Definition of Tumor Bed Boost in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: An Understanding and Approach.


Journal

Clinical breast cancer
ISSN: 1938-0666
Titre abrégé: Clin Breast Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100898731

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2020
Historique:
received: 05 02 2020
revised: 08 03 2020
accepted: 13 03 2020
pubmed: 15 4 2020
medline: 9 10 2021
entrez: 15 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Definition of the tumor bed (TB) is currently guided by intraoperatively placed metal clips. However, this traditional planning method may not be sufficient for tumor cavity defect refilled with modern oncoplastic breast surgery. We explored the impact of a close cooperation between surgeon and oncologist on the accuracy of TB contouring after partial breast reconstruction with chest wall perforator flaps (CWPF). A retrospective review of patients who received radiotherapy after CWPF was performed. TB and boost volume were defined by the surgeon, considering clips and the typical radiologic appearance of the flap, and by a radiation oncologist, and results were compared with the surgical specimen volume (SPV). The boost volume was marked as 5 mm penumbral ring thickness of native breast tissue wall around the replaced flap (nonbreast tissue). There were no significant differences between SPV and surgeon-defined TB values. Conversely, the radiation oncologist-defined values were significantly smaller than the actual SPV. If a ring-shaped TB boost was delivered, this would have allowed a potential reduction of irradiated tissue of 127.6%. TB definition solely by surgical clips may be prone to inaccuracy in case of volume replacement oncoplastic breast surgery. Our approach of combining the clips with the redefinition of the flap on computed tomographic scan may provide more accurate TB definition. Although an ideal ring-shaped boost might be difficult to reproduce in practice, it introduces a new paradigm: a lower radiation dose inside TB is tolerable, if not desirable, at least in CWPF.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32284305
pii: S1526-8209(20)30059-8
doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.03.003
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e510-e515

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Emanuele Garreffa (E)

Breast Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.

Luke Hughes-Davies (L)

Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.

Simon Russell (S)

Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.

Sara Lightowlers (S)

Addenbrooke's Oncology Center, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Amit Agrawal (A)

Breast Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: amit.agrawal@addenbrookes.nhs.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH