A high-throughput digital script for multiplexed immunofluorescent analysis and quantification of sarcolemmal and sarcomeric proteins in muscular dystrophies.
Child
Child, Preschool
Dystrophin
/ analysis
Dystrophin-Associated Proteins
/ analysis
Fluorescent Antibody Technique
High-Throughput Screening Assays
/ methods
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Male
Muscular Dystrophies
/ metabolism
Sarcolemma
/ metabolism
Sarcomeres
/ metabolism
Digital pathology
Dystrophin
Genetic therapies
Immunofluorescence
Muscular dystrophy
Quantification
Journal
Acta neuropathologica communications
ISSN: 2051-5960
Titre abrégé: Acta Neuropathol Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101610673
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 04 2020
17 04 2020
Historique:
received:
31
01
2020
accepted:
16
03
2020
entrez:
19
4
2020
pubmed:
19
4
2020
medline:
1
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The primary molecular endpoint for many Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) clinical trials is the induction, or increase in production, of dystrophin protein in striated muscle. For accurate endpoint analysis, it is essential to have reliable, robust and objective quantification methodologies capable of detecting subtle changes in dystrophin expression. In this work, we present further development and optimisation of an automated, digital, high-throughput script for quantitative analysis of multiplexed immunofluorescent (IF) whole slide images (WSI) of dystrophin, dystrophin associated proteins (DAPs) and regenerating myofibres (fetal/developmental myosin-positive) in transverse sections of DMD, Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) and control skeletal muscle biopsies. The script enables extensive automated assessment of myofibre morphometrics, protein quantification by fluorescence intensity and sarcolemmal circumference coverage, colocalisation data for dystrophin and DAPs and regeneration at the single myofibre and whole section level. Analysis revealed significant variation in dystrophin intensity, percentage coverage and amounts of DAPs between differing DMD and BMD samples. Accurate identification of dystrophin via a novel background subtraction method allowed differential assessment of DAP fluorescence intensity within dystrophin positive compared to dystrophin negative sarcolemma regions. This enabled surrogate quantification of molecular functionality of dystrophin in the assembly of the DAP complex. Overall, the digital script is capable of multiparametric and unbiased analysis of markers of myofibre regeneration and dystrophin in relation to key DAPs and enabled better characterisation of the heterogeneity in dystrophin expression patterns seen in BMD and DMD alongside the surrogate assessment of molecular functionality of dystrophin. Both these aspects will be of significant relevance to ongoing and future DMD and other muscular dystrophies clinical trials to help benchmark therapeutic efficacy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32303261
doi: 10.1186/s40478-020-00918-5
pii: 10.1186/s40478-020-00918-5
pmc: PMC7165405
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dystrophin
0
Dystrophin-Associated Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
53Subventions
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : Cl 15121 A 20256
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Physiol Rev. 2002 Apr;82(2):291-329
pubmed: 11917091
Isr Med Assoc J. 2003 Feb;5(2):94-7
pubmed: 12674656
Skelet Muscle. 2015 Jul 15;5:22
pubmed: 26180627
J Neuromuscul Dis. 2019;6(1):147-159
pubmed: 30614809
Lancet. 2011 Aug 13;378(9791):595-605
pubmed: 21784508
Ann Neurol. 2001 Jun;49(6):706-11
pubmed: 11409421
Mol Ther. 2018 Oct 3;26(10):2337-2356
pubmed: 30093306
Lancet Neurol. 2009 Oct;8(10):918-28
pubmed: 19713152
Molecules. 2017 Apr 05;22(4):
pubmed: 28379182
Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2012 Oct;38(6):591-601
pubmed: 22243335
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 13;8(1):4470
pubmed: 29535336
Neurology. 2018 Jun 12;90(24):e2146-e2154
pubmed: 29752304
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 27;6:19750
pubmed: 26813695
N Engl J Med. 2007 Dec 27;357(26):2677-86
pubmed: 18160687
FASEB J. 2013 Jun;27(6):2484-95
pubmed: 23460734
FEBS J. 2018 Oct;285(20):3688-3694
pubmed: 29761627
Compr Physiol. 2015 Jul 1;5(3):1223-39
pubmed: 26140716
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 22;9(9):e107494
pubmed: 25244123
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 26;13(3):e0194540
pubmed: 29579078
Neuromuscul Disord. 2010 May;20(5):295-301
pubmed: 20395141
J Mass Spectrom. 2020 Feb;55(2):e4437
pubmed: 31502334
J Pathol Clin Res. 2019 Apr;5(2):81-90
pubmed: 30767396
Nucleic Acid Ther. 2017 Feb;27(1):1-3
pubmed: 27929755
Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Mar;56(3):725-31
pubmed: 7887428
Mol Ther. 2011 Jan;19(1):165-71
pubmed: 20924363
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 11;13(4):e0195850
pubmed: 29641567
Ann Neurol. 2012 Mar;71(3):304-13
pubmed: 22451200
Muscle Nerve. 1986 Jan;9(1):51-8
pubmed: 3513005
Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2010 Jun;36(4):265-74
pubmed: 20002311
BMC Neurol. 2015 Aug 26;15:153
pubmed: 26306629
Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2018 Dec 7;13:442-449
pubmed: 30388618
J Neuromuscul Dis. 2014;1(1):41-53
pubmed: 27858668
Skelet Muscle. 2019 May 27;9(1):15
pubmed: 31133066
Hum Mol Genet. 2019 Oct 1;28(R1):R102-R107
pubmed: 31238336
Ann Neurol. 2013 Nov;74(5):637-47
pubmed: 23907995
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 14;11(3):e0150818
pubmed: 26974331
Neuromuscul Disord. 2007 Dec;17(11-12):913-8
pubmed: 17826093
Hum Mol Genet. 2019 Jan 15;28(2):307-319
pubmed: 30304405
Sci Transl Med. 2011 Nov 9;3(108):108ra113
pubmed: 22072638
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Oct;13(10):987-96
pubmed: 25209738
J Gen Physiol. 2010 Jul;136(1):29-34
pubmed: 20584890
Lancet Neurol. 2003 Dec;2(12):731-40
pubmed: 14636778
Sci Transl Med. 2018 Apr 18;10(437):
pubmed: 29669851
Oncotarget. 2016 Jul 12;7(28):44381-44394
pubmed: 27322148
J Med Genet. 1994 Nov;31(11):843-7
pubmed: 7853367
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019 Feb;143(2):197-205
pubmed: 30168727