Brief version of the coping health inventory for parents (CHIP) among family caregivers of children with chronic diseases.
Adaptation, Physiological
Adult
Anxiety
/ diagnosis
Caregivers
/ psychology
Child
Child, Preschool
Chronic Disease
/ psychology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
Humans
Male
Mexico
Parents
/ psychology
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
/ standards
Quality of Life
Reproducibility of Results
Anxiety
Coping
Depression
Family caregivers
Mexico
Psychometrics
Journal
Health and quality of life outcomes
ISSN: 1477-7525
Titre abrégé: Health Qual Life Outcomes
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101153626
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Apr 2020
19 Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
04
11
2018
accepted:
08
04
2020
entrez:
21
4
2020
pubmed:
21
4
2020
medline:
1
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Coping Health Inventory for Parents (CHIP) has demonstrated good psychometric properties in several language forms and has been used to assess the coping behaviors of families facing disease. However, the CHIP has not been validated in Mexico among families of children with chronic conditions, where it could be useful for research and intervention. The objectives of this instrumental study were to obtain a version of the CHIP for the Spanish language in Mexico, establish the factor structure of the Mexican version of the CHIP, probe its internal consistency reliability, and assess its concurrent construct validity. A nonprobability sample of 405 family caregivers of children with chronic diseases responded to a battery of measurement instruments that included the CHIP, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the Beck Depression Inventory. The sample was randomly divided into two parts. In one subsample (190 participants), an exploratory factor analysis was performed using a principal component analysis and oblique rotation. In the second subsample (215 participants), a confirmatory factor analysis was performed using maximum likelihood estimation. The scale was reduced to 16 items (CHIP-16) with factorial loads greater than .50. The empirical criteria used to determine the number of factors converged on the following five factors: belief and trust (McDonald ω = .85), spouse/partner relationship (ω = .79), home care (ω = .77), family involvement (ω = .75), and security/stability (ω = .79). The overall internal consistency was good (ω = .88). The five-factor model showed acceptable fit indices and high parsimony. The mean CHIP-16 scores and the Spouse/partner relationship scores among the caregivers with anxiety were greater than those among the caregivers without anxiety. The mean home-care scores among the women were greater than those among men. The 16-item version of the CHIP showed good internal consistency and construct validity; thus, the CHIP-16 is a useful instrument for measuring and assessing coping in family caregivers of children with chronic diseases.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The Coping Health Inventory for Parents (CHIP) has demonstrated good psychometric properties in several language forms and has been used to assess the coping behaviors of families facing disease. However, the CHIP has not been validated in Mexico among families of children with chronic conditions, where it could be useful for research and intervention. The objectives of this instrumental study were to obtain a version of the CHIP for the Spanish language in Mexico, establish the factor structure of the Mexican version of the CHIP, probe its internal consistency reliability, and assess its concurrent construct validity.
METHODS
METHODS
A nonprobability sample of 405 family caregivers of children with chronic diseases responded to a battery of measurement instruments that included the CHIP, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the Beck Depression Inventory. The sample was randomly divided into two parts. In one subsample (190 participants), an exploratory factor analysis was performed using a principal component analysis and oblique rotation. In the second subsample (215 participants), a confirmatory factor analysis was performed using maximum likelihood estimation.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The scale was reduced to 16 items (CHIP-16) with factorial loads greater than .50. The empirical criteria used to determine the number of factors converged on the following five factors: belief and trust (McDonald ω = .85), spouse/partner relationship (ω = .79), home care (ω = .77), family involvement (ω = .75), and security/stability (ω = .79). The overall internal consistency was good (ω = .88). The five-factor model showed acceptable fit indices and high parsimony. The mean CHIP-16 scores and the Spouse/partner relationship scores among the caregivers with anxiety were greater than those among the caregivers without anxiety. The mean home-care scores among the women were greater than those among men.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The 16-item version of the CHIP showed good internal consistency and construct validity; thus, the CHIP-16 is a useful instrument for measuring and assessing coping in family caregivers of children with chronic diseases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32307007
doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01357-5
pii: 10.1186/s12955-020-01357-5
pmc: PMC7168940
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
104Subventions
Organisme : Effects of mindfulness training on psychological distress and quality of life of the family caregiver
ID : HIM/2015/017/SSA.1207
Références
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 27;19(1):1164
pubmed: 31455340
Psychooncology. 2001 Jul-Aug;10(4):325-35
pubmed: 11462231
Res Nurs Health. 1991 Feb;14(1):41-50
pubmed: 1708157
J Health Soc Behav. 1978 Mar;19(1):2-21
pubmed: 649936
Am J Med Genet A. 2015 May;167A(5):974-82
pubmed: 25755074
J Pediatr Nurs. 2016 Sep-Oct;31(5):528-36
pubmed: 27245404
J Pediatr Psychol. 1992 Aug;17(4):491-502
pubmed: 1527682
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Dec 13;15(1):242
pubmed: 29237460
Br J Psychol. 2014 Aug;105(3):399-412
pubmed: 24844115
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2017 May 11;30(1):10
pubmed: 32026041
Salud Publica Mex. 2007 Jan-Feb;49(1):63-70
pubmed: 17388037
Cancer. 2014 May 1;120(9):1417-25
pubmed: 24473774
Biopsychosoc Med. 2019 Mar 8;13:6
pubmed: 30899323
Psychometrika. 2009 Mar;74(1):107-120
pubmed: 20037639
Qual Life Res. 1998 May;7(4):323-35
pubmed: 9610216
Psychosom Med. 1976 Sep-Oct;38(5):300-14
pubmed: 981490
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Dec;78(6):1056-1071
pubmed: 30559513
World J Psychiatry. 2016 Mar 22;6(1):7-17
pubmed: 27014594
Psychooncology. 2009 Sep;18(9):956-64
pubmed: 19117279
Biopsychosoc Med. 2018 Dec 12;12:20
pubmed: 30559833
J Adv Nurs. 2002 Jul;39(2):190-8
pubmed: 12100663
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(2):155-64
pubmed: 17535316
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Dec;56(6):893-7
pubmed: 3204199
BMC Psychol. 2019 Dec 21;7(1):85
pubmed: 31864414
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
J Pediatr Psychol. 2001 Apr-May;26(3):155-62
pubmed: 11259517
Psychol Assess. 2012 Jun;24(2):282-92
pubmed: 21966933
J Pediatr Health Care. 2011 Nov-Dec;25(6):347-54
pubmed: 22018425
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0206917
pubmed: 30485299
Psychometrika. 1965 Jun;30:179-85
pubmed: 14306381