Diffusion-Tensor Imaging of Uterine Cervical Carcinoma: Correlation With Histopathologic Findings.
Journal
Journal of computer assisted tomography
ISSN: 1532-3145
Titre abrégé: J Comput Assist Tomogr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7703942
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed:
30
4
2020
medline:
26
5
2020
entrez:
30
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The authors investigated the usefulness of diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) for evaluating tumor invasion depth, histologic grade, and lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical carcinoma (CC). Fifteen consecutive patients with histologically confirmed CC underwent 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging and DTI. The CCs were clearly depicted as hypointense areas on all DTI maps. Fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and axial diffusivity showed significantly inverse correlations with CC histologic grades and were significantly different between metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32345807
doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001014
pii: 00004728-202005000-00018
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
426-435Références
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7–34.
Intaraphet S, Kasatpibal N, Siriaunkgul S, et al. Prognostic impact of histology in patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14:5355–5360.
Kodama J, Seki N, Masahiro S, et al. Prognostic factors in stage IB-IIB cervical adenocarcinoma patients treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101:413–417.
Kasamatsu T, Sasajima Y, Onda T, et al. Surgical treatment for neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;99:225–228.
Logsdon MD, Eifel PJ. Figo IIIB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: an analysis of prognostic factors emphasizing the balance between external beam and intracavitary radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;43:763–775.
Wagner AE, Pappas L, Ghia AJ, et al. Impact of tumor size on survival in cancer of the cervix and validation of stage IIA1 and IIA2 subdivisions. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;129:517–521.
Sala E, Rockall AG, Freeman SJ, et al. The added role of MR imaging in treatment stratification of patients with gynecologic malignancies: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiology. 2013;266:717–740.
Kundu S, Chopra S, Verma A, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging in cervical cancer: current evidence and future directions. J Cancer Res Ther. 2012;8:11–18.
Liu Y, Ye Z, Sun H, et al. Grading of uterine cervical cancer by using the ADC difference value and its correlation with microvascular density and vascular endothelial growth factor. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:757–765.
Zhou Y, Liu J, Liu C, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted MRI of cervical cancer — correlated with tumor differentiation and perfusion. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;34:1050–1056.
Yamada I, Hikishima K, Miyasaka N, et al. Diffusion-tensor MRI and tractography of the esophageal wall ex vivo. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;40:567–576.
Yamada I, Hikishima K, Miyasaka N, et al. Esophageal carcinoma: ex vivo evaluation with diffusion-tensor MR imaging and tractography at 7 T. Radiology. 2014;272:164–173.
Yamada I, Hikishima K, Miyasaka N, et al. Gastric carcinoma: evaluation with diffusion-tensor MR imaging and tractography ex vivo. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;34:144–151.
Toba M, Miyasaka N, Sakurai U, et al. Diagnostic possibility of diffusion tensor imaging for the evaluation of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: an ex vivo study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;34:616–622.
Zhang L, Liu A, Zhang T, et al. Use of diffusion tensor imaging in assessing superficial myometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma: a preliminary study. Acta Radiol. 2015;56:1273–1280.
Yamada I, Wakana K, Kobayashi D, et al. Endometrial carcinoma: evaluation using diffusion-tensor imaging and its correlation with histopathologic findings. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;50:250–260.
Goebell E, Paustenbach S, Vaeterlein O, et al. Low-grade and anaplastic gliomas: differences in architecture evaluated with diffusion-tensor MR imaging. Radiology. 2006;239:217–222.
Yamaguchi K, Nakazono T, Egashira R, et al. Diagnostic performance of diffusion tensor imaging with readout-segmented echo-planar imaging for invasive breast cancer: correlation of ADC and FA with pathological prognostic markers. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2017;16:245–252.
Kim JY, Kim JJ, Kim S, et al. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer: associations between diffusion metrics and histological prognostic factors. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:3185–3193.
Jiang R, Ma Z, Dong H, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy and tissue cellularity. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:20160076.
Feng Q, Fang W, Sun XP, et al. Renal clear cell carcinoma: diffusion tensor imaging diagnostic accuracy and correlations with clinical and histopathological factors. Clin Radiol. 2017;72:560–564.
Le Bihan D, Mangin JF, Poupon C, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:534–546.
Bammer R, Acar B, Moseley ME. In vivo MR tractography using diffusion imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2003;45:223–234.
Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105:103–104.
Weiss S, Jaermann T, Schmid P, et al. Three-dimensional fiber architecture of the nonpregnant human uterus determined ex vivo using magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2006;288:84–90.
Fujimoto K, Kido A, Okada T, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the normal human uterus in vivo at 3 tesla: comparison of DTI parameters in the different uterine layers. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;38:1494–1500.
He Y, Ding N, Li Y, et al. 3-T diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of normal uterus in young and middle-aged females during the menstrual cycle: evaluation of the cyclic changes of fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. Br J Radiol. 2015;88:20150043.
Nott JP, Pervolaraki E, Benson AP, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging determines three-dimensional architecture of human cervix: a cross-sectional study. BJOG. 2018;125:812–818.
Levy A, Medjhoul A, Caramella C, et al. Interest of diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient mapping in gynecological malignancies: a review. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;33:1020–1027.
Klerkx WM, Veldhuis WB, Spijkerboer AM, et al. The value of 3.0Tesla diffusion-weighted MRI for pelvic nodal staging in patients with early stage cervical cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:3414–3421.
He XQ, Wei LN. Diagnostic value of lymph node metastasis by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in cervical cancer. J Cancer Res Ther. 2016;12:77–83.
Song J, Hu Q, Huang J, et al. Combining tumor size and diffusion-weighted imaging to diagnose normal-sized metastatic pelvic lymph nodes in cervical cancers. Acta Radiol. 2019;60:388–395.
Ozal ST, Inci E, Gemici AA, et al. Can 3.0 Tesla diffusion tensor imaging parameters be prognostic indicators in breast cancer? Clin Imaging. 2018;51:240–247.
Kuang F, Ren J, Zhong Q, et al. The value of apparent diffusion coefficient in the assessment of cervical cancer. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:1050–1058.
Gladwish A, Milosevic M, Fyles A, et al. Association of apparent diffusion coefficient with disease recurrence in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with radical chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Radiology. 2016;279:158–166.