Communication of children's weight status: what is effective and what are the children's and parents' experiences and preferences? A mixed methods systematic review.
Adolescents
Children
Communication
Parents
Systematic review
Weight
Weight assessment
Weight notification
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Apr 2020
28 Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
29
10
2019
accepted:
08
04
2020
entrez:
30
4
2020
pubmed:
30
4
2020
medline:
2
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Early intervention and conversation about a child's weight may offer an important chance of success in reducing weight and implementing a healthier lifestyle. This review explores the most effective ways to notify parents and children about the child's weight as well as their preferences and experiences around weight notification. We systematically searched nine databases for relevant primary research. Records were independently screened by two authors. We extracted data into a form designed for this review. Effect data was analysed using narrative synthesis and qualitative data using a best-fit framework synthesis. We assessed our confidence in the evidence using GRADE and GRADE-CERQual. Studies of effect found that the format of feedback made little or no difference in parents attending further treatment, recognising their child as overweight or obese, reactions to the way the weight notification is given, motivation for lifestyle change, understanding how to reduce the risk of overweight, or taking any action. However, parents receiving feedback with motivational interviewing have somewhat greater satisfaction with the way the healthcare provider supports them. Qualitative studies found that parents had clear preferences for the format, timing, content and amount of information they wanted to receive in relation to both the weighing process and weight notification. They also had clear preferences for how they wanted health care providers to interact and communicate with them and their children. Both parents and children often felt that they were not receiving enough information and worried about how their results would be kept private. Many parents experienced an emotional response when told about their child's weight ranging from positive, disbelief and negative feelings. Those who reacted with disbelief or negatively were less likely to accept their child's weight status and/or act upon the notification letter. No studies reported results for children who were underweight. Based on these qualitative results people working with weight assessment and notification programs should consider parents' preferences when developing feedback formats, considering the mode of feedback they are going to use and provide parents and children with tailored feedback and personalized follow up once a child is identified as overweight or obese.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Early intervention and conversation about a child's weight may offer an important chance of success in reducing weight and implementing a healthier lifestyle. This review explores the most effective ways to notify parents and children about the child's weight as well as their preferences and experiences around weight notification.
METHODS
METHODS
We systematically searched nine databases for relevant primary research. Records were independently screened by two authors. We extracted data into a form designed for this review. Effect data was analysed using narrative synthesis and qualitative data using a best-fit framework synthesis. We assessed our confidence in the evidence using GRADE and GRADE-CERQual.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Studies of effect found that the format of feedback made little or no difference in parents attending further treatment, recognising their child as overweight or obese, reactions to the way the weight notification is given, motivation for lifestyle change, understanding how to reduce the risk of overweight, or taking any action. However, parents receiving feedback with motivational interviewing have somewhat greater satisfaction with the way the healthcare provider supports them. Qualitative studies found that parents had clear preferences for the format, timing, content and amount of information they wanted to receive in relation to both the weighing process and weight notification. They also had clear preferences for how they wanted health care providers to interact and communicate with them and their children. Both parents and children often felt that they were not receiving enough information and worried about how their results would be kept private. Many parents experienced an emotional response when told about their child's weight ranging from positive, disbelief and negative feelings. Those who reacted with disbelief or negatively were less likely to accept their child's weight status and/or act upon the notification letter. No studies reported results for children who were underweight.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Based on these qualitative results people working with weight assessment and notification programs should consider parents' preferences when developing feedback formats, considering the mode of feedback they are going to use and provide parents and children with tailored feedback and personalized follow up once a child is identified as overweight or obese.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32345274
