DNA damage response signaling pathways and targets for radiotherapy sensitization in cancer.
Journal
Signal transduction and targeted therapy
ISSN: 2059-3635
Titre abrégé: Signal Transduct Target Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101676423
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 05 2020
01 05 2020
Historique:
received:
24
01
2020
accepted:
16
03
2020
revised:
20
02
2020
entrez:
2
5
2020
pubmed:
2
5
2020
medline:
7
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Radiotherapy is one of the most common countermeasures for treating a wide range of tumors. However, the radioresistance of cancer cells is still a major limitation for radiotherapy applications. Efforts are continuously ongoing to explore sensitizing targets and develop radiosensitizers for improving the outcomes of radiotherapy. DNA double-strand breaks are the most lethal lesions induced by ionizing radiation and can trigger a series of cellular DNA damage responses (DDRs), including those helping cells recover from radiation injuries, such as the activation of DNA damage sensing and early transduction pathways, cell cycle arrest, and DNA repair. Obviously, these protective DDRs confer tumor radioresistance. Targeting DDR signaling pathways has become an attractive strategy for overcoming tumor radioresistance, and some important advances and breakthroughs have already been achieved in recent years. On the basis of comprehensively reviewing the DDR signal pathways, we provide an update on the novel and promising druggable targets emerging from DDR pathways that can be exploited for radiosensitization. We further discuss recent advances identified from preclinical studies, current clinical trials, and clinical application of chemical inhibitors targeting key DDR proteins, including DNA-PKcs (DNA-dependent protein kinase, catalytic subunit), ATM/ATR (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated and Rad3-related), the MRN (MRE11-RAD50-NBS1) complex, the PARP (poly[ADP-ribose] polymerase) family, MDC1, Wee1, LIG4 (ligase IV), CDK1, BRCA1 (BRCA1 C terminal), CHK1, and HIF-1 (hypoxia-inducible factor-1). Challenges for ionizing radiation-induced signal transduction and targeted therapy are also discussed based on recent achievements in the biological field of radiotherapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32355263
doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-0150-x
pii: 10.1038/s41392-020-0150-x
pmc: PMC7192953
doi:
Substances chimiques
Neoplasm Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
60Références
Fidler, M. M. et al. Cancer incidence and mortality among young adults aged 20–39 years worldwide in 2012: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 18, 1579–1589 (2017).
pubmed: 29111259
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30677-0
Global Burden of Disease Cancer, C. et al. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol. 3, 524–548 (2017).
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688
Collaborators, G. B. D. C. O. D. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 390, 1151–1210 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32152-9
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J. Clin. 67, 7–30 (2017).
pubmed: 28055103
doi: 10.3322/caac.21387
Bray, F. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 68, 394–424 (2018).
pubmed: 30207593
doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
Chen, W. et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2014. Chin. J. Cancer Res. 30, 1–12 (2018).
pubmed: 29545714
pmcid: 5842223
doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.01.01
Torre, L. A. et al. Global cancer in women: burden and trends. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 26, 444–457 (2017).
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0858
Goldberg, M. S. Improving cancer immunotherapy through nanotechnology. Nat. Rev. Cancer 19, 587–602 (2019).
pubmed: 31492927
doi: 10.1038/s41568-019-0186-9
Shaked, Y. The pro-tumorigenic host response to cancer therapies. Nat. Rev. Cancer 19, 667–685 (2019).
pubmed: 31645711
doi: 10.1038/s41568-019-0209-6
Falkson, C. B. et al. Radiotherapy with curative intent in patients with early-stage, medically inoperable, non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review. Clin. Lung Cancer 18, 105–121 e105 (2017).
pubmed: 27908621
doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.10.008
Tam, S. Y. & Wu, V. W. C. A review on the special radiotherapy techniques of colorectal cancer. Front. Oncol. 9, 208 (2019).
pubmed: 31001474
pmcid: 6454863
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00208
Taito, M. et al. Voice rehabilitation for laryngeal cancer after radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-laryngol. 276, 1573–1583 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05452-2
Robinson, S. D. et al. Radical accelerated radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a 5-year retrospective review of two dose fractionation schedules. Radiother. Oncol. 143, 37–43 (2019).
Razvi, Y. et al. A review of the rapid response radiotherapy program in patients with advanced cancer referred for palliative radiotherapy over two decades. Support. Care Cancer 27, 2131–2134 (2019).
pubmed: 30246224
doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4474-9
Ghotra, V. P., Geldof, A. A. & Danen, E. H. Targeted radiosensitization in prostate cancer. Curr. Pharm. Des. 19, 2819–2828 (2013).
pubmed: 23448469
doi: 10.2174/1381612811319150017
Ma, L. et al. A current review of dose-escalated radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Radiol. Oncol. 53, 6–14 (2019).
pubmed: 30840594
pmcid: 6411023
doi: 10.2478/raon-2019-0006
Kumar, S., Singh, R. K. & Meena, R. Emerging targets for radioprotection and radiosensitization in radiotherapy. Tumour Biol. 37, 11589–11609 (2016).
pubmed: 27318945
doi: 10.1007/s13277-016-5117-8
Allison, R. R., Patel, R. M. & McLawhorn, R. A. Radiation oncology: physics advances that minimize morbidity. Fut. Oncol. 10, 2329–2344 (2014).
doi: 10.2217/fon.14.176
Roland, C. G. Priority of clinical x-ray reports: a classic dethroned? Can. J. Surg. 5, 247–251 (1962).
pubmed: 14493469
Thariat, J. et al. Past, present, and future of radiotherapy for the benefit of patients. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 10, 52–60 (2013).
pubmed: 23183635
doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.203
Baskar, R., Lee, K. A., Yeo, R. & Yeoh, K. W. Cancer and radiation therapy: current advances and future directions. Int. J. Med. Sci. 9, 193–199 (2012).
pubmed: 22408567
pmcid: 3298009
doi: 10.7150/ijms.3635
Royce, T. J. & Efstathiou, J. A. Proton therapy for prostate cancer: a review of the rationale, evidence, and current state. Urol. Oncol. 37, 628–636 (2019).
pubmed: 30527342
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.11.012
Lorenz, E. et al. Radiotherapy for childhood cancer and subsequent thyroid cancer risk: a systematic review. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 33, 1139–1162 (2018).
pubmed: 30511135
doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0467-8
Gebauer, J. et al. Long-term endocrine and metabolic consequences of cancer treatment: a systematic review. Endocr. Rev. 40, 711–767 (2019).
pubmed: 30476004
doi: 10.1210/er.2018-00092
Mattke, M. et al. High control rates of proton- and carbon-ion-beam treatment with intensity-modulated active raster scanning in 101 patients with skull base chondrosarcoma at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center. Cancer 124, 2036–2044 (2018).
pubmed: 29469932
doi: 10.1002/cncr.31298
Huang, R. et al. Radiotherapy exposure in cancer patients and subsequent risk of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Neurol. 10, 233 (2019).
pubmed: 30930843
pmcid: 6428767
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00233
Turek, M., Krzyczmonik, M. & Balczewski, P. New hopes in cancer battle—a review of new molecules and treatment strategies. Med. Chem. 12, 700–719 (2016).
pubmed: 27140184
doi: 10.2174/1573406412666160502153700
Killock, D. Brain cancer: chemoradiotherapy for low-grade glioma: battle won, but the war goes on. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 13, 328–329 (2016).
pubmed: 27141888
doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.61
Dabaja, B. S. & Mikhaeel, N. G. In the battle between protons and photons for hematologic malignancies, the patient must win. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 95, 43–45 (2016).
pubmed: 27084623
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.09.043
Delaney, G., Jacob, S., Featherstone, C. & Barton, M. The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment: estimating optimal utilization from a review of evidence-based clinical guidelines. Cancer 104, 1129–1137 (2005).
pubmed: 16080176
doi: 10.1002/cncr.21324
Xian, S. & Zhang, S. New advances in clinical treatment of radiation oncology. Sci. Technol. Rev. 32, 37–41 (2014).
He, J. et al. Basic guidelines of quality control for radiotherapy. Chin. J. Radiat. Oncol. 27, 335–342 (2018).
Baskar, R. & Itahana, K. Radiation therapy and cancer control in developing countries: can we save more lives? Int. J. Med. Sci. 14, 13–17 (2017).
pubmed: 28138304
pmcid: 5278654
doi: 10.7150/ijms.17288
Atun, R. et al. Expanding global access to radiotherapy. Lancet Oncol. 16, 1153–1186 (2015).
pubmed: 26419354
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00222-3
Seo, Y. S. et al. Radiation-induced changes in tumor vessels and microenvironment contribute to therapeutic resistance in glioblastoma. Front. Oncol. 9, 1259 (2019).
pubmed: 31803626
pmcid: 6873882
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01259
Ranawat, P. & Rawat, S. Radiation resistance in thermophiles: mechanisms and applications. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 33, 112 (2017).
pubmed: 28470425
doi: 10.1007/s11274-017-2279-5
Steinbichler, T. B. et al. Therapy resistance mediated by exosomes. Mol. Cancer 18, 58 (2019).
pubmed: 30925921
pmcid: 6441190
doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-0970-x
Meads, M. B., Gatenby, R. A. & Dalton, W. S. Environment-mediated drug resistance: a major contributor to minimal residual disease. Nat. Rev. Cancer 9, 665–674 (2009).
pubmed: 19693095
doi: 10.1038/nrc2714
Hegedus, F., Mathew, L. M. & Schwartz, R. A. Radiation dermatitis: an overview. Int. J. Dermatol. 56, 909–914 (2017).
pubmed: 27496623
doi: 10.1111/ijd.13371
Chen, L., Abulizi, A. & Li, M. Protective effect of Ganoderma (Lingzhi) on radiation and chemotherapy. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1182, 119–142 (2019).
pubmed: 31777016
doi: 10.1007/978-981-32-9421-9_4
Lam, E. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinician-reported versus patient-reported outcomes of radiation dermatitis. Breast. 50, 125–134 (2019).
Facoetti, A., Barcellini, A., Valvo, F. & Pullia, M. The role of particle therapy in the risk of radio-induced second tumors: a review of the literature. Anticancer Res. 39, 4613–4617 (2019).
pubmed: 31519558
doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13641
Pearce, M. S. et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380, 499–505 (2012).
pubmed: 22681860
pmcid: 3418594
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0
Lee, J. W. & Wernicke, A. G. Risk and survival outcomes of radiation-induced CNS tumors. J. Neuro-Oncol. 129, 15–22 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2148-3
Friedman, D. N. et al. Radiation dose and volume to the pancreas and subsequent risk of diabetes mellitus. J. Natl Cancer Inst. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djz152 .
Groot, H. J. et al. Risk of diabetes after para-aortic radiation for testicular cancer. Br. J. cancer 119, 901–907 (2018).
pubmed: 30297773
pmcid: 6189211
doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0248-x
van Nimwegen, F. A. et al. Radiation dose–response relationship for risk of coronary heart disease in survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 235–243 (2016).
pubmed: 26573075
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.4444
Luo, D. et al. Targeted gold nanocluster-enhanced radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Small 15, e1900968 (2019).
pubmed: 31265213
doi: 10.1002/smll.201900968
Khoo, A. M. et al. Radiosensitization of prostate cancers in vitro and in vivo to erbium-filtered orthovoltage X-rays using actively targeted gold nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 7, 18044 (2017).
pubmed: 29273727
pmcid: 5741750
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18304-y
Roy, S. & Trinchieri, G. Microbiota: a key orchestrator of cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 271–285 (2017).
pubmed: 28303904
doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.13
Castro-Eguiluz, D. et al. Nutrient recommendations for cancer patients treated with pelvic radiotherapy, with or without comorbidities. Rev. Invest. Clin. 70, 130–135 (2018).
pubmed: 29943773
Aghajanzadeh, S., Karlsson, T., Tuomi, L. & Finizia, C. The effect of jaw exercises on anxiety and depression in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy: prospective 2-year follow-up study. Head Neck. 42, 330–335 (2020).
Santivasi, W. L. & Xia, F. Ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage, response, and repair. Antioxid. redox Signal. 21, 251–259 (2014).
pubmed: 24180216
doi: 10.1089/ars.2013.5668
Anand, S. K., Sharma, A., Singh, N. & Kakkar, P. Entrenching role of cell cycle checkpoints and autophagy for maintenance of genomic integrity. DNA Rep. 86, 102748 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.102748
Huang, R. & Zhou, P. Double-edged effects of noncoding RNAs in responses to environmental genotoxic insults: perspectives with regards to molecule-ecology network. Environ. Pollut. 247, 64–71 (2019).
pubmed: 30654255
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.014
Ferreira, S. & Dutreix, M. DNA repair inhibitors to enhance radiotherapy: progresses and limitations. Cancer Radiother. 23, 883–890 (2019).
pubmed: 31615730
doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.08.008
Shukla, V. et al. HMCES functions in the alternative end-joining pathway of the DNA DSB repair during class switch recombination in B cells. Mol. Cell. 77, 384–394 (2020).
pubmed: 31806351
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.10.031
Xiong, H. et al. miR-613 inhibits cell migration and invasion by downregulating Daam1 in triple-negative breast cancer. Cell. Signal. 44, 33–42 (2018).
pubmed: 29339084
doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2018.01.013
Ward, J. F. Mechanisms of DNA repair and their potential modification for radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 12, 1027–1032 (1986).
pubmed: 3528085
doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(86)90220-8
Deycmar, S. et al. The relative biological effectiveness of proton irradiation in dependence of DNA damage repair. Br. J. Radiol. 20190494 (2019).
Kim, W. et al. Cellular stress responses in radiotherapy. Cells 8, 1105 (2019).
Mavragani, I. V., Nikitaki, Z., Kalospyros, S. A. & Georgakilas, A. G. Ionizing radiation and complex DNA damage: from prediction to detection challenges and biological significance. Cancers 11, 1789 (2019).
Lomax, M. E., Folkes, L. K. & O’Neill, P. Biological consequences of radiation-induced DNA damage: relevance to radiotherapy. Clin. Oncol. 25, 578–585 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2013.06.007
Hei, T. K. et al. Radiation induced non-targeted response: mechanism and potential clinical implications. Curr. Mol. Pharmacol. 4, 96–105 (2011).
pubmed: 21143185
pmcid: 3356574
doi: 10.2174/1874467211104020096
Groth, P. et al. Homologous recombination repairs secondary replication induced DNA double-strand breaks after ionizing radiation. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 6585–6594 (2012).
pubmed: 22505579
pmcid: 3413124
doi: 10.1093/nar/gks315
Mladenov, E., Magin, S., Soni, A. & Iliakis, G. DNA double-strand break repair as determinant of cellular radiosensitivity to killing and target in radiation therapy. Front. Oncol. 3, 113 (2013).
pubmed: 23675572
pmcid: 3650303
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00113
Sage, E. & Shikazono, N. Radiation-induced clustered DNA lesions: Repair and mutagenesis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 107, 125–135 (2017).
pubmed: 27939934
doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.12.008
Nikjoo, H. et al. Radiation track, DNA damage and response-a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. Phys. Soc. 79, 116601 (2016).
doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/79/11/116601
Li, Z., Pearlman, A. H. & Hsieh, P. DNA mismatch repair and the DNA damage response. DNA Rep. 38, 94–101 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.11.019
Goldstein, M. & Kastan, M. B. The DNA damage response: implications for tumor responses to radiation and chemotherapy. Annu. Rev. Med. 66, 129–143 (2015).
pubmed: 25423595
doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-081313-121208
Pilie, P. G., Tang, C., Mills, G. B. & Yap, T. A. State-of-the-art strategies for targeting the DNA damage response in cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 16, 81–104 (2019).
pubmed: 30356138
doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0114-z
Ou, H. L. & Schumacher, B. DNA damage responses and p53 in the aging process. Blood 131, 488–495 (2018).
pubmed: 29141944
doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-07-746396
Nikitaki, Z. et al. Measurement of complex DNA damage induction and repair in human cellular systems after exposure to ionizing radiations of varying linear energy transfer (LET). Free Radic. Res. 50, S64–S78 (2016).
pubmed: 27593437
doi: 10.1080/10715762.2016.1232484
Lorat, Y. et al. Nanoscale analysis of clustered DNA damage after high-LET irradiation by quantitative electron microscopy—the heavy burden to repair. DNA Rep. 28, 93–106 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.01.007
Hagiwara, Y. et al. 3D-structured illumination microscopy reveals clustered DNA double-strand break formation in widespread gammaH2AX foci after high LET heavy-ion particle radiation. Oncotarget 8, 109370–109381 (2017).
pubmed: 29312614
pmcid: 5752527
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22679
Stewart, R. D. Induction of DNA damage by light ions relative to (60)Co gamma-rays. Int. J. Part. Ther. 5, 25–39 (2018).
pubmed: 31773018
pmcid: 6871587
doi: 10.14338/IJPT-18-00030
Li, T. & Chen, Z. J. The cGAS-cGAMP-STING pathway connects DNA damage to inflammation, senescence, and cancer. J. Exp. Med. 215, 1287–1299 (2018).
pubmed: 29622565
pmcid: 5940270
doi: 10.1084/jem.20180139
Maremonti, E. et al. In vivo assessment of reactive oxygen species production and oxidative stress effects induced by chronic exposure to gamma radiation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Free Radic. Biol. Med. (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.11.037 .
Schuch, A. P., Garcia, C. C., Makita, K. & Menck, C. F. DNA damage as a biological sensor for environmental sunlight. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 12, 1259–1272 (2013).
pubmed: 23525255
doi: 10.1039/c3pp00004d
Harper, J. W. & Elledge, S. J. The DNA damage response: ten years after. Mol. Cell 28, 739–745 (2007).
pubmed: 18082599
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.015
Kouranti, I. & Peyroche, A. Protein degradation in DNA damage response. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 23, 538–545 (2012).
pubmed: 22353182
doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.02.004
Hau, P. M. et al. Role of ATM in the formation of the replication compartment during lytic replication of Epstein–Barr virus in nasopharyngeal epithelial cells. J. Virol. 89, 652–668 (2015).
pubmed: 25355892
doi: 10.1128/JVI.01437-14
Ciccia, A. & Elledge, S. J. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol. Cell 40, 179–204 (2010).
pubmed: 20965415
pmcid: 20965415
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019
Heijink, A. M., Krajewska, M. & van Vugt, M. A. The DNA damage response during mitosis. Mutat. Res. 750, 45–55 (2013).
pubmed: 23880065
doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2013.07.003
Hau, P. M. & Tsao, S. W. Epstein–Barr virus hijacks DNA damage response transducers to orchestrate its life cycle. Viruses. 9, 341 (2017).
Ford, J. C. et al. 14-3-3 protein homologs required for the DNA damage checkpoint in fission yeast. Science 265, 533–535 (1994).
pubmed: 8036497
doi: 10.1126/science.8036497
Voicu, P. M. et al. In Schizosaccharomyces pombe the 14-3-3 protein Rad24p is involved in negative control of pho1 gene expression. Yeast 24, 121–127 (2007).
pubmed: 17173334
doi: 10.1002/yea.1433
Brown, A. L. et al. A human Cds1-related kinase that functions downstream of ATM protein in the cellular response to DNA damage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 3745–3750 (1999).
pubmed: 10097108
doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3745
Paciotti, V., Lucchini, G., Plevani, P. & Longhese, M. P. Mec1p is essential for phosphorylation of the yeast DNA damage checkpoint protein Ddc1p, which physically interacts with Mec3p. EMBO J. 17, 4199–4209 (1998).
pubmed: 9670034
pmcid: 1170752
doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.14.4199
Kenna, M. A. & Skibbens, R. V. Mechanical link between cohesion establishment and DNA replication: Ctf7p/Eco1p, a cohesion establishment factor, associates with three different replication factor C complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 2999–3007 (2003).
pubmed: 12665596
pmcid: 152568
doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.8.2999-3007.2003
Zhang, H. et al. Characterization of DNA damage-stimulated self-interaction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint protein Rad17p. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 26715–26723 (2001).
pubmed: 11356855
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M103682200
Mayer, M. L., Gygi, S. P., Aebersold, R. & Hieter, P. Identification of RFC(Ctf18p, Ctf8p, Dcc1p): an alternative RFC complex required for sister chromatid cohesion in S. cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 7, 959–970 (2001).
pubmed: 11389843
doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00254-4
Maradeo, M. E., Garg, A. & Skibbens, R. V. Rfc5p regulates alternate RFC complex functions in sister chromatid pairing reactions in budding yeast. Cell Cycle 9, 4370–4378 (2010).
pubmed: 20980821
pmcid: 3055188
doi: 10.4161/cc.9.21.13634
Kasahara, K. et al. 14-3-3gamma mediates Cdc25A proteolysis to block premature mitotic entry after DNA damage. EMBO J. 29, 2802–2812 (2010).
pubmed: 20639859
pmcid: 2924644
doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.157
McAinsh, A. D., Scott-Drew, S., Murray, J. A. & Jackson, S. P. DNA damage triggers disruption of telomeric silencing and Mec1p-dependent relocation of Sir3p. Curr. Biol. 9, 963–966 (1999).
pubmed: 10508591
doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80424-2
McCulley, J. L. & Petes, T. D. Chromosome rearrangements and aneuploidy in yeast strains lacking both Tel1p and Mec1p reflect deficiencies in two different mechanisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 11465–11470 (2010).
pubmed: 20534547
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006281107
Legrand, M., Chan, C. L., Jauert, P. A. & Kirkpatrick, D. T. The contribution of the S-phase checkpoint genes MEC1 and SGS1 to genome stability maintenance in Candida albicans. Fungal Genet. Biol. 48, 823–830 (2011).
pubmed: 21511048
pmcid: 3126902
doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2011.04.005
Foss, E. J. Is Rad9p upstream or downstream from Mec1p? Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 65, 347–351 (2000).
pubmed: 12760049
doi: 10.1101/sqb.2000.65.347
Rouse, J. & Jackson, S. P. Lcd1p recruits Mec1p to DNA lesions in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Cell 9, 857–869 (2002).
pubmed: 11983176
doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00507-5
Rouse, J. & Jackson, S. P. LCD1: an essential gene involved in checkpoint control and regulation of the MEC1 signalling pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 19, 5801–5812 (2000).
pubmed: 11060031
pmcid: 305794
doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.21.5801
Siddiqui, M. S., Francois, M., Fenech, M. F. & Leifert, W. R. Persistent gammaH2AX: a promising molecular marker of DNA damage and aging. Mutat. Res. Rev. Mutat. Res. 766, 1–19 (2015).
pubmed: 26596544
doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2015.07.001
Ku, A., Facca, V. J., Cai, Z. & Reilly, R. M. Auger electrons for cancer therapy— review. EJNMMI Radiopharm. Chem. 4, 27 (2019).
pubmed: 31659527
pmcid: 6800417
doi: 10.1186/s41181-019-0075-2
Motoyama, S. et al. Advantages of evaluating gammaH2AX induction in non-clinical drug development. Genes Environ. 40, 10 (2018).
pubmed: 29785231
pmcid: 5950202
doi: 10.1186/s41021-018-0098-z
Campillo-Marcos, I. & Lazo, P. A. Implication of the VRK1 chromatin kinase in the signaling responses to DNA damage: a therapeutic target? Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 75, 2375–2388 (2018).
pubmed: 29679095
pmcid: 5986855
doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2811-2
Popp, H. D. et al. Leukocyte DNA damage after reduced and conventional absorbed radiation doses using 3rd generation dual-source CT technology. Eur. J. Radiol. Open 3, 134–137 (2016).
pubmed: 27437433
pmcid: 4939318
doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2016.06.001
Kuo, L. J. & Yang, L. X. Gamma-H2AX—a novel biomarker for DNA double-strand breaks. In vivo 22, 305–309 (2008).
pubmed: 18610740
Liu, H. et al. Brca1 is involved in tolerance to adefovir dipivoxilinduced DNA damage. Int. J. Mol. Med. 43, 2491–2498 (2019).
pubmed: 31017265
Kitabatake, K., Yoshida, E., Kaji, T. & Tsukimoto, M. Involvement of adenosine A2B receptor in radiation-induced translocation of epidermal growth factor receptor and DNA damage response leading to radioresistance in human lung cancer cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 1864, 129457 (2020).
pubmed: 31678144
doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2019.129457
Gustafsson, N. M. S. et al. Targeting PFKFB3 radiosensitizes cancer cells and suppresses homologous recombination. Nat. Commun. 9, 3872 (2018).
pubmed: 30250201
pmcid: 6155239
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06287-x
Im, J., Lawrence, J., Seelig, D. & Nho, R. S. FoxM1-dependent RAD51 and BRCA2 signaling protects idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis fibroblasts from radiation-induced cell death. Cell Death Dis. 9, 584 (2018).
pubmed: 29789556
pmcid: 5964221
doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0652-4
Zhang, P. et al. Knockdown of long non-coding RNA PCAT1 in glioma stem cells promotes radiation sensitivity. Med. Mol. Morphol. 52, 114–122 (2019).
pubmed: 30564876
doi: 10.1007/s00795-018-0209-8
pmcid: 30564876
Katagi, H. et al. Radiosensitization by histone H3 demethylase inhibition in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Clin. Cancer Res. 25, 5572–5583 (2019).
pubmed: 31227500
pmcid: 6744979
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3890
Rothkamm, K. et al. DNA damage foci: meaning and significance. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 56, 491–504 (2015).
pubmed: 25773265
doi: 10.1002/em.21944
pmcid: 25773265
Sharma, A., Singh, K. & Almasan, A. Histone H2AX phosphorylation: a marker for DNA damage. Methods Mol. Biol. 920, 613–626 (2012).
pubmed: 22941631
doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-998-3_40
pmcid: 22941631
Carney, J. P. et al. The hMre11/hRad50 protein complex and Nijmegen breakage syndrome: linkage of double-strand break repair to the cellular DNA damage response. Cell 93, 477–486 (1998).
pubmed: 9590181
doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81175-7
pmcid: 9590181
Habraken, Y., Jolois, O. & Piette, J. Differential involvement of the hMRE11/hRAD50/NBS1 complex, BRCA1 and MLH1 in NF-kappaB activation by camptothecin and X-ray. Oncogene 22, 6090–6099 (2003).
pubmed: 12955088
doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206893
pmcid: 12955088
Kobayashi, J. Molecular mechanism of the recruitment of NBS1/hMRE11/hRAD50 complex to DNA double-strand breaks: NBS1 binds to gamma-H2AX through FHA/BRCT domain. J. Radiat. Res. 45, 473–478 (2004).
pubmed: 15635255
doi: 10.1269/jrr.45.473
pmcid: 15635255
Tauchi, H. et al. The forkhead-associated domain of NBS1 is essential for nuclear foci formation after irradiation but not essential for hRAD50·hMRE11·NBS1 complex DNA repair activity. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 12–15 (2001).
pubmed: 11062235
doi: 10.1074/jbc.C000578200
Park, Y. B., Chae, J., Kim, Y. C. & Cho, Y. Crystal structure of human Mre11: understanding tumorigenic mutations. Structure 19, 1591–1602 (2011).
pubmed: 22078559
doi: 10.1016/j.str.2011.09.010
pmcid: 22078559
Park, Y. B. et al. Eukaryotic Rad50 functions as a rod-shaped dimer. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 248–257 (2017).
pubmed: 28134932
pmcid: 5625350
doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3369
Kim, H. et al. Heterozygous germline mutations in NBS1 among Korean patients with high-risk breast cancer negative for BRCA1/2 mutation. Fam. Cancer 14, 365–371 (2015).
pubmed: 25712764
doi: 10.1007/s10689-015-9789-9
Someya, M. et al. Association of ionizing radiation-induced foci of NBS1 with chromosomal instability and breast cancer susceptibility. Radiat. Res. 166, 575–582 (2006).
pubmed: 17007554
doi: 10.1667/RR0638.1
pmcid: 17007554
Dumon-Jones, V. et al. Nbn heterozygosity renders mice susceptible to tumor formation and ionizing radiation-induced tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 63, 7263–7269 (2003).
pubmed: 14612522
Della-Maria, J. et al. Human Mre11/human Rad50/Nbs1 and DNA ligase IIIalpha/XRCC1 protein complexes act together in an alternative nonhomologous end joining pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 33845–33853 (2011).
pubmed: 21816818
pmcid: 3190819
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.274159
Ho, V. et al. Overexpression of the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN) complex in rectal cancer correlates with poor response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy and prognosis. BMC Cancer 18, 869 (2018).
pubmed: 30176843
pmcid: 6122630
doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4776-9
Blackford, A. N. & Jackson, S. P. ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK: the trinity at the heart of the DNA damage response. Mol. Cell 66, 801–817 (2017).
pubmed: 28622525
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.015
pmcid: 28622525
Nishi, R. et al. The deubiquitylating enzyme UCHL3 regulates Ku80 retention at sites of DNA damage. Sci. Rep. 8, 17891 (2018).
pubmed: 30559450
pmcid: 6297141
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36235-0
Pucci, S. et al. Ku70, Ku80, and sClusterin: a cluster of predicting factors for response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 97, 381–388 (2017).
pubmed: 28068245
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.10.018
Koike, M., Yutoku, Y. & Koike, A. Cloning, localization and focus formation at DNA damage sites of canine Ku70. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 79, 554–561 (2017).
pubmed: 28163277
pmcid: 5383176
doi: 10.1292/jvms.16-0649
Deriano, L. et al. Human chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells can escape DNA damage-induced apoptosis through the nonhomologous end-joining DNA repair pathway. Blood 105, 4776–4783 (2005).
pubmed: 15718417
doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-07-2888
Gou, Q. et al. Downregulation of MDC1 and 53BP1 by short hairpin RNA enhances radiosensitivity in laryngeal carcinoma cells. Oncol. Rep. 34, 251–257 (2015).
pubmed: 25976740
doi: 10.3892/or.2015.3980
pmcid: 25976740
Gerloff, D. L., Woods, N. T., Farago, A. A. & Monteiro, A. N. BRCT domains: a little more than kin, and less than kind. FEBS Lett. 586, 2711–2716 (2012).
pubmed: 22584059
pmcid: 3413754
doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.05.005
Chen, Y. et al. And-1 coordinates with CtIP for efficient homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint maintenance. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 2516–2530 (2017).
pubmed: 27940552
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1212
pmcid: 27940552
Baldock, R. A. et al. ATM localization and heterochromatin repair depend on direct interaction of the 53BP1-BRCT2 domain with gammaH2AX. Cell Rep. 13, 2081–2089 (2015).
pubmed: 26628370
pmcid: 4688034
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.10.074
Dai, Y. et al. Structural basis for recognition of 53BP1 tandem Tudor domain by TIRR. Nat. Commun. 9, 2123 (2018).
pubmed: 29844495
pmcid: 5974088
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04557-2
Capalbo, G. et al. Radiation-induced survivin nuclear accumulation is linked to DNA damage repair. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 77, 226–234 (2010).
pubmed: 20394854
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.12.001
pmcid: 20394854
Cairns, J. et al. Bora downregulation results in radioresistance by promoting repair of double strand breaks. PLoS ONE 10, e0119208 (2015).
pubmed: 25742493
pmcid: 4351037
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119208
Cirauqui, B. et al. DNA repair pathways to regulate response to chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. Tumour Biol. 37, 13435–13443 (2016).
pubmed: 27465548
doi: 10.1007/s13277-016-5149-0
Li, H. et al. Alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, and risk of breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from the BRCA1 and BRCA2 Cohort Consortium. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 29, 368–378 (2020).
Kratochwil, C. et al. Patients resistant against PSMA-targeting alpha-radiation therapy often harbor mutations in DNA-repair associated genes. J. Nucl. Med. (2019). https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.234559 .
Gorodetska, I., Kozeretska, I. & Dubrovska, A. BRCA genes: the role in genome stability, cancer stemness and therapy resistance. J. Cancer 10, 2109–2127 (2019).
pubmed: 31205572
pmcid: 6548160
doi: 10.7150/jca.30410
Atipairin, A., Canyuk, B. & Ratanaphan, A. The RING heterodimer BRCA1-BARD1 is a ubiquitin ligase inactivated by the platinum-based anticancer drugs. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 126, 203–209 (2011).
pubmed: 20878461
doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1182-7
Nishikawa, H. et al. BRCA1-associated protein 1 interferes with BRCA1/BARD1 RING heterodimer activity. Cancer Res. 69, 111–119 (2009).
pubmed: 19117993
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3355
Venkitaraman, A. R. Cancer suppression by the chromosome custodians, BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science 343, 1470–1475 (2014).
pubmed: 24675954
doi: 10.1126/science.1252230
Li, Y. et al. USP13 regulates the RAP80-BRCA1 complex dependent DNA damage response. Nat. Commun. 8, 15752 (2017).
pubmed: 28569838
pmcid: 5461494
doi: 10.1038/ncomms15752
Her, J., Soo Lee, N., Kim, Y. & Kim, H. Factors forming the BRCA1-A complex orchestrate BRCA1 recruitment to the sites of DNA damage. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 48, 658–664 (2016).
pubmed: 27325824
doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmw047
pmcid: 27325824
Ling, H. et al. Genetic evaluation of BRCA1 associated a complex genes with triple-negative breast cancer susceptibility in Chinese women. Oncotarget 7, 9759–9772 (2016).
pubmed: 26848770
pmcid: 4891082
Batenburg, N. L. et al. CSB interacts with BRCA1 in late S/G2 to promote MRN- and CtIP-mediated DNA end resection. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 10678–10692 (2019).
pubmed: 31501894
pmcid: 6847465
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz784
Anantha, R. W. et al. Functional and mutational landscapes of BRCA1 for homology-directed repair and therapy resistance. eLife. 6, e21350 (2017).
Thakur, V. et al. The membrane tethered matrix metalloproteinase MT1-MMP triggers an outside-in DNA damage response that impacts chemo- and radiotherapy responses of breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 443, 115–124 (2019).
pubmed: 30502358
doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.11.031
pmcid: 30502358
Costes, S. V. et al. Spatiotemporal characterization of ionizing radiation induced DNA damage foci and their relation to chromatin organization. Mutat. Res. 704, 78–87 (2010).
pubmed: 20060491
pmcid: 3951968
doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2009.12.006
Xu, J. et al. Silencing of MBD1 reverses pancreatic cancer therapy resistance through inhibition of DNA damage repair. Int. J. Oncol. 42, 2046–2052 (2013).
pubmed: 23588667
doi: 10.3892/ijo.2013.1901
pmcid: 23588667
Watanabe, S. et al. JMJD1C demethylates MDC1 to regulate the RNF8 and BRCA1-mediated chromatin response to DNA breaks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1425–1433 (2013).
pubmed: 24240613
doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2702
Reichert, S. et al. Survivin inhibition and DNA double-strand break repair: a molecular mechanism to overcome radioresistance in glioblastoma. Radiother. Oncol. 101, 51–58 (2011).
pubmed: 21852011
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.06.037
Zhao, J. et al. pATM and gammaH2AX are effective radiation biomarkers in assessing the radiosensitivity of (12)C(6+) in human tumor cells. Cancer Cell Int. 17, 49 (2017).
pubmed: 28450809
pmcid: 5405484
doi: 10.1186/s12935-017-0419-5
Pajic, M. et al. miR-139-5p modulates radiotherapy resistance in breast cancer by repressing multiple gene networks of DNA repair and ROS defense. Cancer Res. 78, 501–515 (2018).
pubmed: 29180477
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-3105
Koval, L., Proshkina, E., Shaposhnikov, M. & Moskalev, A. The role of DNA repair genes in radiation-induced adaptive response in Drosophila melanogaster is differential and conditional. Biogerontology 21, 45–56 (2020).
Iliakis, G., Mladenov, E. & Mladenova, V. Necessities in the processing of DNA double strand breaks and their effects on genomic instability and cancer. Cancers 11, 1671 (2019).
Karanam, N. K., Ding, L., Aroumougame, A. & Story, M. D. Tumor treating fields cause replication stress and interfere with DNA replication fork maintenance: Implications for cancer therapy. Transl. Res. 217, 33–46 (2020).
Dukaew, N. et al. Enhancement of radiosensitivity by eurycomalactone in human NSCLC cells through G2/M cell cycle arrest and delayed DNA double-strand break repair. Oncol. Res. 28, 161–175 (2020).
Resnick, M. A. The repair of double-strand breaks in DNA; a model involving recombination. J. Theor. Biol. 59, 97–106 (1976).
pubmed: 940351
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5193(76)80025-2
Lodovichi, S. et al. Effect of BRCA1 missense variants on gene reversion in DNA double-strand break repair mutants and cell cycle-arrested cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutagenesis 35, 189–195 (2020).
Roth, D. B. & Wilson, J. H. Relative rates of homologous and nonhomologous recombination in transfected DNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 82, 3355–3359 (1985).
pubmed: 2987922
doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.10.3355
Roth, D. B., Porter, T. N. & Wilson, J. H. Mechanisms of nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 5, 2599–2607 (1985).
pubmed: 3016509
pmcid: 366995
doi: 10.1128/MCB.5.10.2599
Mukherjee, K. et al. Systematic analysis of linker histone PTM hotspots reveals phosphorylation sites that modulate homologous recombination and DSB repair. DNA Rep. 86, 102763 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.102763
Berthel, E. et al. What does the history of research on the repair of DNA double-strand breaks tell us?—A comprehensive review of human radiosensitivity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 5339 (2020).
Foray, N., Bourguignon, M. & Hamada, N. Individual response to ionizing radiation. Mutat. Res. 770, 369–386 (2016).
pubmed: 27919342
doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2016.09.001
Joubert, A. & Foray, N. Intrinsic radiosensitivity and DNA double-strand breaks in human cells. Cancer Radiother. 11, 129–142 (2007).
pubmed: 17321185
doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2007.01.003
Wright, W. D., Shah, S. S. & Heyer, W. D. Homologous recombination and the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 10524–10535 (2018).
pubmed: 29599286
pmcid: 6036207
doi: 10.1074/jbc.TM118.000372
Toulany, M. Targeting DNA double-strand break repair pathways to improve radiotherapy response. Genes 10, 25 (2019).
Klein, H. L. et al. Guidelines for DNA recombination and repair studies: cellular assays of DNA repair pathways. Microb. Cell 6, 1–64 (2019).
pubmed: 30652105
pmcid: 6334234
doi: 10.15698/mic2019.01.664
Ranjha, L., Howard, S. M. & Cejka, P. Main steps in DNA double-strand break repair: an introduction to homologous recombination and related processes. Chromosoma 127, 187–214 (2018).
pubmed: 29327130
doi: 10.1007/s00412-017-0658-1
Hoppe, M. M., Sundar, R., Tan, D. S. P. & Jeyasekharan, A. D. Biomarkers for homologous recombination deficiency in cancer. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 110, 704–713 (2018).
pubmed: 29788099
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy085
Mazur, A. K., Nguyen, T. S. & Gladyshev, E. Direct homologous dsDNA–dsDNA pairing: How, where, and why? J. Mol. Biol. 432, 737–744 (2020).
Turan, V. & Oktay, K. BRCA-related ATM-mediated DNA double-strand break repair and ovarian aging. Hum. Reprod. Update 26, 43–57 (2020).
Brito, D. V. C. et al. Mimicking age-associated Gadd45gamma dysregulation results in memory impairments in young adult mice. J. Neurosci. 40, 1197–1210 (2020).
Knott, G. J. & Doudna, J. A. CRISPR-Cas guides the future of genetic engineering. Science 361, 866–869 (2018).
pubmed: 30166482
pmcid: 6455913
doi: 10.1126/science.aat5011
Fellmann, C. et al. Cornerstones of CRISPR-Cas in drug discovery and therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 16, 89–100 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.238
Jin, M. et al. The diversity and commonalities of the radiation-resistance mechanisms of Deinococcus and its up-to-date applications. AMB Express 9, 138 (2019).
pubmed: 31482336
pmcid: 6722170
doi: 10.1186/s13568-019-0862-x
Lopez Perez, R. et al. DNA damage response of clinical carbon ion versus photon radiation in human glioblastoma cells. Radiother. Oncol. 133, 77–86 (2019).
pubmed: 30935585
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.12.028
Gao, Y. et al. The cancer/testes (CT) antigen HORMAD1 promotes homologous recombinational DNA repair and radioresistance in lung adenocarcinoma cells. Sci. Rep. 8, 15304 (2018).
pubmed: 30333500
pmcid: 6192992
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33601-w
Zhang, X. et al. Cathepsin B contributes to radioresistance by enhancing homologous recombination in glioblastoma. Biomed. Pharmacother. 107, 390–396 (2018).
pubmed: 30099343
doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.08.007
Koonin, E. V., Makarova, K. S. & Zhang, F. Diversity, classification and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 37, 67–78 (2017).
pubmed: 28605718
pmcid: 5776717
doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.05.008
Ipoutcha, T. et al. Multiple origins and specific evolution of CRISPR/Cas9 systems in minimal bacteria (Mollicutes). Front. Microbiol. 10, 2701 (2019).
pubmed: 31824468
pmcid: 6882279
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02701
Buyukyoruk, M. & Wiedenheft, B. Type I-F CRISPR-Cas provides protection from DNA, but not RNA phages. Cell Discov. 5, 54 (2019).
pubmed: 31798958
pmcid: 6868142
doi: 10.1038/s41421-019-0123-9
Dave, A. et al. Homologous recombination repair intermediates promote efficient de novo telomere addition at DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 1271–1284 (2020).
Gibbs, D. R. & Dhakal, S. Homologous recombination under the single-molecule fluorescence microscope. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 6102 (2019).
Sun, Y., McCorvie, T. J., Yates, L. A. & Zhang, X. Structural basis of homologous recombination. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 77, 3–18 (2020).
Nogueira, A., Fernandes, M., Catarino, R. & Medeiros, R. RAD52 functions in homologous recombination and its importance on genomic integrity maintenance and cancer therapy. Cancers 11 (2019).
