Surgical Results of Intraoperative C-arm Fluoroscopy Versus O-arm in Transarticular Screw Fixation for Atlantoaxial Instability.
Aged
Atlanto-Axial Joint
/ diagnostic imaging
Blood Loss, Surgical
Bone Screws
Female
Fluoroscopy
/ methods
Humans
Internal Fixators
Intraoperative Period
Joint Instability
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Retrospective Studies
Surgery, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Surgical Wound Infection
/ epidemiology
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Outcome
Atlantoaxial fixation
C-arm fluoroscopy
O-arm
Transarticular screw
Journal
World neurosurgery
ISSN: 1878-8769
Titre abrégé: World Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101528275
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2020
07 2020
Historique:
received:
18
02
2020
revised:
12
04
2020
accepted:
13
04
2020
pubmed:
28
4
2020
medline:
27
10
2020
entrez:
28
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study compared the surgical results of transarticular screw (TAS) fixation for atlantoaxial instability between C-arm fluoroscopy and O-arm. Of 58 patients who underwent TAS fixation for atlantoaxial instability, 35 underwent C-arm-assisted surgery (C-group) and 23 underwent O-arm-assisted surgery (O-group). In total, 78 TASs were placed: 39 in the C-group and 39 in the O-group. Unilateral and bilateral TAS fixation was performed in 38 and 20 patients, respectively. All patients underwent Brook's procedure with TAS. TAS fixation accuracy on postoperative computed tomography, operative time, intraoperative bleeding, perioperative complications, and bone union were evaluated. Screw accuracy was assessed using Neo's classification: grade (G) 0, no perforation; G1, perforation <2 mm; G2, perforation 2-4 mm; G3, perforation >4 mm. TAS fixation accuracy was greater in the O-group than the C-group: G0: 38, 97.4%; G1: 1, 2.6% (O-group) vs G0: 22, 56.4%; G1: 11, 28.2%; G2: 3, 7.7%; G3: 3, 7.7% (C-group) (P < 0.001). Median operative time and median blood loss were similar between both groups. Bone union rate was greater with bilateral than unilateral TAS fixation (P < 0.05). There were no complications regarding screw malposition. Deep wound infection was observed in 1 case in the C-group. O-arm use improved TAS fixation accuracy. Blood loss was equivalent between the groups. O-arm-assisted TAS fixation did not prolong operative time despite the time required for setting and scanning. The O-arm is safe and useful for TAS fixation in atlantoaxial instability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32339745
pii: S1878-8750(20)30816-0
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.109
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e686-e690Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.