The "11 for Health in Denmark" intervention in 10- to 12-year-old Danish girls and boys and its effects on well-being-A large-scale cluster RCT.
KIDSCREEN-27
football
physical activity
physical well-being
psychological well-being
school setting
Journal
Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports
ISSN: 1600-0838
Titre abrégé: Scand J Med Sci Sports
Pays: Denmark
ID NLM: 9111504
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
27
11
2019
revised:
26
03
2020
accepted:
20
04
2020
pubmed:
1
5
2020
medline:
12
2
2021
entrez:
1
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The present study investigates the well-being effects for 10- to 12-year-old children who participated in the school-based intervention "11 for Health in Denmark," which comprises physical activity (PA) and health education. Subgroup analyses were carried out for boys and girls. Three thousand sixty-one children were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG) or a control group (CG) by 5:1 cluster randomization by school. 2533 children (mean age 11.5 ± 0.4; 49.7% boys) were assigned to IG and 528 children (mean age 11.4 ± 0.5; 50.8% boys) were assigned to CG. IG participated in the "11 for Health in Denmark" 11-week program, consisting of 2 × 45 min per week of football drills, small-sided games, and health education. CG did not participate in any intervention and continued with their regular education. Before and after the intervention period, both groups answered a shortened version of the multidimensional well-being questionnaire KIDSCREEN-27. The "11 for Health in Denmark" intervention program had a positive effect on physical well-being in girls (IG: 48.6 ± 8.5 to 50.2 ± 9.3), whereas the improvement was not significant in boys. The program also had a positive impact on well-being scores for peers and social support (IG: 50.2 ± 10.2 to 50.8 ± 10.1), though when analyzed separately in the subgroups of boys and girls the changes were not significant. No between-group differences were found for psychological well-being or school environment. The intervention program had a positive between-group effect on physical well-being in girls, whereas the change was not significant in boys. The overall scores for peers and social support improved during the intervention period, but no subgroup differences were found.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The present study investigates the well-being effects for 10- to 12-year-old children who participated in the school-based intervention "11 for Health in Denmark," which comprises physical activity (PA) and health education. Subgroup analyses were carried out for boys and girls.
METHOD
METHODS
Three thousand sixty-one children were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG) or a control group (CG) by 5:1 cluster randomization by school. 2533 children (mean age 11.5 ± 0.4; 49.7% boys) were assigned to IG and 528 children (mean age 11.4 ± 0.5; 50.8% boys) were assigned to CG. IG participated in the "11 for Health in Denmark" 11-week program, consisting of 2 × 45 min per week of football drills, small-sided games, and health education. CG did not participate in any intervention and continued with their regular education. Before and after the intervention period, both groups answered a shortened version of the multidimensional well-being questionnaire KIDSCREEN-27.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The "11 for Health in Denmark" intervention program had a positive effect on physical well-being in girls (IG: 48.6 ± 8.5 to 50.2 ± 9.3), whereas the improvement was not significant in boys. The program also had a positive impact on well-being scores for peers and social support (IG: 50.2 ± 10.2 to 50.8 ± 10.1), though when analyzed separately in the subgroups of boys and girls the changes were not significant. No between-group differences were found for psychological well-being or school environment.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The intervention program had a positive between-group effect on physical well-being in girls, whereas the change was not significant in boys. The overall scores for peers and social support improved during the intervention period, but no subgroup differences were found.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1787-1795Subventions
Organisme : Aase og Ejnar Danielsens Fond
Organisme : Danish Football Association
Organisme : Nordea-fonden
Informations de copyright
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Saxena S, Setoya Y. World Health Organization's comprehensive mental health action plan 2013-2020. Psychiatr Clin Neurosci. 2014;68(8):585-586.
Dodge R, Daly A, Huyton J, Sanders L. The challenge of defining wellbeing. Int J Wellbeing. 2012;2(3):222-235.
Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):593-602.
Ahn S, Fedewa AL. A meta-analysis of the relationship between children's physical activity and mental health. J Pediatric Psychol. 2011;36(4):385-397.
Brown HE, Pearson N, Braithwaite RE, Brown WJ, Biddle SJ. Physical activity interventions and depression in children and adolescents : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2013;43(3):195-206.
Liu M, Wu L, Ming Q. How does physical activity intervention improve self-esteem and self-concept in children and adolescents? Evidence from a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8):e0134804.
Weiss MR, Bolter ND, Bhalla JA, Price MS. Positive youth development through sport: comparison of participants in the first tee life skills programs with participants in other organized activities. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2007;29:S212-S212.
Costigan SA, Lubans DR, Lonsdale C, Sanders T, del Pozo CB. Associations between physical activity intensity and well-being in adolescents. Prevent Med. 2019;125:55-61.
Cooper AR, Goodman A, Page AS, et al. Objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time in youth: the International children's accelerometry database (ICAD). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity. 2015;12:113.
Fox KR, Cooper A, McKenna J. The school and promotion of children’s health-enhancing physical activity: perspectives from the United Kingdom. J Teach Phys Educ. 2004;23(4):338-358.
Harris KC, Kuramoto LK, Schulzer M, Retallack JE. Effect of school-based physical activity interventions on body mass index in children: a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2009;180(7):719-726.
Kriemler S, Meyer U, Martin E, van Sluijs EMF, Andersen LB, Martin BW. Effect of school-based interventions on physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents: a review of reviews and systematic update. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(11):923-930.
Love R, Adams J, van Sluijs EMF. Are school-based physical activity interventions effective and equitable? A meta-analysis of cluster randomized controlled trials with accelerometer-assessed activity. Obes Rev. 2019;20(6):859-870.
Rafferty R, Breslin G, Brennan D, Hassan D. A systematic review of school-based physical activity interventions on children’s wellbeing. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2016;9(1):215-230.
Eime RM, Young JA, Harvey JT, Charity MJ, Payne WR. A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for children and adolescents: informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity. 2013;10(1):98.
Nielsen G, Wikman JM, Jensen CJ, Schmidt JF, Gliemann L, Andersen TR. Health promotion: the impact of beliefs of health benefits, social relations and enjoyment on exercise continuation. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(Suppl 1):66-75.
Vella SA, Cliff DP, Magee CA, Okely AD. Associations between sports participation and psychological difficulties during childhood: A two-year follow up. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18(3):304-309.
McCarthy PJ, Jones MV, Clark-Carter D. Understanding enjoyment in youth sport: A developmental perspective. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2008;9(2):142-156.
Elbe AM, Wikman JM, Zheng M, Larsen MN, Nielsen G, Krustrup P. The importance of cohesion and enjoyment for the fitness improvement of 8-10-year-old children participating in a team and individual sport school-based physical activity intervention. Eur J Sport Sci. 2017;17(3):343-350.
Fuller CW, Orntoft C, Larsen MN, et al. 'FIFA 11 for Health' for Europe. 1: effect on health knowledge and well-being of 10- to 12-year-old Danish school children. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(20):1483-1488.
Varni JW, Seid M, Rode CA. The PedsQL: measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory. Med Care. 1999;37(2):126-139.
Helseth S, Haraldstad K, Christophersen K-A. A cross-sectional study of Health Related Quality of Life and body mass index in a Norwegian school sample (8-18 years): a comparison of child and parent perspectives. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13(1):47.
Michel G, Bisegger C, Fuhr DC, Abel T. Age and gender differences in health-related quality of life of children and adolescents in Europe: a multilevel analysis. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(9):1147-1157.
Haraldstad K, Christophersen K-A, Eide H, Nativg GK, Helseth S. Predictors of health-related quality of life in a sample of children and adolescents: a school survey. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(21-22):3048-3056.
Dreyhaupt J, Mayer B, Keis O, Öchsner W, Muche R. Cluster-randomized studies in educational research: principles and methodological aspects. GMS J Med Educ. 2017;34(2):Doc26.
Hey SP, Kimmelman J. The questionable use of unequal allocation in confirmatory trials. Neurology. 2014;82(1):77-79.
Randers MB, Andersen TB, Rasmussen LS, Larsen MN, Krustrup P. Effect of game format on heart rate, activity profile, and player involvement in elite and recreational youth players. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(S1):17-26.
Ravens-Sieberer U, Gosch A, Rajmil L, et al. KIDSCREEN-52 quality-of-life measure for children and adolescents. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2005;5(3):353-364.
Ravens-Sieberer U, Herdman M, Devine J, et al. The European KIDSCREEN approach to measure quality of life and well-being in children: development, current application, and future advances. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(3):791-803.
Breslin G, Gossrau-Breen D, McCay N, Gilmore G, McDonald L, Hanna D. Physical activity, gender, weight status, and wellbeing in 9- to 11-year-old children: a cross sectional survey. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(3):394-401.
Nielsen G, Bugge A, Andersen LB. The influence of club football on children’s daily physical activity. Soccer Soc. 2015;17(2):246-258.
Bendiksen M, Williams CA, Hornstrup T, et al. Heart rate response and fitness effects of various types of physical education for 8- to 9-year-old schoolchildren. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14(8):861-869.
Wikman JM, Elsborg P, Ryom K. Psychological benefits of team sport. In: I D. Parnell PK, (Ed). Sport and Health: Exploring the Current State of Play(pp. 132-146). 2017. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Vella SA, Cliff DP, Magee CA, Okely AD. Sports participation and parent-reported health-related quality of life in children: longitudinal associations. J Pediatrics. 2014;164(6):1469-1474.
Edwards DJ, Edwards SD, Basson CJ. Psychological well - being and physical self-esteem in sport and exercise. Int J Mental Health Promotion. 2004;6(1):25-32.
Henderlong Corpus J, Lepper MR. The Effects of Person Versus Performance Praise on Children’s Motivation: Gender and age as moderating factors. Educ Psychol. 2007;27(4):487-508.
The Danish Health Authority. Fysisk aktivitet og stillesiddende adfaerd blandt 11-15-årige. København: Sundhedsstyrelsen; 2019.
Pilgaard M, Rask S. Danskernes motions-og sportsvaner 2016. København: Idraettens Analyseinstitut; 2016.