Long-distance aberrant heterotopic connectivity in a mouse strain with a high incidence of callosal anomalies.
Agenesis of Corpus Callosum
/ diagnostic imaging
Animals
Connectome
Corpus Callosum
/ diagnostic imaging
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Female
Male
Mice
Mice, Inbred BALB C
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Nerve Fibers, Myelinated
/ pathology
Neural Pathways
/ diagnostic imaging
Species Specificity
White Matter
/ diagnostic imaging
Brain plasticity
Corpus callosum
Corpus callosum dysgenesis
DWI
Structural connectivity
Journal
NeuroImage
ISSN: 1095-9572
Titre abrégé: Neuroimage
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9215515
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 08 2020
15 08 2020
Historique:
received:
04
03
2020
revised:
13
04
2020
accepted:
21
04
2020
pubmed:
27
4
2020
medline:
20
2
2021
entrez:
27
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Corpus callosum dysgenesis (CCD) is a developmental brain condition in which some white matter fibers fail to find their natural course across the midplane, reorganizing instead to form new aberrant pathways. This type of white matter reorganization is known as long-distance plasticity (LDP). The present work aimed to characterize the Balb/c mouse strain as a model of CCD. We employed high-resolution anatomical MRI in 81 Balb/c and 27 C57bl6 mice to show that the Balb/c mouse strain presents a variance in the size of the CC that is 3.9 times higher than the variance of normotypical C57bl6. We also performed high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in 8 Balb/c and found that the Balb/c strain shows aberrant white matter bundles, such as the Probst (5/8 animals) and the Sigmoid bundles (7/8 animals), which are similar to those found in humans with CCD. Using a histological tracer technique, we confirmed the existence of these aberrant bundles in the Balb/c strain. Interestingly, we also identified sigmoid-like fibers in the C57bl6 strain, thought to a lesser degree. Next, we used a connectome approach and found widespread brain connectivity differences between Balb/c and C57bl6 strains. The Balb/c strain also exhibited increased variability of global connectivity. These findings suggest that the Balb/c strain presents local and global changes in brain structural connectivity. This strain often presents with callosal abnormalities, along with the Probst and the Sigmoid bundles, making it is an attractive animal model for CCD and LDP in general. Our results also show that even the C57bl6 strain, which typically serves as a normotypical control animal in a myriad of studies, presents sigmoid-fashion pattern fibers laid out in the brain. These results suggest that these aberrant fiber pathways may not necessarily be a pathological hallmark, but instead an alternative roadmap for misguided axons. Such findings offer new insights for interpreting the significance of CCD-associated LDP in humans.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32335262
pii: S1053-8119(20)30361-X
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116875
pmc: PMC7590260
mid: NIHMS1636195
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
116875Subventions
Organisme : Intramural NIH HHS
ID : Z01 NS003041
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests.
Références
Surg Radiol Anat. 2009 Aug;31(7):501-6
pubmed: 19214366
Neuroimage. 2016 Oct 1;139:259-270
pubmed: 27338515
Eur Radiol. 2016 Aug;26(8):2587-96
pubmed: 26560723
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007 Oct;17(5):516-24
pubmed: 17950593
J Comp Neurol. 1993 Oct 22;336(4):595-604
pubmed: 7504000
Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Dec;32(10):1428-33
pubmed: 25093633
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 27;111(21):7843-8
pubmed: 24821757
Neuroimage. 2006 Jan 1;29(1):99-105
pubmed: 16084741
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Apr;8(4):287-99
pubmed: 17375041
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2033-44
pubmed: 20851191
Nature. 2014 Apr 10;508(7495):207-14
pubmed: 24695228
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 15;125:1063-1078
pubmed: 26481672
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 12;11(9):e0162755
pubmed: 27618534
Neuroimage. 2015 May 1;111:277-88
pubmed: 25725467
Genes Brain Behav. 2017 Jan;16(1):101-117
pubmed: 27561549
Brain. 2014 Jun;137(Pt 6):1579-613
pubmed: 24477430
Neuroimage. 2016 Nov 15;142:394-406
pubmed: 27523449
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 07;11(4):e0152668
pubmed: 27055255
J Comp Neurol. 1988 Apr 22;270(4):575-90
pubmed: 3372749
J Neurosci. 2007 Sep 26;27(39):10345-9
pubmed: 17898206
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Mar;17(3):531-41
pubmed: 16627861
Brain Res. 1987 Jan 6;400(2):239-46
pubmed: 3815072
Behav Brain Res. 2007 Jan 10;176(1):53-65
pubmed: 16890300
J Comp Neurol. 2001 May 28;434(2):147-57
pubmed: 11331522
Hippocampus. 1997;7(1):2-14
pubmed: 9138666
Neuroimage. 2013 Apr 15;70:340-55
pubmed: 23268782
Neuroimage. 2007 May 1;35(4):1459-72
pubmed: 17379540
Neural Dev. 2015 Apr 03;10:10
pubmed: 25879444
Brain Struct Funct. 2016 Mar;221(2):941-54
pubmed: 25445840
Brain Res. 1974 Mar 15;68(1):1-18
pubmed: 4470444
Neuroimage. 2013 Sep;78:196-203
pubmed: 23587687
Mol Autism. 2011 May 16;2(1):7
pubmed: 21575186
Neuroimage. 2014 Dec;103:411-426
pubmed: 25109526