An altered posterior question-mark incision is associated with a reduced infection rate of cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy.
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Algorithms
Bone Resorption
/ prevention & control
Cerebral Arteries
/ surgery
Cohort Studies
Decompressive Craniectomy
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neurosurgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Risk Factors
Surgical Flaps
/ blood supply
Surgical Wound Infection
/ epidemiology
Temporal Arteries
/ surgery
Treatment Failure
Treatment Outcome
aseptic bone resorption
complications
cranioplasty
decompressive hemicraniectomy
osteonecrosis
surgical site infection
surgical technique
wound infection
Journal
Journal of neurosurgery
ISSN: 1933-0693
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0253357
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Apr 2020
24 Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
10
12
2019
accepted:
04
02
2020
pubmed:
25
4
2020
medline:
31
7
2021
entrez:
25
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Performing a cranioplasty (CP) after decompressive craniotomy is a straightforward neurosurgical procedure, but it remains associated with a high complication rate. Surgical site infection (SSI), aseptic bone resorption (aBR), and need for a secondary CP are the most common complications. This observational study aimed to identify modifiable risk factors to prevent CP failure. A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients who underwent CP following decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) between 2010 and 2018 at a single institution. Predictors of SSI, aBR, and need for allograft CP were evaluated in a univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression model. One hundred eighty-six patients treated with CP after DHC were included. The diagnoses leading to a DHC were as follows: stroke (83 patients, 44.6%), traumatic brain injury (55 patients, 29.6%), subarachnoid hemorrhage (33 patients, 17.7%), and intracerebral hemorrhage (15 patients, 8.1%). Post-CP SSI occurred in 25 patients (13.4%), whereas aBR occurred in 32 cases (17.2%). An altered posterior question-mark incision, ending behind the ear, was associated with a significantly lower infection rate and CP failure, compared to the classic question-mark incision (6.3% vs 18.4%; p = 0.021). The only significant predictor of aBR was patient age, in which those developing resorption were on average 16 years younger than those without aBR (p < 0.001). The primary goal of this retrospective cohort analysis was to identify adjustable risk factors to prevent post-CP complications. In this analysis, a posterior question-mark incision proved beneficial regarding infection and CP failure. The authors believe that these findings are caused by the better vascularized skin flap due to preservation of the superficial temporal artery and partial preservation of the occipital artery. In this trial, the posterior question-mark incision was identified as an easily and costless adaptable technique to reduce CP failure rates.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32330877
doi: 10.3171/2020.2.JNS193335
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1262-1270Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn