[Development of a decision aid for participative advance planning for people with dementia and their relatives].

Entwicklung einer Entscheidungshilfe für partizipative Vorausplanungen für Menschen mit Demenz und deren Angehörige.
Advance Care Planning Alzheimer´s Disease Decision Aid Patient Autonomy Shared decision Making

Journal

Der Nervenarzt
ISSN: 1433-0407
Titre abrégé: Nervenarzt
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0400773

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 30 4 2020
medline: 11 11 2020
entrez: 30 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Patients with a diagnosis of dementia face various important social and health-related decisions. Due to the progression of the disease it seems crucial that patients try to deal with these decisions early in the course of the disease to have the opportunity to make decisions autonomously. Professional support can help to plan in advance according to the wishes and possibilities in an effective and individualized manner. The instrument was developed in a multiphase process based on advance care planning and shared decision-making. The prototype was pretested on 8 patient-relative dyads from a special outpatient department for early recognition and adapted as best as possible to their needs. Subsequently, in a pilot study the applicability of the decision aid was tested as an intervention in a further 19 patient-relative dyads with trained conversion attendants (diagnosis of Alzheimer's dementia or mixed form; mini mental state examination, MMSE (Mini-Mental-State-Test-Summenwert) >20 and <27). The result was a written decision-making aid for people with early stage dementia and their relatives, which supports the decision-making process (health care proxy, advance directive, living and care, driving ability). The first results showed good acceptance and handling. Patients and relatives dealt with the individual topics to a high degree and found them to be highly relevant. Despite positive feedback from the participants with respect to acceptance and applicability, there were major difficulties in recruiting. In the future, the systematic use of decision support as part of routine care could help to support the decision-making process in this patient group.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Patients with a diagnosis of dementia face various important social and health-related decisions. Due to the progression of the disease it seems crucial that patients try to deal with these decisions early in the course of the disease to have the opportunity to make decisions autonomously. Professional support can help to plan in advance according to the wishes and possibilities in an effective and individualized manner.
MATERIAL AND METHODS METHODS
The instrument was developed in a multiphase process based on advance care planning and shared decision-making. The prototype was pretested on 8 patient-relative dyads from a special outpatient department for early recognition and adapted as best as possible to their needs. Subsequently, in a pilot study the applicability of the decision aid was tested as an intervention in a further 19 patient-relative dyads with trained conversion attendants (diagnosis of Alzheimer's dementia or mixed form; mini mental state examination, MMSE (Mini-Mental-State-Test-Summenwert) >20 and <27).
RESULTS RESULTS
The result was a written decision-making aid for people with early stage dementia and their relatives, which supports the decision-making process (health care proxy, advance directive, living and care, driving ability). The first results showed good acceptance and handling. Patients and relatives dealt with the individual topics to a high degree and found them to be highly relevant.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Despite positive feedback from the participants with respect to acceptance and applicability, there were major difficulties in recruiting. In the future, the systematic use of decision support as part of routine care could help to support the decision-making process in this patient group.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32347327
doi: 10.1007/s00115-020-00911-2
pii: 10.1007/s00115-020-00911-2
pmc: PMC7606278
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

ger

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1032-1039

Références

Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Apr;14(4):535-562
pubmed: 29653606
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Nov;59(11):2045-52
pubmed: 22092150
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Mar 1;154(5):336-46
pubmed: 21357911
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jul;175(7):1213-21
pubmed: 25985438
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014 Jan 24;111(4):50-7
pubmed: 24612497
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Jun 21;17(1):88
pubmed: 29933758
Palliat Med. 2014 Mar;28(3):197-209
pubmed: 23828874
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Mar 08;9:149
pubmed: 26956520
J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;40(3):743-57
pubmed: 24531163
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4:CD001431
pubmed: 28402085
J Clin Nurs. 2010 Nov;19(21-22):3073-84
pubmed: 21040013
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;27(10):1045-52
pubmed: 22139621
Lancet. 2011 Mar 19;377(9770):1019-31
pubmed: 21371747
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2008 Jul-Sep;22(3):293-8
pubmed: 18580595
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c1345
pubmed: 20332506
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Dec;25(12):2011-21
pubmed: 24053783
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1361-7
pubmed: 22618581
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Jan;55(1):132-150.e1
pubmed: 28827062
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2002 Summer;15(2):68-72
pubmed: 12083595
Neurology. 2008 Nov 4;71(19):1474-80
pubmed: 18981368
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018 Dec 30;148:w14706
pubmed: 30594990
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Feb;53(2):290-4
pubmed: 15673354
Palliat Care. 2019 Feb 27;12:1178224219826579
pubmed: 30833812
Dementia (London). 2019 Apr;18(3):825-845
pubmed: 27821714
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):e51-9
pubmed: 21546322
Nurs Res Pract. 2014;2014:875897
pubmed: 24757563
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 13;166(5):493-7
pubmed: 16534034

Auteurs

Katharina Bronner (K)

Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.

Lea Bodner (L)

Institut für Ethik, Geschichte und Theorie der Medizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland.

Ralf J Jox (RJ)

Institut für Ethik, Geschichte und Theorie der Medizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland.

Georg Marckmann (G)

Institut für Ethik, Geschichte und Theorie der Medizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland.

Janine Diehl-Schmid (J)

Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.

Johannes Hamann (J)

Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, München, Deutschland. Johannes.hamann@tum.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH