Three-dimensional printing of extracellular matrix (ECM)-mimicking scaffolds: A critical review of the current ECM materials.
3D printing
ECM-mimicking scaffolds/materials
extracellular matrix
regenerative medicine
tissue engineering
Journal
Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A
ISSN: 1552-4965
Titre abrégé: J Biomed Mater Res A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101234237
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
received:
09
10
2019
revised:
24
03
2020
accepted:
28
03
2020
pubmed:
5
5
2020
medline:
21
10
2021
entrez:
5
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The loss of tissues and organs through injury and disease has stimulated the development of therapeutics that have the potential to regenerate and replace the affected tissue. Such therapeutics have the benefit of reducing the reliance and demand for life-saving organ transplants. Of the several regenerative strategies, 3D printing has emerged as the forerunner in regenerative attempts due to the fact that biologically and anatomically correct 3D structures can be fabricated according to the specified need. Despite the progress in this field, improvement is still limited by the difficulty in fabricating scaffolds that adequately mimic the native cellular microenvironment. In response, despite the complexities of the native extracellular matrix (ECM), the inclusion of ECM components into bioinks has emerged as a cutting-edge research area in terms of providing possible ECM-mimicking abilities of the 3D printed constructs. Furthermore, the development of ECM-mimicking scaffolds can potentially assist in improving personalized patient treatments. This review provides a critical analysis of selected naturally occurring ECM components as well as synthetic self-assembling peptides in their ability to provide the required ECM microenvironment for tissue regeneration. The success and possible short comings of each material, as well as the specific characteristics of each bioink, are evaluated.
Substances chimiques
Biocompatible Materials
0
Peptides
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2324-2350Informations de copyright
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Abbadessa, A., Blokzijl, M. M., Mouser, V. H. M., Marica, P., Malda, J, Hennink, W. E., & Vermonden, T. A. (2016). Thermo-responsive and photo-Polymerizable chondroitin sulfate-based hydrogel for 3D printing applications. Carbohydrate Polymers, 149, 163-174.
Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., & Walter, P. (2002). The extracellular matrix of animals. In Molecular biology of the cell. New York, NY: Garland Science Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK26810/
Anilkumar, S., Allen, S. C., Tasnim, N., Akter, T., Park, S., Kumar, A., … Joddar, B. (2018). The applicability of Furfuryl-gelatin as a novel bioink for tissue engineering applications. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 107, 1-10.
Badylak, S., Freytes, D., & Gilbert, T. (2009). Extracellular matrix as a biological scaffold material: Structure and function. Acta Biomaterialia, 5(1), 1-13.
Beniash, E., Hartgerink, J. D., Storrie, H., Stendahl, J. C., & Stupp, S. I. (2005). Self-assembling peptide Amphiphile Nanofiber matrices for cell entrapment. Acta Biomaterialia, 1(4), 387-397.
Bertlein, S., Brown, G., Lim, K. S., Jungst, T., Boeck, T., Blunk, T., … Groll, J. (2017). Thiol-Ene clickable gelatin: A platform bioink for multiple 3D biofabrication technologies. Advanced Materials, 29(44), 1-6.
Chau, Y., Luo, Y., Cheung, A. C. Y., Nagai, Y., Zhang, S., Kobler, J. B., … Langer, R. (2008). Incorporation of a matrix metalloproteinase-sensitive substrate into self-assembling peptides - A model for biofunctional scaffolds. Biomaterials, 29(11), 1713-1719.
Chawla, S., Kumar, A., Admane, P., Bandyopadhyay, A., & Ghosh, S. (2017). Elucidating role of silk-gelatin bioink to recapitulate articular cartilage differentiation in 3D bioprinted constructs. Bioprinting, 7, 1-13.
Cheng, N. C., Wang, S., & Young, T. H. (2012). The influence of spheroid formation of human adipose-derived stem cells on chitosan films on Stemness and differentiation capabilities. Biomaterials, 33(6), 1748-1758.
Chung, M. I. S., Miao, M., Stahl, R. J., Chan, E., Parkinson, J., & Keeley, F. W. (2006). Sequences and domain structures of mammalian, avian, amphibian and teleost Tropoelastins: Clues to the evolutionary history of Elastins. Matrix Biology, 25(8), 492-504.
Compaan, A. M., Christensen, K., & Huang, Y. (2017). Inkjet bioprinting of 3D silk fibroin cellular constructs using sacrificial alginate. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 3(8), 1519-1526.
Contessi Negrini, N., Celikkin, N., Tarsini, P., Farè, S., & Święszkowski, W. (2020). Three-dimensional printing of chemically crosslinked gelatin hydrogels for adipose tissue engineering. Biofabrication, 12(2), 025001.
Corning Incorporated. (n.d.) Corning® Matrigel® Matrix Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved from https://www.corning.com/media/worldwide/cls/documents/CLS-DL-CC-026DL.pdf.
Costa, J. B., Silva-Correia, J., Ribeiro, V. P., da Silva, M. A., Oliveira, J. M., & Reis, R. L. (2018). Engineering patient-specific bioprinted constructs for treatment of degenerated intervertebral disc. Materials Today Communications, 22(5), 778.
Costantini, M., Idaszek, J., Szöke, K., Jaroszewicz, J., Dentini, M., Barbetta, A., … Święszkowski, W. (2016). 3D bioprinting of BM-MSCs-loaded ECM biomimetic hydrogels for in vitro Neocartilage formation. Biofabrication, 8(3), 035002.
Cui, H., Webber, M. J., & Stupp, S. I. (2010). Self-assembly of peptide Amphiphiles: From molecules to nanostructures to biomaterials. Biopolymers, 94(1), 1-18.
Daley, W. P., Peters, S. B., & Larsen, M. (2008). Extracellular matrix dynamics in development and regenerative medicine. Journal of Cell Science, 121(3), 255-264.
Das, S., Pati, F., Choi, Y., Rijal, G., Shim, J., Kim, S. W., … Ghosh, S. (2015). Bioprintable, cell-laden silk fibroin-gelatin hydrogel supporting multilineage differentiation of stem cells for fabrication of three-dimensional tissue constructs. Acta Biomaterialia, 11, 233-246.
Derakhshanfar, S., Mbeleck, R., Xu, K., Zhang, X., Zhong, W., & Xing, M. (2018). 3D bioprinting for biomedical devices and tissue engineering: A review of recent trends and advances. Bioactive Materials, 3(2), 144-156.
Donderwinkel, I., van Hest, J. C. M., & Cameron, N. R. (2017). Bio-inks for 3D bioprinting: Recent advances and future prospects. Polymer Chemistry, 8(31), 4451-4471.
England, S., Rajaram, A., Schreyer, D. J., & Chen, X. (2017). Bioprinted fibrin-factor XIII-hyaluronate hydrogel scaffolds with encapsulated Schwann cells and their in vitro characterization for use in nerve regeneration. Bioprinting, 5, 1-9.
Floren, M., Bonani, W., Dharmarajan, A., Motta, A., Migliaresi, C., & Tan, W. (2016). Human Mesenchymal stem cells cultured on silk hydrogels with variable stiffness and growth factor differentiate into mature smooth muscle cell phenotype. Acta Biomaterialia, 31, 156-166.
Francis Suh, J. K., & Matthew, H. W. (2000). Application of chitosan-based polysaccharide biomaterials in cartilage tissue engineering: A review. Biomaterials, 21(24), 2589-2598.
Frantz, C., Stewart, K. M., & Weaver, V. M. (2010). The extracellular matrix at a glance. Journal of Cell Science, 123(24), 4195-4200.
Gaetani, R., Feyen, D. A. M., Verhage, V., Slaats, R., Messina, E., Christman, K. L., … Sluijter, J. P. G. (2015). Epicardial application of cardiac progenitor cells in a 3D-printed gelatin/hyaluronic acid patch preserves cardiac function after myocardial infarction. Biomaterials, 61, 339-348.
González-Díaz, E., & Varghese, S. (2016). Hydrogels as extracellular matrix analogs. Gels, 2(3), 20.
Gopinathan, J., & Noh, I. (2018). Recent trends in bioinks for 3D printing. Biomaterials Research, 22(1), 11.
Gough, J. E., Saiani, A., & Miller, A. F. (2012). Peptide hydrogels: Mimicking the extracellular matrix. Bioinspired, Biomim. Nano, 1(1), 4-12.
Goy, R. C., de Britto, D., & Assis, O. B. G. (2009). A review of the antimicrobial activity of chitosan. Polímeros, 19(3), 241-247.
Gungor-Ozkerim, P. S., Inci, I., Zhang, Y. S., Khademhosseini, A., & Dokmeci, M. R. (2018). Bioinks for 3D bioprinting: An overview. Biomaterials Science, 6(5), 915-946.
Hartgerink, J. D. (2001). Self-assembly and mineralization of peptide-Amphiphile Nanofibers. Science, 294(5547), 1684-1688.
Hartgerink, J. D., Beniash, E., & Stupp, S. I. (2002). Peptide-Amphiphile Nanofibers: A versatile scaffold for the preparation of self-assembling materials. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(8), 5133-5138.
Hinderer, S., Layland, S. L., & Schenke-Layland, K. (2016). ECM and ECM-like materials-biomaterials for applications in regenerative medicine and cancer therapy. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 97, 260-269.
Hospodiuk, M., Dey, M., Sosnoski, D., & Ozbolat, I. T. (2017). The bioink: A comprehensive review on bioprintable materials. Biotechnology Advances, 35(2), 217-239.
Hubmacher, D., & Apte, S. S. (2013). The biology of the extracellular matrix. Current Opinion in Rheumatology, 25(1), 65-70.
Jang, J., Park, H. J., Kim, S. W., Kim, H., Park, J. Y., Na, S. J., … Cho, D. W. (2017). 3D printed complex tissue construct using stem cell-laden decellularized extracellular matrix bioinks for cardiac repair. Biomaterials, 112(6), 264-274.
Jarvelainen, H., Sainio, A., Koulu, M., Wight, T. N., & Penttinen, R. (2009). Extracellular matrix molecules: Potential targets in pharmacotherapy. Pharmacological Reviews, 61(2), 198-223.
Jhala, D., & Vasita, R. (2015). A review on extracellular matrix mimicking strategies for an artificial stem cell niche. Polymer Reviews, 55(4), 561-595.
Joas, S., Tovar, G., Celik, O., Bonten, C., & Southan, A. (2018). Extrusion-based 3D printing of poly(ethylene glycol) Diacrylate hydrogels containing positively and negatively charged groups. Gels, 4(3), 69.
Jun, H. W., Yuwono, V., Paramonov, S. E., & Hartgerink, J. D. (2005). Enzyme-mediated degradation of peptide-Amphiphile nanofiber networks. Advanced Materials, 17(21), 2612-2617.
Jung, J. P., Bhuiyan, D. B., & Ogle, B. M. (2016). Solid organ fabrication: Comparison of Decellularization to 3D bioprinting. Biomaterials Research, 20(1), 27.
Kiani, C., Chen, L., Wu, Y. J., Yee, A. J., & Yang, B. B. (2002). Structure and function of Aggrecan. Cell Research, 12(1), 19-32.
Koch, L., Deiwick, A., Franke, A., Schwanke, K., Haverich, A., Zweigerdt, R., & Chichkov, B. (2018). Laser bioprinting of human induced pluripotent stem cells-The effect of printing and biomaterials on cell survival, Pluripotency, and differentiation. Biofabrication, 10(3), 035005.
Kokkoli, E., Mardilovich, A., Wedekind, A., Rexeisen, E. L., Garg, A., & Craig, J. A. (2006). Self-assembly and applications of biomimetic and bioactive peptide-Amphiphiles. Soft Matter, 2(12), 1015.
Köpf, M., Campos, D. F. D., Blaeser, A., Sen, K. S., & Fischer, H. (2016). A tailored three-dimensionally printable Agarose-collagen blend allows encapsulation, spreading, and attachment of human umbilical artery smooth muscle cells. Biofabrication, 8(2), 025011.
Kumar, P., Choonara, Y. E., Khan, R. A., & Pillay, V. (2017). The chemo-biological outreach of Nano-biomaterials: Implications for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 23(24), 3538-3549.
Lakshmanan, A., Zhang, S., & Hauser, C. A. E. (2012). Short self-assembling peptides as building blocks for modern Nanodevices. Trends in Biotechnology, 30(3), 155-165.
Lee, H. J., Kim, Y. B., Ahn, S. H., Lee, J. S., Jang, C. H., Yoon, H., … Kim, G. H. (2015). A new approach for fabricating collagen/ECM-based bioinks using preosteoblasts and human adipose stem cells. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 4(9), 1359-1368.
Litvinov, R. I., & Weisel, J. W. (2017). Fibrin mechanical properties and their structural origins. Matrix Biology, 60-61(1), 110-123.
Loo, Y., & Hauser, C. A. E. (2015). Bioprinting synthetic self-assembling peptide hydrogels for biomedical applications. Biomedical Materials, 11(1), 014103.
Loo, Y., Lakshmanan, A., Ni, M., Toh, L. L., Wang, S., & Hauser, C. A. E. (2015). Peptide bioink: Self-assembling Nanofibrous scaffolds for three-dimensional Organotypic cultures. Nano Letters, 15(10), 6919-6925.
Malda, J., Visser, J., Melchels, F. P., Jüngst, T., Hennink, W. E., Dhert, W. J. A., … Hutmacher, D. W. (2013). 25th anniversary article: Engineering hydrogels for biofabrication. Advanced Materials, 25(36), 5011-5028.
Mandrycky, C., Wang, Z., Kim, K., & Kim, D. H. (2016). 3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues. Biotechnology Advances, 34(4), 422-434.
Mazzocchi, A., Devarasetty, M., Huntwork, R. C., Soker, S., & Skardal, A. (2018). Optimization of collagen type I-Hyaluronan hybrid bioink for 3D bioprinted liver microenvironments. Biofabrication, 11(1), 015003.
Mok, S. W., Nizak, R., Fu, S. C., Ho, K. W. K., Qin, L., Saris, D. B. F., … Malda, J. (2016). From the printer: Potential of three-dimensional printing for orthopaedic applications. Journal of Orthopaedic Translation, 6, 42-49.
Morris, V. B., Nimbalkar, S., Younesi, M., McClellan, P., & Akkus, O. (2017). Mechanical properties, Cytocompatibility and manufacturability of chitosan: PEGDA hybrid-gel scaffolds by Stereolithography. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 45(1), 286-296.
Murphy, S. V., & Atala, A. (2014). 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nature Biotechnology, 32(8), 773-785.
Ng, W. L., Yeong, W. Y., & Naing, M. W. (2016). Polyelectrolyte gelatin-chitosan hydrogel optimized for 3D bioprinting in skin tissue engineering. Polyelectrolyte gelatin-chitosan hydrogel optimized for 3D bioprinting in skin tissue engineering. International Journal of Bioprinting, 2(1), 53-62.
Nguyen, D., Hägg, D. A., Forsman, A., Ekholm, J., Nimkingratana, P., Brantsing, C., … Simonsson, S. (2017). Cartilage tissue engineering by the 3D bioprinting of IPS cells in a Nanocellulose/alginate bioink. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 658.
Niece, K. L., Hartgerink, J. D., Donners, J. J. J. M., & Stupp, S. I. (2003). Self-assembly combining two bioactive peptide-Amphiphile molecules into Nanofibers by electrostatic attraction. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 125(24), 7146-7147.
Nocera, A. D., Comín, R., Salvatierra, N. A., & Cid, M. P. (2018). Development of 3D printed Fibrillar collagen scaffold for tissue engineering. Biomedical Microdevices, 20(2), 26.
Ouyang, L., Highley, C. B., Rodell, C. B., Sun, W., & Burdick, J. A. (2016). 3D printing of shear-thinning hyaluronic acid hydrogels with secondary cross-linking. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 2(10), 1743-1751.
Panwar, A., & Tan, L. P. (2016). Current status of bioinks for micro-extrusion-based 3D bioprinting. Molecules, 21(6), E685.
Parak, A., Pradeep, P., du Toit, L. C., Kumar, P., Choonara, Y. E., & Pillay, V. (2018). Functionalizing bioinks for 3D bioprinting applications. Drug Discovery Today, 24, 1-8.
Paramonov, S. E., Jun, H. W., & Hartgerink, J. D. (2006). Self-assembly of peptide−Amphiphile Nanofibers: The roles of hydrogen bonding and Amphiphilic packing. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 128(22), 7291-7298.
Park, J. Y., Choi, J. C., Shim, J. H., Lee, J. S., Park, H., Kim, S. W., … Cho, D. W. (2014). A comparative study on collagen type i and hyaluronic acid dependent cell behavior for Osteochondral tissue bioprinting. Biofabrication, 6(3), 035004.
Pati, F., Jang, J., Ha, D. H., Won Kim, S., Rhie, J. W., Shim, J. H., … Cho, D. W. (2014). Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink. Nature Communications, 5(1), 3935.
Prydz, K. (2015). Determinants of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) structure. Biomolecules, 5(3), 2003-2022.
Rhee, S., Puetzer, J. L., Mason, B. N., Reinhart-King, C. A., & Bonassar, L. J. (2016). 3D bioprinting of spatially heterogeneous collagen constructs for cartilage tissue engineering. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 2(10), 1800-1805.
Rodriguez, E., Roland, S. K., Plaas, A., & Roughley, P. J. (2006). The glycosaminoglycan attachment regions of human Aggrecan. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 281(27), 18444-18450.
Rutz, A. L., Hyland, K. E., Jakus, A. E., Burghardt, W. R., & Shah, R. N. (2015). A multimaterial bioink method for 3D printing tunable, cell-compatible hydrogels. Advanced Materials, 27(9), 1607-1614.
Sakai, S., Ohi, H., Hotta, T., Kamei, H., & Taya, M. (2018). Differentiation potential of human adipose stem cells bioprinted with hyaluronic acid/gelatin-based bioink through microextrusion and visible light-initiated crosslinking. Biopolymers, 109(2), e23080.
Saxena, R., & Nanjan, M. J. (2015). Elastin-like polypeptides and their applications in anticancer drug delivery systems: A review. Drug Delivery, 22(2), 156-167.
Schaefer, L., & Schaefer, R. M. (2010). Proteoglycans: From structural compounds to signaling molecules. Cell and Tissue Research, 339(1), 237-246.
Shan Wong, Y., Yong Tay, C., Wen, F. S., Venkatraman, S., & Poh Tan, L. (2012). Engineered polymeric biomaterials for tissue engineering. Current Tissue Engineering, 1(1), 41-53.
Shim, J. H., Jang, K. M., Hahn, S. K., Park, J. Y., Jung, H., Oh, K., … Cho, D. W. (2016). Three-dimensional bioprinting of multilayered constructs containing human Mesenchymal stromal cells for Osteochondral tissue regeneration in the rabbit knee joint. Biofabrication, 8(1), 014102.
Sieminski, A. L., Was, A. S., Kim, G., Gong, H., & Kamm, R. D. (2007). The stiffness of three-dimensional ionic self-assembling peptide gels affects the extent of capillary-like network formation. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, 49(2), 73-83.
Silva, G. A. (2004). Selective differentiation of neural progenitor cells by high-epitope density Nanofibers. Science, 303(5662), 1352-1355.
