Multimodal Breast Phantoms for Microwave, Ultrasound, Mammography, Magnetic Resonance and Computed Tomography Imaging.
dielectric properties
microwave imaging
tissue-mimicking materials
Journal
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8220
Titre abrégé: Sensors (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101204366
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Apr 2020
23 Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
17
03
2020
revised:
20
04
2020
accepted:
21
04
2020
entrez:
29
4
2020
pubmed:
29
4
2020
medline:
5
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this work was to develop multimodal anthropomorphic breast phantoms suitable for evaluating the imaging performance of a recently-introduced Microwave Imaging (MWI) technique in comparison to the established diagnostic imaging modalities of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Ultrasound (US), mammography and Computed Tomography (CT). MWI is an emerging technique with significant potential to supplement established imaging techniques to improve diagnostic confidence for breast cancer detection. To date, numerical simulations have been used to assess the different MWI scanning and image reconstruction algorithms in current use, while only a few clinical trials have been conducted. To bridge the gap between the numerical simulation environment and a more realistic diagnostic scenario, anthropomorphic phantoms which mimic breast tissues in terms of their heterogeneity, anatomy, morphology, and mechanical and dielectric characteristics, may be used. Key in this regard is achieving realism in the imaging appearance of the different healthy and pathologic tissue types for each of the modalities, taking into consideration the differing imaging and contrast mechanisms for each modality. Suitable phantoms can thus be used by radiologists to correlate image findings between the emerging MWI technique and the more familiar images generated by the conventional modalities. Two phantoms were developed in this study, representing difficult-to-image and easy-to-image patients: the former contained a complex boundary between the mammary fat and fibroglandular tissues, extracted from real patient MRI datasets, while the latter contained a simpler and less morphologically accurate interface. Both phantoms were otherwise identical, with tissue-mimicking materials (TMMs) developed to mimic skin, subcutaneous fat, fibroglandular tissue, tumor and pectoral muscle. The phantoms' construction used non-toxic materials, and they were inexpensive and relatively easy to manufacture. Both phantoms were scanned using conventional modalities (MRI, US, mammography and CT) and a recently introduced MWI radar detection procedure called in-coherent Multiple Signal Classification (I-MUSIC). Clinically realistic artifact-free images of the anthropomorphic breast phantoms were obtained using the conventional imaging techniques as well as the emerging technique of MWI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32340281
pii: s20082400
doi: 10.3390/s20082400
pmc: PMC7219586
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1989;15(1):21-8
pubmed: 2538018
Diagnostics (Basel). 2018 Dec 18;8(4):
pubmed: 30567344
Am J Phys Med. 1958 Jun;37(3):160-5
pubmed: 13545384
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011 May;37(5):813-26
pubmed: 21497719
IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2012;11:1610-1613
pubmed: 25132808
Phys Med Biol. 2007 May 21;52(10):2637-56
pubmed: 17473342
Opt Express. 2016 Apr 18;24(8):9077-93
pubmed: 27137336
Med Phys. 2011 Feb;38(2):743-53
pubmed: 21452712
Phys Med Biol. 1987 Jun;32(6):675-95
pubmed: 3039542
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Oct 21;52(20):6093-115
pubmed: 17921574
Healthc Technol Lett. 2016 Jun 30;3(3):218-221
pubmed: 27733930
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011 Jan;37(1):122-35
pubmed: 21084158
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017 Nov;43(11):2733-2740
pubmed: 28843619
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002 Aug;49(8):812-22
pubmed: 12148820
Med Phys. 2014 Oct;41(10):103101
pubmed: 25281985
J Acoust Soc Am. 1978 Aug;64(2):423-57
pubmed: 361793
PLoS One. 2013 May 14;8(5):e64180
pubmed: 23691165
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Oct 7;55(19):5965-83
pubmed: 20858913
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008 Aug;34(8):1292-306
pubmed: 18343021
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Jan;23(1):87-91
pubmed: 16315211
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Mar;31(3):562-70
pubmed: 20187198
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008 Dec;55(12):2792-800
pubmed: 19126460
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012 Aug;31(8):1584-92
pubmed: 22562726
Med Phys. 2009 Jul;36(7):2955-65
pubmed: 19673194
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Feb;16(2):211-218
pubmed: 30409561
Ultrasonics. 1998 Feb;36(1-5):653-60
pubmed: 9651595
Med Phys. 2011 Feb;38(2):565-73
pubmed: 21452693
Microw Opt Technol Lett. 2011 Aug;53(8):1896-1902
pubmed: 21866208
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1986 Oct;12(10):795-808
pubmed: 3541334
J Clin Ultrasound. 1982 Feb;10(2):67-75
pubmed: 6804504
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999 Oct;10(4):533-44
pubmed: 10508320