Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.

Zhou, F. et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 395, 1054–1062 (2020).

pubmed: 32171076 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3 pmcid: 32171076

Lunn, P. et al. Using behavioural science to help fight the coronavirus. ESRI Working Paper No. 656 March 2020. http://aei.pitt.edu/102644/ (2020).

Scott, S. & Duncan, C.J. Biology of Plagues: Evidence from Historical Populations. (Cambridge University Press, 2001).

LeDoux, J. Rethinking the emotional brain. Neuron 73, 653–676 (2012).

pubmed: 22365542 pmcid: 3625946 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.02.004

Mobbs, D., Hagan, C. C., Dalgleish, T., Silston, B. & Prévost, C. The ecology of human fear: survival optimization and the nervous system. Front. Neurosci. 9, 55 (2015).

pubmed: 25852451 pmcid: 4364301 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00055

Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E. & Hancock, J. T. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 8878–8790 (2014).

doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320040111

Cole, S., Balcetis, E. & Dunning, D. Affective signals of threat increase perceived proximity. Psychol. Sci. 24, 34–40 (2013).

pubmed: 23160204 doi: 10.1177/0956797612446953

Witte, K. & Allen, M. A meta-analysis of fear appeals: implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Educ. Behav. 27, 591–615 (2000).

pubmed: 11009129 doi: 10.1177/109019810002700506

Strunk, D. R., Lopez, H. & DeRubeis, R. J. Depressive symptoms are associated with unrealistic negative predictions of future life events. Behav. Res. Ther. 44, 861–882 (2006).

pubmed: 16126162 doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.07.001

Sharot, T. The optimism bias. Curr. Biol. 21, R941–R945 (2011).

pubmed: 22153158 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.030

Wise, T., Zbozinek, T. D., Michelini, G., Hagan, C. C. & Mobbs, D. Changes in risk perception and protective behavior during the first week of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://osf.io/dz428 (2020).

Fischhoff, B. The sciences of science communication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110(Suppl 3), 14033–14039 (2013).

pubmed: 23942125 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213273110

Slovic, P. Perception of risk. Science 236, 280–285 (1987).

pubmed: 3563507 doi: 10.1126/science.3563507 pmcid: 3563507

Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E. & MacGregor, D. G. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal. 24, 311–322 (2004).

pubmed: 15078302 doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x

Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K. & Welch, N. Risk as feelings. Psychol. Bull. 127, 267–286 (2001).

pubmed: 11316014 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267

Peters, E., Lipkus, I. & Diefenbach, M. A. The functions of affect in health communications and in the construction of health preferences. J. Commun. 56, S140–S162 (2006).

doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00287.x

Evans, A. T. et al. Graphic warning labels elicit affective and thoughtful responses from smokers: results of a randomized clinical trial. PLoS One 10, e0142879 (2015).

pubmed: 26672982 pmcid: 4684406 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142879

Noar, S. M. et al. Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. Tob. Control 25, 341–354 (2016).

pubmed: 25948713 doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051978

Rottenstreich, Y. & Hsee, C. K. Money, kisses, and electric shocks: on the affective psychology of risk. Psychol. Sci. 12, 185–190 (2001).

pubmed: 11437299 doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00334

Hsee, C. K. & Rottenstreich, Y. Music, pandas, and muggers: on the affective psychology of value. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 133, 23–30 (2004).

pubmed: 14979749 doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.23

Peters, E. et al. Numeracy and decision making. Psychol. Sci. 17, 407–413 (2006).

pubmed: 16683928 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.x

Schaller, M. & Neuberg, S. L. Danger, disease, and the nature of prejudice(s). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 46, 1–54 (2012).

Feldman, S. & Stenner, K. Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Polit. Psychol. 18, 741–770 (1997).

doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00077

Jackson, J. C. et al. Ecological and cultural factors underlying the global distribution of prejudice. PLoS One 14, e0221953 (2019).

pubmed: 31490981 pmcid: 6730889 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221953

Marcus, G. E., Sullivan, J. L., Theiss-Morse, E. & Wood, S. L. With Malice Toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments. (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995).

Cikara, M., Bruneau, E. G. & Saxe, R. R. Us and them: intergroup failures of empathy. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 20, 149–153 (2011).

doi: 10.1177/0963721411408713

Han, S. Neurocognitive basis of racial ingroup bias in empathy. Trends Cogn. Sci. 22, 400–421 (2018).

pubmed: 29563059 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.013

Kteily, N., Hodson, G. & Bruneau, E. They see us as less than human: metadehumanization predicts intergroup conflict via reciprocal dehumanization. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 110, 343–370 (2016).

pubmed: 26963763 doi: 10.1037/pspa0000044

Han, X. et al. A neurobiological association of revenge propensity during intergroup conflict. eLife 9, e52014 (2020).

pubmed: 32122462 pmcid: 7058385 doi: 10.7554/eLife.52014

Cohn, S. K. Pandemics: waves of disease, waves of hate from the Plague of Athens to A.I.D.S. Hist. J. 85, 535–555 (2012).

pubmed: 25960572 pmcid: 4422154

Russell, A. The rise of coronavirus hate crimes. The New Yorker https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-the-uk/the-rise-of-coronavirus-hate-crimes (2020).

Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L. & Saguy, T. Another view of “we”: majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 18, 296–330 (2007).

doi: 10.1080/10463280701726132

Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T. & Ropp, S. A. The extended contact effect: knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 73, 73–90 (1997).

doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.73

Clarke, L. Panic: myth or reality? Contexts 1, 21–26 (2002).

doi: 10.1525/ctx.2002.1.3.21

Drury, J. The role of social identity processes in mass emergency behaviour: an integrative review. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 29, 38–81 (2018).

doi: 10.1080/10463283.2018.1471948

Booth, R. Community aid groups set up across UK amid coronavirus crisis. The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/mar/16/community-aid-groups-set-up-across-uk-amid-coronavirus-crisis (16 March 2020).

Canter, D. Fires and Human Behaviour. (David Fulton, 1990).

Tierney, K.J., Lindell, M.K. & Perry, R.W. Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States. (Joseph Henry Press, 2001).

Quarantelli, E.L. Sociology of panic. in International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences (eds. Smelser, N. J. & Baltes, P. B.) 11020–11023 (Pergamon Press, 2001).

Drury, J., Cocking, C. & Reicher, S. The nature of collective resilience: survivor reactions to the 2005 London bombings. Int. J. Mass Emerg. Disasters 27, 66–95 (2009).

Carter, H., Drury, J., Rubin, G. J., Williams, R. & Amlôt, R. Applying crowd psychology to develop recommendations for the management of mass decontamination. Health Secur. 13, 45–53 (2015).

pubmed: 25812428 pmcid: 4389693 doi: 10.1089/hs.2014.0061

Stiff, C. The game theory of panic-buying – and how to reduce it. The Conversation http://theconversation.com/the-game-theory-of-panic-buying-and-how-to-reduce-it-134107 (2020).

Cialdini, R. B. & Goldstein, N. J. Social influence: compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55, 591–621 (2004).

pubmed: 14744228 doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015

Wood, W. Attitude change: persuasion and social influence. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 51, 539–570 (2000).

pubmed: 10751980 doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.539

Miller, D.T. & Prentice, D.A. The construction of social norms and standards. in Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles 799–829 (Guilford Press, 1996).

Dickie, R., Rasmussen, S., Cain, R., Williams, L. & MacKay, W. The effects of perceived social norms on handwashing behaviour in students. Psychol. Health Med. 23, 154–159 (2018).

pubmed: 28592138 doi: 10.1080/13548506.2017.1338736

Berkowitz, A.D. An overview of the social norms approach. in Changing the Culture of College Drinking: A Socially Situated Health Communication Campaign (eds. Stewart, L. & Lederman, L. C.) 193–214 (Hampton Press, 2005).

Cialdini, R.B., Kallgren, C.A. & Reno, R.R. A focus theory of normative conduct: a theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 24, 201–234 (1991).

Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J. & Griskevicius, V. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol. Sci. 18, 429–434 (2007).

pubmed: 17576283 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x

Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A. & Turner, J. C. Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 29, 97–119 (1990).

pubmed: 2372667 doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00892.x

Centola, D. An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior. Science 334, 1269–1272 (2011).

Christakis, N. A. & Fowler, J. H. Social contagion theory: examining dynamic social networks and human behavior. Stat. Med. 32, 556–577 (2013).

pubmed: 22711416 doi: 10.1002/sim.5408

Christakis, N. A. & Fowler, J. H. Social network sensors for early detection of contagious outbreaks. PLoS One 5, e12948 (2010).

pubmed: 20856792 pmcid: 2939797 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012948

Kim, D. A. et al. Social network targeting to maximise population behaviour change: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386, 145–153 (2015).

pubmed: 25952354 pmcid: 4638320 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60095-2

Bond, R. M. et al. A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 489, 295–298 (2012).

pubmed: 22972300 doi: 10.1038/nature11421

Halpern, D. Inside the Nudge Unit: How Small Changes Can Make a Big Difference (Random House, 2015).

Thaler, R.H. & Sunstein, C.R. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. (Yale University Press, 2008).

Sparkman, G. & Walton, G. M. Dynamic norms promote sustainable behavior, even if it is counternormative. Psychol. Sci. 28, 1663–1674 (2017).

pubmed: 28961062 doi: 10.1177/0956797617719950

HUD Continuum of Care Homeless Assistance Programs Homeless Populations and Subpopulations. https://files.hudexchange.info/reports/published/CoC_PopSub_NatlTerrDC_2019.pdf (US Department of Housing & Urban Development, 2019).

Deitz, S. & Meehan, K. Plumbing poverty: mapping hot spots of racial and geographic inequality in U.S. household water insecurity. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 109, 1092–1109 (2019).

Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. Higher wage workers more likely than lower wage workers to have paid leave benefits in 2018. The Economics Daily https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2018/higher-wage-workers-more-likely-than-lower-wage-workers-to-have-paid-leave-benefits-in-2018.htm (2018).

Cockerham, W. C., Hamby, B. W. & Oates, G. R. The social determinants of chronic disease. Am. J. Prev. Med. 52(1S1), S5–S12 (2017).

pubmed: 27989293 pmcid: 5328595 doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.010

Fothergill, A. & Peek, L. A. Poverty and disasters in the United States: a review of recent sociological findings. Nat. Hazards 32, 89–110 (2004).

doi: 10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000026792.76181.d9

Bolin, B. & Kurtz, L.C. Race, class, ethnicity, and disaster vulnerability. in Handbook of Disaster Research (eds. Rodríguez, H., Donner, W. & Trainor, J. E.) 181–203 (Springer International Publishing, 2018).

Kristal, T., Cohen, Y. & Navot, E. Benefit inequality among American workers by gender, race, and ethnicity, 1982–2015. Sociol. Sci. 5, 461–488 (2018).

doi: 10.15195/v5.a20

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Communities in Action: Pathways to Health Equity. (National Academies Press, 2017).

Quiñones, A. R. et al. Racial/ethnic differences in multimorbidity development and chronic disease accumulation for middle-aged adults. PLoS One 14, e0218462 (2019).

pubmed: 31206556 pmcid: 6576751 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218462

Marsden, P. V. Core discussion networks of Americans. Am. Sociol. Rev. 52, 122–131 (1987).

doi: 10.2307/2095397

Granovetter, M. S. The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78, 1360–1380 (1973).

doi: 10.1086/225469

Demaris, A. & Yang, R. Race, alienation, and interpersonal mistrust. Sociol. Spectr. 14, 327–349 (1994).

doi: 10.1080/02732173.1994.9982075

Brehm, J. & Rahn, W. Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. Am. J. Pol. Sci. 41, 999–1023 (1997).

doi: 10.2307/2111684

Smith, T. W. Factors relating to misanthropy in contemporary American society. Soc. Sci. Res. 26, 170–196 (1997).

doi: 10.1006/ssre.1997.0592

Claibourn, M. P. & Martin, P. S. Trusting and Joining? An empirical test of the reciprocal nature of social capital. Polit. Behav. 22, 267–291 (2000).

doi: 10.1023/A:1010688913148

Alesina, A. & La Ferrara, E. Who trusts others? J. Public Econ. 85, 207–234 (2002).

doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00084-6

Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol. Rev. 98, 224–253 (1991).

doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224

Triandis, H.C. Individualism And Collectivism. (Westview Press, 1995).

Kitayama, S., Park, H., Sevincer, A. T., Karasawa, M. & Uskul, A. K. A cultural task analysis of implicit independence: comparing North America, Western Europe, and East Asia. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 97, 236–255 (2009).

pubmed: 19634973 doi: 10.1037/a0015999

San Martin, A. et al. Self-assertive interdependence in Arab culture. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 830–837 (2018).

pubmed: 31558808 doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0435-z

Kitayama, S. et al. Behavioral adjustment moderates the link between neuroticism and biological health risk: a U.S.-Japan comparison study. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 44, 809–822 (2018).

pubmed: 29380686 pmcid: 5940540 doi: 10.1177/0146167217748603

Betsch, C., Böhm, R., Korn, L. & Holtmann, C. On the benefits of explaining herd immunity in vaccine advocacy. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 56 (2017).

doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0056

Kraus, B. & Kitayama, S. Interdependent self-construal predicts emotion suppression in Asian Americans: an electro-cortical investigation. Biol. Psychol. 146, 107733 (2019).

pubmed: 31352031 doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.107733

Gelfand, M. J. et al. Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study. Science 332, 1100–1104 (2011).

pubmed: 21617077 doi: 10.1126/science.1197754 pmcid: 21617077

Gelfand, M. J., Harrington, J. R. & Jackson, J. C. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 12, 800–809 (2017). The strength of social norms across human groups.

pubmed: 28972845 doi: 10.1177/1745691617708631

Harrington, J. R. & Gelfand, M. J. Tightness-looseness across the 50 United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7990–7995 (2014).

pubmed: 24843116 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317937111

Roos, P., Gelfand, M., Nau, D. & Lun, J. Societal threat and cultural variation in the strength of social norms: an evolutionary basis. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 129, 14–23 (2015).

doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.01.003

Gelfand, M. Rule Makers, Rule Breakers: How Tight and Loose Cultures Wire Our World. (Scribner, 2018).

Westwood, S. J. et al. The tie that divides: cross-national evidence of the primacy of partyism. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 57, 333–354 (2018).

doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12228

Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N. & Westwood, S. J. The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 22, 129–146 (2019).

doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034

Hetherington, M.J. & Weiler, J.D. Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics, still? in American Gridlock: The Sources, Character, and Impact of Polarization (eds. Thurber, J. A. & Yoshinaka, A.) 86–112 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015).

Abramowitz, A. I. & Webster, S. The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century. Elect. Stud. 41, 12–22 (2016).

doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.001

Van Bavel, J. J. & Pereira, A. The partisan brain: an identity-based model of political belief. Trends Cogn. Sci. 22, 213–224 (2018).

pubmed: 29475636 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.004

Bakshy, E., Messing, S. & Adamic, L. A. Political science. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348, 1130–1132 (2015).

pubmed: 25953820 doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1160

Lelkes, Y., Sood, G. & Iyengar, S. The hostile audience: the effect of access to broadband internet on partisan affect. Am. J. Pol. Sci. 61, 5–20 (2017).

doi: 10.1111/ajps.12237

Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A. & Van Bavel, J. J. Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 7313–7318 (2017).

pubmed: 28652356 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618923114

Minozzi, W., Song, H., Lazer, D. M. J., Neblo, M. A. & Ognyanova, K. The incidental pundit: who talks politics with whom, and why? Am. J. Pol. Sci. 64, 135–151 (2020).

doi: 10.1111/ajps.12469

Ahler, D. J. & Sood, G. The parties in our heads: misperceptions about party composition and their consequences. J. Polit. 80, 964–981 (2018).

doi: 10.1086/697253

Lees, J. & Cikara, M. Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 279–286 (2020).

pubmed: 31712763 doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0766-4

Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N. & Cook, F. L. The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Polit. Behav. 36, 235–262 (2014).

doi: 10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0

Ellis, E.G. The coronavirus outbreak is a petri dish for conspiracy theories. Wired https://www.wired.com/story/coronavirus-conspiracy-theories/ (2020).

Gertz, B. Coronavirus may have originated in lab linked to China’s biowarfare program. The Washington Times https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jan/26/coronavirus-link-to-china-biowarfare-program-possi/ (2020).

Sommer, W. QAnon-ers’ magic cure for coronavirus: just drink bleach! The Daily Beast https://www.thedailybeast.com/qanon-conspiracy-theorists-magic-cure-for-coronavirus-is-drinking-lethal-bleach (2020).

Leman, P. & Cinnirella, M. A major event has a major cause: evidence for the role of heuristics in reasoning about conspiracy theories. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 9, 18–28 (2007).

McCauley, C. & Jacques, S. The popularity of conspiracy theories of presidential assassination: a Bayesian analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37, 637–644 (1979).

doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.5.637

van Prooijen, J.-W. & Douglas, K. M. Conspiracy theories as part of history: the role of societal crisis situations. Mem. Stud. 10, 323–333 (2017).

pubmed: 29081831 pmcid: 5646574 doi: 10.1177/1750698017701615

Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M. & Cichocka, A. The psychology of conspiracy theories. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 26, 538–542 (2017).

pubmed: 29276345 pmcid: 5724570 doi: 10.1177/0963721417718261

Graeupner, D. & Coman, A. The dark side of meaning-making: how social exclusion leads to superstitious thinking. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 69, 218–222 (2017).

doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.10.003

Jolley, D. & Douglas, K. M. The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS One 9, e89177 (2014).

pubmed: 24586574 pmcid: 3930676 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089177

Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E. & Oberauer, K. The robust relationship between conspiracism and denial of (climate) science. Psychol. Sci. 26, 667–670 (2015).

pubmed: 25814501 doi: 10.1177/0956797614568432

van Prooijen, J.-W., Krouwel, A. P. M. & Pollet, T. V. Political extremism predicts belief in conspiracy theories. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 6, 570–578 (2015).

doi: 10.1177/1948550614567356

Jolley, D., Meleady, R. & Douglas, K. M. Exposure to intergroup conspiracy theories promotes prejudice which spreads across groups. Br. J. Psychol. 111, 17–35 (2020).

pubmed: 30868563 doi: 10.1111/bjop.12385

Kofta, M., Soral, W. & Bilewicz, M. What breeds conspiracy antisemitism? The role of political uncontrollability and uncertainty in the belief in Jewish conspiracy. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000183 (2020).

Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A., Łozowski, F., Górska, P. & Winiewski, M. In search of an imaginary enemy: Catholic collective narcissism and the endorsement of gender conspiracy beliefs. J. Soc. Psychol. 159, 766–779 (2019).

pubmed: 30870100 doi: 10.1080/00224545.2019.1586637

Jolley, D. & Douglas, K. M. Prevention is better than cure: addressing anti‐vaccine conspiracy theories. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 47, 459–469 (2017).

doi: 10.1111/jasp.12453

Zollo, F. et al. Debunking in a world of tribes. PLoS One 12, e0181821 (2017).

pubmed: 28742163 pmcid: 5524392 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181821

Frenkel, S., Alba, D. & Zhong, R. Surge of virus misinformation stumps Facebook and Twitter. The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/08/technology/coronavirus-misinformation-social-media.html (2020).

Allen, J., Howland, B., Mobius, M., Rothschild, D. & Watts, D. J. Evaluating the fake news problem at the scale of the information ecosystem. Sci. Adv. 1, eaay3539 (2020).

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay3539

Allcott, H. & Gentzkow, M. Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J. Econ. Perspect. 31, 211–236 (2017).

doi: 10.1257/jep.31.2.211

Guess, A., Nagler, J. & Tucker, J. Less than you think: prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Sci. Adv. 5, u4586 (2019).

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4586

Berinsky, A. J. Rumors and health care reform: experiments in political misinformation. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 47, 241–262 (2017).

doi: 10.1017/S0007123415000186

Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N. & Cook, J. Misinformation and its correction: continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 13, 106–131 (2012).

pubmed: 26173286 doi: 10.1177/1529100612451018

Guess, A. & Coppock, A. Does counter-attitudinal information cause backlash? Results from three large survey experiments. Br. J. Polit. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000327 (2018).

Schmid, P. & Betsch, C. Effective strategies for rebutting science denialism in public discussions. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3, 931–939 (2019).

pubmed: 31235861 doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0632-4

Nyhan, B. & Reifler, J. Displacing misinformation about events: an experimental test of causal corrections. J. Exp. Political Sci. 2, 81–93 (2015).

doi: 10.1017/XPS.2014.22

Wittenberg, C. & Berinsky, A.J. Misinformation and its correction. in Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field (eds Persily, N. & Tucker, J. A.) (Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).

Swire, B. & Ecker, U.K.H. Misinformation and its correction: Cognitive mechanisms and recommendations for mass communication. in Misinformation and Mass Audiences (eds. Southwell, B. G., Thorson, E. A. & Sheble, L.) 195–2011 (University of Texas Press, 2018).

Wood, T. & Porter, E. The elusive backfire effect: mass attitudes’ steadfast factual adherence. Polit. Behav. 41, 135–163 (2018).

doi: 10.1007/s11109-018-9443-y

Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y. & Rand, D. Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy nudge intervention. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/uhbk9 (2020).

McGuire, W. J. Some contemporary approaches. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1, 191–229 (1964).

doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60052-0

van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S. & Maibach, E. Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change. Glob. Chall. 1, 1600008 (2017).

pubmed: 31565263 pmcid: 6607159 doi: 10.1002/gch2.201600008

Banas, J. A. & Rains, S. A. A meta-analysis of research on inoculation theory. Commun. Monogr. 77, 281–311 (2010).

doi: 10.1080/03637751003758193

Basol, M., Roozenbeek, J. & van der Linden, S. Good news about bad news: gamified inoculation boosts confidence and cognitive immunity against fake news. J. Cogn. 3, 2 (2020).

pubmed: 31934684 pmcid: 6952868 doi: 10.5334/joc.91

Roozenbeek, J. & van der Linden, S. Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation. Palgrave Commun. 5, 65 (2019).

doi: 10.1057/s41599-019-0279-9

Roozenbeek, J., van der Linden, S. & Nygren, T. Prebunking interventions based on “inoculation” theory can reduce susceptibility to misinformation across cultures. Harv. Kennedy Sch. Misinformation Rev. https://doi.org/10.37016//mr-2020-008 (2020).

Pennycook, G. & Rand, D. G. Lazy, not biased: susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition 188, 39–50 (2019).

pubmed: 29935897 doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011

Pennycook, G. & Rand, D. G. Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. J. Pers. 88, 185–200 (2020).

pubmed: 30929263 doi: 10.1111/jopy.12476

Bronstein, M. V., Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Rand, D. G. & Cannon, T. D. Belief in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism, and reduced analytic thinking. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 8, 108–117 (2019).

doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.005

Bago, B., Rand, D. G. & Pennycook, G. Fake news, fast and slow: deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/xge0000729 (2020).

Dias, N., Pennycook, G. & Rand, D. G. Emphasizing publishers does not effectively reduce susceptibility to misinformation on social media. Harv. Kennedy Sch. Misinformation Rev. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-001 (2020).

Pennycook, G. & Rand, D. G. Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 2521–2526 (2019).

pubmed: 30692252 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806781116

Clayton, K. et al. Real solutions for fake news? Measuring the effectiveness of general warnings and fact-check tags in reducing belief in false stories on social media. Polit. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09533-0 (2019).

Trevena, L.J. et al. Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 13 Suppl 2, S7 (2013).

Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19, 123–205 (1986).

Briñol, P. & Petty, R. E. Source factors in persuasion: a self-validation approach. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 20, 49–96 (2009).

doi: 10.1080/10463280802643640

O’Keefe, D.J. Persuasion: Theory and Research. (SAGE, 2016).

Greyling, C. et al. Lessons from the faith-driven response to the West Africa Ebola epidemic. Rev. Faith Int. Aff. 14, 118–123 (2016).

doi: 10.1080/15570274.2016.1215829

Teeny, J., Siev, J., Briñol, P. & Petty, R.E. A review and conceptual framework for understanding personalized matching effects in persuasion. J. Consum. Psychol. (in the press).

Grant, A. M. & Hofmann, D. A. It’s not all about me: motivating hand hygiene among health care professionals by focusing on patients. Psychol. Sci. 22, 1494–1499 (2011).

pubmed: 22075239 doi: 10.1177/0956797611419172

Feinberg, M. & Willer, R. Moral reframing: a technique for effective and persuasive communication across political divides. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 13, e12501 (2019).

doi: 10.1111/spc3.12501

Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E. & Vaughan, S. The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nat. Clim. Chang. 3, 399–404 (2013).

doi: 10.1038/nclimate1720

Linden, S. V., Leiserowitz, A. & Maibach, E. Scientific agreement can neutralize politicization of facts. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 2–3 (2018).

pubmed: 30980051 doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0259-2

van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A. & Maibach, E. The gateway belief model: a large-scale replication. J. Environ. Psychol. 62, 49–58 (2019).

doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.009

Drummond, C. & Fischhoff, B. Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 9587–9592 (2017).

pubmed: 28827344 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704882114

Kahan, D. M. et al. The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2, 732–735 (2012).

doi: 10.1038/nclimate1547

Druckman, J. N. & McGrath, M. C. The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 111–119 (2019).

doi: 10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1

Rucker, D., Tormala, Z. L., Petty, R. E. & Briñol, P. Consumer conviction and commitment: an appraisal-based framework for attitude certainty. J. Consum. Psychol. 24, 119–136 (2014).

doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2013.07.001

Barden, J. & Petty, R. E. The mere perception of elaboration creates attitude certainty: exploring the thoughtfulness heuristic. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 95, 489–509 (2008).

pubmed: 18729690 doi: 10.1037/a0012559

Luttrell, A., Petty, R. E., Briñol, P. & Wagner, B. C. Making it moral: merely labeling an attitude as moral increases its strength. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 65, 82–93 (2016).

doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.04.003

Greene, J. Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap between Us and Them (Penguin Press, 2013).

Haidt, J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol. Rev. 108, 814–834 (2001).

pubmed: 11699120 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814

Haidt, J. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. (Vintage, 2012).

Tomasello, M. Why We Cooperate. (MIT Press, 2009).

Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. Groups in mind: the coalitional roots of war and morality. in Human Morality and Sociality (ed. Høgh-Olesen, H.) 191–234 (2010).

Leach, C.W., Bilali, R. & Pagliaro, S. Groups and morality. in APA handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, Volume 2: Group Processes 123–149 (American Psychological Association, 2015).

Ellemers, N. Morality and the Regulation of Social Behavior. (Routledge, 2017).

Ellemers, N. & van den Bos, K. Morality in groups: on the social-regulatory functions of right and wrong. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 6, 878–889 (2012).

doi: 10.1111/spc3.12001

Boyer, P. & Petersen, M. B. Folk-economic beliefs: an evolutionary cognitive model. Behav. Brain Sci. 41, 1–51 (2017).

Meegan, D. V. Zero-sum bias: perceived competition despite unlimited resources. Front. Psychol. 1, 191 (2010).

pubmed: 21833251 pmcid: 3153800 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00191

Folch, E., Hernandez, I., Barragan, M. & Franco-Paredes, C. Infectious diseases, non-zero-sum thinking, and the developing world. Am. J. Med. Sci. 326, 66–72 (2003).

pubmed: 12920437 doi: 10.1097/00000441-200308000-00003

Goodwin, G. P. & Landy, J. F. Valuing different human lives. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 143, 778–803 (2014).

pubmed: 23647311 doi: 10.1037/a0032796

Awad, E. et al. The Moral Machine experiment. Nature 563, 59–64 (2018).

pubmed: 30356211 doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6

Everett, J. A. C., Pizarro, D. A. & Crockett, M. J. Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 145, 772–787 (2016).

pubmed: 27054685 doi: 10.1037/xge0000165

Funk, C., Hefferon, M., Kennedy, B. & Johnson, C. Trust and Mistrust in Americans’ Views of Scientific Experts. Pew Research Center Science & Society https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2019/08/02/trust-and-mistrust-in-americans-views-of-scientific-experts/ (2019).

Ransohoff, K.J. Patients on the Trolley Track: The Moral Cognition of Medical Practitioners and Public Health Professionals. (Harvard Univ. Press, 2011).

Gino, F., Norton, M. I. & Weber, R. A. Motivated Bayesians: feeling moral while acting egoistically. J. Econ. Perspect. 30, 189–212 (2016).

doi: 10.1257/jep.30.3.189

Garcia, T., Massoni, S. & Villeval, M. C. Ambiguity and excuse-driven behavior in charitable giving. Eur. Econ. Rev. 124, 103412 (2020).

doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103412

Kappes, A. et al. Uncertainty about the impact of social decisions increases prosocial behaviour. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 573–580 (2018).

pubmed: 31209312 pmcid: 6639117 doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0372-x

Barclay, P. & Willer, R. Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans. Proc. Biol. Sci. 274, 749–753 (2007).

pubmed: 17255001 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.0209

Milinski, M., Semmann, D. & Krambeck, H.-J. Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’. Nature 415, 424–426 (2002).

pubmed: 11807552 doi: 10.1038/415424a

Cushman, F. & Young, L. Patterns of moral judgment derive from nonmoral psychological representations. Cogn. Sci. 35, 1052–1075 (2011).

pubmed: 21790743 doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01167.x

Ritov, I. & Baron, J. Reluctance to vaccinate: omission bias and ambiguity. J. Behav. Decis. Making 3, 263–277 (1990).

doi: 10.1002/bdm.3960030404

Ritov, I. & Baron, J. Status-quo and omission biases. J. Risk Uncertain. 5, 49–61 (1992).

doi: 10.1007/BF00208786

Tetlock, P. E. & Boettger, R. Accountability amplifies the status quo effect when change creates victims. J. Behav. Decis. Making 7, 1–23 (1994).

doi: 10.1002/bdm.3960070102

Nowak, M. A. Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314, 1560–1563 (2006).

pubmed: 17158317 pmcid: 3279745 doi: 10.1126/science.1133755

Van Lange, P. A. M., Joireman, J. & Milinski, M. Climate change: what psychology can offer in terms of insights and solutions. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 27, 269–274 (2018).

pubmed: 30166778 pmcid: 6099976 doi: 10.1177/0963721417753945

Milinski, M., Hilbe, C., Semmann, D., Sommerfeld, R. & Marotzke, J. Humans choose representatives who enforce cooperation in social dilemmas through extortion. Nat. Commun. 7, 10915 (2016).

pubmed: 26948250 pmcid: 4786683 doi: 10.1038/ncomms10915

Reinders Folmer, C. P. et al. One for all: what representing a group may do to us. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 48, 1047–1056 (2012).

doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.009

Yamagishi, T. The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51, 110–116 (1986).

doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.110

Rand, D. G., Dreber, A., Ellingsen, T., Fudenberg, D. & Nowak, M. A. Positive interactions promote public cooperation. Science 325, 1272–1275 (2009).

pubmed: 19729661 pmcid: 2875121 doi: 10.1126/science.1177418

Dal Bó, E. & Dal Bó, P. “Do the right thing:” the effects of moral suasion on cooperation. J. Public Econ. 117, 28–38 (2014).

doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.05.002

Capraro, V., Jagfeld, G., Klein, R., Mul, M. & de Pol, I. V. Increasing altruistic and cooperative behaviour with simple moral nudges. Sci. Rep. 9, 11880 (2019).

pubmed: 31417106 pmcid: 6695418 doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48094-4

Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S. & Fehr, E. Are people conditionally cooperative? evidence from a public goods experiment. Econ. Lett. 71, 397–404 (2001).

doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00394-9

Kraft-Todd, G., Yoeli, E., Bhanot, S. & Rand, D. Promoting cooperation in the field. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 3, 96–101 (2015).

doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.02.006

Christensen, D., Dube, O., Haushofer, J., Siddiqi, B. & Voors, M. Community-based crisis response: evidence from Sierra Leone’s Ebola outbreak. Am. Econ. Rev. Pap. Proc. (in the press).

Tsai, L.L., Morse, B.S. & Blair, R.A. Building credibility and cooperation in low-trust settings: persuasion and source accountability in Liberia during the 2014–2015 Ebola crisis. Comp. Polit. Stud. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019897698 (2020).

Blair, R. A., Morse, B. S. & Tsai, L. L. Public health and public trust: survey evidence from the Ebola virus disease epidemic in Liberia. Soc. Sci. Med. 172, 89–97 (2017).

pubmed: 27914936 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.016

Morse, B., Grépin, K. A., Blair, R. A. & Tsai, L. Patterns of demand for non-Ebola health services during and after the Ebola outbreak: panel survey evidence from Monrovia, Liberia. BMJ Glob. Health 1, e000007 (2016).

pubmed: 28588907 pmcid: 5321298 doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2015-000007

Vinck, P., Pham, P. N., Bindu, K. K., Bedford, J. & Nilles, E. J. Institutional trust and misinformation in the response to the 2018-19 Ebola outbreak in North Kivu, DR Congo: a population-based survey. Lancet Infect. Dis. 19, 529–536 (2019).

pubmed: 30928435 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30063-5

Alsan, M. & Wanamaker, M. Tuskegee and the health of black men. Q. J. Econ. 133, 407–455 (2018).

pubmed: 30505005 doi: 10.1093/qje/qjx029

Reicher, S., Haslam, S. A. & Hopkins, N. Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. Leadersh. Q. 16, 547–568 (2005).

doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.007

Haslam, S.A., Reicher, S.D. & Platow, M.J. The New Psychology of Leadership: Identity, Influence, and Power. (Routledge, 2011).

Fransen, K. et al. Believing in “us”: exploring leaders’ capacity to enhance team confidence and performance by building a sense of shared social identity. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 21, 89–100 (2015).

pubmed: 25401268 doi: 10.1037/xap0000033

Haslam, S. A. & Reicher, S. Stressing the group: social identity and the unfolding dynamics of responses to stress. J. Appl. Psychol. 91, 1037–1052 (2006). Stressing the group.

pubmed: 16953766 doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1037

Haslam, S. A. & Platow, M. J. The link between leadership and followership: how affirming social identity translates vision into action. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 27, 1469–1479 (2001).

doi: 10.1177/01461672012711008

Hogg, M. A. A social identity theory of leadership. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 5, 184–200 (2001).

doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_1

Nielsen, J.S. The Myth Of Leadership: Creating Leaderless Organizations. (Davies-Black Publishing, 2004).

Mooijman, M., van Dijk, W. W., van Dijk, E. & Ellemers, N. On sanction-goal justifications: How and why deterrence justifications undermine rule compliance. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 112, 577–588 (2017).

pubmed: 27935728 doi: 10.1037/pspi0000084

Tyler, T.R. Why People Cooperate: The Role of Social Motivations. (Princeton Univ. Press, 2011).

Ellemers, N., Spears, R. & Doosje, B. Self and social identity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 53, 161–186 (2002).

pubmed: 11752483 doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228

Schnall, S., Roper, J. & Fessler, D. M. T. Elevation leads to altruistic behavior. Psychol. Sci. 21, 315–320 (2010).

pubmed: 20424062 doi: 10.1177/0956797609359882

Schnall, S. & Roper, J. Elevation puts moral values into action. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 3, 373–378 (2012).

doi: 10.1177/1948550611423595

Yang, X.-F., Pavarini, G., Schnall, S. & Immordino-Yang, M. H. Looking up to virtue: averting gaze facilitates moral construals via posteromedial activations. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 13, 1131–1139 (2018).

pubmed: 30212913 pmcid: 6234327

de Zavala, A. G., Cichocka, A., Eidelson, R. & Jayawickreme, N. Collective narcissism and its social consequences. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 97, 1074–1096 (2009).

pubmed: 19968420 doi: 10.1037/a0016904

Cichocka, A. Understanding defensive and secure in-group positivity: the role of collective narcissism. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 27, 283–317 (2016).

doi: 10.1080/10463283.2016.1252530

Cichocka, A. & Cislak, A. Nationalism as collective narcissism. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 34, 69–74 (2020).

doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.12.013

Cichocka, A., Marchlewska, M., Golec de Zavala, A. & Olechowski, M. ‘They will not control us’: ingroup positivity and belief in intergroup conspiracies. Br. J. Psychol. 107, 556–576 (2016).

pubmed: 26511288 doi: 10.1111/bjop.12158

Baumeister, R. F. & Leary, M. R. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull. 117, 497–529 (1995).

pubmed: 7777651 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497

Jetten, J., Haslam, C., & Haslam, S. A. (eds.) The Social Cure: Identity, Health and Well-being. (Psychology Press, 2012).

Jetten, J. et al. Advancing the social identity approach to health and well-being: progressing the social cure research agenda. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 47, 789–802 (2017).

doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2333

Rimé, B. Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: theory and empirical review. Emot. Rev. 1, 60–85 (2009).

doi: 10.1177/1754073908097189

Williams, W. C., Morelli, S. A., Ong, D. C. & Zaki, J. Interpersonal emotion regulation: Implications for affiliation, perceived support, relationships, and well-being. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 115, 224–254 (2018).

pubmed: 29733662 doi: 10.1037/pspi0000132

Haslam, C. et al. The New Psychology of Health: Unlocking the Social Cure. (Routledge, 2018).

Hawkley, L. C. & Cacioppo, J. T. Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Ann. Behav. Med. 40, 218–227 (2010).

pubmed: 20652462 doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8

Luo, Y., Hawkley, L. C., Waite, L. J. & Cacioppo, J. T. Loneliness, health, and mortality in old age: a national longitudinal study. Soc. Sci. Med. 74, 907–914 (2012).

pubmed: 22326307 pmcid: 3303190 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.028

Cacioppo, J.T. & Patrick, W. Loneliness: Human Nature and the Need for Social Connection. (Norton, 2009).

Doré, B. P., Morris, R. R., Burr, D. A., Picard, R. W. & Ochsner, K. N. Helping others regulate emotion predicts increased regulation of one’s own emotions and decreased symptoms of depression. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 43, 729–739 (2017).

pubmed: 28903637 doi: 10.1177/0146167217695558

Helliwell, J. F. & Huang, H. Comparing the happiness effects of real and on-line friends. PLoS One 8, e72754 (2013).

pubmed: 24019875 pmcid: 3760892 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072754

Verduyn, P. et al. Passive Facebook usage undermines affective well-being: experimental and longitudinal evidence. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 144, 480–488 (2015).

pubmed: 25706656 doi: 10.1037/xge0000057

Schroeder, J., Kardas, M. & Epley, N. The humanizing voice: speech reveals, and text conceals, a more thoughtful mind in the midst of disagreement. Psychol. Sci. 28, 1745–1762 (2017).

pubmed: 29068763 doi: 10.1177/0956797617713798

Waytz, A. & Gray, K. Does online technology make us more or less sociable? a preliminary review and call for research. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 13, 473–491 (2018).

pubmed: 29758166 doi: 10.1177/1745691617746509

Brooks, S. K. et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet 395, 912–920 (2020).

pubmed: 32112714 pmcid: 7158942 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8

Ellemers, N. & Jetten, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 17, 3–21 (2013). The many ways to be marginal in a group.

pubmed: 22854860 doi: 10.1177/1088868312453086

Greenaway, K. H., Jetten, J., Ellemers, N. & van Bunderen, L. The dark side of inclusion: undesired acceptance increases aggression. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 18, 173–189 (2015).

doi: 10.1177/1368430214536063

Owen, L. Five ways the coronavirus is hitting women in Asia. BBC News https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-51705199 (2020).

Karney, B.R. Socioeconomic status and intimate relationships. Annu. Rev. Psychol. (in the press).

Karney, B.R. & Neff, L.A. Couples and stress: how demands outside a relationship affect intimacy within the relationship. in The Oxford Handbook of Close Relationships (eds. Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L.) 664–684 (Oxford Univ.Press, 2013).

Cohan, C. L. & Cole, S. W. Life course transitions and natural disaster: marriage, birth, and divorce following Hurricane Hugo. J. Fam. Psychol. 16, 14–25 (2002).

pubmed: 11915406 doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.16.1.14

Finkel, E.J. The All-or-Nothing Marriage: How the Best Marriages Work. (Dutton, 2017).

Crum, A. J., Jamieson, J. P. & Akinola, M. Optimizing stress: an integrated intervention for regulating stress responses. Emotion 20, 120–125 (2020).

pubmed: 31961190 doi: 10.1037/emo0000670

Jamieson, J. P., Crum, A. J., Goyer, J. P., Marotta, M. E. & Akinola, M. Optimizing stress responses with reappraisal and mindset interventions: an integrated model. Anxiety Stress Coping 31, 245–261 (2018).

pubmed: 29471669 doi: 10.1080/10615806.2018.1442615

Dienstbier, R. A. Arousal and physiological toughness: implications for mental and physical health. Psychol. Rev. 96, 84–100 (1989).

pubmed: 2538855 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.84

Epel, E. S., McEwen, B. S. & Ickovics, J. R. Embodying psychological thriving: physical thriving in response to stress. J. Soc. Issues 54, 301–322 (1998).

doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1998.tb01220.x

Hazeldine, J., Arlt, W. & Lord, J. M. Dehydroepiandrosterone as a regulator of immune cell function. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 120, 127–136 (2010).

pubmed: 20060904 doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2009.12.016

Tedeschi, R. G. & Calhoun, L. G. Posttraumatic growth: conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychol. Inq. 15, 1–18 (2004).

doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01

Crum, A. J., Akinola, M., Martin, A. & Fath, S. The role of stress mindset in shaping cognitive, emotional, and physiological responses to challenging and threatening stress. Anxiety Stress Coping 30, 379–395 (2017).

pubmed: 28120622 doi: 10.1080/10615806.2016.1275585

Crum, A. J., Salovey, P. & Achor, S. Rethinking stress: the role of mindsets in determining the stress response. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 104, 716–733 (2013).

pubmed: 23437923 doi: 10.1037/a0031201

Soper, G. A. The lessons of the pandemic. Science 49, 501–506 (1919).

pubmed: 17793800 doi: 10.1126/science.49.1274.501

Byrne, S. & Hart, P. S. The boomerang effect a synthesis of findings and a preliminary theoretical framework. Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc. 33, 3–37 (2009).

doi: 10.1080/23808985.2009.11679083

Burgoon, M., Alvaro, E., Grandpre, J. & Voulodakis, M. Revisiting the theory of psychological reactance: Communicating threats to attitudinal freedom. in The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice (eds. Dillard, J. P. & Pfau, M.) 213–232 (SAGE, 2002).

Garcia, D. & Rimé, B. Collective emotions and social resilience in the digital traces after a terrorist attack. Psychol. Sci. 30, 617–628 (2019).

pubmed: 30865565 pmcid: 6472144 doi: 10.1177/0956797619831964

Brady, W. J., Crockett, M. & Van Bavel, J. J. The MAD model of moral contagion: the role of motivation, attention and design in the spread of moralized content online. Persp. Psychol. Sci. (in the press).

Duncan, G. J., Brooks-Gunn, J. & Klebanov, P. K. Economic deprivation and early childhood development. Child Dev. 65, 296–318 (1994).

pubmed: 7516849 doi: 10.2307/1131385

Jin, R. L., Shah, C. P. & Svoboda, T. J. The impact of unemployment on health: a review of the evidence. CMAJ 153, 529–540 (1995).

pubmed: 7641151 pmcid: 1487417

Rimal, R. N. & Lapinski, M. K. Why health communication is important in public health. Bull. World Health Organ. 87, 247–247a (2009).

pubmed: 19551226 pmcid: 2672574 doi: 10.2471/BLT.08.056713

Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.

Journal

Informations de publication

Résumé

Identifiants

Types de publication

Langues

Sous-ensembles de citation

Pagination

Subventions

Références

Auteurs

Articles similaires

Classifications MeSH