Reinforcement biases subsequent perceptual decisions when confidence is low, a widespread behavioral phenomenon.
human
mouse
neuroscience
rat
reinforcement learning
reward
sensory decision
uncertainty
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 04 2020
15 04 2020
Historique:
received:
01
07
2019
accepted:
09
04
2020
pubmed:
15
4
2020
medline:
30
3
2021
entrez:
15
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Learning from successes and failures often improves the quality of subsequent decisions. Past outcomes, however, should not influence purely perceptual decisions after task acquisition is complete since these are designed so that only sensory evidence determines the correct choice. Yet, numerous studies report that outcomes can bias perceptual decisions, causing spurious changes in choice behavior without improving accuracy. Here we show that the effects of reward on perceptual decisions are principled: past rewards bias future choices specifically when previous choice was difficult and hence decision confidence was low. We identified this phenomenon in six datasets from four laboratories, across mice, rats, and humans, and sensory modalities from olfaction and audition to vision. We show that this choice-updating strategy can be explained by reinforcement learning models incorporating statistical decision confidence into their teaching signals. Thus, reinforcement learning mechanisms are continually engaged to produce systematic adjustments of choices even in well-learned perceptual decisions in order to optimize behavior in an uncertain world.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32286227
doi: 10.7554/eLife.49834
pii: 49834
pmc: PMC7213979
doi:
pii:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.Figshare.4300043']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : DO 1240/2-1
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 205093
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS108740
Pays : United States
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 213465
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 205093/Z/16/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH097061
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : R01 DA038209
Pays : United States
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 106101
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH110404
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH110404
Pays : United States
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : DO 1240/3-1
Informations de copyright
© 2020, Lak et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
AL, EH, JH, PM, TO, AU, MC, ST, AK No competing interests declared, TD, NU Reviewing editor, eLife
Références
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006 Apr;16(2):199-204
pubmed: 16563737
Cell Rep. 2017 Sep 5;20(10):2513-2524
pubmed: 28877482
Nat Commun. 2017 Mar 03;8:14637
pubmed: 28256514
Elife. 2018 May 15;7:
pubmed: 29785928
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2012;35:287-308
pubmed: 22462543
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jun 21;113(25):E3548-57
pubmed: 27330086
Elife. 2019 Jun 06;8:
pubmed: 31169495
Science. 2005 Nov 25;310(5752):1337-40
pubmed: 16311337
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Nov;100(5):2653-68
pubmed: 18753326
Curr Biol. 2017 Mar 20;27(6):821-832
pubmed: 28285994
Nature. 2008 Sep 11;455(7210):227-31
pubmed: 18690210
J Neurosci. 1997 Aug 15;17(16):6391-400
pubmed: 9236247
Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1293-313
pubmed: 11800458
Neuron. 2020 Feb 19;105(4):700-711.e6
pubmed: 31859030
Nature. 2018 Feb 15;554(7692):368-372
pubmed: 29414944
J Neurosci. 1992 Dec;12(12):4745-65
pubmed: 1464765
Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2008;21:1873-1880
pubmed: 26412953
Neuron. 2013 Apr 24;78(2):339-51
pubmed: 23541901
J Neurosci. 2018 Apr 4;38(14):3495-3506
pubmed: 29440531
Neuron. 2014 Jan 8;81(1):195-206
pubmed: 24333055
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 3;116(49):24872-24880
pubmed: 31732671
Nature. 2006 Jun 15;441(7095):876-9
pubmed: 16778890
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2002 Dec;2(4):283-99
pubmed: 12641174
Neuron. 2013 Apr 24;78(2):249-55
pubmed: 23622062
J Neurosci. 2011 Aug 3;31(31):11351-61
pubmed: 21813694
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Dec;108(12):3416-23
pubmed: 23019000
Elife. 2015 Aug 31;4:
pubmed: 26322383
J Vis. 2014 Jun 18;14(7):
pubmed: 24944238
Curr Biol. 2017 Feb 20;27(4):590-595
pubmed: 28162897
Mem Cognit. 1994 Nov;22(6):657-72
pubmed: 7808275
J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 7;38(10):2418-2429
pubmed: 29371318
Front Comput Neurosci. 2010 Nov 24;4:146
pubmed: 21152255
Neural Comput. 2016 Sep;28(9):1840-58
pubmed: 27391683
Front Neuroeng. 2014 Dec 11;7:43
pubmed: 25566051
Nat Neurosci. 2014 May;17(5):738-43
pubmed: 24686785
Nature. 2019 Dec;576(7787):446-451
pubmed: 31801999
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Mar;19(3):366-74
pubmed: 26906503
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Nov;6(11):1224-9
pubmed: 14566341
Nat Neurosci. 2012 Sep;15(9):1281-9
pubmed: 22902719
Science. 2013 Apr 5;340(6128):95-8
pubmed: 23559254
Elife. 2018 Oct 10;7:
pubmed: 30303484
Neuron. 2016 May 4;90(3):499-506
pubmed: 27151640
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008 Dec;8(4):429-53
pubmed: 19033240
Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 1;8(1):1242
pubmed: 29089500
Neuron. 2016 Feb 3;89(3):658-71
pubmed: 26804992