Biau, J., Chautard, E., Verrelle, P. & Dutreix, M. Altering DNA repair to improve radiation therapy: specific and multiple pathway targeting. Front. Oncol. 9, 1009 (2019).
pubmed: 31649878
pmcid: 6795692
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01009
Bylicky, M. A., Mueller, G. P. & Day, R. M. Radiation resistance of normal human astrocytes: the role of non-homologous end joining DNA repair activity. J. Radiat. Res. 60, 37–50 (2019).
pubmed: 30423138
doi: 10.1093/jrr/rry084
Mu, F. et al. Mangiferin induces radiosensitization in glioblastoma cells by inhibiting nonhomologous end joining. Oncol. Rep. 40, 3663–3673 (2018).
pubmed: 30272350
Wang, X. et al. LINP1 facilitates DNA damage repair through non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway and subsequently decreases the sensitivity of cervical cancer cells to ionizing radiation. Cell Cycle 17, 439–447 (2018).
pubmed: 29527968
pmcid: 5927633
doi: 10.1080/15384101.2018.1442625
Estrada-Bernal, A. et al. MEK inhibitor GSK1120212-mediated radiosensitization of pancreatic cancer cells involves inhibition of DNA double-strand break repair pathways. Cell Cycle 14, 3713–3724 (2015).
pubmed: 4825728
pmcid: 4825728
doi: 10.1080/15384101.2015.1104437
Barnum, K. J. & O’Connell, M. J. Cell cycle regulation by checkpoints. Methods Mol. Biol. 1170, 29–40 (2014).
pubmed: 24906307
pmcid: 4990352
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0888-2_2
Schafer, K. A. The cell cycle: a review. Vet. Pathol. 35, 461–478 (1998).
pubmed: 9823588
doi: 10.1177/030098589803500601
Harashima, H., Dissmeyer, N. & Schnittger, A. Cell cycle control across the eukaryotic kingdom. Trends Cell Biol. 23, 345–356 (2013).
pubmed: 23566594
doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2013.03.002
Ghelli Luserna di Rora, A., Iacobucci, I. & Martinelli, G. The cell cycle checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of leukemias. J. Hematol. Oncol. 10, 77 (2017).
pubmed: 28356161
pmcid: 5371185
doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0443-x
Wang, H., Zhang, X., Teng, L. & Legerski, R. J. DNA damage checkpoint recovery and cancer development. Exp. Cell Res. 334, 350–358 (2015).
pubmed: 25842165
doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.03.011
Panzica, M. T. & McNally, F. J. Mechanisms that prevent catastrophic interactions between paternal chromosomes and the oocyte meiotic spindle. Cell Cycle 17, 529–534 (2018).
pubmed: 29375006
pmcid: 5969545
doi: 10.1080/15384101.2018.1431495
Ikeda, H. et al. Expression profile of cell cycle-related genes in human fibroblasts exposed simultaneously to radiation and simulated microgravity. Int. J. Mol. Sci 20, 4791 (2019).
Ismael, M. et al. The targeting of rna polymerase I transcription using CX-5461 in combination with radiation enhances tumour cell killing effects in human solid cancers. Cancers. 11, 1429 (2019).
Peng, G. et al. Alterations of cell cycle control proteins SHP1/2, p16, CDK4 and cyclin D1 in radioresistant nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 10, 1709–1716 (2014).
pubmed: 25109634
pmcid: 4148372
doi: 10.3892/mmr.2014.2463
Finkielstein, C. V., Chen, L. G. & Maller, J. L. A role for G1/S cyclin-dependent protein kinases in the apoptotic response to ionizing radiation. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 38476–38485 (2002).
pubmed: 12176996
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206184200
Agami, R. & Bernards, R. Distinct initiation and maintenance mechanisms cooperate to induce G1 cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage. Cell 102, 55–66 (2000).
pubmed: 10929713
doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00010-6
Poon, R. Y., Toyoshima, H. & Hunter, T. Redistribution of the CDK inhibitor p27 between different cyclin.CDK complexes in the mouse fibroblast cell cycle and in cells arrested with lovastatin or ultraviolet irradiation. Mol. Biol. cell 6, 1197–1213 (1995).
pubmed: 8534916
pmcid: 301277
doi: 10.1091/mbc.6.9.1197
Lv, L. et al. SOX6 suppresses the development of lung adenocarcinoma by regulating expression of p53, p21(CIPI), cyclin D1 and beta-catenin. FEBS Open Biol. 10, 135–146 (2020).
Tanoue, Y. et al. Differential roles of Rad18 and Chk2 in genome maintenance and skin carcinogenesis following UV exposure. J. Invest. Dermatol. 138, 2550–2557 (2018).
pubmed: 29859927
doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.05.015
Luo, L. et al. Study on the mechanism of cell cycle checkpoint kinase 2 (CHEK2) gene dysfunction in chemotherapeutic drug resistance of triple negative breast cancer cells. Med. Sci. Monit. 24, 3176–3183 (2018).
pubmed: 29761796
pmcid: 5978023
doi: 10.12659/MSM.907256
Andrysik, Z., Kim, J., Tan, A. C. & Espinosa, J. M. A genetic screen identifies TCF3/E2A and TRIAP1 as pathway-specific regulators of the cellular response to p53 activation. Cell Rep. 3, 1346–1354 (2013).
pubmed: 23684607
pmcid: 3733554
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.014
Kottemann, M. C. & Bale, A. E. Characterization of DNA damage-dependent cell cycle checkpoints in a menin-deficient model. DNA Rep. 8, 944–952 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.06.001
Nagasawa, H. et al. Absence of a radiation-induced first-cycle G1–S arrest in p53+ human tumor cells synchronized by mitotic selection. Cancer Res. 58, 2036–2041 (1998).
pubmed: 9581850
Fabbro, M. et al. BRCA1-BARD1 complexes are required for p53Ser-15 phosphorylation and a G1/S arrest following ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 31251–31258 (2004).
pubmed: 15159397
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405372200
Yoon, H. S., Chen, X. & Yang, V. W. Kruppel-like factor 4 mediates p53-dependent G1/S cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 2101–2105 (2003).
pubmed: 12427745
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211027200
Jiang, X. & Wang, J. Down-regulation of TFAM increases the sensitivity of tumour cells to radiation via p53/TIGAR signalling pathway. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 23, 4545–4558 (2019).
pubmed: 31062473
pmcid: 6584511
Li, S. J. et al. Low-dose irradiation promotes proliferation of the human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells through accumulation of mutant P53. Int. J. Oncol. 50, 290–296 (2017).
pubmed: 27959407
doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3795
Chen, S. et al. Inhibition of MELK produces potential anti-tumour effects in bladder cancer by inducing G1/S cell cycle arrest via the ATM/CHK2/p53 pathway. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 24, 1804–1821 (2020).
Lashgari, A., Fauteux, M., Marechal, A. & Gaudreau, L. Cellular Depletion of BRD8 causes p53-dependent apoptosis and induces a DNA damage response in non-stressed cells. Sci. Rep. 8, 14089 (2018).
pubmed: 30237520
pmcid: 6147888
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32323-3
Gomez, V. et al. Regulation of DNA damage responses and cell cycle progression by hMOB2. Cell. Signal. 27, 326–339 (2015).
pubmed: 25460043
doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2014.11.016
Luo, Q. et al. Sodium fluoride arrests renal G2/M phase cell-cycle progression by activating ATM-Chk2-P53/Cdc25C signaling pathway in mice. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 51, 2421–2433 (2018).
pubmed: 30537743
doi: 10.1159/000495899
Thanasoula, M., Escandell, J. M., Suwaki, N. & Tarsounas, M. ATM/ATR checkpoint activation downregulates CDC25C to prevent mitotic entry with uncapped telomeres. EMBO J. 31, 3398–3410 (2012).
pubmed: 22842784
pmcid: 3419928
doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.191
Bahassi el, M. et al. Priming phosphorylation of Chk2 by polo-like kinase 3 (Plk3) mediates its full activation by ATM and a downstream checkpoint in response to DNA damage. Mutat. Res. 596, 166–176 (2006).
pubmed: 16481012
doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.12.002
Li, J. & Stern, D. F. DNA damage regulates Chk2 association with chromatin. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 37948–37956 (2005).
pubmed: 16150728
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M509299200
Wang, B. Analyzing cell cycle checkpoints in response to ionizing radiation in mammalian cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 1170, 313–320 (2014).
pubmed: 24906320
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0888-2_15
Deckbar, D., Jeggo, P. A. & Lobrich, M. Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 46, 271–283 (2011).
pubmed: 21524151
pmcid: 3171706
doi: 10.3109/10409238.2011.575764
Warren, N. J. H. & Eastman, A. Inhibition of checkpoint kinase 1 following gemcitabine-mediated S phase arrest results in CDC7- and CDK2-dependent replication catastrophe. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 1763–1778 (2019).
pubmed: 30573684
doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.005231
Falck, J. et al. The DNA damage-dependent intra-S phase checkpoint is regulated by parallel pathways. Nat. Genet. 30, 290–294 (2002).
pubmed: 11850621
doi: 10.1038/ng845
Peng, Y. et al. Glutamine synthetase facilitates cancer cells to recover from irradiation-induced G2/M arrest. Cancer Biol. Ther. 21, 43–51 (2020).
pubmed: 31526079
doi: 10.1080/15384047.2019.1665394
Reda, M. et al. PLK1 and EGFR targeted nanoparticle as a radiation sensitizer for non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Lett. 467, 9–18 (2019).
pubmed: 31563561
doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.09.014
Zhou, X. et al. EBV encoded miRNA BART8-3p promotes radioresistance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by regulating ATM/ATR signaling pathway. Biosci. Rep. 39, BSR20190415 (2019).
Gogineni, V. R. et al. Chk2-mediated G2/M cell cycle arrest maintains radiation resistance in malignant meningioma cells. Cancer Lett. 313, 64–75 (2011).
pubmed: 21945852
pmcid: 3196767
doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.08.022
Aninditha, K. P. et al. In vitro sensitivity of malignant melanoma cells lines to photon and heavy ion radiation. Clin. Transl. Radiat. Oncol. 17, 51–56 (2019).
pubmed: 31211251
pmcid: 6562297
doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.06.002
Wang, Q. et al. Melatonin sensitizes human colorectal cancer cells to gamma-ray ionizing radiation in vitro and in vivo. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 3974 (2018).
Dolman, M. E. et al. DNA-dependent protein kinase as molecular target for radiosensitization of neuroblastoma cells. PLoS ONE 10, e0145744 (2015).
pubmed: 26716839
pmcid: 4696738
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145744
Innes, C. L. et al. DNA damage responses in murine pre-B cells with genetic deficiencies in damage response genes. Cell Cycle. 19, 67–83 (2020).
Lu, H. et al. DNA-PKcs promotes chromatin decondensation to facilitate initiation of the DNA damage response. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 9467–9479 (2019).
pubmed: 31396623
pmcid: 6765147
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz694
Walker, A. I., Hunt, T., Jackson, R. J. & Anderson, C. W. Double-stranded DNA induces the phosphorylation of several proteins including the 90 000 mol. wt. heat-shock protein in animal cell extracts. EMBO J. 4, 139–145 (1985).
pubmed: 4018025
pmcid: 554162
doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb02328.x
Xie, Y. et al. RBX1 prompts degradation of EXO1 to limit the homologous recombination pathway of DNA double-strand break repair in G1 phase. Cell Death Differ. 27, 1383–1397 (2020).
Davis, A. J. et al. BRCA1 modulates the autophosphorylation status of DNA-PKcs in S phase of the cell cycle. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 11487–11501 (2014).
pubmed: 25223785
pmcid: 4191403
doi: 10.1093/nar/gku824
Zhou, Y. & Paull, T. T. DNA-dependent protein kinase regulates DNA end resection in concert with Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 (MRN) and ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM). J. Biol. Chem. 288, 37112–37125 (2013).
pubmed: 24220101
pmcid: 3873567
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.514398
Neal, J. A. et al. Inhibition of homologous recombination by DNA-dependent protein kinase requires kinase activity, is titratable, and is modulated by autophosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 1719–1733 (2011).
pubmed: 21300785
pmcid: 3126343
doi: 10.1128/MCB.01298-10
Huang, B. et al. DNA-PKcs associates with PLK1 and is involved in proper chromosome segregation and cytokinesis. J. Cell. Biochem. 115, 1077–1088 (2014).
pubmed: 24166892
doi: 10.1002/jcb.24703
Tu, W. Z. et al. GammaH2AX foci formation in the absence of DNA damage: mitotic H2AX phosphorylation is mediated by the DNA-PKcs/CHK2 pathway. FEBS Lett. 587, 3437–3443 (2013).
pubmed: 24021642
doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.08.028
Lee, K. J. et al. Involvement of DNA-dependent protein kinase in normal cell cycle progression through mitosis. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 12796–12802 (2011).
pubmed: 21330363
pmcid: 3069479
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.212969
Shang, Z. F. et al. Inactivation of DNA-dependent protein kinase leads to spindle disruption and mitotic catastrophe with attenuated checkpoint protein 2 phosphorylation in response to DNA damage. Cancer Res. 70, 3657–3666 (2010).
pubmed: 20406977
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3362
pmcid: 20406977
Ruis, B. L., Fattah, K. R. & Hendrickson, E. A. The catalytic subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase regulates proliferation, telomere length, and genomic stability in human somatic cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 6182–6195 (2008).
pubmed: 18710952
pmcid: 2577426
doi: 10.1128/MCB.00355-08
Li, Y. et al. Transient introduction of human telomerase mRNA improves hallmarks of progeria cells. Aging Cell 18, e12979 (2019).
pubmed: 31152494
pmcid: 6612639
Jeggo, P. A. DNA-PK: at the cross-roads of biochemistry and genetics. Mutat. Res. 384, 1–14 (1997).
pubmed: 9201268
doi: 10.1016/S0921-8777(97)00009-8
pmcid: 9201268
Goodwin, J. F. & Knudsen, K. E. Beyond DNA repair: DNA-PK function in cancer. Cancer Discov. 4, 1126–1139 (2014).
