Biomechanical modeling of radiation dose-induced volumetric changes of the parotid glands for deformable image registration.


Journal

Physics in medicine and biology
ISSN: 1361-6560
Titre abrégé: Phys Med Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401220

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 08 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 23 4 2020
medline: 11 11 2020
entrez: 23 4 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Early animal studies suggest that parotid gland (PG) toxicity prediction could be improved by an accurate estimation of the radiation dose to sub-regions of the PG. Translation to clinical investigation requires voxel-level dose accumulation in this organ that responds volumetrically throughout treatment. To date, deformable image registration (DIR) has been evaluated for the PG using only surface alignment. We sought to develop and evaluate an advanced DIR technique capable of modeling these complex PG volume changes over the course of radiation therapy. Planning and mid-treatment magnetic resonance images from 19 patients and computed tomography images from nine patients who underwent radiation therapy for head and neck cancer were retrospectively evaluated. A finite element model (FEM)-based DIR algorithm was applied between the corresponding pairs of images, based on boundary conditions on the PG surfaces only (Morfeus-spatial). To investigate an anticipated improvement in accuracy, we added a population model-based thermal expansion coefficient to simulate the dose distribution effect on the volume change inside the glands (Morfeus-spatialDose). The model accuracy was quantified using target registration error for magnetic resonance images, where corresponding anatomical landmarks could be identified. The potential clinical impact was evaluated using differences in mean dose, median dose, D98, and D50 of the PGs. In the magnetic resonance images, the mean (±standard deviation) target registration error significantly reduced by 0.25 ± 0.38 mm (p = 0.01) when using Morfeus-spatialDose instead of Morfeus-spatial. In the computed tomography images, differences in the mean dose, median dose, D98, and D50 of the PGs reached 2.9 ± 0.8, 3.8, 4.1, and 3.8 Gy, respectively, between Morfeus-spatial and Morfeus-spatialDose. Differences between Morfeus-spatial and Morfeus-spatialDose may be impactful when considering high-dose gradients of radiation in the PGs. The proposed DIR model can allow more accurate PG alignment than the standard model and improve dose estimation and toxicity prediction modeling.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32320955
doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab8bf1
pmc: PMC7483909
mid: NIHMS1598574
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

165017

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA016672
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCR NIH HHS
ID : R01 DE025248
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA214825
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCR NIH HHS
ID : R56 DE025248
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : T32 EB007507
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA218148
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA097007
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCR NIH HHS
ID : R01 DE028290
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : K12 CA088084
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R25 EB025787
Pays : United States

Références

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jul 15;59(4):960-70
pubmed: 15234029
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 May;19(3):251-260
pubmed: 29664218
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Sep;197(3):532-6
pubmed: 21862792
Support Care Cancer. 2008 Mar;16(3):285-9
pubmed: 17680281
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Jul 15;62(4):1090-5
pubmed: 15990013
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Nov 7;60(21):8481-9
pubmed: 26485227
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Nov 15;99(4):1004-1012
pubmed: 28864401
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;3(4):524-548
pubmed: 27918777
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 17;12(4):e0175906
pubmed: 28414799
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Jul 15;62(4):1055-69
pubmed: 15990009
Laryngoscope. 2009 Oct;119(10):1966-74
pubmed: 19688858
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Nov 1;90(3):680-7
pubmed: 25151537
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Nov 15;87(4):676-82
pubmed: 24035328
Med Phys. 2008 Jan;35(1):81-8
pubmed: 18293565
Med Phys. 2005 Jun;32(6):1647-59
pubmed: 16013724
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Jun 21;50(12):2887-905
pubmed: 15930609
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Apr 1;91(5):925-33
pubmed: 25832685

Auteurs

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH