Safety and Efficacy of Lenabasum in a Phase II, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Adults With Systemic Sclerosis.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists
/ therapeutic use
Double-Blind Method
Dronabinol
/ analogs & derivatives
Drugs, Investigational
/ therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2
/ agonists
Scleroderma, Systemic
/ drug therapy
Severity of Illness Index
Skin
/ drug effects
Synthetic Drugs
/ therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Journal
Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)
ISSN: 2326-5205
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Rheumatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101623795
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
received:
16
09
2019
accepted:
21
04
2020
pubmed:
27
4
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
27
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the safety and efficacy of lenabasum in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc). A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study was conducted at 9 SSc clinics in the US. Adults with dcSSc of ≤6 years' duration who were receiving stable standard-of-care treatment were randomized to receive lenabasum (n = 27) or placebo (n = 15). Lenabasum doses were 5 mg once daily, 20 mg once daily, or 20 mg twice daily for 4 weeks, followed by 20 mg twice daily for 8 weeks. Safety and efficacy were assessed at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 63% of the lenabasum group and 60% of the placebo group, with no serious AEs related to lenabasum. Compared to placebo, lenabasum treatment was associated with greater improvement in the American College of Rheumatology Combined Response Index in diffuse cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis (CRISS) score and other efficacy outcome measures that assessed overall disease, skin involvement, and patient-reported function. The median CRISS score increased in the lenabasum group during the study, reaching 0.33, versus 0.00 in the placebo group, at week 16 (P = 0.07 by 2-sided mixed-effects model repeated-measures analysis). Gene expression in inflammation and fibrosis pathways was reduced, and inflammation and fibrosis were improved on histologic evaluation of skin biopsy specimens, in the lenabasum group compared to the placebo group (all P ≤ 0.05). Despite a short trial duration in a small number of patients in this phase II study in dcSSc, our findings indicate that lenabasum improves efficacy outcomes and underlying disease pathology with a favorable safety profile.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32336038
doi: 10.1002/art.41294
pmc: PMC7497006
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists
0
Drugs, Investigational
0
Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2
0
Synthetic Drugs
0
Dronabinol
7J8897W37S
lenabasum
OGN7X90BT8
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1350-1360Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.
Références
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Aug;76(8):1374-1380
pubmed: 28213563
J Rheumatol. 2010 Mar;37(3):591-8
pubmed: 20080913
JAMA. 2014 Jun 25;311(24):2490-8
pubmed: 25058083
Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Nov;42(11):2372-80
pubmed: 10555033
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 09;11(9):e0155076
pubmed: 27611972
Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Jun;44(6):1351-8
pubmed: 11407694
J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2015 Jun;10(2):318-32
pubmed: 25980325
Br J Dermatol. 2010 Mar;162(3):587-93
pubmed: 19995367
Liver Int. 2011 Jul;31(6):860-70
pubmed: 21645218
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Jan;159(1):179-87
pubmed: 9872837
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Jan 16;21(1):23
pubmed: 30651141
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Aug 1;56(8):1302-1311
pubmed: 28431140
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Oct;104(4):675-686
pubmed: 29238967
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 4;378(1):35-47
pubmed: 29298160
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Sep;71(9):1545-51
pubmed: 22492781
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2015 May;353(2):369-79
pubmed: 25749929
Eur J Pharmacol. 2016 Sep 5;786:128-136
pubmed: 27268717
Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Jul 29;17:194
pubmed: 26220546
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jul;39(Web Server issue):W307-15
pubmed: 21646343
Bioorg Med Chem. 2014 Jul 1;22(13):3245-51
pubmed: 24856183
Life Sci. 2006 Jan 2;78(6):549-63
pubmed: 16109430
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Sep;4(9):708-719
pubmed: 27469583
Hepatology. 2014 Jan;59(1):296-306
pubmed: 23813495
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Feb;68(2):299-311
pubmed: 26808827
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 Sep;48(9):1050-6
pubmed: 19589890
Eur J Biochem. 1995 Aug 15;232(1):54-61
pubmed: 7556170
J Rheumatol. 2015 Jan;42(1):64-72
pubmed: 25362656
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013 Mar-Apr;31(2 Suppl 76):166-71
pubmed: 23910619
Biochem Pharmacol. 2003 Feb 15;65(4):649-55
pubmed: 12566094
Rheumatol Int. 2008 May;28(7):631-5
pubmed: 18040689
Br J Dermatol. 2018 Sep;179(3):669-678
pubmed: 29494763
Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Nov;65(11):2737-47
pubmed: 24122180
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2017 Jan-Apr;2(1):11-18
pubmed: 28516167
FASEB J. 2009 Jul;23(7):2120-30
pubmed: 19246487
Respir Res. 2016 May 06;17(1):49
pubmed: 27153807
Arthritis Rheum. 1998 Sep;41(9):1613-9
pubmed: 9751093
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015 Jun;21(6):609.e1-4
pubmed: 25749560
Am J Pathol. 2010 Jul;177(1):187-96
pubmed: 20508030
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2009 Nov;21(6):617-22
pubmed: 19633559
Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Oct;65(10):1325-9
pubmed: 16540546
Lancet. 2011 Aug 6;378(9790):498-506
pubmed: 21777972
Pharmacol Res. 2013 Feb;68(1):46-58
pubmed: 23174265
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Nov;54(11):3655-60
pubmed: 17075814
Glia. 2010 Jan 15;58(2):135-47
pubmed: 19565660
J Leukoc Biol. 2005 Jul;78(1):231-8
pubmed: 15845647
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Oct;64(10):3420-9
pubmed: 22328195
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Nov 15;176(10):1026-34
pubmed: 17717203
Pharmacol Res. 2012 Jul;66(1):88-94
pubmed: 22465144
Bioinformatics. 2006 Aug 1;22(15):1924-5
pubmed: 16709585