pubmed: 25168287
pmcid: 4184981
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0358
Yan, Q. et al. Cleavage of Ku80 by caspase-2 promotes non-homologous end joining-mediated DNA repair. DNA Rep. 60, 18–28 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2017.10.001
Cui, X. et al. Autophosphorylation of DNA-dependent protein kinase regulates DNA end processing and may also alter double-strand break repair pathway choice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 10842–10852 (2005).
pubmed: 16314509
pmcid: 1316975
doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.24.10842-10852.2005
Zhang, S. et al. Spontaneous tumor development in bone marrow-rescued DNA-PKcs(3A/3A) mice due to dysfunction of telomere leading strand deprotection. Oncogene 35, 3909–3918 (2016).
pubmed: 26616856
doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.459
pmcid: 26616856
Lee, B. S. et al. Functional intersection of ATM and DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit in coding end joining during V(D)J recombination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 33, 3568–3579 (2013).
pubmed: 23836881
pmcid: 3753869
doi: 10.1128/MCB.00308-13
Douglas, P. et al. DNA-PK-dependent phosphorylation of Ku70/80 is not required for non-homologous end joining. DNA Rep. 4, 1006–1018 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.05.003
Serrano, M. A. et al. DNA-PK, ATM and ATR collaboratively regulate p53-RPA interaction to facilitate homologous recombination DNA repair. Oncogene 32, 2452–2462 (2013).
pubmed: 22797063
doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.257
pmcid: 22797063
Shang, Z. F. et al. DNA-PKcs negatively regulates cyclin B1 protein stability through facilitating its ubiquitination mediated by Cdh1-APC/C pathway. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 11, 1026–1035 (2015).
pubmed: 26221070
pmcid: 4515814
doi: 10.7150/ijbs.12443
Cui, F. et al. The involvement of c-Myc in the DNA double-strand break repair via regulating radiation-induced phosphorylation of ATM and DNA-PKcs activity. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 406, 43–51 (2015).
pubmed: 26049366
doi: 10.1007/s11010-015-2422-2
pmcid: 26049366
Du, L. et al. Radiosensitization and growth inhibition of cancer cells mediated by an scFv antibody gene against DNA-PKcs in vitro and in vivo. Radiat. Oncol. 5, 70 (2010).
pubmed: 20704701
pmcid: 2927608
doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-70
An, J. et al. DNA-PKcs plays a dominant role in the regulation of H2AX phosphorylation in response to DNA damage and cell cycle progression. BMC Mol. Biol. 11, 18 (2010).
pubmed: 20205745
pmcid: 2844398
doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-11-18
An, J. et al. Silencing of DNA-PKcs alters the transcriptional profile of certain signal transduction genes related to proliferation and differentiation in HeLa cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 16, 455–462 (2005).
pubmed: 16077955
Mohiuddin, I. S. & Kang, M. H. DNA-PK as an emerging therapeutic target in cancer. Front. Oncol. 9, 635 (2019).
pubmed: 31380275
pmcid: 6650781
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00635
Liu, Y. et al. DNA-PKcs deficiency inhibits glioblastoma cell-derived angiogenesis after ionizing radiation. J. Cell. Physiol. 230, 1094–1103 (2015).
pubmed: 25294801
doi: 10.1002/jcp.24841
Mamo, T. et al. Inhibiting DNA-PKCS radiosensitizes human osteosarcoma cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 486, 307–313 (2017).
pubmed: 28300555
pmcid: 5489116
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.03.033
Willoughby, C. E. et al. Selective DNA-PKcs inhibition extends the therapeutic index of localized radiotherapy and chemotherapy. J. Clin. Invest. 130, 258–271 (2020).
Critchlow, S. E., Bowater, R. P. & Jackson, S. P. Mammalian DNA double-strand break repair protein XRCC4 interacts with DNA ligase IV. Curr. Biol. 7, 588–598 (1997).
pubmed: 9259561
doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00258-2
Davidson, D., Amrein, L., Panasci, L. & Aloyz, R. Small Molecules, Inhibitors of DNA-PK, Targeting DNA Repair, and Beyond. Front Pharmacol. 4, 5 (2013).
Collis, S. J., DeWeese, T. L., Jeggo, P. A. & Parker, A. R. The life and death of DNA-PK. Oncogene 24, 949–961 (2005).
doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208332
Gurung, R. L. et al. Targeting DNA-PKcs and telomerase in brain tumour cells. Mol. Cancer 13, 232 (2014).
pubmed: 25307264
pmcid: 4213508
doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-13-232
Yang, C. et al. NU7441 enhances the radiosensitivity of liver cancer cells. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 38, 1897–1905 (2016).
pubmed: 27160694
doi: 10.1159/000445551
pmcid: 27160694
Shinohara, E. T. et al. DNA-dependent protein kinase is a molecular target for the development of noncytotoxic radiation-sensitizing drugs. Cancer Res. 65, 4987–4992 (2005).
pubmed: 15958537
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4250
pmcid: 15958537
Durant, S. & Karran, P. Vanillins—a novel family of DNA-PK inhibitors. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 5501–5512 (2003).
pubmed: 14500812
pmcid: 206453
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg753
Zhang, B. et al. Proteomic profiling revealed the functional networks associated with mitotic catastrophe of HepG2 hepatoma cells induced by 6-bromine-5-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 252, 307–317 (2011).
pubmed: 21419150
doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2011.03.003
pmcid: 21419150
Yan, Y. Q. et al. Induction of apoptosis and autophagic cell death by the vanillin derivative 6-bromine-5-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde is accompanied by the cleavage of DNA-PKcs and rapid destruction of c-Myc oncoprotein in HepG2 cells. Cancer Lett. 252, 280–289 (2007).
pubmed: 17316978
doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.01.007
pmcid: 17316978
Wise, H. C. et al. Activity of M3814, an oral DNA-PK inhibitor, in combination with topoisomerase II inhibitors in ovarian cancer models. Sci. Rep. 9, 18882 (2019).
pubmed: 31827119
pmcid: 6906487
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54796-6
Sun, Q. et al. Therapeutic implications of p53 status on cancer cell fate following exposure to ionizing radiation and the DNA-PK inhibitor M3814. Mol. Cancer Res. 17, 2457–2468 (2019).
pubmed: 31551253
doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-19-0362
Fok, J. H. L. et al. AZD7648 is a potent and selective DNA-PK inhibitor that enhances radiation, chemotherapy and olaparib activity. Nat. Commun. 10, 5065 (2019).
pubmed: 31699977
pmcid: 6838110
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12836-9
Khan, A. J. et al. VX-984 is a selective inhibitor of non-homologous end joining, with possible preferential activity in transformed cells. Oncotarget 9, 25833–25841 (2018).
pubmed: 29899825
pmcid: 5995231
Lamb, R. et al. Doxycycline down-regulates DNA-PK and radiosensitizes tumor initiating cells: Implications for more effective radiation therapy. Oncotarget 6, 14005–14025 (2015).
pubmed: 26087309
pmcid: 4546447
Oike, T. et al. Garcinol, a histone acetyltransferase inhibitor, radiosensitizes cancer cells by inhibiting non-homologous end joining. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 84, 815–821 (2012).
pubmed: 22417805
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.017
Gotoff, S. P., Amirmokri, E. & Liebner, E. J. Ataxia telangiectasia. Neoplasia, untoward response to x-irradiation, and tuberous sclerosis. Am. J. Dis. Child. 114, 617–625 (1967).
pubmed: 6072741
doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1967.02090270073006
Taylor, A. M. et al. Ataxia telangiectasia: a human mutation with abnormal radiation sensitivity. Nature 258, 427–429 (1975).
pubmed: 1196376
doi: 10.1038/258427a0
Imray, F. P. & Kidson, C. Perturbations of cell-cycle progression in gamma-irradiated ataxia telangiectasia and Huntington’s disease cells detected by DNA flow cytometric analysis. Mutat. Res. 112, 369–382 (1983).
pubmed: 6228733
Savitsky, K. et al. A single ataxia telangiectasia gene with a product similar to PI-3 kinase. Science 268, 1749–1753 (1995).
pubmed: 7792600
doi: 10.1126/science.7792600
Weinert, T. A., Kiser, G. L. & Hartwell, L. H. Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair. Genes Dev. 8, 652–665 (1994).
pubmed: 7926756
doi: 10.1101/gad.8.6.652
al-Khodairy, F. & Carr, A. M. DNA repair mutants defining G2 checkpoint pathways in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. EMBO J. 11, 1343–1350 (1992).
pubmed: 1563350
pmcid: 556583
doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05179.x
Bentley, N. J. et al. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad3 checkpoint gene. EMBO J. 15, 6641–6651 (1996).
pubmed: 8978690
pmcid: 452488
doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb01054.x
Kim, S. T., Lim, D. S., Canman, C. E. & Kastan, M. B. Substrate specificities and identification of putative substrates of ATM kinase family members. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 37538–37543 (1999).
pubmed: 10608806
doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.53.37538
Zou, L. & Elledge, S. J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300, 1542–1548 (2003).
pubmed: 12791985
doi: 10.1126/science.1083430
Shiloh, Y. & Ziv, Y. The ATM protein kinase: regulating the cellular response to genotoxic stress, and more. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 197–210 (2013).
pubmed: 23847781
doi: 10.1038/nrm3546
Matsuoka, S. et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 316, 1160–1166 (2007).
pubmed: 17525332
doi: 10.1126/science.1140321
Hirao, A. et al. Chk2 is a tumor suppressor that regulates apoptosis in both an ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM)-dependent and an ATM-independent manner. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 6521–6532 (2002).
pubmed: 12192050
pmcid: 135625
doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.18.6521-6532.2002
Heylmann, D. et al. Sensitivity of CD3/CD28-stimulated versus non-stimulated lymphocytes to ionizing radiation and genotoxic anticancer drugs: key role of ATM in the differential radiation response. Cell Death Dis. 9, 1053 (2018).
pubmed: 30323167
pmcid: 6189042
doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-1095-7
Mladenov, E. et al. Radiation-dose-dependent functional synergisms between ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs in checkpoint control and resection in G2-phase. Sci. Rep. 9, 8255 (2019).
pubmed: 31164689
pmcid: 6547644
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44771-6
Weber, A. M. & Ryan, A. J. ATM and ATR as therapeutic targets in cancer. Pharmacol. Ther. 149, 124–138 (2015).
pubmed: 25512053
pmcid: 25512053
doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.12.001
Powell, S. N. et al. Differential sensitivity of p53(−) and p53(+) cells to caffeine-induced radiosensitization and override of G2 delay. Cancer Res. 55, 1643–1648 (1995).
pubmed: 7712468
Zhang, T. et al. The ATM inhibitor KU55933 sensitizes radioresistant bladder cancer cells with DAB2IP gene defect. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 91, 368–378 (2015).
pubmed: 25585815
doi: 10.3109/09553002.2015.1001531
Vecchio, D. et al. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy on pediatric tumors of the glioma radiosensitizer KU60019. Int. J. Cancer 136, 1445–1457 (2015).
pubmed: 25091220
doi: 10.1002/ijc.29121
Vecchio, D. et al. Predictability, efficacy and safety of radiosensitization of glioblastoma-initiating cells by the ATM inhibitor KU-60019. Int. J. Cancer 135, 479–491 (2014).
pubmed: 24443327
doi: 10.1002/ijc.28680
Nishida, H. et al. Inhibition of ATR protein kinase activity by schisandrin B in DNA damage response. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 5678–5689 (2009).
pubmed: 19625493
pmcid: 2761266
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp593
Fokas, E. et al. Targeting ATR in vivo using the novel inhibitor VE-822 results in selective sensitization of pancreatic tumors to radiation. Cell Death Dis. 3, e441 (2012).
pubmed: 3542617
pmcid: 3542617
doi: 10.1038/cddis.2012.181
Foote, K. M. et al. Discovery of 4-{4-[(3R)-3-Methylmorpholin-4-yl]-6-[1-(methylsulfonyl)cyclopropyl]pyrimidin-2-y l}-1H-indole (AZ20): a potent and selective inhibitor of ATR protein kinase with monotherapy in vivo antitumor activity. J. Med. Chem. 56, 2125–2138 (2013).
Dillon, M. T. et al. PATRIOT: a phase I study to assess the tolerability, safety and biological effects of a specific ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) inhibitor (AZD6738) as a single agent and in combination with palliative radiation therapy in patients with solid tumours. Clin. Transl. Radiat. Oncol. 12, 16–20 (2018).
pubmed: 6068075
pmcid: 6068075
doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2018.06.001
Mo, L. J. et al. Exosome-packaged miR-1246 contributes to bystander DNA damage by targeting LIG4. Br. J. Cancer 119, 492–502 (2018).
pubmed: 30038324
pmcid: 6134031
doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0192-9
Williams, G. J. et al. Structural insights into NHEJ: building up an integrated picture of the dynamic DSB repair super complex, one component and interaction at a time. DNA Rep. 17, 110–120 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.02.009
Altmann, T. & Gennery, A. R. DNA ligase IV syndrome; a review. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 11, 137 (2016).
pubmed: 27717373
pmcid: 5055698
doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0520-1
O’Driscoll, M. et al. DNA ligase IV mutations identified in patients exhibiting developmental delay and immunodeficiency. Mol. Cell 8, 1175–1185 (2001).
pubmed: 11779494
doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00408-7
Riballo, E. et al. Cellular and biochemical impact of a mutation in DNA ligase IV conferring clinical radiosensitivity. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 31124–31132 (2001).
pubmed: 11349135
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M103866200
Mumbrekar, K. D., Goutham, H. V., Vadhiraja, B. M. & Bola Sadashiva, S. R. Polymorphisms in double strand break repair related genes influence radiosensitivity phenotype in lymphocytes from healthy individuals. DNA Rep. 40, 27–34 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2016.02.006
Kondo, N. et al. DNA damage induced by boron neutron capture therapy is partially repaired by DNA ligase IV. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 55, 89–94 (2016).
pubmed: 26573366
doi: 10.1007/s00411-015-0625-2
McKay, M. J. et al. Non-homologous end-joining protein expression screen from radiosensitive cancer patients yields a novel DNA double strand break repair phenotype. Ann. Transl. Med. 5, 96 (2017).
