand Surg Am. 1987 Nov;12(6):1119-23
pubmed: 3693848
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012 Oct;114(8):1149-52
pubmed: 22425460
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2015 Apr;23(1):59-61
pubmed: 25920646
Rev Neurosci. 2018 Jul 26;29(5):557-566
pubmed: 29306933
Breast J. 2013 Nov-Dec;19(6):671-2
pubmed: 24102889
Hand. 1978 Jun;10(2):187-90
pubmed: 711002
Exp Neurol. 2010 May;223(1):77-85
pubmed: 19348799
Acta Neurol Scand. 1989 Mar;79(3):243-5
pubmed: 2541594
Microsurgery. 2020 Sep;40(6):710-716
pubmed: 32277511
Can J Neurol Sci. 1994 Feb;21(1):34-7
pubmed: 8180902
Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Apr;82(4S Suppl 3):S247-S255
pubmed: 30855395
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Aug;63(8):1150-4
pubmed: 16094583
Diabet Med. 1997 May;14(5):353-6
pubmed: 9171249

Auteurs

Ivica Ducic (I)

Washington Nerve Institute, McLean, Virginia, USA.
Department of Surgery, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

Joshua Yoon (J)

Department of Surgery, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

Gregory Buncke (G)

The Buncke Clinic, San Francisco, California, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH