A stepped wedge trial of efficacy and scalability of a virtual clinical pharmacy service (VCPS) in rural and remote NSW health facilities.
Clinical pharmacy
Hospital
Patient experience
Remote
Rural
Stepped wedge
Telehealth
Virtual healthcare
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 May 2020
04 May 2020
Historique:
received:
30
03
2020
accepted:
15
04
2020
entrez:
6
5
2020
pubmed:
6
5
2020
medline:
21
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Medication errors are a leading cause of mortality and morbidity. Clinical pharmacy services provided in hospital can reduce medication errors and medication related harm. However, few rural or remote hospitals in Australia have a clinical pharmacy service. This study will evaluate a virtual clinical pharmacy service (VCPS) provided via telehealth to eight rural and remote hospitals in NSW, Australia. A stepped wedge cluster randomised trial design will use routinely collected data from patients' electronic medical records (n = 2080) to evaluate the VCPS at eight facilities. The sequence of steps is randomised, allowing for control of potential confounding temporal trends. Primary outcomes are number of medication reconciliations completed on admission and discharge. Secondary outcomes are length of stay, falls and 28 day readmissions. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and cost-benefit analysis (CBA) will be conducted. The CEA will answer the question of whether the VCPS is more cost-effective compared to treatment as usual; the CBA will consider the rate of return on investing in the VCPS. A patient experience measure (n = 500) and medication adherence questionnaire (n = 100 pre and post) will also be used to identify patient responses to the virtual service. Focus groups will investigate implementation from hospital staff perspectives at each site. Analyses of routine data will comprise generalised linear mixed models. Descriptive statistical analysis will summarise patient experience responses. Differences in medication adherence will be compared using linear regression models. Thematic analysis of focus groups will identify barriers and facilitators to VCPS implementation. We aim to demonstrate the effectiveness of virtual pharmacy interventions for rural populations, and inform best practice for using virtual healthcare to improve access to pharmacy services. It is widely recognised that clinical pharmacists are best placed to reduce medication errors. However, pharmacy services are limited in rural and remote hospitals. This project will provide evidence about ways in which the benefits of hospital pharmacists can be maximised utilising telehealth technology. If successful, this project can provide a model for pharmacy delivery in rural and remote locations. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) -ACTRN12619001757101 Prospectively registered on 11 December 2019. Record available from: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=378878&isReview=true.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Medication errors are a leading cause of mortality and morbidity. Clinical pharmacy services provided in hospital can reduce medication errors and medication related harm. However, few rural or remote hospitals in Australia have a clinical pharmacy service. This study will evaluate a virtual clinical pharmacy service (VCPS) provided via telehealth to eight rural and remote hospitals in NSW, Australia.
METHODS
METHODS
A stepped wedge cluster randomised trial design will use routinely collected data from patients' electronic medical records (n = 2080) to evaluate the VCPS at eight facilities. The sequence of steps is randomised, allowing for control of potential confounding temporal trends. Primary outcomes are number of medication reconciliations completed on admission and discharge. Secondary outcomes are length of stay, falls and 28 day readmissions. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and cost-benefit analysis (CBA) will be conducted. The CEA will answer the question of whether the VCPS is more cost-effective compared to treatment as usual; the CBA will consider the rate of return on investing in the VCPS. A patient experience measure (n = 500) and medication adherence questionnaire (n = 100 pre and post) will also be used to identify patient responses to the virtual service. Focus groups will investigate implementation from hospital staff perspectives at each site. Analyses of routine data will comprise generalised linear mixed models. Descriptive statistical analysis will summarise patient experience responses. Differences in medication adherence will be compared using linear regression models. Thematic analysis of focus groups will identify barriers and facilitators to VCPS implementation.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
We aim to demonstrate the effectiveness of virtual pharmacy interventions for rural populations, and inform best practice for using virtual healthcare to improve access to pharmacy services. It is widely recognised that clinical pharmacists are best placed to reduce medication errors. However, pharmacy services are limited in rural and remote hospitals. This project will provide evidence about ways in which the benefits of hospital pharmacists can be maximised utilising telehealth technology. If successful, this project can provide a model for pharmacy delivery in rural and remote locations.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) -ACTRN12619001757101 Prospectively registered on 11 December 2019. Record available from: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=378878&isReview=true.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32366308
doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05229-y
pii: 10.1186/s12913-020-05229-y
pmc: PMC7197111
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
373Subventions
Organisme : NSW Ministry of Health
ID : FE7801
Références
BMC Public Health. 2011 Dec 15;11:934
pubmed: 22168312
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 23;6(2):e010003
pubmed: 26908524
Aust J Rural Health. 2012 Jun;20(3):138-43
pubmed: 22620478
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2016 Oct 26;5:75-82
pubmed: 29354542
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Aug 09;14(1):60
pubmed: 27507300
J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(2):95-9
pubmed: 20139138
J Telemed Telecare. 2017 Dec;23(10):861-865
pubmed: 29081271
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2017 Feb;41(1):48-53
pubmed: 27868300
Res Nurs Health. 2009 Feb;32(1):110-21
pubmed: 19035619
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2012 Sep-Oct;8(5):420-32
pubmed: 22222342
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Mar 1;178(3):375-382
pubmed: 29379953
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Oct;64(10):2784-2797
pubmed: 31037593
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2016 Sep;14(3):113-22
pubmed: 26886682
Med J Aust. 2017 Jan 16;206(1):36-39
pubmed: 28076735
Lancet. 2017 Apr 29;389(10080):1680-1681
pubmed: 28463129