Are all trauma centers created equal? Level 1 to level 1 trauma center patient transfers in the setting of rapid trauma center proliferation.
Adult
Aged
Arizona
/ epidemiology
Cost of Illness
Female
Health Resources
/ economics
Hospital Costs
/ statistics & numerical data
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Injury Severity Score
Length of Stay
/ statistics & numerical data
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Transfer
/ economics
Retrospective Studies
Trauma Centers
/ economics
Wounds and Injuries
/ diagnosis
Young Adult
Journal
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
ISSN: 2163-0763
Titre abrégé: J Trauma Acute Care Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101570622
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
18
4
2020
medline:
3
2
2021
entrez:
18
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Level 1 trauma centers should provide definitive care for every aspect of injury. However, in environments that have experienced trauma center proliferation, not all level 1 centers may have the resources or expertise needed for every patient, necessitating transfer to another trauma center. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of such transfers and associated impact on patient outcome and burden on the receiving level 1 center. In a metropolitan area experiencing trauma center proliferation, we performed a 5.5-year review of patient transfers to an established level 1 (index center) from other state designated level 1 centers. American College of Surgeons verification level was identified for each facility. Comparisons were performed between the cohort of transferred patients and patients with similar demographics, injury patterns, and severity managed at the index center using propensity score matching. A total of 104 patients were received from other state level 1 centers (39% American College of Surgeons level 2, 61% American College of Surgeons level 1). Nearly 70% of patients were transferred for definitive evaluation and/or management of brain, spine, or cerebrovascular injury. For 76% of this subgroup, specialty consultation was available, but the injury was deemed beyond their capability. Comparison of the transfer cohort propensity score matched to the control cohort (93 vs. 558 patients) demonstrated increased length of stay (6.5 days vs. 4.6 days, p = 0.001) and cost (US $36,027 vs. US $30,654, p = 0.033) associated with the transfer cohort, with similar mortality (12.1% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.492). The number of level 1 to level 1 transfers observed imply a disparity in resources and capability among level 1 trauma centers in the region. The majority of transfers were for neurosurgical care, suggestive of a deficit of adequate neurosurgical coverage in the setting of trauma center proliferation. Both patients and established trauma centers bear the burden for these transfers with respect to increased cost and length of stay. Care management, level IV.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Level 1 trauma centers should provide definitive care for every aspect of injury. However, in environments that have experienced trauma center proliferation, not all level 1 centers may have the resources or expertise needed for every patient, necessitating transfer to another trauma center. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of such transfers and associated impact on patient outcome and burden on the receiving level 1 center.
METHODS
In a metropolitan area experiencing trauma center proliferation, we performed a 5.5-year review of patient transfers to an established level 1 (index center) from other state designated level 1 centers. American College of Surgeons verification level was identified for each facility. Comparisons were performed between the cohort of transferred patients and patients with similar demographics, injury patterns, and severity managed at the index center using propensity score matching.
RESULTS
A total of 104 patients were received from other state level 1 centers (39% American College of Surgeons level 2, 61% American College of Surgeons level 1). Nearly 70% of patients were transferred for definitive evaluation and/or management of brain, spine, or cerebrovascular injury. For 76% of this subgroup, specialty consultation was available, but the injury was deemed beyond their capability. Comparison of the transfer cohort propensity score matched to the control cohort (93 vs. 558 patients) demonstrated increased length of stay (6.5 days vs. 4.6 days, p = 0.001) and cost (US $36,027 vs. US $30,654, p = 0.033) associated with the transfer cohort, with similar mortality (12.1% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.492).
CONCLUSION
The number of level 1 to level 1 transfers observed imply a disparity in resources and capability among level 1 trauma centers in the region. The majority of transfers were for neurosurgical care, suggestive of a deficit of adequate neurosurgical coverage in the setting of trauma center proliferation. Both patients and established trauma centers bear the burden for these transfers with respect to increased cost and length of stay.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Care management, level IV.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32301886
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002738
pii: 01586154-202011000-00012
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
920-925Références
Mullins RJ. A historical perspective of trauma system development in the United States. J Trauma. 1999;47(Suppl 3):S8–S14.
Kaiser Health News in collaboration with USA today. Boom in Trauma Centers Can Help Save Lives, but at What Price? 2016. Available at: http://khn.org/news/trauma-centers/. Accessed September 1, 2016.
Staudenmayer K, Lin F, Mackersie R, Spain D, Hsia R. Variability in California triage from 2005 to 2009: a population-based longitudinal study of severely injured patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(4):1041–1047.
American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. Statement on trauma center designation based upon system need. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2015;100(1):51–52.
Tepas JJ 3rd, Kerwin AJ, Ra JH. Unregulated proliferation of trauma centers undermines cost efficiency of population-based injury control. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(3):576–581; discussion 579-81.
Ciesla DJ, Pracht EE, Leitz PT, Spain DA, Staudenmayer KL, Tepas JJ 3rd. The trauma ecosystem: the impact and economics of new trauma centers on a mature statewide trauma system. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;82(6):1014–1022.
Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Incorporated Places of 50,000 or More, Ranked by July 1, 2018 Population: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2018 — United States — Places of 50,000+ Population. Available at: Factfinder.census.gov. Accessed November 1, 2019.
Mullins T, Bently B, Fisher B, Chikani V, Blust R, Benkert M, Vossbrink A. State Trauma Advisory Board 2018 Annual Report. Arizona Department of Health Services, Phoenix, AZ.
Durham R, Pracht E, Orban B, Lottenburg L, Tepas J, Flint L. Evaluation of a mature trauma system. Ann Surg. 2006;243(6):775–783.
Proposition 202 Trauma and Emergency Services Fund Payments. Available at azahcccs.gov/PlansProviders/RatesAndBilling/prop202.html. Accessed March 18, 2020.