pubmed: 28361061
pmcid: 5360626
doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.03.04
Koike, M., Yutoku, Y. & Koike, A. Establishment of hamster cell lines with EGFP-tagged human XRCC4 and protection from low-dose X-ray radiation. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 74, 1269–1275 (2012).
pubmed: 22673749
doi: 10.1292/jvms.12-0112
Guo, Q. et al. ID1 affects the efficacy of radiotherapy in glioblastoma through inhibition of DNA repair pathways. Med. Oncol. 30, 325 (2013).
pubmed: 23377983
doi: 10.1007/s12032-012-0325-6
Wang, Y. G. et al. Phosphorylation and regulation of DNA ligase IV stability by DNA-dependent protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 37282–37290 (2004).
pubmed: 15194694
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M401217200
Tseng, H. M. et al. A high-throughput scintillation proximity-based assay for human DNA ligase IV. Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 10, 235–249 (2012).
pubmed: 22192310
pmcid: 3374410
doi: 10.1089/adt.2011.0404
Srivastava, M. et al. An inhibitor of nonhomologous end-joining abrogates double-strand break repair and impedes cancer progression. Cell 151, 1474–1487 (2012).
pubmed: 23260137
pmcid: 23260137
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.054
Ma, H. et al. Combining carbon ion irradiation and non-homologous end-joining repair inhibitor NU7026 efficiently kills cancer cells. Radiat. Oncol. 10, 225 (2015).
pubmed: 26553138
pmcid: 4638098
doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0536-z
Kim, D. S. et al. Activation of PARP-1 by snoRNAs controls ribosome biogenesis and cell growth via the RNA helicase DDX21. Mol. Cell 75, 1270–1285 e1214 (2019).
pubmed: 31351877
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.06.020
Swiatecka, G. & Smagon, H. Primary heart amyloidosis. Kardiol. Pol. 19, 67–73 (1976).
pubmed: 768604
Maltseva, E. A., Rechkunova, N. I., Sukhanova, M. V. & Lavrik, O. I. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 modulates interaction of the nucleotide excision repair factor XPC-RAD23B with DNA via poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 21811–21820 (2015).
pubmed: 26170451
pmcid: 4571937
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.646638
Durante, M. et al. Effects of PARP-1 deficiency and histamine H4 receptor inhibition in an inflammatory model of lung fibrosis in mice. Front. Pharmacol. 10, 525 (2019).
pubmed: 31164820
pmcid: 6535496
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00525
Sodhi, R. K., Singh, N. & Jaggi, A. S. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) and its therapeutic implications. Vasc. Pharmacol. 53, 77–87 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2010.06.003
Kai, M. Roles of RNA-binding proteins in DNA damage response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17, 310 (2016).
pubmed: 26927092
pmcid: 4813173
doi: 10.3390/ijms17030310
Han, Y. et al. DNAPKcs PARylation regulates DNAPK kinase activity in the DNA damage response. Mol. Med. Rep. 20, 3609–3616 (2019).
pubmed: 31485633
pmcid: 6755157
de Murcia, J. M. et al. Requirement of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in recovery from DNA damage in mice and in cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 7303–7307 (1997).
pubmed: 9207086
doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.14.7303
Soni, A. et al. Requirement for Parp-1 and DNA ligases 1 or 3 but not of Xrcc1 in chromosomal translocation formation by backup end joining. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 6380–6392 (2014).
pubmed: 24748665
pmcid: 4041464
doi: 10.1093/nar/gku298
Vormoor, B. et al. Sensitizing Ewing sarcoma to chemo- and radiotherapy by inhibition of the DNA-repair enzymes DNA protein kinase (DNA-PK) and poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) 1/2. Oncotarget 8, 113418–113430 (2017).
pubmed: 29371919
pmcid: 5768336
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21300
Hirai, T. et al. Radiosensitization by PARP inhibition to proton beam irradiation in cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 478, 234–240 (2016).
pubmed: 27425251
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.07.062
Begg, A. C., Stewart, F. A. & Vens, C. Strategies to improve radiotherapy with targeted drugs. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 239–253 (2011).
pubmed: 21430696
doi: 10.1038/nrc3007
Jannetti, S. A. et al. PARP-1-targeted radiotherapy in mouse models of glioblastoma. J. Nucl. Med. 59, 1225–1233 (2018).
pubmed: 29572254
pmcid: 6071508
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.205054
Ieraci, A. & Herrera, D. G. Nicotinamide inhibits ethanol-induced caspase-3 and PARP-1 Over-activation and subsequent neurodegeneration in the developing mouse cerebellum. Cerebellum 17, 326–335 (2018).
pubmed: 29327278
doi: 10.1007/s12311-017-0916-z
Calabrese, C. R. et al. Anticancer chemosensitization and radiosensitization by the novel poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibitor AG14361. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 96, 56–67 (2004).
pubmed: 14709739
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh005
Noel, G. et al. Radiosensitization by the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor 4-amino-1,8-naphthalimide is specific of the S phase of the cell cycle and involves arrest of DNA synthesis. Mol. Cancer Ther. 5, 564–574 (2006).
pubmed: 16546970
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0418
Mateo, J. et al. A decade of clinical development of PARP inhibitors in perspective. Ann. Oncol. 30, 1437–1447 (2019).
pubmed: 31218365
pmcid: 6771225
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz192
Murai, J. et al. Stereospecific PARP trapping by BMN 673 and comparison with olaparib and rucaparib. Mol. Cancer Ther. 13, 433–443 (2014).
pubmed: 24356813
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0803
Ryu, H. et al. A small compound KJ-28d enhances the sensitivity of non-small cell lung cancer to radio- and chemotherapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 6026 (2019).
Farmer, H. et al. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature 434, 917–921 (2005).
pubmed: 15829967
pmcid: 15829967
doi: 10.1038/nature03445
Bourton, E. C. et al. The PARP-1 inhibitor Olaparib suppresses BRCA1 protein levels, increases apoptosis and causes radiation hypersensitivity in BRCA1(+/−) lymphoblastoid cells. J. Cancer 8, 4048–4056 (2017).
pubmed: 29187880
pmcid: 5706007
doi: 10.7150/jca.21338
Guillot, C. et al. PARP inhibition and the radiosensitizing effects of the PARP inhibitor ABT-888 in in vitro hepatocellular carcinoma models. BMC Cancer 14, 603 (2014).
pubmed: 25139788
pmcid: 25139788
doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-603
Wang, L. et al. MK-4827, a PARP-1/-2 inhibitor, strongly enhances response of human lung and breast cancer xenografts to radiation. Invest. N. Drugs 30, 2113–2120 (2012).
doi: 10.1007/s10637-011-9770-x
Mirza, M. R. et al. Niraparib maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 2154–2164 (2016).
pubmed: 27717299
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611310
Alotaibi, M. et al. Radiosensitization by PARP Inhibition in DNA repair proficient and deficient tumor cells: proliferative recovery in senescent cells. Radiat. Res. 185, 229–245 (2016).
pubmed: 26934368
pmcid: 4821451
doi: 10.1667/RR14202.1
Pernin, V. et al. PARP inhibitors and radiotherapy: rational and prospects for a clinical use. Cancer Radiother. 18, 790–798 (2014). quiz 799–802.
pubmed: 25441760
doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2014.05.012
Ledford, H. & Callaway, E. Biologists who decoded how cells sense oxygen win medicine Nobel. Nature 574, 161–162 (2019).
pubmed: 31595071
doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02963-0
Bhattarai, D., Xu, X. & Lee, K. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) inhibitors from the last decade (2007 to 2016): a “structure–activity relationship” perspective. Med. Res. Rev. 38, 1404–1442 (2018).
pubmed: 29278273
doi: 10.1002/med.21477
Ban, H. S., Uto, Y., Won, M. & Nakamura, H. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) inhibitors: a patent survey (2011–2015). Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 26, 309–322 (2016).
pubmed: 26882240
doi: 10.1517/13543776.2016.1146252
Vaupel, P. & Multhoff, G. Hypoxia-/HIF-1alpha-driven factors of the tumor microenvironment impeding antitumor immune responses and promoting malignant progression. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1072, 171–175 (2018).
pubmed: 30178341
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-91287-5_27
Cui, W., Wu, F. & Ma, L. Hypoxia associated biomarkers in lung cancer—an update. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 21, 43–46 (2017).
pubmed: 28745793
Nenu, I., Gafencu, G. A., Popescu, T. & Kacso, G. Lactate—a new frontier in the immunology and therapy of prostate cancer. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 13, 406–411 (2017).
pubmed: 28862200
Moeller, B. J., Cao, Y., Li, C. Y. & Dewhirst, M. W. Radiation activates HIF-1 to regulate vascular radiosensitivity in tumors: role of reoxygenation, free radicals, and stress granules. Cancer Cell 5, 429–441 (2004).
pubmed: 15144951
doi: 10.1016/S1535-6108(04)00115-1
Harada, H. et al. The Akt/mTOR pathway assures the synthesis of HIF-1alpha protein in a glucose- and reoxygenation-dependent manner in irradiated tumors. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 5332–5342 (2009).
pubmed: 19098000
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806653200
Kang, J. et al. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 enhances radioresistance and aggressiveness of non-small cell lung cancer cells. Oncotarget 7, 23961–23974 (2016).
pubmed: 27004408
pmcid: 5029677
Lee, M. & Yoon, J. H. Metabolic interplay between glycolysis and mitochondrial oxidation: the reverse Warburg effect and its therapeutic implication. World J. Biol. Chem. 6, 148–161 (2015).
pubmed: 26322173
pmcid: 4549759
doi: 10.4331/wjbc.v6.i3.148
Dittmann, K. et al. Nuclear EGFR renders cells radio-resistant by binding mRNA species and triggering a metabolic switch to increase lactate production. Radiother. Oncol. 116, 431–437 (2015).
pubmed: 26320552
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.08.016
pmcid: 26320552
Sun, X. et al. Combination with stereotactic body radiotherapy offers a promising strategy to overcome resistance to immunotherapy in advanced renal cell cancer. J. Oncol. 2019, 1483406 (2019).
pubmed: 31871454
pmcid: 6906880
Lyakhovich, A. & Lleonart, M. E. Bypassing mechanisms of mitochondria-mediated cancer stem cells resistance to chemo- and radiotherapy. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 1716341 (2016).
pubmed: 26697128
doi: 10.1155/2016/1716341
pmcid: 26697128
Brown, J. M. Tumor hypoxia in cancer therapy. Methods Enzymol. 435, 297–321 (2007).
pubmed: 17998060
pmcid: 17998060
Sato, M. et al. LW6, a hypoxia-inducible factor 1 inhibitor, selectively induces apoptosis in hypoxic cells through depolarization of mitochondria in A549 human lung cancer cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 12, 3462–3468 (2015).
pubmed: 26017562
pmcid: 4526100
doi: 10.3892/mmr.2015.3862
Schwartz, D. L. et al. Radiosensitization and stromal imaging response correlates for the HIF-1 inhibitor PX-478 given with or without chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 9, 2057–2067 (2010).
pubmed: 20587661
pmcid: 20587661
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0768
Yang, R. et al. Inhibitors of HIF-1alpha and CXCR4 mitigate the development of radiation necrosis in mouse brain. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 100, 1016–1025 (2018).
pubmed: 29485043
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.12.257
pmcid: 29485043
Paap, B., Wilson, D. M. 3rd & Sutherland, B. M. Human abasic endonuclease action on multilesion abasic clusters: implications for radiation-induced biological damage. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 2717–2727 (2008).
pubmed: 18353858
pmcid: 2377450
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn118
Marampon, F. et al. HDAC4 and HDAC6 sustain DNA double strand break repair and stem-like phenotype by promoting radioresistance in glioblastoma cells. Cancer Lett. 397, 1–11 (2017).
pubmed: 28342984
doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.03.028
pmcid: 28342984
Zhu, L., Wu, K., Ma, S. & Zhang, S. HDAC inhibitors: a new radiosensitizer for non-small-cell lung cancer. Tumori 101, 257–262 (2015).
pubmed: 25953446
doi: 10.5301/tj.5000347
Robert, C. et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors decrease NHEJ both by acetylation of repair factors and trapping of PARP1 at DNA double-strand breaks in chromatin. Leuk. Res. 45, 14–23 (2016).
pubmed: 27064363
pmcid: 5007632
doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2016.03.007
Chinnaiyan, P., Allen, G. W. & Harari, P. M. Radiation and new molecular agents, part II: targeting HDAC, HSP90, IGF-1R, PI3K, and Ras. Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 16, 59–64 (2006).
pubmed: 16378908
doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2005.08.008
Shi, X. Y. et al. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA), induces apoptosis in prostate cancer cell lines via the Akt/FOXO3a signaling pathway. Med. Sci. Monit. 23, 5793–5802 (2017).
pubmed: 29211704
pmcid: 5727751
doi: 10.12659/MSM.904597
Wang, G. et al. HDAC inhibition prevents white matter injury by modulating microglia/macrophage polarization through the GSK3beta/PTEN/Akt axis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 2853–2858 (2015).
pubmed: 25691750
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501441112
pmcid: 25691750
Mehndiratta, S. et al. N-alkyl-hydroxybenzoyl anilide hydroxamates as dual inhibitors of HDAC and HSP90, downregulating IFN-gamma induced PD-L1 expression. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 185, 111725 (2020).
pubmed: 31655430
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.111725
pmcid: 31655430
Hernandez, A., Lopez-Lluch, G., Navas, P. & Pintor-Toro, J. A. HDAC and Hsp90 inhibitors down-regulate PTTG1/securin but do not induce aneuploidy. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 48, 194–201 (2009).
pubmed: 19006077
doi: 10.1002/gcc.20630
Wang, S. H. et al. Curcumin-mediated HDAC inhibition suppresses the DNA damage response and contributes to increased DNA damage sensitivity. PLoS ONE 10, e0134110 (2015).
pubmed: 26218133
pmcid: 4517890
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134110
Frame, F. M. et al. HDAC inhibitor confers radiosensitivity to prostate stem-like cells. Br. J. Cancer 109, 3023–3033 (2013).
pubmed: 24220693
pmcid: 3859953
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.691
Chiu, H. W. et al. Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, an inhibitor of histone deacetylase, enhances radiosensitivity and suppresses lung metastasis in breast cancer in vitro and in vivo. PLoS ONE 8, e76340 (2013).
pubmed: 24130769
pmcid: 3794942
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076340
Wang, Y. et al. Radiosensitization by irinotecan is attributed to G2/M phase arrest, followed by enhanced apoptosis, probably through the ATM/Chk/Cdc25C/Cdc2 pathway in p53-mutant colorectal cancer cells. Int. J. Oncol. 53, 1667–1680 (2018).
pubmed: 30085332
Wang, J. et al. Tetrandrine enhances radiosensitivity through the CDC25C/CDK1/cyclin B1 pathway in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Cell Cycle 17, 671–680 (2018).
pubmed: 29285984
pmcid: 5969555
doi: 10.1080/15384101.2017.1415679
Wang, Z. et al. Radiosensitization of metformin in pancreatic cancer cells via abrogating the G2 checkpoint and inhibiting DNA damage repair. Cancer Lett. 369, 192–201 (2015).
pubmed: 26304716
doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.08.015
pmcid: 26304716
Yu, T. Y., Garcia, V. E. & Symington, L. S. CDK and Mec1/Tel1-catalyzed phosphorylation of Sae2 regulate different responses to DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 11238–11249 (2019).
pubmed: 31552432
pmcid: 6868371
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz814
Prevo, R. et al. CDK1 inhibition sensitizes normal cells to DNA damage in a cell cycle dependent manner. Cell Cycle 17, 1513–1523 (2018).
pubmed: 30045664
pmcid: 6132956
doi: 10.1080/15384101.2018.1491236
Lee, M. S., Joo, J. W., Kang, H. A. & Kim, K. Mec1 modulates interhomolog crossover and interplays with Tel1 at post double-strand break stages. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30, 469–475 (2020).