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08682-w
pii: 10.1186/s12889-020-08682-w
pmc: PMC7189728
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
574Subventions
Organisme : Helsedirektoratet
ID : NA
Références
BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 13;12:783
pubmed: 22974365
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 20;16:846
pubmed: 27544538
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Jun 14;13:57
pubmed: 22697580
J Child Health Care. 2018 Sep;22(3):486-500
pubmed: 29439599
J Sch Health. 2011 Mar;81(3):128-37
pubmed: 21332477
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2016 Aug;55(9):844-50
pubmed: 26637404
Public Health Nutr. 2014 May;17(5):987-97
pubmed: 24060095
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jun 03;14:549
pubmed: 24888972
Child Obes. 2017 Apr;13(2):164-171
pubmed: 28099048
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2016 Aug 18;11:31934
pubmed: 27543411
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Aug 27;12:E136
pubmed: 26312381
Lancet. 2004 Jan 10;363(9403):157-63
pubmed: 14726171
J Pediatr. 2013 Dec;163(6):1657-1662.e1
pubmed: 24075623
Fam Pract. 2013 Dec;30(6):719-23
pubmed: 24107270
Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Nov;59(568):856-62
pubmed: 19712545
J Pediatr. 2004 Apr;144(4):461-5
pubmed: 15069393
Health Expect. 2008 Sep;11(3):232-51
pubmed: 18816320
BMC Public Health. 2010 May 24;10:271
pubmed: 20497522
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):4716-4725
pubmed: 28334476
Child Care Health Dev. 2018 Jul;44(4):636-643
pubmed: 29761539
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2017 Summer;4(3):114-124
pubmed: 29546229
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Feb;94(2):210-7
pubmed: 24290240
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 30;4(7):e004481
pubmed: 25079920
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016 Jun;3(2):320-30
pubmed: 27271073
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 Feb 16;7:16
pubmed: 20205918
J Sch Nurs. 2008 Oct;24(5):298-309
pubmed: 18941154
Obes Rev. 2008 Sep;9(5):474-88
pubmed: 18331423
Vaccine. 2010 Jun 11;28(26):4235-48
pubmed: 20438879
Obes Rev. 2006 Feb;7 Suppl 1:7-66
pubmed: 16371076
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Sep 03;8:50
pubmed: 17767720
J Sch Health. 2012 Mar;82(3):107-14
pubmed: 22320334
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Nov;24(11):700-8
pubmed: 26306609
J Paediatr Child Health. 2014 Jun;50(6):461-70
pubmed: 24617494
Obes Rev. 2017 Feb;18(2):164-182
pubmed: 27888564
Pediatr Obes. 2018 Nov;13(11):639-646
pubmed: 27863185
Child Obes. 2014 Jun;10(3):197-206
pubmed: 24809221
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Nov;21(11):2180-8
pubmed: 24136924
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2009 Mar;21(3):160-6
pubmed: 19302692
BMC Public Health. 2014 Aug 07;14:806
pubmed: 25099430
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 27;12(10):e1001895
pubmed: 26506244
J Natl Med Assoc. 2007 Feb;99(2):153-8
pubmed: 17366952
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Sep 30;14:143
pubmed: 24079391
Health Educ Behav. 2007 Aug;34(4):622-33
pubmed: 16740517
Acad Pediatr. 2015 Mar-Apr;15(2):210-7
pubmed: 25536907
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Oct;21(15):2884-2892
pubmed: 29914583
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):833-842
pubmed: 27745683
Obes Res. 2003 Nov;11(11):1362-8
pubmed: 14627757
Pediatrics. 2009 Sep;124 Suppl 1:S63-72
pubmed: 19720669
J Health Econ. 2014 Sep;37:232-47
pubmed: 25132149
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 08;(10):CD010414
pubmed: 24101553
J Child Health Care. 2016 Dec;20(4):464-472
pubmed: 26447217
Int J Obes (Lond). 2006 Dec;30 Suppl 4:S11-7
pubmed: 17133230
BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 21;17(1):730
pubmed: 28934942
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Mar;20(3):525-33
pubmed: 26530036
Psychol Bull. 2007 Jul;133(4):673-93
pubmed: 17592961
J Child Health Care. 2007 Dec;11(4):311-22
pubmed: 18039733
Matern Child Health J. 2011 Nov;15(8):1308-15
pubmed: 20865447
BMJ. 2007 Jul 28;335(7612):194
pubmed: 17591624
Lancet. 2017 Dec 16;390(10113):2627-2642
pubmed: 29029897
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 07;2:CD011787
pubmed: 28169420
Acad Pediatr. 2009 May-Jun;9(3):172-8
pubmed: 19450777
J Sch Health. 2015 Oct;85(10):714-21
pubmed: 26331754