Wildfire Smoke Risk Communication Efficacy: A Content Analysis of Washington State's 2018 Statewide Smoke Event Public Health Messaging.
Journal
Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP
ISSN: 1550-5022
Titre abrégé: J Public Health Manag Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9505213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed:
26
4
2020
medline:
28
10
2021
entrez:
26
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Wildfire events are increasing in prevalence and intensity in the Pacific Northwest. Effective communication of health risks and actions to reduce exposure to wildfire smoke is imperative. We assessed the content of wildfire smoke risk messages from government organizations and mainstream media during a major wildfire smoke event in August 2018. We conducted a content analysis of wildfire smoke risk information communicated by local and state government organizations and the mainstream media. Eight Washington State counties during a statewide wildfire smoke event in August 2018. Leveraging the Extended Parallel Process Model and information in the existing literature on wildfire smoke and health, we assessed messages for the presence of information regarding health risk, personal interventions, administrative interventions, vulnerable populations, and trusted sources of information. Summary statistics were calculated to identify common messages about recommended interventions, vulnerable populations cited, and trusted sources of public health information. Of the 273 identified government and media messages on wildfire smoke, the majority (71% and 66%) contained information about health risks. However, only 46% and 33% of government and media messages contained information about personal interventions to reduce risk, and 37% and 14% of government and media messages contained information about administrative interventions to reduce risk. Less than half of government and media messages (28% and 31%) contained information specific to vulnerable populations, and 58% and 46% of government and media messages contained any reference to a trusted source of information. While information about wildfire smoke and health risks was communicated during Washington's August 2018 wildfire smoke event, there remains considerable opportunity to include additional information about interventions, vulnerable populations, and trusted sources of information. We recommend several opportunities to improve and evaluate risk communication and risk reduction before, during, and after future wildfire smoke events.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32332485
pii: 00124784-202111000-00009
doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001151
doi:
Substances chimiques
Smoke
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
607-614Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
Abatzoglou JT, Williams AP. Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(42):11770–11775.
Westerling AL. Increasing western US forest wildfire activity: sensitivity to changes in the timing of spring. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016;371:20150178.
National Interagency Fire Center. National Report of Wildland Fires and Acres Burned by State, 2017 and 2018. Boise, ID: National Interagency Fire Center; 2018.
Department of Ecology. 2018 Daily PM2.5 Concentration, by Monitor. Olympia, WA: Washington State Department of Ecology; 2019.
Welch C. Wildfire smoke makes Seattle and Portland world's dirtiest cities. National Geographic. August 2018. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2018/08/news-seattle-portland-dirtier-air-quality-than-parts-of-asia . Accessed November 14, 2019.
Errett NA, Roop HA, Pendergrast C, et al. Building a practice-based research agenda for wildfire smoke and health: a report of the 2018 Washington Wildfire Smoke Risk Communication Stakeholder Synthesis Symposium. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(13). doi:10.3390/ijerph16132398.
Laumbach RJ. Clearing the air on personal interventions to reduce exposure to wildfire smoke. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16(7):815–818.
Elliott CT. Guidance for BC Public Health Decision Makers During Wildfire Smoke Events. Vancouver, BC, Canada: BC Centre for Disease Control; 2014.
Delfino RJ, Brummel S, Wu J, et al. The relationship of respiratory and cardiovascular hospital admissions to the southern California wildfires of 2003. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66(3):189–197.
Gan RW, Ford B, Lassman W, et al. Comparison of wildfire smoke estimation methods and associations with cardiopulmonary-related hospital admissions. Geohealth. 2017;1(3):122–136.
Alman BL, Pfister G, Hao H, et al. The association of wildfire smoke with respiratory and cardiovascular emergency department visits in Colorado in 2012: a case crossover study. Environ Health. 2016;15(1):64.
Wettstein ZS, Hoshiko S, Fahimi J, Harrison RJ, Cascio WE, Rappold AG. Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular emergency department visits associated with wildfire smoke exposure in California in 2015. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(8). doi:10.1161/JAHA.117.007492.
Olsen CS, Mazzotta DK, Toman E, Fischer AP. Communicating about smoke from wildland fire: challenges and opportunities for managers. Environ Manage. 2014;54(3):571–582.
US Environmental Protection Agency. Wildfire Smoke: A Guide for Public Health Officials. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency; 2016.
Fish JA, Peters MDJ, Ramsey I, Sharplin G, Corsini N, Eckert M. Effectiveness of public health messaging and communication channels during smoke events: a rapid systematic review. J Environ Manage. 2017;193:247–256.
Glik DC. Risk communication for public health emergencies. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:33–54.
Steelman TA, McCaffrey S. Best practices in risk and crisis communication: implications for natural hazards management. Nat Hazards. 2013;65(1):683–705.
Witte K. Putting the fear back into fear appeals: the Extended Parallel Process Model. Commun Monogr. 1992;59(4):329–349.
Ejeta LT, Ardalan A, Paton D. Application of behavioral theories to disaster and emergency health preparedness: a systematic review. PLoS Curr. 2015;7. doi:10.1371/currents.dis.31a8995ced321301466db400f1357829.
Hamann CJ, Mello E, Wu H, Yang J, Waldron D, Ramirez M. Disaster preparedness in rural families of children with special health care needs. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016;10(2):225–232.
Barnett DJ, Balicer RD, Thompson CB, et al. Assessment of local public health workers' willingness to respond to pandemic influenza through application of the Extended Parallel Process Model. PLoS One. 2009;4(7):e6365.
Basil M, Basil D, Deshpande S, Lavack AM. Applying the Extended Parallel Process Model to workplace safety messages. Health Commun. 2013;28(1):29–39.
Errett NA, Barnett DJ, Thompson CB, et al. Assessment of psychological preparedness and emergency response willingness of local public health department and hospital workers. Int J Emerg Ment Health. 2012;14(2):125–133.
Balicer RD, Barnett DJ, Thompson CB, et al. Characterizing hospital workers' willingness to report to duty in an influenza pandemic through threat- and efficacy-based assessment. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:436.
Errett NA, Barnett DJ, Thompson CB, et al. Assessment of Medical Reserve Corps volunteers' emergency response willingness using a threat- and efficacy-based model. Biosecur Bioterror. 2013;11(1):29–40.
von Gottberg C, Krumm S, Porzsolt F, Kilian R. The analysis of factors affecting municipal employees' willingness to report to work during an influenza pandemic by means of the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM). BMC Public Health. 2016;16:26.
Office of Financial Management. April 1 official population estimates. Washington data & research. https://www.ofm.wa.gov/washington-data-research/population-demographics/population-estimates/april-1-official-population-estimates . Accessed November 7, 2019.
Scott KK, Errett NA. Content, accessibility, and dissemination of disaster information via social media during the 2016 Louisiana floods. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018;24(4):370–379.
US Environmental Protection Agency. Air Quality Index (AQI) basics. AirNow. https://airnow.gov/index.cfm?action=aqibasics.aqi . Published 2016. Accessed October 2, 2019.
Washington State Department of Ecology. Washington Air Quality Advisory. https://ecology.wa.gov/Research-Data/Monitoring-assessment/Washington-Air-Quality-Advisory . Accessed October 2, 2019.
Washington State Department of Health. Community health assessment and improvement. https://www.doh.wa.gov/ForPublicHealthandHealthcareProviders/PublicHealthSystemResourcesandServices/CommunityHealthAssessmentandImprovement . Accessed October 3, 2019.
Qian Y, Willeke K, Grinshpun SA, Donnelly J, Coffey CC. Performance of N95 respirators: filtration efficiency for airborne microbial and inert particles. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1998;59(2):128–132.
Reponen T, Lee SA, Grinshpun SA, Johnson E, McKay R. Effect of fit testing on the protection offered by n95 filtering facepiece respirators against fine particles in a laboratory setting. Ann Occup Hyg. 2011;55(3):264–271.