Skardal, A., Murphy, S. V., Crowell, K., Mack, D., Atala, A., & Soker, S. (2017). A tunable hydrogel system for long-term release of cell-secreted cytokines and bioprinted in situ wound cell delivery. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials, 105(7), 1986-2000.
Smelyanskiy, M., Holmes, D., Chhugani, J., Larson, A., Carmean, D. M., Hanson, D., … Robb, R. (2009). Mapping high-fidelity volume rendering for medical imaging to CPU, GPU and many-core architectures. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15(6), 1563-1570.
Subramanian, A., Krishnan, U., & Sethuraman, S. (2009). Development of biomaterial scaffold for nerve tissue engineering: Biomaterial mediated neural regeneration. Journal of Biomedical Science, 16(1), 108.
Theocharis, A. D., Skandalis, S. S., Gialeli, C., & Karamanos, N. K. (2016). Extracellular matrix structure. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 97, 4-27.
Toprakhisar, B., Nadernezhad, A., Bakirci, E., Khani, N., Skvortsov, G. A., & Koc, B. (2018). Development of bioink from Decellularized tendon extracellular matrix for 3D bioprinting. Macromolecular Bioscience, 18(10), 1800024.
Urban, J. P. G., Roberts, S., & Ralphs, J. R. (2000). The nucleus of the intervertebral disc from development to degeneration. American Zoologist, 40(1), 53-61.
Velasco, M. A., Narváez-Tovar, C. A., & Garzón-Alvarado, D. A. (2015). Design, materials, and Mechanobiology of biodegradable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. BioMed Research International, 2015, 1-21.
Vigier, S., & Fülöp, T. (2016). Exploring the extracellular matrix to create biomaterials. In Composition and function of the extracellular matrix in the human body (p. 13). London, United Kingdom: InTech.
Wang, Q., Han, G., Yan, S., & Zhang, Q. (2019). 3D printing of silk fibroin for biomedical applications. Materials, 12(3), 504.
Wang, X., Ao, Q., Tian, X., Fan, J., Tong, H., Hou, W., & Bai, S. (2017). Gelatin-based hydrogels for organ 3D bioprinting. Polymers, 9(12), 401.
Yamada, S., Sugahara, K., & Özbek, S. (2011). Evolution of Glycosaminoglycans. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 4(2), 150-158.
Yang, X., Lu, Z., Wu, H., Li, W., Zheng, L., & Zhao, J. (2018). Collagen-alginate as bioink for three-dimensional (3D) cell printing based cartilage tissue engineering. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 83, 195-201.
Yoo, H. S., Lee, E. A., Yoon, J. J., & Park, T. G. (2005). Hyaluronic acid modified biodegradable scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 26(14), 1925-1933.
Yue, B. (2014). Biology of the extracellular matrix. Journal of Glaucoma, 23, S20-S23.
Zhang, K., Fu, Q., Yoo, J., Chen, X., Chandra, P., Mo, X., … Zhao, W. (2017). 3D bioprinting of urethra with PCL/PLCL blend and dual autologous cells in fibrin hydrogel: An in vitro evaluation of biomimetic mechanical property and cell growth environment. Acta Biomaterialia, 50, 154-164.
Zhang, S. (2003). Fabrication of novel biomaterials through molecular self-assembly. Nature Biotechnology, 21(10), 1171-1178.
Zhao, X., & Zhang, S. (2007). Designer self-assembling peptide materials. Macromolecular Bioscience, 7(1), 13-22.
Zhao, X., Zhang, S., & Spirio, L. (2005). PuraMatrix. In P. X. Ma & J. Elisseeff (Eds.), Scaffolding in tissue engineering (pp. 217-238). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Zhen, Z., Wu, J., Liu, M., Wang, H., Li, C., Rodriguez, M. J., … Kaplan, D. L. (2018). 3D bioprinting of self-standing silk-based bioink. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 7(6), 1701026.