Mladenov, E. et al. Strong suppression of gene conversion with increasing DNA double-strand break load delimited by 53BP1 and RAD52. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 1905–1924 (2020).
Raghavan, P. et al. AZD5438, an inhibitor of Cdk1, 2, and 9, enhances the radiosensitivity of non-small cell lung carcinoma cells. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 84, e507–e514 (2012).
pubmed: 22795803
pmcid: 3623267
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.05.035
Kojima, K. et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 inhibitor RO-3306 enhances p53-mediated Bax activation and mitochondrial apoptosis in AML. Cancer Sci. 100, 1128–1136 (2009).
pubmed: 19385969
pmcid: 2759356
doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01150.x
Rodland, G. E. et al. The dual cell cycle kinase inhibitor JNJ-7706621 reverses resistance to CD37-targeted radioimmunotherapy in activated B cell like diffuse large B cell lymphoma cell lines. Front. Oncol. 9, 1301 (2019).
pubmed: 31850205
pmcid: 6897291
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01301
Narayan, R. S. et al. Identification of MEK162 as a radiosensitizer for the treatment of glioblastoma. Mol. Cancer Ther. 17, 347–354 (2018).
pubmed: 28958992
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-0480
Satyanarayana, A., Hilton, M. B. & Kaldis, P. p21 inhibits Cdk1 in the absence of Cdk2 to maintain the G1/S phase DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 65–77 (2008).
pubmed: 17942597
pmcid: 2174178
doi: 10.1091/mbc.e07-06-0525
Sun, L. et al. WEE1 kinase inhibition reverses G2/M cell cycle checkpoint activation to sensitize cancer cells to immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology 7, e1488359 (2018).
pubmed: 30288354
pmcid: 6169577
doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1488359
Friedman, J. et al. Inhibition of WEE1 kinase and cell cycle checkpoint activation sensitizes head and neck cancers to natural killer cell therapies. J. Immunother. Cancer 6, 59 (2018).
pubmed: 29925431
pmcid: 6011473
doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0374-2
Qiu, L., Wang, J. J., Ying, S. H. & Feng, M. G. Wee1 and Cdc25 control morphogenesis, virulence and multistress tolerance of Beauveria bassiana by balancing cell cycle-required cyclin-dependent kinase 1 activity. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 1119–1133 (2015).
pubmed: 24910927
doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12530
Nojima, H. et al. Differential properties of mitosis-associated events following CHK1 and WEE1 inhibitor treatments in human tongue carcinoma cells. Exp. Cell Res. 386, 111720 (2020).
pubmed: 31738907
doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.111720
Fu, S. et al. Strategic development of AZD1775, a Wee1 kinase inhibitor, for cancer therapy. Expert Opin. Invest. Drugs 27, 741–751 (2018).
doi: 10.1080/13543784.2018.1511700
Forment, J. V. & O’Connor, M. J. Targeting the replication stress response in cancer. Pharmacol. Ther. 188, 155–167 (2018).
pubmed: 29580942
doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.03.005
pmcid: 29580942
Schmidt, M. et al. Regulation of G2/M transition by inhibition of WEE1 and PKMYT1 kinases. Molecules 22, 2045 (2017).
Lee, Y. Y. et al. Anti-tumor effects of Wee1 kinase inhibitor with radiotherapy in human cervical cancer. Sci. Rep. 9, 15394 (2019).
pubmed: 31659268
pmcid: 6817901
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51959-3
Lescarbeau, R. S. et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals Wee1 kinase as a therapeutic target in a model of proneural glioblastoma. Mol. Cancer Ther. 15, 1332–1343 (2016).
pubmed: 27196784
pmcid: 4893926
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0692
Matheson, C. J. et al. A WEE1 inhibitor analog of AZD1775 maintains synergy with cisplatin and demonstrates reduced single-agent cytotoxicity in medulloblastoma cells. ACS Chem. Biol. 11, 921–930 (2016).
pubmed: 26745241
doi: 10.1021/acschembio.5b00725
pmcid: 26745241
Kausar, T. et al. Sensitization of pancreatic cancers to gemcitabine chemoradiation by WEE1 kinase inhibition depends on homologous recombination repair. Neoplasia 17, 757–766 (2015).
pubmed: 26585231
pmcid: 26585231
doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2015.09.006
Yang, L. et al. Wee1 kinase inhibitor AZD1775 effectively sensitizes esophageal cancer to radiotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3373 .
Chen, G. et al. Suppression of Sirt1 sensitizes lung cancer cells to WEE1 inhibitor MK-1775-induced DNA damage and apoptosis. Oncogene 36, 6863–6872 (2017).
pubmed: 28869605
doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.297
Havelek, R. et al. Specific inhibition of Wee1 kinase and Rad51 recombinase: a strategy to enhance the sensitivity of leukemic T-cells to ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 453, 569–575 (2014).
pubmed: 25285634
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.09.123
PosthumaDeBoer, J. et al. WEE1 inhibition sensitizes osteosarcoma to radiotherapy. BMC Cancer 11, 156 (2011).
pubmed: 21529352
pmcid: 3103478
doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-156
Sancar, A., Lindsey-Boltz, L. A., Unsal-Kacmaz, K. & Linn, S. Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73, 39–85 (2004).
pubmed: 15189136
doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073723
Gonzalez Besteiro, M. A. & Gottifredi, V. The fork and the kinase: a DNA replication tale from a CHK1 perspective. Mutat. Res. Rev. Mutat. Res. 763, 168–180 (2015).
pubmed: 25795119
doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2014.10.003
Chen, Z. et al. Selective Chk1 inhibitors differentially sensitize p53-deficient cancer cells to cancer therapeutics. Int. J. Cancer 119, 2784–2794 (2006).
pubmed: 17019715
doi: 10.1002/ijc.22198
Bunch, R. T. & Eastman, A. Enhancement of cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity by 7-hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01), a new G2-checkpoint inhibitor. Clin. Cancer Res. 2, 791–797 (1996).
pubmed: 9816232
Patties, I. et al. The Chk1 inhibitor SAR-020106 sensitizes human glioblastoma cells to irradiation, to temozolomide, and to decitabine treatment. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 38, 420 (2019).
pubmed: 31639020
pmcid: 6805470
doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1434-2
Parmar, K. et al. The CHK1 inhibitor prexasertib exhibits monotherapy activity in high-grade serous ovarian cancer models and sensitizes to PARP inhibition. Clin. Cancer Res. 25, 6127–6140 (2019).
pubmed: 31409614
pmcid: 6801076
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0448
King, C. et al. Characterization and preclinical development of LY2603618: a selective and potent Chk1 inhibitor. Invest. N. Drugs 32, 213–226 (2014).
doi: 10.1007/s10637-013-0036-7
Guster, J. D. et al. The inhibition of PARP but not EGFR results in the radiosensitization of HPV/p16-positive HNSCC cell lines. Radiother. Oncol. 113, 345–351 (2014).
pubmed: 25467050
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.10.011
Booth, L., Roberts, J., Poklepovic, A. & Dent, P. The CHK1 inhibitor SRA737 synergizes with PARP1 inhibitors to kill carcinoma cells. Cancer Biol. Ther. 19, 786–796 (2018).
pubmed: 30024813
pmcid: 6154848
doi: 10.1080/15384047.2018.1472189
Suzuki, M. et al. MK-8776, a novel Chk1 inhibitor, exhibits an improved radiosensitizing effect compared to UCN-01 by exacerbating radiation-induced aberrant mitosis. Transl. Oncol. 10, 491–500 (2017).
pubmed: 28550769
pmcid: 5447387
doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.04.002
Patel, R. et al. An orally bioavailable Chk1 inhibitor, CCT244747, sensitizes bladder and head and neck cancer cell lines to radiation. Radiother. Oncol. 122, 470–475 (2017).
pubmed: 28131548
pmcid: 6155495
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.12.026
Barker, H. E. et al. CHK1 inhibition radiosensitizes head and neck cancers to paclitaxel-based chemoradiotherapy. Mol. Cancer Ther. 15, 2042–2054 (2016).
pubmed: 27422809
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0998
Restelli, V. et al. DNA damage response inhibitor combinations exert synergistic antitumor activity in aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Mol. Cancer Ther. 18, 1255–1264 (2019).
pubmed: 31064869
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-18-0919
Heidler, C. L. et al. Prexasertib (LY2606368) reduces clonogenic survival by inducing apoptosis in primary patient-derived osteosarcoma cells and synergizes with cisplatin and talazoparib. Int. J Cancer. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32814 .
Sung, P. Introduction to the Thematic Minireview Series: DNA double-strand break repair and pathway choice. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 10500–10501 (2018).
pubmed: 29853635
pmcid: 6036216
doi: 10.1074/jbc.TM118.003212
Lanz, M. C., Dibitetto, D. & Smolka, M. B. DNA damage kinase signaling: checkpoint and repair at 30 years. EMBO J. 38, e101801 (2019).
pubmed: 31393028
doi: 10.15252/embj.2019101801
Tadesse, S. et al. Targeting CDK2 in cancer: challenges and opportunities for therapy. Drug Discov. Today. 25, 406–413 (2020).
Pillon, M. C., Lo, Y. H. & Stanley, R. E. IT’S 2 for the price of 1: multifaceted ITS2 processing machines in RNA and DNA maintenance. DNA Rep. 81, 102653 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.102653
Katsogiannou, M. et al. Integrative proteomic and phosphoproteomic profiling of prostate cell lines. PLoS ONE 14, e0224148 (2019).
pubmed: 31675377
pmcid: 6824562
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224148
Waterworth, W. M. et al. Phosphoproteomic analysis reveals plant DNA damage signalling pathways with a functional role for histone H2AX phosphorylation in plant growth under genotoxic stress. Plant J. 100, 1007–1021 (2019).
pubmed: 31410901
pmcid: 6900162
doi: 10.1111/tpj.14495
Owusu, M. et al. Mapping the human kinome in response to DNA damage. Cell Rep. 26, 555–563 e556 (2019).
pubmed: 30650350
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.12.087
Kim, D. C. et al. Effects of low dose ionizing radiation on DNA damage-caused pathways by reverse-phase protein array and Bayesian networks. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 15, 1750006 (2017).
pubmed: 28440122
doi: 10.1142/S0219720017500068
Nagle, P. W. et al. Lack of DNA damage response at low radiation doses in adult stem cells contributes to organ dysfunction. Clin. Cancer Res. 24, 6583–6593 (2018).
pubmed: 30135147
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0533
Gaetani, S. et al. DNA damage response in workers exposed to low-dose ionising radiation. Occup. Environ. Med. 75, 724–729 (2018).
pubmed: 30087158
doi: 10.1136/oemed-2018-105094
Limpose, K. L., Corbett, A. H. & Doetsch, P. W. BERing the burden of damage: Pathway crosstalk and posttranslational modification of base excision repair proteins regulate DNA damage management. DNA Rep. 56, 51–64 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2017.06.007
Sunada, S., Nakanishi, A. & Miki, Y. Crosstalk of DNA double-strand break repair pathways in poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor treatment of breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2-mutated cancer. Cancer Sci. 109, 893–899 (2018).
pubmed: 29427345
pmcid: 5891174
doi: 10.1111/cas.13530
Yuan, F. et al. A new regulatory mechanism between P53 And YAP crosstalk By SIRT1 mediated deacetylation to regulate cell cycle and apoptosis in A549 cell lines. Cancer Manag. Res. 11, 8619–8633 (2019).
pubmed: 31576168
pmcid: 6765265
doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S214826
Raghunandan, M. et al. Functional crosstalk between the Fanconi anemia and ATRX/DAXX histone chaperone pathways promotes replication fork recovery. Hum. Mol. Genet. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddz250 .
