Use of transversus abdominis plane block to decrease pain scores and narcotic use following robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.


Journal

Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN: 1863-2491
Titre abrégé: J Robot Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300401

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Historique:
received: 15 10 2019
accepted: 09 03 2020
pubmed: 24 4 2020
medline: 27 7 2021
entrez: 24 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aim of this study was to assess whether transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks can be utilized to decrease patient pain scores and narcotic use during the first 24 h following robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). 100 patients received a TAP block with a mixture of 1.3% liposomal bupivacaine, 0.5% Marcaine and 0.9% NaCl prior to RALP. This was in addition to an already established pain management regiment, which included preoperative PO acetaminophen (650 mg), celecoxib (200 mg), and tolterodine ER (4 mg). These patients were prospectively followed and then retrospectively compared to a 1:1 propensity matched group of 100 patients that did not receive a TAP but did receive the preoperative PO medications. Pain scores were assessed on a scale from 1-10 in the PACU, as well as the surgical floor at 8, 16, and 24-h post-surgery. Intra-/post-operative narcotic use and time to ambulation following arrival to the surgical floor were also analyzed. Patient receiving TAP blocks had immediate post-op pain scores of 2.23 vs 4.26 for those not receiving TAP blocks (p = 0.000). The pain scores at 8, 16, and 24 h for TAP patients were 2.68, 2.62, and 2.62 as compared to 2.89, 2.87, and 3.36 for non-TAP patients. The difference was statistically significant for immediate and 24-h pain scores (p = 0.000, 0.001, respectively). On average, TAP block patients ambulated faster than non-TAP patients, 2.68 vs 4.91 h (p = 0.000). Intra-operative narcotic use was decreased in the TAP group for each of the opioids that were used: fentanyl 177.5 vs 205mcg (p = 0.001), morphine 5.5 vs 10 mg (p = 0.000), and hydromorphone 0.75 vs 1.75 mg (p = 0.001). Narcotic usage in the PACU was limited to hydromorphone and TAP patients used 0.7 mg compared to 1.36 mg (p = 0.003) for non-TAP patients. Oral oxycodone/acetaminophen (5 mg/325 mg) was used for pain control on the surgical floor and on average TAP patients received less, 2.4 vs 5 tabs (p = 0.000). Average time to perform the TAP block was 3.5 min and total OR time for TAP vs non-TAP patients was 107.41 vs 106.58 min (p = 0.386). TAP blocks as part of a perioperative pain management protocol can be utilized during RALPs to decrease patient pain scores at two different time intervals, immediately post-operative and 24 h after surgery. Patients also ambulate sooner following surgery and require a decreased amount of narcotics during the intra-operative and post-operative periods. TAP blocks are quick, effective, and do not add a significant amount of OR time to RALPs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32323138
doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01064-9
pii: 10.1007/s11701-020-01064-9
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anesthetics, Local 0
Narcotics 0
Bupivacaine Y8335394RO

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

81-86

Références

Sharkey A, Finnerty O, Mc Donnell JG (2013) Transversus abdominis plane block. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 3:223–239
doi: 10.1007/s40140-013-0034-5
Felling DR, Jackson MW, Ferraro J, Battaglia MA, Albright JJ, Wu J et al (2018) Liposomal bupivacaine transversus abdominis plane block versus epidural analgesia in a colon and rectal surgery enhanced recovery pathway. Dis Colon Rectum 61(10):1196–1204
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001211
U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. U.S. Cancer Statistics Data Visualizations Tool, based on November 2017 submission data (1999–2015): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute
Baker BW, Villadiego LG, Lake YN, Amin Y, Timmins AE, Swaim LS et al (2018) Transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine for pain control after cesarean delivery: a retrospective chart review. J Pain Res 11:3109–3116
doi: 10.2147/JPR.S184279
Emile SH, Abdel-Razik MA, Elbahrawy K, Elshobaky A, Shalaby M, Elbaz SA et al (2019) Impact of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block on postoperative pain and early outcome after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a randomized double-blinded controlled trial. Obes Surg 29(5):1534–1541
doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03720-y
Tikuisis R, Miliauskas P, Lukoseviciene V, Samalavicius N, Dulskas A, Zabuliene L et al (2016) Transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain relief after hand-assisted laparoscopic colon surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Tech Coloproctol 20(12):835–844
doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1550-3
Shahait M, Yezdani M, Katz B, Lee A, Yu S-J, Lee DI (2019) Robot-assisted transversus abdominis plane block: description of the technique and comparative analysis. J Endourol 33(3):207–210
doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0828
Cacciamani GE, Menestrina N, Pirozzi M, Tafuri A, Corsi P, de Marchi D et al (2019) Impact of combination of local anesthetic wounds infiltration and ultrasound transversus abdominal plane block in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: perioperative results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Endourol 33(4):295–301
doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0761
Dal Moro F, Aiello L, Pavarin P, Zattoni F (2019) Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block (US-TAPb) for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a novel ‘4-point’ technique—results of a prospective, randomized study. J Robot Surg 13(1):147–151
doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0858-6
Boggs SD, Tan DW, Watkins CL, Tsai MH (2019) OR management and metrics: how it all fits together for the healthcare system. J Med Syst 43(6):147
doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1272-y
Keller DS, Madhoun N, Ponte-Moreno OI, Ibarra S, Haas EM (2016) Transversus abdominis plane blocks: pilot of feasibility and the learning curve. J Surg Res 204(1):101–108
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.012

Auteurs

Travis Rogers (T)

Global Robotics Institute, Advent Health, Celebration, FL, USA. Travis.Rogers.MD@flhosp.org.

K R Seetharam Bhat (KRS)

Global Robotics Institute, Advent Health, Celebration, FL, USA.

Marcio Moschovas (M)

Global Robotics Institute, Advent Health, Celebration, FL, USA.

Fikret Onol (F)

Global Robotics Institute, Advent Health, Celebration, FL, USA.

Cathy Jenson (C)

Global Robotics Institute, Advent Health, Celebration, FL, USA.

Shannon Roof (S)

Global Robotics Institute, Advent Health, Celebration, FL, USA.

Nina Gallo (N)

US Anesthesia Partners (USAP), Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.

Marco Sandri (M)

Data Methods and Systems Statistical Laboratory, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

Bruno Gallo (B)

US Anesthesia Partners (USAP), Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.

Vipul Patel (V)

Global Robotics Institute, Advent Health, Celebration, FL, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH