Canada-wide mixed methods analysis evaluating the reasons for inappropriate emergency department presentation in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation: the multicentre AF-ED trial.
Aged
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Anxiety
/ psychology
Atrial Fibrillation
/ psychology
Canada
Emergency Medical Services
/ statistics & numerical data
Emergency Service, Hospital
/ statistics & numerical data
Fear
/ psychology
Female
Health Services Misuse
/ statistics & numerical data
Health Surveys
/ statistics & numerical data
Heart Failure
/ therapy
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Odds Ratio
Prospective Studies
Qualitative Research
atrial fibrillation
atrial fibrillation management
cardiology
emergency department
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 04 2020
16 04 2020
Historique:
entrez:
19
4
2020
pubmed:
19
4
2020
medline:
13
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The primary objective of this study was to ascertain the reasons for emergency department (ED) attendance among patients with a history of atrial fibrillation (AF). Appropriate ED attendance was defined by the requirement for an electrical or chemical cardioversion and/or an attendance resulting in hospitalisation or administration of intravenous medications for ventricular rate control. Quantitative and qualitative responses were recorded and analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis, respectively. Random effects logistic regression was performed to estimate the OR of inappropriate ED attendance based on clinically relevant patient characteristics. Participants ≥18 years with a documented history of AF were approached in one of eight centres partaking in the study across Canada (Ontario, Nova Scotia, Alberta and British Columbia). Of the 356 patients enrolled (67±13, 45% female), the majority (271/356, 76%) had inappropriate reasons for presentation and did not require urgent ED treatment. Approximately 50% of patients(172/356, 48%) were driven to the ED due to symptoms, while the remainder presented on the basis of general fear or anxiety (67/356, 19%) or prior medical advice (117/356, 33%). Random effects logistic regression analysis showed that patients with a history of congestive heart failure were significantly more likely to seek urgent care for appropriate reasons (p=0.03). Likewise, symptom-related concerns for ED presentation were significantly less likely to result in inappropriate visitation (p=0.02). When patients were surveyed on alternatives to ED care, the highest proportion of responses among both groups was in favour of specialised rapid assessment outpatient clinics (186/356, 52%). Qualitative content analysis confirmed these results. Improved education focused on symptom management and alleviating disease-related anxiety as well as the institution of rapid access arrhythmias clinics may reduce the need for unnecessary healthcare utilisation in the ED and subsequent hospitalisation. NCT03127085.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32303514
pii: bmjopen-2019-033482
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033482
pmc: PMC7201301
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03127085']
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e033482Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Feb;37(2):371-8
pubmed: 11216949
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Sep 1;151(5):297-305
pubmed: 19721017
Can J Cardiol. 2015 Oct;31(10):1207-18
pubmed: 26429352
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Dec;62(6):570-577.e7
pubmed: 23810031
CJEM. 2018 May;20(3):392-400
pubmed: 29117873
Can J Cardiol. 2013 Feb;29(2):229-35
pubmed: 22652091
Europace. 2016 Nov;18(11):1609-1678
pubmed: 27567465
Can J Cardiol. 2011 Jan-Feb;27(1):38-46
pubmed: 21329861
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019 Oct;18(7):526-533
pubmed: 31046431
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Dec 1;104(11):1534-9
pubmed: 19932788
Int J Cardiol. 2012 May 17;157(1):91-5
pubmed: 21195490
Can J Cardiol. 2004 Jul;20(9):869-76
pubmed: 15266356
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jul;33(7):957-62
pubmed: 26001737
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Jan;51(1):58-65
pubmed: 17466409
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 1;118(1):64-71
pubmed: 27206910
Europace. 2013 Apr;15(4):486-93
pubmed: 23220354
Europace. 2018 Feb 1;20(2):225-233
pubmed: 29040548
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jan 25;5(1):
pubmed: 26811169
JAMA. 2001 May 9;285(18):2370-5
pubmed: 11343485