Darragh, L. B., Oweida, A. J. & Karam, S. D. Overcoming resistance to combination radiation-immunotherapy: a focus on contributing pathways within the tumor microenvironment. Front. Immunol. 9, 3154 (2018).
pubmed: 30766539
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03154
Schaue, D., Ratikan, J. A., Iwamoto, K. S. & McBride, W. H. Maximizing tumor immunity with fractionated radiation. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 83, 1306–1310 (2012).
pubmed: 22208977
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.09.049
Harding, S. M. et al. Mitotic progression following DNA damage enables pattern recognition within micronuclei. Nature 548, 466–470 (2017).
pubmed: 28759889
pmcid: 5857357
doi: 10.1038/nature23470
Yang, H. et al. cGAS is essential for cellular senescence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E4612–E4620 (2017).
pubmed: 28533362
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705499114
Cryer, B. A COX-2-specific inhibitor plus a proton-pump inhibitor: is this a reasonable approach to reduction in NSAIDs’ GI toxicity? Am. J. Gastroenterol. 101, 711–713 (2006).
pubmed: 16635218
doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00508.x
Chen, L. et al. Selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib combined with EGFR-TKI ZD1839 on non-small cell lung cancer cell lines: in vitro toxicity and mechanism study. Med. Oncol. 25, 161–171 (2008).
pubmed: 18172786
doi: 10.1007/s12032-007-9015-1
Marton, A. et al. Vanillin analogues o-vanillin and 2,4,6-trihydroxybenzaldehyde inhibit NFkB activation and suppress growth of A375 human melanoma. Anticancer Res. 36, 5743–5750 (2016).
pubmed: 27793895
doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11157
Shanmuganathan, S. & Angayarkanni, N. Chebulagic acid chebulinic acid and gallic acid, the active principles of triphala, inhibit TNFalpha induced pro-angiogenic and pro-inflammatory activities in retinal capillary endothelial cells by inhibiting p38, ERK and NFkB phosphorylation. Vasc. Pharmacol. 108, 23–35 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2018.04.005
Kirsch, D. G. et al. The future of radiobiology. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 110, 329–340 (2018).
pubmed: 29126306
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx231
Kobayashi, J. et al. NBS1 localizes to gamma-H2AX foci through interaction with the FHA/BRCT domain. Curr. Biol. 12, 1846–1851 (2002).
pubmed: 12419185
doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01259-9
Mischo, H. E., Hemmerich, P., Grosse, F. & Zhang, S. Actinomycin D induces histone gamma-H2AX foci and complex formation of gamma-H2AX with Ku70 and nuclear DNA helicase II. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 9586–9594 (2005).
pubmed: 15613478
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411444200
Stewart, G. S. et al. MDC1 is a mediator of the mammalian DNA damage checkpoint. Nature 421, 961–966 (2003).
pubmed: 12607005
doi: 10.1038/nature01446
Lukas, C. et al. Mdc1 couples DNA double-strand break recognition by Nbs1 with its H2AX-dependent chromatin retention. EMBO J. 23, 2674–2683 (2004).
pubmed: 15201865
pmcid: 449779
doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600269
Rogakou, E. P. et al. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 5858–5868 (1998).
pubmed: 9488723
doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.10.5858
Lee, K. Y. et al. MCM8-9 complex promotes resection of double-strand break ends by MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex. Nat. Commun. 6, 7744 (2015).
pubmed: 26215093
pmcid: 4525285
doi: 10.1038/ncomms8744
Zhu, X. D. et al. Cell-cycle-regulated association of RAD50/MRE11/NBS1 with TRF2 and human telomeres. Nat. Genet. 25, 347–352 (2000).
pubmed: 10888888
doi: 10.1038/77139
Wang, Y. et al. BASC, a super complex of BRCA1-associated proteins involved in the recognition and repair of aberrant DNA structures. Genes Dev. 14, 927–939 (2000).
pubmed: 10783165
pmcid: 316544
Gatei, M. et al. ATM-dependent phosphorylation of nibrin in response to radiation exposure. Nat. Genet. 25, 115–119 (2000).
pubmed: 10802669
doi: 10.1038/75508
Trujillo, K. M., Yuan, S. S., Lee, E. Y. & Sung, P. Nuclease activities in a complex of human recombination and DNA repair factors Rad50, Mre11, and p95. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 21447–21450 (1998).
pubmed: 9705271
doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.34.21447
Fukuda, T. et al. Alterations of the double-strand break repair gene MRE11 in cancer. Cancer Res. 61, 23–26 (2001).
pubmed: 11196167
Zhong, Q. et al. Association of BRCA1 with the hRad50-hMre11-p95 complex and the DNA damage response. Science 285, 747–750 (1999).
pubmed: 10426999
doi: 10.1126/science.285.5428.747
Heikkinen, K. et al. Mutation screening of Mre11 complex genes: indication of RAD50 involvement in breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility. J. Med. Genet. 40, e131 (2003).
pubmed: 14684699
pmcid: 1735331
doi: 10.1136/jmg.40.12.e131
Becherel, O. J. et al. CK2 phosphorylation-dependent interaction between aprataxin and MDC1 in the DNA damage response. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 1489–1503 (2010).
pubmed: 20008512
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp1149
Peng, A. & Chen, P. L. NFBD1, like 53BP1, is an early and redundant transducer mediating Chk2 phosphorylation in response to DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 8873–8876 (2003).
pubmed: 12551934
doi: 10.1074/jbc.C300001200
Luo, K. et al. Sumoylation of MDC1 is important for proper DNA damage response. EMBO J. 31, 3008–3019 (2012).
pubmed: 22635276
pmcid: 3395099
doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.158
Drane, P. et al. TIRR regulates 53BP1 by masking its histone methyl-lysine binding function. Nature 543, 211–216 (2017).
pubmed: 28241136
pmcid: 5441565
doi: 10.1038/nature21358
Escribano-Diaz, C. et al. A cell cycle-dependent regulatory circuit composed of 53BP1-RIF1 and BRCA1-CtIP controls DNA repair pathway choice. Mol. Cell 49, 872–883 (2013).
pubmed: 23333306
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.001
Derbyshire, D. J. et al. Crystal structure of human 53BP1 BRCT domains bound to p53 tumour suppressor. EMBO J. 21, 3863–3872 (2002).
pubmed: 12110597
pmcid: 126127
doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf383
Wang, B., Matsuoka, S., Carpenter, P. B. & Elledge, S. J. 53BP1, a mediator of the DNA damage checkpoint. Science 298, 1435–1438 (2002).
pubmed: 12364621
doi: 10.1126/science.1076182
Callen, E. et al. 53BP1 mediates productive and mutagenic DNA repair through distinct phosphoprotein interactions. Cell 153, 1266–1280 (2013).
pubmed: 23727112
pmcid: 3713552
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.023
Tomida, J. et al. FAM35A associates with REV7 and modulates DNA damage responses of normal and BRCA1-defective cells. EMBO J. 37, e99543 (2018).
Wu, Q. et al. Structure of BRCA1-BRCT/Abraxas complex reveals phosphorylation-dependent BRCT dimerization at DNA damage sites. Mol. cell. 61, 434–448 (2016).
pubmed: 26778126
pmcid: 4747905
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.12.017
Hiraike, H. et al. Identification of DBC1 as a transcriptional repressor for BRCA1. Br. J. Cancer 102, 1061–1067 (2010).
pubmed: 20160719
pmcid: 2844029
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605577
Feng, L., Huang, J. & Chen, J. MERIT40 facilitates BRCA1 localization and DNA damage repair. Genes Dev. 23, 719–728 (2009).
pubmed: 19261748
pmcid: 2661609
doi: 10.1101/gad.1770609
Shao, G. et al. MERIT40 controls BRCA1-Rap80 complex integrity and recruitment to DNA double-strand breaks. Genes Dev. 23, 740–754 (2009).
pubmed: 19261746
pmcid: 2661612
doi: 10.1101/gad.1739609
Yu, X. et al. BRCA1 ubiquitinates its phosphorylation-dependent binding partner CtIP. Genes Dev. 20, 1721–1726 (2006).
pubmed: 16818604
pmcid: 1522068
doi: 10.1101/gad.1431006
Kais, Z. et al. KIAA0101 interacts with BRCA1 and regulates centrosome number. Mol. Cancer Res. 9, 1091–1099 (2011).
pubmed: 21673012
pmcid: 3157549
doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0503
Wu-Baer, F., Ludwig, T. & Baer, R. The UBXN1 protein associates with autoubiquitinated forms of the BRCA1 tumor suppressor and inhibits its enzymatic function. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 2787–2798 (2010).
pubmed: 20351172
pmcid: 2876507
doi: 10.1128/MCB.01056-09
Ouchi, M. et al. BRCA1 phosphorylation by Aurora-A in the regulation of G2 to M transition. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 19643–19648 (2004).
pubmed: 14990569
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311780200
Tibbetts, R. S. et al. Functional interactions between BRCA1 and the checkpoint kinase ATR during genotoxic stress. Genes Dev. 14, 2989–3002 (2000).
pubmed: 11114888
pmcid: 317107
doi: 10.1101/gad.851000
Gough, C. A., Gojobori, T. & Imanishi, T. Cancer-related mutations in BRCA1-BRCT cause long-range structural changes in protein–protein binding sites: a molecular dynamics study. Proteins 66, 69–86 (2007).
pubmed: 17063491
doi: 10.1002/prot.21188
Kumagai, A., Lee, J., Yoo, H. Y. & Dunphy, W. G. TopBP1 activates the ATR-ATRIP complex. Cell 124, 943–955 (2006).
pubmed: 16530042
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.12.041
Bass, T. E. et al. ETAA1 acts at stalled replication forks to maintain genome integrity. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 1185–1195 (2016).
pubmed: 27723720
pmcid: 5245861
doi: 10.1038/ncb3415
Schiewer, M. J. et al. PARP-1 regulates DNA repair factor availability. EMBO Mol. Med. 10, e8816 (2018).
Kratassiouk, G. et al. The WEE1 regulators CPEB1 and miR-15b switch from inhibitor to activators at G2/M. Cell Cycle 15, 667–677 (2016).
pubmed: 27027998
pmcid: 4845936
doi: 10.1080/15384101.2016.1147631
Timme, C. R. et al. The DNA-PK inhibitor VX-984 enhances the radiosensitivity of glioblastoma cells grown in vitro and as orthotopic xenografts. Mol. Cancer Ther. 17, 1207–1216 (2018).
pubmed: 29549168
pmcid: 6322200
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-1267
van Oorschot, B. et al. Targeting DNA double strand break repair with hyperthermia and DNA-PKcs inhibition to enhance the effect of radiation treatment. Oncotarget 7, 65504–65513 (2016).
pubmed: 27602767
pmcid: 5323171
Yang, L. et al. Inhibition of DNA-PKcs enhances radiosensitivity and increases the levels of ATM and ATR in NSCLC cells exposed to carbon ion irradiation. Oncol. Lett. 10, 2856–2864 (2015).
pubmed: 26722253
pmcid: 4665689
doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3730
Ortiz, T. et al. Enhanced induction of apoptosis in a radio-resistant bladder tumor cell line by combined treatments with X-rays and wortmannin. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 47, 445–452 (2008).
pubmed: 18787832
doi: 10.1007/s00411-008-0188-6
pmcid: 18787832
Durant, S. T. et al. The brain-penetrant clinical ATM inhibitor AZD1390 radiosensitizes and improves survival of preclinical brain tumor models. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat1719 (2018).
pubmed: 29938225
pmcid: 6010333
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat1719
Karlin, J. et al. Orally bioavailable and blood–brain barrier-penetrating ATM inhibitor (AZ32) radiosensitizes intracranial gliomas in mice. Mol. Cancer Ther. 17, 1637–1647 (2018).
pubmed: 29769307
pmcid: 6072596
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-0975
Dohmen, A. J. C. et al. Identification of a novel ATM inhibitor with cancer cell specific radiosensitization activity. Oncotarget 8, 73925–73937 (2017).
pubmed: 29088757
pmcid: 5650312
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18034
Vendetti, F. P. et al. ATR kinase inhibitor AZD6738 potentiates CD8+ T cell-dependent antitumor activity following radiation. J. Clin. Invest. 128, 3926–3940 (2018).
pubmed: 29952768
pmcid: 6118586
doi: 10.1172/JCI96519
Fujisawa, H. et al. VE-821, an ATR inhibitor, causes radiosensitization in human tumor cells irradiated with high LET radiation. Radiat. Oncol. 10, 175 (2015).
pubmed: 26286029
pmcid: 4554350
doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0464-y
Xia, Y., Choi, H. K. & Lee, K. Recent advances in hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 49, 24–40 (2012).
pubmed: 22305612
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2012.01.033
pmcid: 22305612
Ellinghaus, P. et al. BAY 87-2243, a highly potent and selective inhibitor of hypoxia-induced gene activation has antitumor activities by inhibition of mitochondrial complex I. Cancer Med. 2, 611–624 (2013).
pubmed: 24403227
pmcid: 3892793
Wang, B. F. et al. Saikosaponin-D enhances radiosensitivity of hepatoma cells under hypoxic conditions by inhibiting hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 33, 37–51 (2014).
pubmed: 24401554
doi: 10.1159/000356648
Helbig, L. et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor pathway inhibition resolves tumor hypoxia and improves local tumor control after single-dose irradiation. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 88, 159–166 (2014).
pubmed: 24331663
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.09.047
Yu, J. et al. Regulation of radiosensitivity by HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A in the human cervical carcinoma cell line Hela. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol. 33, 285–290 (2012).
pubmed: 22873101
Miles, M. A., Harris, M. A. & Hawkins, C. J. Proteasome inhibitors trigger mutations via activation of caspases and CAD, but mutagenesis provoked by the HDAC inhibitors vorinostat and romidepsin is caspase/CAD-independent. Apoptosis Int. J. Program. Cell Death 24, 404–413 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s10495-019-01543-x
Marampon, F. et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitor ITF2357 (givinostat) reverts transformed phenotype and counteracts stemness in in vitro and in vivo models of human glioblastoma. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 145, 393–409 (2019).
pubmed: 30474756
doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2800-8
pmcid: 30474756
Cuneo, K. C. et al. Wee1 kinase inhibitor AZD1775 radiosensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma regardless of TP53 mutational status through induction of replication stress. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 95, 782–790 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.01.028
Ma, H. et al. Targeting of carbon ion-induced G2 checkpoint activation in lung cancer cells using Wee-1 inhibitor MK-1775. Radiat. Res. 184, 660–669 (2015).
pubmed: 26645158
doi: 10.1667/RR14171.1
Zhou, Z. R. et al. The Chk1 inhibitor MK-8776 increases the radiosensitivity of human triple-negative breast cancer by inhibiting autophagy. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 38, 513–523 (2017).
pubmed: 28042876
pmcid: 5386307
doi: 10.1038/aps.2016.136