Airborne Transmission Route of COVID-19: Why 2 Meters/6 Feet of Inter-Personal Distance Could Not Be Enough.
COVID-19
airborne transmission
droplets
persistence
social distancing
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 04 2020
23 04 2020
Historique:
received:
15
04
2020
accepted:
16
04
2020
entrez:
29
4
2020
pubmed:
29
4
2020
medline:
1
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic caused the shutdown of entire nations all over the world. In addition to mobility restrictions of people, the World Health Organization and the Governments have prescribed maintaining an inter-personal distance of 1.5 or 2 m (about 6 feet) from each other in order to minimize the risk of contagion through the droplets that we usually disseminate around us from nose and mouth. However, recently published studies support the hypothesis of virus transmission over a distance of 2 m from an infected person. Researchers have proved the higher aerosol and surface stability of SARS-COV-2 as compared with SARS-COV-1 (with the virus remaining viable and infectious in aerosol for hours) and that airborne transmission of SARS-CoV can occur besides close-distance contacts. Indeed, there is reasonable evidence about the possibility of SARS-COV-2 airborne transmission due to its persistence into aerosol droplets in a viable and infectious form. Based on the available knowledge and epidemiological observations, it is plausible that small particles containing the virus may diffuse in indoor environments covering distances up to 10 m from the emission sources, thus representing a kind of aerosol transmission. On-field studies carried out inside Wuhan Hospitals showed the presence of SARS-COV-2 RNA in air samples collected in the hospitals and also in the surroundings, leading to the conclusion that the airborne route has to be considered an important pathway for viral diffusion. Similar findings are reported in analyses concerning air samples collected at the Nebraska University Hospital. On March 16th, we have released a Position Paper emphasizing the airborne route as a possible additional factor for interpreting the anomalous COVID-19 outbreaks in northern Italy, ranked as one of the most polluted areas in Europe and characterized by high particulate matter (PM) concentrations. The available information on the SARS-COV-2 spreading supports the hypothesis of airborne diffusion of infected droplets from person to person at a distance greater than two meters (6 feet). The inter-personal distance of 2 m can be reasonably considered as an effective protection only if everybody wears face masks in daily life activities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32340347
pii: ijerph17082932
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082932
pmc: PMC7215485
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Aerosols
0
Types de publication
Editorial
Comment
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentOn
Références
Aerosol Sci Technol. 2020 Apr 03;0(0):1-4
pubmed: 32308568
Genome Biol. 2020 Mar 3;21(1):55
pubmed: 32127018
Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2020;38:197-244
pubmed: 31967581
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(12):13524-13533
pubmed: 32030582
JAMA. 2020 Mar 4;:
pubmed: 32129805
Environ Res. 2017 Jul;156:306-311
pubmed: 28388516
Environ Int. 2017 Jan;98:82-88
pubmed: 27745688
JAMA. 2020 Mar 26;:
pubmed: 32215590
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Oct;23(20):20178-20185
pubmed: 27439752
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 13;9(1):11755
pubmed: 31409807
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 16;382(16):1564-1567
pubmed: 32182409
JAMA. 2020 Jan 23;:
pubmed: 31971553
Environ Int. 2020 Apr 10;139:105730
pubmed: 32294574
Vet Microbiol. 2009 Oct 20;139(1-2):156-64
pubmed: 19539435
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46789
pubmed: 23056454
J R Soc Interface. 2011 Aug 7;8(61):1176-84
pubmed: 21300628
ISME J. 2018 Apr;12(4):1154-1162
pubmed: 29379178
Exp Fluids. 2016;57(2):24
pubmed: 32214638