Communication ability and communication methods in children with cerebral palsy.
Journal
Developmental medicine and child neurology
ISSN: 1469-8749
Titre abrégé: Dev Med Child Neurol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0006761
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
accepted:
16
03
2020
pubmed:
14
4
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
14
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate if communication ability and method were related to each other and to age, sex, gross motor function, or manual ability in children with cerebral palsy. This cross-sectional study used data registered in the Swedish Cerebral Palsy Surveillance Program registry, involving 3000 children aged 0 to 18 years. Pearson's χ Communication ability and method were related to each other and to age, gross motor function, and manual ability. Aided communication methods were more frequently used among older children. The more functional the communication was, the less use of unaided communication occurred. Different communication methods were used across all Communication Function Classification System (CFCS) levels. Speech was most common in more functional levels, used by 72% of the children. Forty-five per cent were considered effective communicators in all environments. For classification of communication level and method, some recurring registration errors were made by the raters. Some raters may need clarification on interpretations of CFCS instructions. Results indicate that children should be presented to aided augmentative and alternative communication and manual signs earlier and to a greater extent.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
933-938Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Mac KeithPress.
Références
Himmelmann K, Uvebrant P. The panorama of cerebral palsy in Sweden. XI. Changing patterns in the birth-year period 2003-2006. Acta Paediatr 2014; 103: 618-24.
Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe (SCPE). Prevalence and characteristics of children with cerebral palsy in Europe. Dev Med Child Neurol 2002; 44: 633-40.
Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, et al. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl 2007; 109: 8-14.
Pennington L. Symposium: special needs: cerebral palsy and communication. Pediatr Child Health 2008; 18: 405-9.
Holck P, Nettelbladt U, Sandberg AD. Children with cerebral palsy, spina bifida and pragmatic language impairment: differences and similarities in pragmatic ability. Res Dev Disabil 2009; 30: 942-51.
Vos RC, Dallmeijer AJ, Verhoef M, et al. Developmental trajectories of receptive and expressive communication in children and young adults with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2014; 56: 951-9.
Pennington L, McConachie H. Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their mothers: the effects of speech intelligibility. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2001; 36: 371-93.
Andersen G, Mjøen TR, Vik T. Prevalence of speech problems and the use of augmentative and alternative communication in children with cerebral palsy: a registry-based study in Norway. Perspect Augment Altern Commun 2010; 19: 1-28.
Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC). https://www.asha.org/NJC/AAC/ (accessed 24 March 2020).
Himmelmann K, Lindh K, Hidecker MJ. Communication ability in cerebral palsy: a study from the CP register of western Sweden. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2013; 17: 568-74.
Vander Zwart KE, Geytenbeek JJ, de Kleijn M, et al. Reliability of the Dutch-language version of the Communication Function Classification System and its association with language comprehension and method of communication. Dev Med Child Neurol 2016; 58: 180-8.
Virella D, Pennington L, Andersen GL, et al. Classification systems of communication for use in epidemiological surveillance of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2016; 58: 285-91.
Hidecker MJ, Paneth N, Rosenbaum PL, et al. Developing and validating the Communication Function Classification System for individuals with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2011; 53: 704-10.
Soleymani Z, Joveini G, Baghestani AR. The Communication Function Classification System: cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Farsi version for patients with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Neurol 2015; 52: 333-7.
Cunningham BJ, Rosenbaum P, Hidecker MJ. Promoting consistent use of the communication function classification system (CFCS). Disabil Rehabil 2016; 38: 195-204.
Communication Function Classification System (CFCS) for Individuals with Cerebral Palsy. http://cfcs.us/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/CFCS_English_CP.pdf (accessed 4 December 2018).
Rosenbaum PL, Palisano RJ, Bartlett DJ, Galuppi BE, Russell DJ. Development of the Gross Motor Function Classification System for cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2008; 50: 249-53.
Eliasson AC, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Rösblad B, et al. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. Dev Med Child Neurol 2006; 48: 549-54.
Eliasson AC, Ullenhag A, Wahlström U, Krumlinde-Sundholm L. Mini-MACS: development of the Manual Ability Classification System for children younger than 4 years of age with signs of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2017; 59: 72-8.
Hidecker MJ, Ho NT, Dodge N, et al. Inter-relationships of functional status in cerebral palsy: analyzing gross motor function, manual ability, and communication function classification systems in children. Dev Med Child Neurol 2012; 54: 737-42.
Compagnone E, Maniglio J, Camposeo S, et al. Functional classifications for cerebral palsy: correlations between the gross motor function classification system (GMFCS), the manual ability classification system (MACS) and the communication function classification system (CFCS). Res Dev Disabil 2014; 35: 2651-7.
Alriksson-Schmidt A, Hägglund G, Rodby-Bousquet E, Westbom L. Follow-up of individuals with cerebral palsy through the transition years and description of adult life: the Swedish experience. J Pediatr Rehabil Med 2014; 7: 53-61.
Årsrapport 2017. CPUP Uppföljningsprogram för cerebral pares, 2017. http://cpup.se/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Årsrapport-CPUP-20171016.pdf(accessed 26 March 2020).
Årsrapport 2014. CPUP Uppföljningsprogram för cerebral pares, 2014. http://cpup.se/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Arsrapport_2014.pdf(accessed 26 March 2020)
MANUAL Till uppföljningsprogram CPUP arbetsterapeuter formulär. http://cpup.se/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/CPUP-MANUAL-version-12-180101.pdf (accessed 4 December 2018).
Bliss C. Semantography (Blissymbolics). Sydney: Semantography Publications, 1965.
Hidecker MJC, Slaughter J, Abeysekara P, et al. Early predictors and correlates of communication function in children with cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol 2018; 33: 275-85.
Novak I, Hines M, Goldsmith S, Barclay R. Clinical prognostic messages from a systematic review on cerebral palsy. Pediatrics 2012; 130: e1285-312.
Romski M, Sevcik RA, Barton-Hulsey A, Whitmore AS. Early intervention and AAC: what a difference 30 years makes. Augment Altern Commun 2015; 31: 181-202.
Snell ME, Brady N, McLean L, et al. Twenty years of communication intervention research with individuals who have severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil 2010; 115: 364-80.