Efficacy and safety of XEN®-Implantation vs. trabeculectomy: Data of a "real-world" setting.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 04 09 2019
accepted: 29 03 2020
entrez: 21 4 2020
pubmed: 21 4 2020
medline: 15 7 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To compare surgical success, postoperative intraocular pressure and complication rates between trabeculectomy and XEN gelstent surgery in a cohort of glaucoma patients in a typical clinical setting. A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with refractory open-angle glaucoma including patients who underwent either stand-alone XEN gelstent insertion with Mitomycin C or trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C between 2016 and 2018 at the University Eye Hospital Mainz, Germany. Primary outcome measure was the proportion of surgical success 1 year after surgery. Patients with an IOP ≤18mmHg, an intraocular pressure reduction of >20% and in no need of revision surgery or topical medication were considered a complete surgical success. If topical therapy was necessary, they were considered a qualified success. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was carried out for the primary outcome including gender, age, preoperative intraocular pressure and number of medication classes used preoperatively as adjustment variables. 171 eyes of 144 patients were included, including 82 eyes of 58 patients in the XEN group and 89 eyes of 86 patients in the trabeculectomy group. The primary outcome defined as the proportion of surgical success after 1 year (mean 11.1 months ± 2.2) was similar for both groups. The complete success proportion was 65.5% (95%-CI: 55.6-75.9%) in the trabeculectomy group, and 58.5% (95%-CI: 47.6-69.4%) in the XEN group and not statistically different in our analysis model (crude OR = 0.61; 95%-CI: 0.31-1.22; adjusted OR = 0.66; 95%-CI: 0.32-1.37). The intraocular pressure reduction, as secondary outcome measure, was higher in the trabeculectomy group (10.5 mmHg) compared to the XEN group (7.2 mmHg; p = 0.003) at the 12-month follow-up. Both XEN gelstent implantation and trabeculectomy show similar proportions of surgical success and of complications and are therefore both recommendable for clinical routine. However, trabeculectomy seems to be more effective in lowering intraocular pressure than the XEN implantation. A prospective randomized clinical trial is necessary to evaluate differences in the long-term clinical outcome.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32310972
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231614
pii: PONE-D-19-24920
pmc: PMC7170231
doi:

Substances chimiques

Hydrogels 0

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0231614

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jan;143(1):9-22
pubmed: 17083910
Ophthalmology. 2013 Dec;120(12):2532-2539
pubmed: 24070811
Biometrics. 2006 Mar;62(1):185-92
pubmed: 16542245
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 4;12(10):e0185246
pubmed: 28977004
Acta Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;93(8):753-61
pubmed: 25847610
Ophthalmology. 2012 Jan;119(1):36-42
pubmed: 21982416
J Glaucoma. 2018 Feb;27(2):140-147
pubmed: 29271806
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug;257(8):1741-1750
pubmed: 31093766
J Glaucoma. 2016 Sep;25(9):763-9
pubmed: 27513900
Int Ophthalmol. 1992 Sep;16(4-5):391-6
pubmed: 1428578
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD004399
pubmed: 15846712
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD003919
pubmed: 17943806
Ophthalmology. 2017 Nov;124(11):1579-1588
pubmed: 28601250
Ophthalmology. 2018 May;125(5):650-663
pubmed: 29477688
Eye (Lond). 2018 Aug;32(8):1321-1328
pubmed: 29581522
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 May;257(5):1005-1011
pubmed: 30783784
Int J Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec 18;11(12):1941-1944
pubmed: 30588427
Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 May;102(5):575-585
pubmed: 29545417
Ophthalmology. 2015 Sep;122(9):1795-801
pubmed: 25881513
Eye (Lond). 2019 Mar;33(3):469-477
pubmed: 30356133
Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov;183:25-36
pubmed: 28784554
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 May;45(4):393-400
pubmed: 27928879

Auteurs

Felix Mathias Wagner (FM)

Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Alexander Karl-Georg Schuster (AK)

Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Julia Emmerich (J)

Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Panagiotis Chronopoulos (P)

Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Esther Maria Hoffmann (EM)

Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH