Patient Perceptions of Video Visits Using Veterans Affairs Telehealth Tablets: Survey Study.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Health Services Accessibility
/ standards
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Preference
/ statistics & numerical data
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tablets
Telemedicine
/ methods
United States
Veterans
/ statistics & numerical data
Videotape Recording
/ standards
Young Adult
eHealth
telehealth
telemedicine
veterans
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 04 2020
15 04 2020
Historique:
received:
29
07
2019
accepted:
19
12
2019
revised:
05
11
2019
entrez:
16
4
2020
pubmed:
16
4
2020
medline:
4
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Video-based health care can help address access gaps for patients and is rapidly being offered by health care organizations. However, patients who lack access to technology may be left behind in these initiatives. In 2016, the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) began distributing video-enabled tablets to provide video visits to veterans with health care access barriers. This study aimed to evaluate veterans' experiences with VA-issued tablets and identify patient characteristics associated with preferences for video visits vs in-person care. A baseline survey was sent to the tablet recipients, and a follow-up survey was sent to the respondents 3 to 6 months later. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify patient characteristics associated with preferences for care, and we examined qualitative themes around care preferences using standard content analysis methods for coding the data collected in the open-ended questions. Patient-reported access barriers centered around transportation and health-related challenges, outside commitments, and feeling uncomfortable or uneasy at the VA. Satisfaction with the tablet program was high, and in the follow-up survey, approximately two-thirds of tablet recipients preferred care via a tablet (194/604, 32.1%) or expressed that video-based and in-person care were "about the same" (216/604, 35.7%), whereas one-third (192/604, 31.7%) indicated a preference for in-person care. Patients were significantly more likely to report a preference for video visits (vs a preference for in-person visits or rating them "about the same") if they felt uncomfortable in a VA setting, reported a collaborative communication style with their doctor, had a substance use disorder diagnosis, or lived in a place with better broadband coverage. Patients were less likely to report a preference for video visits if they had more chronic conditions. Qualitative analyses identified four themes related to preferences for video-based care: perceived improvements in access to care, perceived differential quality of care, feasibility of obtaining necessary care, and technology-related challenges. Many recipients of VA-issued tablets report that video care is equivalent to or preferred to in-person care. Results may inform efforts to identify good candidates for virtual care and interventions to support individuals who experience technical challenges.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Video-based health care can help address access gaps for patients and is rapidly being offered by health care organizations. However, patients who lack access to technology may be left behind in these initiatives. In 2016, the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) began distributing video-enabled tablets to provide video visits to veterans with health care access barriers.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to evaluate veterans' experiences with VA-issued tablets and identify patient characteristics associated with preferences for video visits vs in-person care.
METHODS
A baseline survey was sent to the tablet recipients, and a follow-up survey was sent to the respondents 3 to 6 months later. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify patient characteristics associated with preferences for care, and we examined qualitative themes around care preferences using standard content analysis methods for coding the data collected in the open-ended questions.
RESULTS
Patient-reported access barriers centered around transportation and health-related challenges, outside commitments, and feeling uncomfortable or uneasy at the VA. Satisfaction with the tablet program was high, and in the follow-up survey, approximately two-thirds of tablet recipients preferred care via a tablet (194/604, 32.1%) or expressed that video-based and in-person care were "about the same" (216/604, 35.7%), whereas one-third (192/604, 31.7%) indicated a preference for in-person care. Patients were significantly more likely to report a preference for video visits (vs a preference for in-person visits or rating them "about the same") if they felt uncomfortable in a VA setting, reported a collaborative communication style with their doctor, had a substance use disorder diagnosis, or lived in a place with better broadband coverage. Patients were less likely to report a preference for video visits if they had more chronic conditions. Qualitative analyses identified four themes related to preferences for video-based care: perceived improvements in access to care, perceived differential quality of care, feasibility of obtaining necessary care, and technology-related challenges.
CONCLUSIONS
Many recipients of VA-issued tablets report that video care is equivalent to or preferred to in-person care. Results may inform efforts to identify good candidates for virtual care and interventions to support individuals who experience technical challenges.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32293573
pii: v22i4e15682
doi: 10.2196/15682
pmc: PMC7191342
doi:
Substances chimiques
Tablets
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e15682Subventions
Organisme : HSRD VA
ID : I01 HX002317
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
©Cindie Slightam, Amy J Gregory, Jiaqi Hu, Josephine Jacobs, Tolessa Gurmessa, Rachel Kimerling, Daniel Blonigen, Donna M Zulman. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 15.04.2020.
Références
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Feb 04;18(2):e32
pubmed: 26846162
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2015 Oct-Dec;34(4):337-49
pubmed: 26506296
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Jul;24(6):385-391
pubmed: 28406066
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Aug;30(8):1063-70
pubmed: 25691239
Ann Fam Med. 2017 May;15(3):225-229
pubmed: 28483887
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):561-6
pubmed: 18335281
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Mar;31(3):269-75
pubmed: 26269131
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 May 1;26(5):420-428
pubmed: 30865777
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 08;14:62
pubmed: 24507761
Telemed J E Health. 2015 Apr;21(4):281-5
pubmed: 25166260
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011 Oct;37(10):437-45
pubmed: 22013816
J Rural Health. 2019 Jun;35(3):308-318
pubmed: 30600557
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul;43(3):366-79
pubmed: 26695645
Mil Med. 2019 Dec 1;184(11-12):686-692
pubmed: 30839067
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 22;18(11):e309
pubmed: 27876684
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018 Jul 21;20(8):56
pubmed: 30032337
Telemed J E Health. 2013 Jun;19(6):433-7
pubmed: 23590176
Telemed J E Health. 2016 Oct;22(10):847-854
pubmed: 26982279
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 23;18(11):e296
pubmed: 27881361
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;72(1):58-67
pubmed: 25409287
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Nov 1;70(11):976-982
pubmed: 31378193
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Sep 17;3(3):e90
pubmed: 26381104
J Telemed Telecare. 2019 Jun;25(5):310-317
pubmed: 29384428
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Nov;26 Suppl 2:639-47
pubmed: 21989616
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 19;377(16):1585-1592
pubmed: 29045204
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Nov;26 Suppl 2:655-61
pubmed: 21989618
JAMA. 2018 Apr 3;319(13):1323-1324
pubmed: 29614182
Telemed J E Health. 2015 Jul;21(7):564-6
pubmed: 25799233
Int J Psychiatry Med. 2017 Jan;52(1):3-20
pubmed: 28486881
J Clin Psychol. 2019 Mar 11;:
pubmed: 30859573
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016 Aug 01;9:335-44
pubmed: 27536128
Trials. 2015 Jun 05;16:258
pubmed: 26044763
Telemed J E Health. 2015 Aug;21(8):644-51
pubmed: 25839334
Telemed J E Health. 2018 Sep;24(9):698-701
pubmed: 29303679
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 17;17(1):572
pubmed: 28818082
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2016 Jun;39(2):173-9
pubmed: 26985680
BMC Psychiatry. 2012 Jun 20;12:36
pubmed: 22546012
Am J Med. 2017 Nov;130(11):1326-1330
pubmed: 28756266