GRP78 expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells is a new predictive marker for the benefit of taxanes in breast cancer neoadjuvant treatment.
Adult
Aged
Anthracyclines
/ administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ blood
Breast Neoplasms
/ blood
Cyclophosphamide
/ administration & dosage
Doxorubicin
/ administration & dosage
Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiP
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heat-Shock Proteins
/ blood
Humans
Leukocytes, Mononuclear
/ drug effects
Middle Aged
Neoadjuvant Therapy
/ methods
Paclitaxel
/ administration & dosage
Prognosis
Survival Rate
Breast cancer
GRP78 expression
Interferon gamma
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells
Journal
BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Apr 2020
19 Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
12
05
2019
accepted:
06
04
2020
entrez:
21
4
2020
pubmed:
21
4
2020
medline:
13
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Breast cancer treatment is tailored to the specific cancer subtype. Often, systemic treatment is given prior to surgery. Chemotherapy induces significant endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-mediated cell death and upregulation of 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP78). We hypothesized that chemotherapy induces ER stress not only in the tumor tissue but also in immune cells, which may affect the response to anti-cancer treatment. We determined the surface expression of GRP78 on 15 different peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) subpopulations in 20 breast cancer patients at three time points of the neoadjuvant treatment, i.e., at baseline, after anthracycline treatment, and after taxanes treatment. For this purpose, we performed flow cytometric analyses and analyzed the data using ANOVA and the Tukey test. Serum cytokine levels were also evaluated, and their levels were correlated with response to treatment using the t-test after log transformation and Mann-Whitney U Wilcoxon W test. A significant increase in GRP78 expression in PBMCs was documented during the taxane phase, only in patients who achieved pathological complete response (pCR). GRP78-positive clones correlated with increased serum levels of interferon gamma (IFNγ). The presence of GRP78-positive clones in certain PBMC subpopulations in pCR patients suggests a dynamic interaction between ER stress and immune responsiveness. The correlation of GRP78-positive clones with increased levels of IFNγ supports the idea that GRP78 expression in PBMCs might serve as a new predictive marker to identify the possible benefits of taxanes in the neoadjuvant setting.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Breast cancer treatment is tailored to the specific cancer subtype. Often, systemic treatment is given prior to surgery. Chemotherapy induces significant endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-mediated cell death and upregulation of 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP78). We hypothesized that chemotherapy induces ER stress not only in the tumor tissue but also in immune cells, which may affect the response to anti-cancer treatment.
METHODS
METHODS
We determined the surface expression of GRP78 on 15 different peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) subpopulations in 20 breast cancer patients at three time points of the neoadjuvant treatment, i.e., at baseline, after anthracycline treatment, and after taxanes treatment. For this purpose, we performed flow cytometric analyses and analyzed the data using ANOVA and the Tukey test. Serum cytokine levels were also evaluated, and their levels were correlated with response to treatment using the t-test after log transformation and Mann-Whitney U Wilcoxon W test.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A significant increase in GRP78 expression in PBMCs was documented during the taxane phase, only in patients who achieved pathological complete response (pCR). GRP78-positive clones correlated with increased serum levels of interferon gamma (IFNγ).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The presence of GRP78-positive clones in certain PBMC subpopulations in pCR patients suggests a dynamic interaction between ER stress and immune responsiveness. The correlation of GRP78-positive clones with increased levels of IFNγ supports the idea that GRP78 expression in PBMCs might serve as a new predictive marker to identify the possible benefits of taxanes in the neoadjuvant setting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32306920
doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06835-z
pii: 10.1186/s12885-020-06835-z
pmc: PMC7168854
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anthracyclines
0
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiP
0
HSPA5 protein, human
0
Heat-Shock Proteins
0
Doxorubicin
80168379AG
Cyclophosphamide
8N3DW7272P
Paclitaxel
P88XT4IS4D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
333Subventions
Organisme : Israeli Cancer Association
ID : no relvant
Références
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Dec;48(18):3342-54
pubmed: 22766518
Semin Cancer Biol. 2018 Oct;52(Pt 2):16-25
pubmed: 29024776
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Mar 15;20(6):1456-66
pubmed: 11896092
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Jun 21;18(6):
pubmed: 28635661
J Biol Chem. 2003 Mar 14;278(11):9100-6
pubmed: 12509415
Cancer Immunol Res. 2017 Aug;5(8):666-675
pubmed: 28642246
Int J Oncol. 2012 Sep;41(3):1036-42
pubmed: 22684338
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 28;8(1):5321
pubmed: 29593307
Front Immunol. 2013 Aug 19;4:241
pubmed: 23966998
J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2019 Jan;39(1):30-38
pubmed: 30388040
FEBS J. 2019 Jan;286(2):241-278
pubmed: 30027602
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51120
pubmed: 23251433
Expert Rev Proteomics. 2018 Feb;15(2):131-152
pubmed: 29271260
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018 Apr;22(7):2175-2185
pubmed: 29687878
Mol Cancer. 2017 May 12;16(1):91
pubmed: 28499449
Trends Mol Med. 2012 Oct;18(10):589-98
pubmed: 22883813
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 May;22(5):1441-6
pubmed: 25727556
J Cancer Res Ther. 2015 Jul-Sep;11(3):612-6
pubmed: 26458590
Glycobiology. 2018 Feb 1;28(2):61-68
pubmed: 29206917
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Jun 1;110(6):560-567
pubmed: 29659933
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2017 May 25;1(1):17
pubmed: 29872704
J Breast Cancer. 2017 Jun;20(2):119-131
pubmed: 28690648
Front Immunol. 2018 Mar 05;9:422
pubmed: 29556237
Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 26;7(1):89
pubmed: 29945652
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2017 May-Jun;26(3):421-426
pubmed: 28791816
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016 Nov;107:100-110
pubmed: 27823637
Cancer Lett. 2009 Sep 8;282(1):87-97
pubmed: 19345476
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;27(1):85-91
pubmed: 25490376
J Transl Med. 2015 Jun 27;13:204
pubmed: 26116238
J Glob Oncol. 2018 Jul;4:1-16
pubmed: 30085889
J Mol Biol. 2018 Sep 14;430(18 Pt A):2875-2899
pubmed: 29908887
Cell Death Dis. 2019 Apr 5;10(4):309
pubmed: 30952835
Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2016 Aug;77(Pt A):57-67
pubmed: 27262235
Nat Rev Immunol. 2016 Aug;16(8):469-84
pubmed: 27346803
Anticancer Drugs. 2009 Aug;20(7):601-6
pubmed: 19521235
BMC Med. 2012 Aug 09;10:87
pubmed: 22876833
J Clin Immunol. 2013 Apr;33(3):558-66
pubmed: 23188524
Curr Mol Med. 2006 Feb;6(1):45-54
pubmed: 16472112
Nat Med. 2002 Apr;8(4):379-85
pubmed: 11927944
Breast. 2016 Dec;30:13-18
pubmed: 27569021
Oncotarget. 2014 Nov 30;5(22):11452-63
pubmed: 25360516
Cancer Immunol Res. 2016 Nov;4(11):895-902
pubmed: 27803050
Breast Cancer Res. 2018 Jun 14;20(1):54
pubmed: 29898755
EMBO J. 2009 Mar 4;28(5):578-90
pubmed: 19165151
J Immunol. 2010 Sep 15;185(6):3529-35
pubmed: 20720212
Oncol Lett. 2015 Oct;10(4):2149-2155
pubmed: 26622810
PLoS One. 2015 May 14;10(5):e0125634
pubmed: 25973748
Adv Genet. 2010;69:97-114
pubmed: 20807604