Evidence for extensive anaerobic dechlorination and transformation of the pesticide chlordecone (C10Cl10O) by indigenous microbes in microcosms from Guadeloupe soil.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
26
10
2019
accepted:
18
03
2020
entrez:
14
4
2020
pubmed:
14
4
2020
medline:
15
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The historic use of chlordecone (C10Cl10O) as a pesticide to control banana weevil infestations has resulted in pollution of large land areas in the French West Indies. Although currently banned, chlordecone persists because it adsorbs strongly to soil and its complex bis-homocubane structure is stable, particularly under aerobic conditions. Abiotic chemical transformation catalyzed by reduced vitamin B12 has been shown to break down chlordecone by opening the cage structure to produce C9 polychloroindenes. More recently these C9 polychloroindenes were also observed as products of anaerobic microbiological transformation. To investigate the anaerobic biotransformation of chlordecone by microbes native to the French West Indies, microcosms were constructed anaerobically from chlordecone impacted Guadeloupe soil and sludge to mimic natural attenuation and eletron donor-stimulated reductive dechlorination. Original microcosms and transfers were incubated over a period of 8 years, during which they were repeatedly amended with chlordecone and electron donor (ethanol and acetone). Using LC-MS, chlordecone and degradation products were detected in all the biologically active microcosms. Observed products included monohydro-, dihydro- and trihydrochlordecone derivatives (C10Cl10-nO2Hn; n = 1,2,3), as well as "open cage" C9 polychloroindene compounds (C9Cl5-nH3+n n = 0,1,2) and C10 carboxylated polychloroindene derivatives (C10Cl4-nO2H4+n, n = 0-3). Products with as many as 9 chlorine atoms removed were detected. These products were not observed in sterile (poisoned) microcosms. Chlordecone concentrations decreased in active microcosms as concentrations of products increased, indicating that anaerobic dechlorination processes have occurred. The data enabled a crude estimation of partitioning coefficients between soil and water, showing that carboxylated intermediates sorb poorly and as a consequence may be flushed away, while polychlorinated indenes sorb strongly to soil. Microbial community analysis in microcosms revealed enrichment of anaerobic fermenting and acetogenic microbes possibly involved in anaerobic chlordecone biotransformation. It thus should be possible to stimuilate anaerobic dechlorination through donor amendment to contaminated soils, particularly as some metabolites (in particular pentachloroindene) were already detected in field samples as a result of intrinsic processes. Extensive dechlorination in the microcosms, with evidence for up to 9 Cl atoms removed from the parent molecule is game-changing, giving hope to the possibility of using bioremediation to reduce the impact of CLD contamination.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32282845
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231219
pii: PONE-D-19-29898
pmc: PMC7153859
doi:
Substances chimiques
Insecticides
0
Soil
0
Soil Pollutants
0
Chlordecone
RG5XJ88UDF
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0231219Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Bioinorg Chem. 1978 Aug;9(2):123-43
pubmed: 81074
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Jun 4;53(11):6133-6143
pubmed: 31082212
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Nov;24(33):25488-25499
pubmed: 28699005
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jun 10;668:161-170
pubmed: 30852194
Environ Res. 2015 Apr;138:271-8
pubmed: 25747818
Animal. 2017 Aug;11(8):1363-1371
pubmed: 28069088
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 Feb;39(2):398-406
pubmed: 6155103
Sci Total Environ. 2013 Oct 1;463-464:395-403
pubmed: 23827360
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2004;18(11):1243-4
pubmed: 15164356
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Mar 20;52(6):3615-3624
pubmed: 29473745
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Jan;23(1):81-97
pubmed: 26122571
J Toxicol Environ Health. 1985;15(5):561-74
pubmed: 2413222
Xenobiotica. 1988 Apr;18(4):407-16
pubmed: 2456645
Environ Pollut. 2011 Jun;159(6):1692-701
pubmed: 21440344
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Jan;23(1):3-8
pubmed: 25940496
Chemosphere. 2015 Jan;118:20-8
pubmed: 25433399
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Aug 7;46(15):8131-9
pubmed: 22780863
Biomed Mass Spectrom. 1978 Mar;5(3):232-7
pubmed: 75747
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2014 Apr;21(7):4914-27
pubmed: 23872892
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Mar 2;:
pubmed: 30827027
Front Microbiol. 2016 Dec 20;7:2025
pubmed: 28066351
Environ Pollut. 2016 May;212:615-626
pubmed: 27039897
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 20;28(21):3457-62
pubmed: 20566993
Environ Pollut. 2017 Apr;223:357-366
pubmed: 28161271
Environ Pollut. 2009 May;157(5):1697-705
pubmed: 19167793
J Chromatogr A. 2015 Aug 21;1408:169-77
pubmed: 26184709
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Jan;60(1):313-22
pubmed: 8117084
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 May;25(15):14313-14323
pubmed: 28210952
Chemosphere. 2017 Mar;171:564-570
pubmed: 28039835
Int J Cancer. 2020 Feb 1;146(3):657-663
pubmed: 30892691