A 'hot clinic' for cold limbs: the benefit of urgent clinics for patients with critical limb ischaemia.
Aged
Amputation, Surgical
/ statistics & numerical data
Critical Illness
/ therapy
Efficiency, Organizational
Emergency Service, Hospital
/ statistics & numerical data
Emergency Treatment
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Ischemia
/ diagnosis
Leg
/ blood supply
Length of Stay
/ statistics & numerical data
Limb Salvage
/ adverse effects
Male
Outpatient Clinics, Hospital
/ organization & administration
Patient Admission
/ statistics & numerical data
Patient Readmission
/ statistics & numerical data
Peripheral Arterial Disease
/ diagnosis
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Severity of Illness Index
Time Factors
Time-to-Treatment
Treatment Outcome
United Kingdom
Vascular Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Critical limb ischaemia
Limb salvage
Outcomes
Outpatient
Journal
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
ISSN: 1478-7083
Titre abrégé: Ann R Coll Surg Engl
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7506860
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
21
4
2020
medline:
9
7
2020
entrez:
21
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The national reconfiguration of vascular surgery means that arterial centres serve larger populations with increased demand on resources. Emergency general surgery ambulatory clinics facilitate timely review and intervention, avoiding admission; a critical limb ischaemia (CLI) 'hot clinic' (HC) was implemented to achieve similar for vascular patients. The aim of the study was to determine HC efficacy. This was a prospective cohort study comparing HC patients with emergency admission (EA) patients between 1 May and 1 December 2017. Age, sex, comorbidities, CLI severity and smoking status were noted. HC patients were provided with satisfaction surveys. Primary outcome measures were freedom from reintervention and major amputation. Secondary outcome measures included time to procedure, length of stay, returns to theatre and 30-day readmission. A total of 147 patients (72 HC, 75 EA) were enrolled in the study. No statistical difference was found in age, sex, smoking status, severity of CLI or prevalence of comorbidities between the groups except that diabetes was more prevalent in EA patients ( A vascular HC facilitates urgent review and revascularisation. It provides comparable in-hospital outcomes and better long-term outcomes, with greater efficiency than hospital admission, demonstrating its value in treating CLI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32306742
doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.0068
pmc: PMC7388950
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
412-417Références
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012 Nov;44(5):465-7
pubmed: 23006840
Int J Surg. 2015 Jun;18:57-63
pubmed: 25907322
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;46:168-177
pubmed: 28739453
Circ J. 2017 Dec 25;82(1):267-274
pubmed: 28835590
Diabetes Care. 2016 Nov;39(11):2058-2064
pubmed: 27612499
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Aug;28(6):1432-8
pubmed: 24517986
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2014 Jun 23;10:367-74
pubmed: 25018636
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Nov;62(5):1192-200.e1
pubmed: 26384761
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Feb;65(2):414-421.e5
pubmed: 27667149
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Nov;45:271-286
pubmed: 28483613
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017 Mar;14(3):156-170
pubmed: 27853158
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Sep 28;23:28-31
pubmed: 29098077
Eur Heart J. 2015 Apr 14;36(15):932-8
pubmed: 25650396
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan;8(1):53-61
pubmed: 28839885
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 29;6(9):e011193
pubmed: 27687896
Int J Surg. 2017 May;41:91-96
pubmed: 28344160