Changes in contact patterns shape the dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak in China.
Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Behavior
Betacoronavirus
COVID-19
Child
Child, Preschool
China
/ epidemiology
Communicable Disease Control
Contact Tracing
Coronavirus Infections
/ epidemiology
Disease Outbreaks
Disease Susceptibility
Female
Humans
Infant
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Theoretical
Pandemics
/ prevention & control
Pneumonia, Viral
/ epidemiology
SARS-CoV-2
Schools
Workplace
Young Adult
Journal
Science (New York, N.Y.)
ISSN: 1095-9203
Titre abrégé: Science
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0404511
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 06 2020
26 06 2020
Historique:
received:
19
03
2020
accepted:
27
04
2020
pubmed:
1
5
2020
medline:
7
7
2020
entrez:
1
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Intense nonpharmaceutical interventions were put in place in China to stop transmission of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). As transmission intensifies in other countries, the interplay between age, contact patterns, social distancing, susceptibility to infection, and COVID-19 dynamics remains unclear. To answer these questions, we analyze contact survey data for Wuhan and Shanghai before and during the outbreak and contact-tracing information from Hunan province. Daily contacts were reduced seven- to eightfold during the COVID-19 social distancing period, with most interactions restricted to the household. We find that children 0 to 14 years of age are less susceptible to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection than adults 15 to 64 years of age (odds ratio 0.34, 95% confidence interval 0.24 to 0.49), whereas individuals more than 65 years of age are more susceptible to infection (odds ratio 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 1.92). Based on these data, we built a transmission model to study the impact of social distancing and school closure on transmission. We find that social distancing alone, as implemented in China during the outbreak, is sufficient to control COVID-19. Although proactive school closures cannot interrupt transmission on their own, they can reduce peak incidence by 40 to 60% and delay the epidemic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32350060
pii: science.abb8001
doi: 10.1126/science.abb8001
pmc: PMC7199529
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1481-1486Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1199-1207
pubmed: 31995857
Science. 2003 Jun 20;300(5627):1961-6
pubmed: 12766206
Lancet. 2020 Apr 25;395(10233):1382-1393
pubmed: 32277878
Science. 2020 Jun 26;368(6498):1481-1486
pubmed: 32350060
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 22;9(1):15141
pubmed: 31641189
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;20(7):793-802
pubmed: 32247326
Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 Aug;20(8):1296-305
pubmed: 25076186
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e261-e270
pubmed: 32220655
Epidemiology. 2019 Sep;30(5):723-736
pubmed: 31274572
BMC Med. 2020 May 7;18(1):124
pubmed: 32375776
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e279-e288
pubmed: 32311320
J Math Biol. 1990;28(4):365-82
pubmed: 2117040
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jul 2;116(27):13174-13181
pubmed: 31209042
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 27;:
pubmed: 32353347
Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):689-697
pubmed: 32014114
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Sep 12;13(9):e1005697
pubmed: 28898249
Lancet. 2020 Feb 22;395(10224):542-545
pubmed: 32061313
Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 Feb;23(2):184-194
pubmed: 28098531
PLoS Med. 2008 Mar 25;5(3):e74
pubmed: 18366252
Science. 2020 Apr 24;368(6489):395-400
pubmed: 32144116
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Dec 11;115(50):12680-12685
pubmed: 30463945
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Feb 3;5:17
pubmed: 32322691